Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nuclear Physics A

The LOCV nucleonic matter correlation and distribution functions versus the FHNC/SOC and the Monte Carlo calculations

Majid Modarres, Azar Tafrihi

Published Jul 4, 2015• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.06.016

Related papers

The nucleonic matter LOCV calculations in a periodic box versus the FHNC method

Majid Modarres, Azar Tafrihi

Nuclear Physics A•Aug 21, 2013•11 citations

The p – n pairs correlations of the hot asymmetric nucleonic matter in the LOCV approach

Azar Tafrihi

Annals of Physics•Nov 3, 2023•0 citations

The LOCV finite nucleonic matter three-body cluster energy in the periodic boxes

M. Dadkhah, Azar Tafrihi

Annals of Physics•May 1, 2021•3 citations

FHNC calculations of momentum distribution for state-dependent correlations

Adelchi Fabrocini, A. Polls

Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento•Dec 1, 1980•1 citation

Calculations of nuclear matter with state-dependent correlations and a semirealistic nucleon-nucleon potential

Omar Benhar A, C. Ciofi degli Atti, Stefano Fantoni +1 more

Physics Letters B•Sep 1, 1977•24 citations

Comparative study of theLOCVand theFHNCapproaches for the nucleonic matter problem

Azar Tafrihi, Majid Modarres

The nucleonic matter problem is investigated by comparing the lowest order constrained variational ( LOCV ) method with the Fermi hypernetted chain ( FHNC ) theory, emphasizing the role of the LOCV correlation functions. In this way, the central correlation functions are used in the LOCV formalism, for the Bethe homework problem. It is shown that the LOCV computations reasonably agree with those of FHNC . Moreover, the FHNC calculations are performed with the LOCV correlation functions. It is found that, assuming the LOCV or the parametrized correlation functions, the FHNC computations do not change significantly. So, one may conclude that the mentioned consistencies refer to the choice of the LOCV correlation functions. Because, the contribution of the many-body cluster terms can be ignored, if the LOCV correlation functions satisfy the normalization constraint. Then, using the AV 18 interaction, the operator-dependent ( OD ) correlation functions are employed in the LOCV calculations. Note that the LOCV OD correlation functions are obtained by averaging over the states. It turns out that the overall behaviour of the LOCV OD correlation functions are similar to those of FHNC . Although, due to the many-body effects which are considered in the FHNC calculations, the LOCV results fairly differ from those of FHNC . Finally, it is worth mentioning that, unlike the recent FHNC calculations, the spin-orbit-dependent correlation functions are included in the LOCV approach.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Mar 1, 2016•7 citations
The nucleonic matter problem is investigated by comparing the lowest order constrained variational ( LOCV ) method with the Fermi hypernetted chain ( FHNC ) theory, emphasizing the role of the LOCV correlation functions. In this way, the central correlation functions are used in the LOCV formalism, for the Bethe homework problem. It is shown that the LOCV computations reasonably agree with those of FHNC . Moreover, the FHNC calculations are performed with the LOCV correlation functions. It is found that, assuming the LOCV or the parametrized correlation functions, the FHNC computations do not change significantly. So, one may conclude that the mentioned consistencies refer to the choice of the LOCV correlation functions. Because, the contribution of the many-body cluster terms can be ignored, if the LOCV correlation functions satisfy the normalization constraint. Then, using the AV 18 interaction, the operator-dependent ( OD ) correlation functions are employed in the LOCV calculations. Note that the LOCV OD correlation functions are obtained by averaging over the states. It turns out that the overall behaviour of the LOCV OD correlation functions are similar to those of FHNC . Although, due to the many-body effects which are considered in the FHNC calculations, the LOCV results fairly differ from those of FHNC . Finally, it is worth mentioning that, unlike the recent FHNC calculations, the spin-orbit-dependent correlation functions are included in the LOCV approach.