This thesis addresses a systematic presentation and discussion of Bohm’s approach to quantum mechanics from the point of view of different interpretations. In particular, the question is discussed whether the “quantum potential” should be considered a fundamental element of reality. This question is considered in the context of Bohm’s more general holistic philosophy and suggests a preference towards one over other Bohmian interpretations.
This thesis addresses a systematic presentation and discussion of Bohm’s approach to quantum mechanics from the point of view of different interpretations. In particular, the question is discussed whether the “quantum potential” should be considered a fundamental element of reality. This question is considered in the context of Bohm’s more general holistic philosophy and suggests a preference towards one over other Bohmian interpretations.
Since its inception Bohmian mechanics has been generally regarded as a hidden-variable theory aimed at providing an objective description of quantum phenomena. To date, this rather narrow conception of Bohm’s proposal has caused it more rejection than acceptance. Now, after 65 years of Bohmian mechanics, should still be such an interpretational aspect the prevailing appraisal? Why not favoring a more pragmatic view, as a legitimate picture of quantum mechanics, on equal footing in all respects with any other more conventional quantum picture? These questions are used here to introduce a discussion on an alternative way to deal with Bohmian mechanics at present, enhancing its aspect as an efficient and useful picture or formulation to tackle, explore, describe and explain quantum phenomena where phase and correlation ( entanglement ) are key elements. This discussion is presented through two complementary blocks. The first block is aimed at briefly revisiting the historical context that gave rise to the appearance of Bohmian mechanics, and how this approach or analogous ones have been used in different physical contexts. This discussion is used to emphasize a more pragmatic view to the detriment of the more conventional hidden-variable (ontological) approach that has been a leitmotif within the quantum foundations. The second block focuses on some particular formal aspects of Bohmian mechanics supporting the view presented here, with special emphasis on the physical meaning of the local phase field and the associated velocity field encoded within the wave function. As an illustration, a simple model of Young’s two-slit experiment is considered. The simplicity of this model allows to understand in an easy manner how the information conveyed by the Bohmian formulation relates to other more conventional concepts in quantum mechanics. This sort of pedagogical application is also aimed at showing the potential interest to introduce Bohmian mechanics in undergraduate quantum mechanics courses as a working tool rather than merely an alternative interpretation.
This work presents a historical-epistemological analysis of the foundations of quantum mechanics. From a philosophical point of view, the relationships between quantum mechanics and scientific realism are highlighted, as well as the influence of the neo-positivist philosophy of the first decades of the 20th century. The great significance of measurement in the context of quantum mechanics is underlined, as an essential element in providing a coherent description of reality moving from the microcosm to the macrocosm, as well as the role that the measurement apparatus and the consciousness of the observer assume during the act of measurement, the ontological problem, the problem of the objectification of the wave function and the problem of the definition of discernibility. This is followed by an overview of the most important alternative proposals to the standard interpretation (Copenhagen interpretation), with particular reference to hidden variable theories, and other alternatives to standard quantum mechanics that profoundly modify the vision of reality, such as the Everett’s many-worlds theory, the QBism, the unified holistic approach.
We present a historical-epistemological analysis of the foundations of quantum mechanics, highlighting the relationships between quantum mechanics and scientific realism, as well as the influence of the neo-positivist philosophy of the first decades of the 20th century. The great significance of the measurement process in the context of quantum mechanics is underlined as an essential element in providing a coherent description of reality, moving from micro to macrocosm, as well as the role that the measurement apparatus and the consciousness of the observer assume during the act of measurement, the related ontological problems, the question of the objectification of the wave function, and that of the definition of discernibility. We consider also an overview of the most important alternative proposals to the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics (Copenhagen interpretation), with particular reference to hidden variable theories and other alternatives to standard quantum mechanics philosophical approach, that are modifying the vision of reality, such as the Everett’s many-worlds theory, the QBism and unified holistic approaches, such as the Primordial Dynamic Space.
Abstract This is devoted to detailed commentaries on Bohm’s lectures. The primary aim of these commentaries is to demonstrate how dialectical materialism acted as a new perspective on Bohm’s understanding of the meaning of quantum mechanics and as the foundation for a comprehensive interpretation of science and human understanding of nature in general. The commentaries address all the main topics discussed in Bohm’s lectures, emphasizing their roots in the contemporary discussion about the foundations of quantum theory, in Hegel’s dialectical philosophy, and in dialectical materialism, as well as in current scientific debates—for example, about the foundations of mathematics. The comments summarize Bohm’s long and sometimes convoluted discussions to highlight the key points, occasionally connecting them to the broader scientific and philosophical discourse. The comments also provide missing references and identify novel topics and arguments presented in these lectures, in comparison with those found in Causality and Chance in Modern Physics.
Short introduction to Bohmian mechanics Sheldon Goldstein in a Foundations of Physics paper [1] indicates (p. 341): “Since macroscopic objects are normally regarded as built out of microscopic constituents …there can be no problem of macroscopic reality per se in Bohmian mechanics.” Goldstein in the same paper remarks (p. 342) that this | ψ | 2 has “a status very much the same as that of a thermodynamic equilibrium.” Basil Hiley the closest collaborator of David Bohm, says the following (Hiley [2] (p. 2)): “What Bohm (1952a; 1952b) did was to show how to retain a description of all the usual properties of a classical world and yet remain completely within the quantum formalism.” The Bohm (1952) [3] [4] references in that quote refer to the original work of Bohm in which he sets out the basics of the Bohmian mechanics. As we will see later in the next section of this chapter, the appearance of an “additional term” in the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, is the hallmark of Bohmian mechanics and it is very often termed the “quantum potential.” Hiley [2] (p. 2) remarks that since the Bohmian momentum is a well-defined function of position and time, an ensemble of trajectories can be found when the quantum potential is non-zero. A unique, classical path is found when the quantum potential is zero. From the outset, we hope the reader can savor the beauty of this simple but very powerful result. Bohmian mechanics indeed shows this very gentle transition from quantum mechanics to classical mechanics via the value of the quantum potential.
In this article, we investigate Bohm's view of quantum theory, especially Bohm's quantum potential, from a new perspective. We develop a quasi-Newtonian approach to Bohmian mechanics. We show that to arrive at Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics, there is no necessity to start from the Schrödinger equation. We also obtain an equation that restricts the possible forms of quantum potential and determines the functional form of it without appealing to the wave function and the Schrödinger equation. Finally, we discuss about the significance of quantum potential in the conceptual structure of quantum theory.