Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

A blind quantum computer's laboratory debut

Johanna L. Miller

Published Feb 1, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum computing promises greater efficiency than classical computing. Quantum communication promises tamper-proof security. Combine the two and you get blind quantum computing. <... Quantum computing promises greater efficiency than classical computing. Quantum communication promises tamper-proof security. Combine the two and you get blind quantum computing. <...

DOI
10.1063/pt.4.0730

Related papers

A blind quantum computer makes its laboratory debut

Johanna L. Miller

Quantum computing promises great efficiency advantages over classical computing. Quantum communication promises tamper-proof security. Combine them, and you get blind quantum computing.

Physics Today•Mar 1, 2012•0 citations

Efficient Post-Quantum Secured Blind Computation

Davies, Ethan, Alastair Kay

In the medium term, quantum computing must tackle two key challenges: fault tolerance and security. Fault tolerance will be solved with sufficiently high quality experiments on large numbers of qubits, but the scale and complexity of these devices means that a cloud-based access model is likely to dominate. How can we risk evaluating valuable computations on an untrusted server? Here we detail a verifiable circuit-based model that only requires classical communication between parties. The server is blind to the details of the computation, which is computationally secure.

arXiv:2404.07052•Apr 10, 2024•0 citations

Private quantum computation: an introduction to blind quantum computing and related protocols

Joseph F. Fitzsimons

Abstract Quantum technologies hold the promise of not only faster algorithmic processing of data, via quantum computation, but also of more secure communications, in the form of quantum cryptography. In recent years, a number of protocols have emerged which seek to marry these concepts for the purpose of securing computation rather than communication. These protocols address the task of securely delegating quantum computation to an untrusted device while maintaining the privacy, and in some instances the integrity, of the computation. We present a review of the progress to date in this emerging area.

arXiv:1611.10107•npj Quantum Information•Jun 5, 2017•294 citations

QEnclave - A practical solution for secure quantum cloud computing

Yao Ma, Elham Kashefi, Myrto Arapinis +2 more

Abstract We introduce a secure hardware device named a QEnclave that can secure the remote execution of quantum operations while only using classical controls. This device extends to quantum computing from the classical concept of a secure enclave that isolates a computation from its environment to provide privacy and tamper-resistance. Remarkably, our QEnclave only performs single qubit rotations but can nevertheless be used to secure an arbitrary quantum computation even if the qubit source is controlled by an adversary. More precisely, by attaching a QEnclave to a quantum computer, a remote client controlling the QEnclave can securely delegate its computation to the server solely using classical communication. We investigate the security of our QEnclave by modeling it as an ideal functionality named remote state rotation (RSR). We show that this resource, similar to the previously introduced functionality of remote state preparation, allows blind delegated quantum computing with perfect security. Our proof under the Abstract Cryptography framework shows the construction of remote state preparation from remote state rotation while preserving security. An immediate consequence is the weakening of the requirements for blind delegated computation. While previous delegated protocols relied on a client that can either generate or measure quantum states, we show that this same functionality can be achieved with a client that only transforms quantum states without generating or measuring them.

arXiv:2109.02952•npj Quantum Information•Nov 5, 2022•18 citations

Deterministic entanglement distillation for secure double-server blind quantum computation

Yu‐Bo Sheng, Lan Zhou

Blind quantum computation (BQC) provides an efficient method for the client who does not have enough sophisticated technology and knowledge to perform universal quantum computation. The single-server BQC protocol requires the client to have some minimum quantum ability, while the double-server BQC protocol makes the client's device completely classical, resorting to the pure and clean Bell state shared by two servers. Here, we provide a deterministic entanglement distillation protocol in a practical noisy environment for the double-server BQC protocol. This protocol can get the pure maximally entangled Bell state. The success probability can reach 100% in principle. The distilled maximally entangled states can be remaind to perform the BQC protocol subsequently. The parties who perform the distillation protocol do not need to exchange the classical information and they learn nothing from the client. It makes this protocol unconditionally secure and suitable for the future BQC protocol.

Scientific Reports•Jan 15, 2015•158 citations

Quantum-enhanced secure delegated classical computing

DunjkoVedran, KapourniotisTheodoros, KashefiElham

We present a family of quantumly-enhanced protocols to achieve unconditionally secure delegated classical computation where the client and the server have both their classical and quantum computing...

Quantum Information and Computation•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations
Quantum computing promises greater efficiency than classical computing. Quantum communication promises tamper-proof security. Combine the two and you get blind quantum computing. <...
Quantum computing promises greater efficiency than classical computing. Quantum communication promises tamper-proof security. Combine the two and you get blind quantum computing. <...
In the medium term, quantum computing must tackle two key challenges: fault tolerance and security. Fault tolerance will be solved with sufficiently high quality experiments on large numbers of qubits, but the scale and complexity of these devices means that a cloud-based access model is likely to dominate. How can we risk evaluating valuable computations on an untrusted server? Here we detail a verifiable circuit-based model that only requires classical communication between parties. The server is blind to the details of the computation, which is computationally secure.
Abstract Quantum technologies hold the promise of not only faster algorithmic processing of data, via quantum computation, but also of more secure communications, in the form of quantum cryptography. In recent years, a number of protocols have emerged which seek to marry these concepts for the purpose of securing computation rather than communication. These protocols address the task of securely delegating quantum computation to an untrusted device while maintaining the privacy, and in some instances the integrity, of the computation. We present a review of the progress to date in this emerging area.
Abstract We introduce a secure hardware device named a QEnclave that can secure the remote execution of quantum operations while only using classical controls. This device extends to quantum computing from the classical concept of a secure enclave that isolates a computation from its environment to provide privacy and tamper-resistance. Remarkably, our QEnclave only performs single qubit rotations but can nevertheless be used to secure an arbitrary quantum computation even if the qubit source is controlled by an adversary. More precisely, by attaching a QEnclave to a quantum computer, a remote client controlling the QEnclave can securely delegate its computation to the server solely using classical communication. We investigate the security of our QEnclave by modeling it as an ideal functionality named remote state rotation (RSR). We show that this resource, similar to the previously introduced functionality of remote state preparation, allows blind delegated quantum computing with perfect security. Our proof under the Abstract Cryptography framework shows the construction of remote state preparation from remote state rotation while preserving security. An immediate consequence is the weakening of the requirements for blind delegated computation. While previous delegated protocols relied on a client that can either generate or measure quantum states, we show that this same functionality can be achieved with a client that only transforms quantum states without generating or measuring them.
Blind quantum computation (BQC) provides an efficient method for the client who does not have enough sophisticated technology and knowledge to perform universal quantum computation. The single-server BQC protocol requires the client to have some minimum quantum ability, while the double-server BQC protocol makes the client's device completely classical, resorting to the pure and clean Bell state shared by two servers. Here, we provide a deterministic entanglement distillation protocol in a practical noisy environment for the double-server BQC protocol. This protocol can get the pure maximally entangled Bell state. The success probability can reach 100% in principle. The distilled maximally entangled states can be remaind to perform the BQC protocol subsequently. The parties who perform the distillation protocol do not need to exchange the classical information and they learn nothing from the client. It makes this protocol unconditionally secure and suitable for the future BQC protocol.