Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Unitary Transformations in NMR

Rainer Kimmich

Published Jan 1, 1997• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-60582-6_48

Related papers

Realization of quantum discrete Fourier transform with NMR

Ximing Fang, Xiwen Zhu, Mang Feng +2 more

Chinese Science Bulletin•Jun 1, 2000•8 citations

Unitary control and systematic errors in NMR quantum computing

Lieven M. K. Vandersypen, Matthias Steffen, Mark Sherwood +3 more

APS•Mar 1, 2000•0 citations

Unitary bounds; controllability of quantum evolution in NMR spectroscopy

Untidt, T., Glaser, S.J., Christian Griesinger +1 more

•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Unitary bounds and controllability of quantum evolution in NMR spectroscopy

S. J. GLASER T. S. UNTIDT

Molecular Physics•Jun 20, 1999•4 citations

Experimental realization of discrete fourier transformation on NMR quantum computers

Li‐Yun Fu, J. Luo, Xiao Li +1 more

Applied Magnetic Resonance•Jun 1, 2000•12 citations

Bounds on the entanglement attainable from unitary transformed thermal states in liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance

Terri M. Yu, Kenneth R. Brown, Isaac L. Chuang

The role of mixed-state entanglement in liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) quantum computation is not yet well understood. In particular, despite the success of quantum-information processing with NMR, recent work has shown that quantum states used in most of those experiments were not entangled. This is because these states, derived by unitary transforms from the thermal equilibrium state, were too close to the maximally mixed state. We are thus motivated to determine whether a given NMR state is entanglable---that is, does there exist a unitary transform that entangles the state? The boundary between entanglable and nonentanglable thermal states is a function of the spin system size $N$ and its temperature $T$. We provide bounds on the location of this boundary using analytical and numerical methods; our tightest bound scales as $N\ensuremath{\sim}T$, giving a lower bound requiring at least $N\ensuremath{\sim}22\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}000$ proton spins to realize an entanglable thermal state at typical laboratory NMR magnetic fields. These bounds are tighter than known bounds on the entanglability of effective pure states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0409170•Physical Review A•Mar 24, 2005•11 citations
The role of mixed-state entanglement in liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) quantum computation is not yet well understood. In particular, despite the success of quantum-information processing with NMR, recent work has shown that quantum states used in most of those experiments were not entangled. This is because these states, derived by unitary transforms from the thermal equilibrium state, were too close to the maximally mixed state. We are thus motivated to determine whether a given NMR state is entanglable---that is, does there exist a unitary transform that entangles the state? The boundary between entanglable and nonentanglable thermal states is a function of the spin system size NNN and its temperature TTT. We provide bounds on the location of this boundary using analytical and numerical methods; our tightest bound scales as $N\ensuremath{\sim}T$, giving a lower bound requiring at least $N\ensuremath{\sim}22\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}000$ proton spins to realize an entanglable thermal state at typical laboratory NMR magnetic fields. These bounds are tighter than known bounds on the entanglability of effective pure states.