Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Violation of Bell's inequality in the presence of superselection rules

Tomasz Paterek, Paweł Kurzyński, Daniel K. L. Oi, Dagomir Kaszlikowski

Published Apr 29, 2010• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowable physical operations and consequently the ability to observe violations of local realism. Not only do SSRs restrict the type of states which can be prepared, equally they restrict the reference frames which are necessary for measurements. Here, we derive quantitative conditions under which a Bell inequality is violated in the presence of SSRs which reveal the critical role of reference frames. In particular, references prepared only locally in accordance with SSRs cannot be used to violate a Bell inequality. We discuss the optimal reference frames, their minimal size and reusability. Finally we comment on experiments related to Bell inequality and single photon non-locality, and propose a new experiment showing violation under an induced SSR. ‡ Corresponding author. ar X iv :1 00 4. 51 84 v2 [ qu an tph ] 1 6 Ju n 20 10 Violation of Bell’s inequality in the presence of superselection rules 2

Related papers

Reference frames for Bell inequality violation in the presence of superselection rules

Tomasz Paterek, Paweł Kurzyński, Daniel K. L. Oi +1 more

Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowed states and operations in quantum theory. They limit preparations and measurements and hence impact our ability to observe non-locality, in particular the violation of Bell inequalities. We show that a reference frame compatible with a particle number SSR does not allow observers to violate a Bell inequality if and only if it is prepared using only local operations and classical communication. In particular, jointly prepared separable reference frames are sufficient for obtaining violations of a Bell inequality. We study the size and non-local properties of such reference frames using superselection-induced variance. These results suggest the need for experimental Bell tests in the presence of superselection.

•Apr 19, 2011•5 citations

Reference frames for Bell inequality violation in the presence of superselection rules

Tomasz Paterek, P Kurzyński, D K L Oi +1 more

Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowed states and operations in quantum theory. They limit preparations and measurements and hence impact our ability to observe non-locality, in particular the violation of Bell inequalities. We show that a reference frame compatible with a particle number SSR does not allow observers to violate a Bell inequality if and only if it is prepared using only local operations and classical communication. In particular, jointly prepared separable reference frames are sufficient for obtaining violations of a Bell inequality. We study the size and non-local properties of such reference frames using superselection-induced variance. These results suggest the need for experimental Bell tests in the presence of superselection.

arXiv:1004.5184•New Journal of Physics•Apr 19, 2011•9 citations

Entanglement and symmetry: A case study in superselection rules, reference frames, and beyond

S. J. Jones, Howard M. Wiseman, Stephen D. Bartlett +2 more

In recent years it has become apparent that constraints on possible quantum operations, such as those constraints imposed by superselection rules (SSRs), have a profound effect on quantum information theoretic concepts like bipartite entanglement. This paper concentrates on a particular example: the constraint that applies when the parties (Alice and Bob) cannot distinguish among certain quantum objects they have. This arises naturally in the context of ensemble quantum information processing such as in liquid NMR. We discuss how a SSR for the symmetric group can be applied, and show how the extractable entanglement can be calculated analytically in certain cases, with a maximum bipartite entanglement in an ensemble of $N$ Bell-state pairs scaling as $\mathrm{log}(N)$ as $N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$. We discuss the apparent disparity with the asymptotic $(N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty})$ recovery of unconstrained entanglement for other sorts of superselection rules, and show that the disparity disappears when the correct notion of applying the symmetric group SSR to multiple copies is used. Next we discuss reference frames in the context of this SSR, showing the relation to the work of von Korff and Kempe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 260502 (2004)]. The action of a reference frame can be regarded as the analog of activation in mixed-state entanglement. We also discuss the analog of distillation: there exist states such that one copy can act as an imperfect reference frame for another copy. Finally we present an example of a stronger operational constraint, that operations must be noncollective as well as symmetric. Even under this stronger constraint we, nevertheless, show that Bell nonlocality (and hence entanglement) can be demonstrated for an ensemble of $N$ Bell-state pairs no matter how large $N$ is. This last work is a generalization of that of Mermin [Phys. Rev. D 22, 356 (1980)].

arXiv:quant-ph/0608056•Physical Review A•Dec 20, 2006•23 citations

Complementarity between extractable mechanical work, accessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference frame, under arbitrary superselection rules

Joan A. Vaccaro, Fabio Anselmi, Howard M. Wiseman +1 more

Superselection rules (SSRs) limit the mechanical and quantum processing resources represented by quantum states. However SSRs can be violated using reference systems to break the underlying symmetry. We show that there is a duality between the ability of a system to do mechanical work and to act as a reference system. Further, for a bipartite system in a globally symmetric pure state, we find a triality between the system's ability to do local mechanical work, its ability to do ``logical work'' due to its accessible entanglement, and its ability to act as a shared reference system.

•Jan 21, 2005•3 citations

The resource theory of quantum reference frames: manipulations and monotones

Gilad Gour, Robert W. Spekkens

Every restriction on quantum operations defines a resource theory, determining how quantum states that cannot be prepared under the restriction may be manipulated and used to circumvent the restriction. A superselection rule (SSR) is a restriction that arises through the lack of a classical reference frame and the states that circumvent it (the resource) are quantum reference frames. We consider the resource theories that arise from three types of SSRs, associated respectively with lacking: (i) a phase reference, (ii) a frame for chirality, and (iii) a frame for spatial orientation. Focusing on pure unipartite quantum states (and in some cases restricting our attention even further to subsets of these), we explore single-copy and asymptotic manipulations. In particular, we identify the necessary and sufficient conditions for a deterministic transformation between two resource states to be possible and, when these conditions are not met, the maximum probability with which the transformation can be achieved. We also determine when a particular transformation can be achieved reversibly in the limit of arbitrarily many copies and find the maximum rate of conversion. A comparison of the three resource theories demonstrates that the extent to which resources can be interconverted decreases as the strength of the restriction increases. Along the way, we introduce several measures of frameness and prove that these are monotonically non-increasing under various classes of operations that are permitted by the SSR.

arXiv:0711.0043•New Journal of Physics•Mar 17, 2008•423 citations

Tradeoff between extractable mechanical work, accessible entanglement, and ability to act as a reference system, under arbitrary superselection rules

Joan A. Vaccaro, Fabio Anselmi, Howard M. Wiseman +1 more

Superselection rules (SSRs) limit the mechanical and quantum processing resources represented by quantum states. However, SSRs can be violated using reference systems to break the underlying symmetry. We show that there is a duality between the ability of a system to do mechanical work and to act as a reference system. Further, for a bipartite system in a globally symmetric pure state, we find a triality between the system's ability to do local mechanical work, its ability to do ``logical work'' due to its accessible entanglement, and its ability to act as a shared reference system.

arXiv:quant-ph/0501121•Physical Review A•Mar 25, 2008•138 citations
Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowable physical operations and consequently the ability to observe violations of local realism. Not only do SSRs restrict the type of states which can be prepared, equally they restrict the reference frames which are necessary for measurements. Here, we derive quantitative conditions under which a Bell inequality is violated in the presence of SSRs which reveal the critical role of reference frames. In particular, references prepared only locally in accordance with SSRs cannot be used to violate a Bell inequality. We discuss the optimal reference frames, their minimal size and reusability. Finally we comment on experiments related to Bell inequality and single photon non-locality, and propose a new experiment showing violation under an induced SSR. ‡ Corresponding author. ar X iv :1 00 4. 51 84 v2 [ qu an tph ] 1 6 Ju n 20 10 Violation of Bell’s inequality in the presence of superselection rules 2
Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowed states and operations in quantum theory. They limit preparations and measurements and hence impact our ability to observe non-locality, in particular the violation of Bell inequalities. We show that a reference frame compatible with a particle number SSR does not allow observers to violate a Bell inequality if and only if it is prepared using only local operations and classical communication. In particular, jointly prepared separable reference frames are sufficient for obtaining violations of a Bell inequality. We study the size and non-local properties of such reference frames using superselection-induced variance. These results suggest the need for experimental Bell tests in the presence of superselection.
Superselection rules (SSRs) constrain the allowed states and operations in quantum theory. They limit preparations and measurements and hence impact our ability to observe non-locality, in particular the violation of Bell inequalities. We show that a reference frame compatible with a particle number SSR does not allow observers to violate a Bell inequality if and only if it is prepared using only local operations and classical communication. In particular, jointly prepared separable reference frames are sufficient for obtaining violations of a Bell inequality. We study the size and non-local properties of such reference frames using superselection-induced variance. These results suggest the need for experimental Bell tests in the presence of superselection.
In recent years it has become apparent that constraints on possible quantum operations, such as those constraints imposed by superselection rules (SSRs), have a profound effect on quantum information theoretic concepts like bipartite entanglement. This paper concentrates on a particular example: the constraint that applies when the parties (Alice and Bob) cannot distinguish among certain quantum objects they have. This arises naturally in the context of ensemble quantum information processing such as in liquid NMR. We discuss how a SSR for the symmetric group can be applied, and show how the extractable entanglement can be calculated analytically in certain cases, with a maximum bipartite entanglement in an ensemble of NNN Bell-state pairs scaling as log(N)\mathrm{log}(N)log(N) as $N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$. We discuss the apparent disparity with the asymptotic $(N\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty})$ recovery of unconstrained entanglement for other sorts of superselection rules, and show that the disparity disappears when the correct notion of applying the symmetric group SSR to multiple copies is used. Next we discuss reference frames in the context of this SSR, showing the relation to the work of von Korff and Kempe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 260502 (2004)]. The action of a reference frame can be regarded as the analog of activation in mixed-state entanglement. We also discuss the analog of distillation: there exist states such that one copy can act as an imperfect reference frame for another copy. Finally we present an example of a stronger operational constraint, that operations must be noncollective as well as symmetric. Even under this stronger constraint we, nevertheless, show that Bell nonlocality (and hence entanglement) can be demonstrated for an ensemble of NNN Bell-state pairs no matter how large NNN is. This last work is a generalization of that of Mermin [Phys. Rev. D 22, 356 (1980)].
Superselection rules (SSRs) limit the mechanical and quantum processing resources represented by quantum states. However SSRs can be violated using reference systems to break the underlying symmetry. We show that there is a duality between the ability of a system to do mechanical work and to act as a reference system. Further, for a bipartite system in a globally symmetric pure state, we find a triality between the system's ability to do local mechanical work, its ability to do ``logical work'' due to its accessible entanglement, and its ability to act as a shared reference system.
Every restriction on quantum operations defines a resource theory, determining how quantum states that cannot be prepared under the restriction may be manipulated and used to circumvent the restriction. A superselection rule (SSR) is a restriction that arises through the lack of a classical reference frame and the states that circumvent it (the resource) are quantum reference frames. We consider the resource theories that arise from three types of SSRs, associated respectively with lacking: (i) a phase reference, (ii) a frame for chirality, and (iii) a frame for spatial orientation. Focusing on pure unipartite quantum states (and in some cases restricting our attention even further to subsets of these), we explore single-copy and asymptotic manipulations. In particular, we identify the necessary and sufficient conditions for a deterministic transformation between two resource states to be possible and, when these conditions are not met, the maximum probability with which the transformation can be achieved. We also determine when a particular transformation can be achieved reversibly in the limit of arbitrarily many copies and find the maximum rate of conversion. A comparison of the three resource theories demonstrates that the extent to which resources can be interconverted decreases as the strength of the restriction increases. Along the way, we introduce several measures of frameness and prove that these are monotonically non-increasing under various classes of operations that are permitted by the SSR.
Superselection rules (SSRs) limit the mechanical and quantum processing resources represented by quantum states. However, SSRs can be violated using reference systems to break the underlying symmetry. We show that there is a duality between the ability of a system to do mechanical work and to act as a reference system. Further, for a bipartite system in a globally symmetric pure state, we find a triality between the system's ability to do local mechanical work, its ability to do ``logical work'' due to its accessible entanglement, and its ability to act as a shared reference system.