Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Phase Conjugate Optics and Applications to Interferometry and to Laser Gyros

Christian Bordé

Published Jan 1, 1983• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4613-3712-6_14

Related papers

Phase Conjugation of CO2 Laser Radiation and Its Applications

V E Sherstobitov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1998•1 citation

Phase Conjugate Optics and Its Potential Applications

Cunkai Wu, FAN JUN-YIN

•Jun 7, 1982•0 citations

Atom optics

Marlan O. Scully, M. Suhail Zubairy

Matter–wave interferometry dates from the inception of quantum mechanics, i.e., the early electron diffraction experiments. More recent neutron interferometry experiments have yielded new insights into many fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics. Presently, atom interferometry has been demonstrated and holds promise as a new field of optics – matter–wave optics. This field is particularly interesting since the potential sensitivity of matter–wave interferometers far exceeds that of their light-wave or ‘photon’ antecedents. In this chapter we consider the physics of light-induced forces on the center-of-mass motion of atoms and their application to atom optics (Fig. 17.1). The most obvious being the recoil associated with the emission and absorption of light. This ‘radiation pressure’ is the basis for laser induced cooling. Another very important mechanical effect is the gradient force due to, e.g., transverse variation in the laser beam. These, essentially semiclassical, forces are useful in guiding and trapping neutral atoms. After considering the basic forces which allow us to cool, guide, and trap atoms, we turn to the optics of atomic center-of-mass de Broglie waves, i.e., atom optics. In keeping with the spirit of the present text, we will focus on the quantum limits to matter–wave interferometry. An analysis of a matter–wave gyro in an obvious extension of the laser gyro and the similarity and relative merits of the two will be compared and contrasted. Finally we derive the “recoil limit” to laser cooling; and show that it is possible to supersede this limit via atomic coherence effects.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 4, 1997•0 citations

Grating phase in mutually pumped phase conjugators

William R. Christian, Ragini Saxena, Ian C. McMichael

Much attention is focused on the mutually pumped phase conjugators (MPPCs). Their unique ability to operate with mutually incoherent pumping beams makes them ideal candidates for applications in communications, laser locking, fiber optic gyros, and optical information processing. In the simple physical picture of MPPCs, the conjugate beams result from gratings that form between each pump beam and amplified scattering from that pump beam. Therefore, one might expect that the phase of the grating is determined by the relative phase between the pumping beams and their scattering. That is, the scattering acts as a seed beam that interferes with the pumping beam to determine the phase of the grating. The situation is complicated by the possibility of moving gratings, multiple reflections, and the sharing of holograms written simultaneously by both pump beams and their corresponding scattering. The problem of MPPC driven by an external seed beam was analyzed by Kroli- kowski et al.1 They predicted temporal instabilities for low intensity seed beams and stable solutions for high intensity seed beams. However, it has not been demonstrated (at least experimentally) that a seed beam can control the phase of the diffracted beam without destroying its conjugate nature. To investigate this question, we have set up a MPPC with a variable (phase and amplitude) seed beam and an interferometer to measure the relative phase between an incident and diffracted beam, and thus the phase of the grating. The same interferometer is used to determine whether the seed beam is influencing the wavefront of the diffracted beam and therefore destroying the conjugation process. This effect might be used as a nonmechanical means of biasing phase conjugate interferometers.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

Phase conjugate optics

Jun-ichi Sakai

•Jan 1, 1992•42 citations

Phase Conjugate Optics

J. Auyeung, Avigail Yariv

Springer series in optical sciences/SPringer series in optical sciences•Jan 1, 1979•9 citations
Matter–wave interferometry dates from the inception of quantum mechanics, i.e., the early electron diffraction experiments. More recent neutron interferometry experiments have yielded new insights into many fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics. Presently, atom interferometry has been demonstrated and holds promise as a new field of optics – matter–wave optics. This field is particularly interesting since the potential sensitivity of matter–wave interferometers far exceeds that of their light-wave or ‘photon’ antecedents. In this chapter we consider the physics of light-induced forces on the center-of-mass motion of atoms and their application to atom optics (Fig. 17.1). The most obvious being the recoil associated with the emission and absorption of light. This ‘radiation pressure’ is the basis for laser induced cooling. Another very important mechanical effect is the gradient force due to, e.g., transverse variation in the laser beam. These, essentially semiclassical, forces are useful in guiding and trapping neutral atoms. After considering the basic forces which allow us to cool, guide, and trap atoms, we turn to the optics of atomic center-of-mass de Broglie waves, i.e., atom optics. In keeping with the spirit of the present text, we will focus on the quantum limits to matter–wave interferometry. An analysis of a matter–wave gyro in an obvious extension of the laser gyro and the similarity and relative merits of the two will be compared and contrasted. Finally we derive the “recoil limit” to laser cooling; and show that it is possible to supersede this limit via atomic coherence effects.
Much attention is focused on the mutually pumped phase conjugators (MPPCs). Their unique ability to operate with mutually incoherent pumping beams makes them ideal candidates for applications in communications, laser locking, fiber optic gyros, and optical information processing. In the simple physical picture of MPPCs, the conjugate beams result from gratings that form between each pump beam and amplified scattering from that pump beam. Therefore, one might expect that the phase of the grating is determined by the relative phase between the pumping beams and their scattering. That is, the scattering acts as a seed beam that interferes with the pumping beam to determine the phase of the grating. The situation is complicated by the possibility of moving gratings, multiple reflections, and the sharing of holograms written simultaneously by both pump beams and their corresponding scattering. The problem of MPPC driven by an external seed beam was analyzed by Kroli- kowski et al.1 They predicted temporal instabilities for low intensity seed beams and stable solutions for high intensity seed beams. However, it has not been demonstrated (at least experimentally) that a seed beam can control the phase of the diffracted beam without destroying its conjugate nature. To investigate this question, we have set up a MPPC with a variable (phase and amplitude) seed beam and an interferometer to measure the relative phase between an incident and diffracted beam, and thus the phase of the grating. The same interferometer is used to determine whether the seed beam is influencing the wavefront of the diffracted beam and therefore destroying the conjugation process. This effect might be used as a nonmechanical means of biasing phase conjugate interferometers.