Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Minimal universal two-qubit controlled-NOT-based circuits (8 pages)

Vivek Shende, Stephen S. Bullock, Igor L. Markov

Published Jan 1, 2004• 16 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum circuits with uniformly controlled one-qubit gates (7 pages)

Ville Bergholm, Juha J. Vartiainen

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

Recognizing small-circuit structure in two-qubit operators (5 pages)

Stephen S. Bullock, Vivek Shende

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Optimal quantum circuits for general two-qubit gates (5 pages)

Colin P. Williams, Farrokh Vatan

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•16 citations

Universal quantum circuit for two-qubit transformations with three controlled-NOT gates

Guifré Vidal, Christopher M. Dawson

We consider quantum circuits made of controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates and single-qubit unitary gates and look for constructions that minimize the use of CNOT gates. We show, by means of an explicit quantum circuit, that three CNOT gates are necessary and sufficient in order to implement an arbitrary unitary transformation of two qubits. We also identify the subset of two-qubit gates that can be performed with only two CNOT gates and provide a simple characterization for them.

arXiv:quant-ph/0307177•Physical Review A•Jan 8, 2004•276 citations

Quantum Computing with Controlled-Not and Few Qubits

Dagmar Bruß, ARTUR K. EKERT, Susana F. Huelga +2 more

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Dec 1, 1997•0 citations

Comment on “Universal quantum circuit for two-qubit transformations with three controlled-NOT gates” and “Recognizing small-circuit structure in two-qubit operators”

Mark W. Coffey, Ron Deiotte, Torey Semi

Recent papers in Physical Review A have considered small quantum circuit decompositions in terms of a minimal number of controlled-NOT (CNOT) gates. Specifically, we point out errors in the papers by Vidal and Dawson [Phys. Rev. A 69, 010301(R) (2004)] and by Shende et al. [Phys. Rev. A 70, 012310 (2004)].

Physical Review A•Jun 26, 2008•20 citations