Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Against “Paradoxes”: A New Quantum Philosophy for Quantum Mechanics

Claudio Garola

Published Jan 1, 1999• 9 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-017-2834-8_5

Related papers

Einstein Measurement Paradox via Collapse-Rhythm‑Weighted Dynamics with Testable Predictions 2025.11.23

Giro Hong

This paper introduces collapse rhythm, a new framework for quantum mechanics that dissolves the Einstein measurement paradox. It also reframes the mind–body problem in cognitive psychology, showing consciousness as an emergent resonance of collapse. The theory has implications for philosophy, consciousness studies, quantum computational logic, and AI modeling, and is testable with current photonic and optomechanical experiments.

•Nov 23, 2025•0 citations

The Paradoxes of Quantum Mechanics

Luigi E. Picasso

UNITEXT for physics•Oct 26, 2015•0 citations

The “Paradoxes” of Quantum Mechanics

CHRISTOF WETTERICH

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics

Richard Healey

This is one of the most important books on quantum mechanics to have appeared in recent years. It offers a dramatically new interpretation that resolves puzzles and paradoxes associated with the measurement problem and the behavior of coupled systems. A crucial feature of this interpretation is that a quantum mechanical measurement can be certain to have a particular outcome even when the observed system fails to have the property corresponding to that outcome just prior to the measurement interaction.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 24, 1989•303 citations

Principal Paradoxes of Quantum Mechanics

Oleg Kupervasser

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

The Linguistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Shiro Ishikawa

About twenty years ago, we proposed the mathematical formulation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and further, we concluded that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and EPR-paradox are not contradictory. This is true, however we now think that we should have argued about it under a certain firm interpretation of quantum mechanics. Recently we proposed the linguistic quantum interpretation (called quantum and classical measurement theory), which was characterized as a kind of metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only extend quantum theory to classical systems but also yield the quantum mechanical world view (i.e., the philosophy of quantum mechanics, in other words, quantum philosophy). In fact, we can consider that traditional philosophies have progressed toward quantum philosophy. In this paper, we first review the linguistic quantum interpretation, and further, clarify the relation between EPR-paradox and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. That is, the linguistic interpretation says that EPR-paradox is closely related to the fact that syllogism does not generally hold in quantum physics. This fact should be compared to the non-locality of Bell's inequality.

arXiv:1204.3892•Apr 17, 2012•14 citations
This is one of the most important books on quantum mechanics to have appeared in recent years. It offers a dramatically new interpretation that resolves puzzles and paradoxes associated with the measurement problem and the behavior of coupled systems. A crucial feature of this interpretation is that a quantum mechanical measurement can be certain to have a particular outcome even when the observed system fails to have the property corresponding to that outcome just prior to the measurement interaction.
About twenty years ago, we proposed the mathematical formulation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and further, we concluded that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and EPR-paradox are not contradictory. This is true, however we now think that we should have argued about it under a certain firm interpretation of quantum mechanics. Recently we proposed the linguistic quantum interpretation (called quantum and classical measurement theory), which was characterized as a kind of metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only extend quantum theory to classical systems but also yield the quantum mechanical world view (i.e., the philosophy of quantum mechanics, in other words, quantum philosophy). In fact, we can consider that traditional philosophies have progressed toward quantum philosophy. In this paper, we first review the linguistic quantum interpretation, and further, clarify the relation between EPR-paradox and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. That is, the linguistic interpretation says that EPR-paradox is closely related to the fact that syllogism does not generally hold in quantum physics. This fact should be compared to the non-locality of Bell's inequality.