Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science

Determinism, Determination, and Objectivity in Modern Physics

Gordon G. Brittan

Published Jan 1, 2009• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4020-9510-8_9

Related papers

Determinism and Modern Physics

C. M. Sparrow

The Monist•Jan 1, 1930•0 citations

Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics

Ernst Cassirer, Otto Theodor Benfey, R. Bruce Lindsay

Physics Today•Jul 1, 1957•86 citations

Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics: Historical and Systematic Studies of the Problem of Causality

Ernst Cassirer, Otto Theodor Benfey, Henry Margenau

•Jan 1, 1956•45 citations

A Retrospective View of Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics

Thomas A. Ryckman

De Gruyter eBooks•May 26, 2015•11 citations

Order According to Law: Cassirer’s 'Determinism and Indeterminism' and the Architecture of Scientific Objectivity

James Vafiadis

Ernst Cassirer's Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics (DI; Cassirer, 1936/1956) constitutes a major but systematically overlooked transformation in the philosophy of quantum mechanics. Against interpretations that treat the text as a late application of his earlier structuralism, this article argues that quantum mechanics forces a fundamental reconstruction of causal order and scientific objectivity. Following the dissolution of Laplacean determinism, causality is no longer directed at ‘things’ in the world, but functions as a regulative demand that experience be rendered intelligible. Accordingly, causal order does not map to a pre-given reality but is progressively constituted from within experience through recursive processes of functional co-ordination (Zuordnung). This reconstruction culminates in a participatory account of objectivity organised through three mutually conditioning levels – measurements, laws, and principles. The upshot is that physical objects emerge as invariant nodes within relational structure; objects are fixed as objective relations. On this basis, the article shows that neither epistemic nor ontic structural realism adequately captures Cassirer's position and develops in response a provisional functional ontology in which a co-ordinating subject and an indeterminate relational domain jointly constitute the transcendental conditions of objectivity. The article concludes by situating DI within a broader participatory tradition in the foundations of physics, arguing that Cassirer's recursive and observer-dependent account of objectivity anticipates key developments in second-order cybernetics and participatory approaches to quantum mechanics.

•May 21, 2026•0 citations

ASPECTS OF DETERMINISM IN MODERN PHYSICS

John Earman

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2007•143 citations
Ernst Cassirer's Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics (DI; Cassirer, 1936/1956) constitutes a major but systematically overlooked transformation in the philosophy of quantum mechanics. Against interpretations that treat the text as a late application of his earlier structuralism, this article argues that quantum mechanics forces a fundamental reconstruction of causal order and scientific objectivity. Following the dissolution of Laplacean determinism, causality is no longer directed at ‘things’ in the world, but functions as a regulative demand that experience be rendered intelligible. Accordingly, causal order does not map to a pre-given reality but is progressively constituted from within experience through recursive processes of functional co-ordination (Zuordnung). This reconstruction culminates in a participatory account of objectivity organised through three mutually conditioning levels – measurements, laws, and principles. The upshot is that physical objects emerge as invariant nodes within relational structure; objects are fixed as objective relations. On this basis, the article shows that neither epistemic nor ontic structural realism adequately captures Cassirer's position and develops in response a provisional functional ontology in which a co-ordinating subject and an indeterminate relational domain jointly constitute the transcendental conditions of objectivity. The article concludes by situating DI within a broader participatory tradition in the foundations of physics, arguing that Cassirer's recursive and observer-dependent account of objectivity anticipates key developments in second-order cybernetics and participatory approaches to quantum mechanics.