Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Evaluation Criteria for Physical Random Number Generators

Werner Schindler

Published Jan 1, 2008• 10 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-0-387-71817-0_3

Related papers

Randomness from radiation: evaluation and analysis of radiation-based random number generators

Roohi Zafar, Muhammad Kamran, Tahir Malik +4 more

arXiv:2409.20492•The European Physical Journal Plus•May 30, 2025•0 citations

Design and Evaluation of Random Number Generators Based on Non-Adiabatic Quantum-Flux-Parametron Gates

Wenhui Luo, Naoki Takeuchi, Olivia Chen +1 more

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.•Jan 12, 2021•0 citations

Evaluation of a multi-output random number generator using two adiabatic quantum flux parametron random number generators

Wenhui Luo, Naoki Takeuchi, Olivia Chen +1 more

The Japan Society of Applied Physics•Jul 9, 2020•0 citations

Evaluation Criteria for True (Physical) Random Number Generators Used in Cryptographic Applications

Werner Schindler, Wolfgang Killmann

Random number generators are essential components of many cryptographic systems. Inappropriate random number generators may weaken the security properties of the system considerably. This paper considers evaluation criteria for true (physical) random number generators. General objectives are formulated and possible criteria and measures are discussed which shall ensure these goals. Central parts of the mathematical-technical reference of the German evaluation guidance document AIS 31 ([],[]) are cited and rationale is given.

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2003•137 citations

Physical Random Number Generators

Yuncai Wang

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Concept for a High Performance Random Number Generator Based on Physical Random Phenomena

Michael Gude

Frequenz•Jan 1, 1985•42 citations
Random number generators are essential components of many cryptographic systems. Inappropriate random number generators may weaken the security properties of the system considerably. This paper considers evaluation criteria for true (physical) random number generators. General objectives are formulated and possible criteria and measures are discussed which shall ensure these goals. Central parts of the mathematical-technical reference of the German evaluation guidance document AIS 31 ([],[]) are cited and rationale is given.