Image-based quantum machine learning usually follows a hybrid pipeline: a classical encoder compresses an image, and a quantum circuit then acts as a kernel, feature map, trainable classifier, or measurement-based readout. Yet it remains unclear which of these roles contributes useful predictive structure because prior studies often change the input representation, classical baseline, and measurement budget simultaneously. We present a controlled benchmark spanning five roles: quantum-kernel geometry, fixed product and entangled features, trainable data-reuploading representations, shot-aware probability readout, and task-adaptive Pauli measurement. Six quantum-derived methods, six matched classical controls, and two unmatched neural references are evaluated on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and BreastMNIST using a shared frozen ResNet-18 and train-only PCA interface. We assess exact and finite-shot inference, predictive performance, calibration, selective risk, resource requirements, and statistical reliability. PdrQC-Matched was the strongest quantum-derived method on all four datasets. C-RBF was better on Fashion-MNIST and CIFAR-10 by 2.19 and 3.50 accuracy points, while BreastMNIST showed no detectable difference. Despite lower exact accuracy, PdrQC-Matched achieved significantly lower Brier score and AURC than C-RBF on Fashion-MNIST and CIFAR-10. Finite-shot results showed no automatic benefit from entanglement or shot-aware training. Overall, image-QML conclusions depend on quantum role, measurement budget, classical control, and evaluation metric.
Image-based quantum machine learning usually follows a hybrid pipeline: a classical encoder compresses an image, and a quantum circuit then acts as a kernel, feature map, trainable classifier, or measurement-based readout. Yet it remains unclear which of these roles contributes useful predictive structure because prior studies often change the input representation, classical baseline, and measurement budget simultaneously. We present a controlled benchmark spanning five roles: quantum-kernel geometry, fixed product and entangled features, trainable data-reuploading representations, shot-aware probability readout, and task-adaptive Pauli measurement. Six quantum-derived methods, six matched classical controls, and two unmatched neural references are evaluated on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and BreastMNIST using a shared frozen ResNet-18 and train-only PCA interface. We assess exact and finite-shot inference, predictive performance, calibration, selective risk, resource requirements, and statistical reliability. PdrQC-Matched was the strongest quantum-derived method on all four datasets. C-RBF was better on Fashion-MNIST and CIFAR-10 by 2.19 and 3.50 accuracy points, while BreastMNIST showed no detectable difference. Despite lower exact accuracy, PdrQC-Matched achieved significantly lower Brier score and AURC than C-RBF on Fashion-MNIST and CIFAR-10. Finite-shot results showed no automatic benefit from entanglement or shot-aware training. Overall, image-QML conclusions depend on quantum role, measurement budget, classical control, and evaluation metric.
Abstract Image classification, a pivotal task in multiple industries, faces computational challenges due to the burgeoning volume of visual data. This research addresses these challenges by introducing two quantum machine learning models that leverage the principles of quantum mechanics for effective computations. Our first model, a hybrid quantum neural network with parallel quantum circuits, enables the execution of computations even in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era, where circuits with a large number of qubits are currently infeasible. This model demonstrated a record-breaking classification accuracy of 99.21% on the full MNIST dataset, surpassing the performance of known quantum–classical models, while having eight times fewer parameters than its classical counterpart. Also, the results of testing this hybrid model on a Medical MNIST (classification accuracy over 99%), and on CIFAR-10 (classification accuracy over 82%), can serve as evidence of the generalizability of the model and highlights the efficiency of quantum layers in distinguishing common features of input data. Our second model introduces a hybrid quantum neural network with a Quanvolutional layer, reducing image resolution via a convolution process. The model matches the performance of its classical counterpart, having four times fewer trainable parameters, and outperforms a classical model with equal weight parameters. These models represent advancements in quantum machine learning research and illuminate the path towards more accurate image classification systems.
We implement a hybrid quantum-classical model for image classification that compresses MNIST digit images into a low-dimensional feature space and then maps these features onto a 5-qubit quantum state. First, an autoencoder compresses each 28×28 image (784 pixels) into a 64-dimensional latent vector, preserving salient features of the digit with minimal reconstruction error. We further reduce the latent representation to 5 principal components using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), to match the 5 available qubits. These 5 features are encoded as rotation angles in a quantum circuit with 5 qubits. The quantum feature map applies single-qubit rotations (Ry gates) proportional to the feature values, followed by a Hadamard gate and a cascade of entangling CNOT gates to produce a non-product entangled state. Measuring the 5-qubit state yields a 32-dimensional probability distribution over basis outcomes, which serves as a quantum-enhanced feature vector for classification. A classical neural network with a softmax output is then trained on these 32-dimensional quantum feature vectors to predict the digit class. We evaluate the hybrid model on the MNIST dataset and compare it to a purely classical baseline that uses the 64-dimensional autoencoder latent features for classification. The results show that the hybrid model can successfully classify digits, demonstrating the feasibility of integrating quantum computing in the classification pipeline, although its accuracy (about 75\% on test data) currently falls below the classical baseline (about 98\% on the same compressed data).
In order to leverage quantum computers for machine learning tasks such as image classification, careful consideration is required: NISQ-era quantum computers have limitations, which include noise, scalability, read-in and read-out times, and gate operation times. Therefore, strategies should be devised to mitigate the impact that complex datasets can have on the overall efficiency of a quantum machine learning pipeline. This may otherwise lead to excessive resource demands or increased noise. We apply a classical feature extraction method using a ResNet10-inspired convolutional autoencoder to both reduce the dimensionality of the dataset and extract abstract and meaningful features before feeding them into a quantum machine learning block. The quantum block of choice is a quantum-enhanced support vector machine (QSVM), as support vector machines typically do not require large sample sizes to identify patterns in data and have short-depth quantum circuits, which limits the impact of noise. The autoencoder is trained to extract meaningful features through image reconstruction, aiming to minimize the mean squared error across a training set. Three image datasets are used to illustrate the pipeline: HTRU-1, MNIST, and CIFAR-10. We also include a quantum-enhanced one-class support vector machine (QOCSVM) for the highly unbalanced HTRU-1 set, as well as classical machine learning results to serve as a benchmark. Finally, the HTRU-2 dataset is also included to serve as a benchmark for a dataset with well-correlated features. The autoencoder achieved near-perfect reconstruction and high classification accuracy for MNIST, while CIFAR-10 showed poorer performance due to image complexity, and HTRU-1 struggled because of dataset imbalance. This highlights the need for a balance between dimensionality reduction through classical feature extraction and prediction performance using quantum methods.
Quantum kernel methods are often proposed as a route to improved medical image classification because quantum feature maps can embed data into high-dimensional Hilbert spaces. However, their practical value remains unclear when compared with strong classical kernels under leakage-controlled conditions. This study benchmarks two simulated quantum kernel support vector machines, QSVM-ZZ and QSVM-Pauli, against logistic regression, linear SVM, fixed-default RBF-SVM, and a compact multi-layer perceptron on BrainTumorMRI and BreastMNIST. All models used identical frozen ResNet18 features, train-only standardisation, PCA compression to four and eight dimensions, three random seeds, and matched classifier-training budgets where applicable. Across 24 seed-level matched comparisons, the best quantum kernel model never outperformed the best classical model. The mean quantum-minus-classical macro-F1 gap was - 0.2230, with all 24 gaps negative. Fixed pairwise comparisons confirmed that RBF-SVM exceeded both quantum kernels individually. QSVMs also required approximately 50 × to more than 220 × higher runtime. These findings show that, for compressed ResNet18 medical image features under noiseless simulation, the tested QSVM-ZZ and QSVM-Pauli kernels did not provide a practical advantage over fixed-default RBF-SVM.
Quantum Transfer Learning (QTL) offers a promising approach for visual quantum machine learning under near-term constraints, where limited qubit counts, shallow circuit depths, and costly hybrid optimization restrict end-to-end quantum training. In this setting, pretrained classical backbones can extract high-level visual features, while compact quantum modules operate as trainable classification heads. However, existing QTL results are difficult to compare because they often differ in datasets, preprocessing, backbone settings, qubit budgets, circuit designs, optimization choices, and reporting protocols. This work presents a controlled benchmarking methodology for evaluating representative QTL methods under a unified transfer-learning pipeline. The benchmark compares DQN-QTL, QPIE-QTL, AE-CQTL, PVCQTL, and ED-QTL under shared preprocessing rules, frozen-backbone settings, training conditions, and reporting metrics. The evaluation focuses on Fashion-MNIST and Hymenoptera Ants vs. Bees as the two main datasets, while CIFAR-10 is used to provide additional configuration-level evidence on a harder natural-image task. Beyond predictive performance, the benchmark analyzes circuit size, trainable parameters, quantum parameters, training time, and architectural sensitivity to qubit count and circuit depth. The results show that no single QTL family dominates across all settings: performance depends on the dataset, encoding strategy, circuit design, and computational cost. These findings highlight the need for resource-aware QTL evaluation and provide guidance for selecting hybrid quantum-classical transfer models under near-term resource constraints.
This research explores quantum machine learning for image classification, comparing classical and quantum models. A classical convolutional neural network (CNN), based on the LeNet architecture, achieved 99.12% accuracy on MNIST, outperforming a quantum CNN, which attained 93.30%. Quantum encoders applied to Fashion-MNIST reached 85.60%, while quantum support vector machine (SVM), implemented for binary classification, obtained 71.34%. The study integrates hybrid quantum-classical models, leveraging quantum circuits for feature extraction. A quantum autoencoder-based classifier was introduced, demonstrating efficient data compression and classification without additional qubits. Feature encoding using RX gates mapped classical data into quantum states, and the impact of parameterized quantum circuit structures on classification accuracy was analyzed. Results indicate that specific ansatz structures yield superior accuracy, highlighting the significance of quantum circuit design. While classical models currently outperform quantum counterparts, quantum approaches reduce trainable parameters and computational complexity. Limitations in current quantum hardware, including noise and scalability, restrict performance. However, advancements in error mitigation, quantum gate efficiency, and scalable quantum architecture could bridge the gap with classical methods. These quantum techniques hold potential in aerospace applications, such as satellite image classification, anomaly detection in remote sensing, and real-time processing of high-dimensional image data. This study underscores the growing role of quantum circuits in machine learning, particularly in feature extraction and classification, suggesting that future quantum hardware could unlock new capabilities in end-to-end learning beyond hybrid approaches.