Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical Chemistry Accounts

Symposium on computational quantum chemistry and parallel processors

Sigeru Huzinaga, Mariusz Kłobukowski

Published Apr 1, 1987• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00526410

Related papers

Quantum Chemistry on Parallel Computers: Concepts and Results of a Density Functional Method

Th. Belling, Th. Grauschopf, Sven Krüger +5 more

Lecture notes in computational science and engineering•Jan 1, 1999•19 citations

Efficiently parallelizing Ab-Initio-Computations in Quantum Chemistry

F. Brakhagen, P.G. Lauwers, Uwe Schneider +3 more

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations

Quantum Chemistry Methods with Multiwavelet Bases on Massive Parallel Computers

Álvaro Vázquez‐Mayagoitia, W. Scott Thornton, Jeff R. Hammond +1 more

Annual reports in computational chemistry•Jan 1, 2014•6 citations

Parallel quantum chemistry : a guide to installing and using the massively parallel quantum chemistry program.

Curtis L. Janssen

•Jun 1, 2004•1 citation

Parallel algorithms for quantum chemistry. I. Integral transformations on a hypercube multiprocessor

Robert A. Whiteside, John Stephen Binkley, Michael E. Colvin +1 more

For many years it has been recognized that fundamental physical constraints such as the speed of light will limit the ultimate speed of single processor computers to less than about three billion floating point operations per second (3 GFLOPS). This limitation is becoming increasingly restrictive as commercially available machines are now within an order of magnitude of this asymptotic limit. A natural way to avoid this limit is to harness together many processors to work on a single computational problem. In principle, these parallel processing computers have speeds limited only by the number of processors one chooses to acquire. The usefulness of potentially unlimited processing speed to a computationally intensive field such as quantum chemistry is obvious. If these methods are to be applied to significantly larger chemical systems, parallel schemes will have to be employed. For this reason we have developed distributed-memory algorithms for a number of standard quantum chemical methods. We are currently implementing these on a 32 processor Intel hypercube. In this paper we present our algorithm and benchmark results for one of the bottleneck steps in quantum chemical calculations: the four index integral transformation.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 15, 1987•37 citations

High performance computing in quantum chemistry

Tao Wang

Huadong Shifan Daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue ban•Jul 25, 2018•0 citations
For many years it has been recognized that fundamental physical constraints such as the speed of light will limit the ultimate speed of single processor computers to less than about three billion floating point operations per second (3 GFLOPS). This limitation is becoming increasingly restrictive as commercially available machines are now within an order of magnitude of this asymptotic limit. A natural way to avoid this limit is to harness together many processors to work on a single computational problem. In principle, these parallel processing computers have speeds limited only by the number of processors one chooses to acquire. The usefulness of potentially unlimited processing speed to a computationally intensive field such as quantum chemistry is obvious. If these methods are to be applied to significantly larger chemical systems, parallel schemes will have to be employed. For this reason we have developed distributed-memory algorithms for a number of standard quantum chemical methods. We are currently implementing these on a 32 processor Intel hypercube. In this paper we present our algorithm and benchmark results for one of the bottleneck steps in quantum chemical calculations: the four index integral transformation.