Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Quantum Feature Spaces and Kernels

Hamid D. Ismail

Published Nov 4, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This chapter develops the theory and practice of quantum feature maps and quantum kernels as a central framework in quantum machine learning (QML). Building on the data-encoding methods introduced in the previous chapter, it explains how classical inputs are embedded into quantum states and how similarity between data points is then defined through overlaps in Hilbert space. This chapter introduces the quantum kernel as the squared overlap between encoded states, establishes its fundamental algebraic properties, and shows how it satisfies the conditions required for direct use in classical kernel-learning methods such as support vector machines, kernel ridge regression, and Gaussian process models. A major focus is placed on the circuit-level realization and estimation of quantum kernels. This chapter presents kernel evaluation through encoding unitaries and examines three principal estimation methods: the SWAP test, the Hadamard test, and the direct return-probability method, with attention to their trade-offs in qubit overhead, circuit depth, and suitability for NISQ hardware. It also develops the geometric interpretation of quantum kernels in Hilbert space, relating kernel values to angular separation, decision boundaries, expressivity, and generalization. Together, these ideas provide a unified foundation for understanding how quantum circuits, feature maps, and classical learning algorithms interact in hybrid quantum-classical kernel models.

DOI
10.1201/9781042002818-6

Related papers

Quantum Kernel Methods

Hamid D. Ismail

This chapter develops quantum kernel-based machine learning as one of the most mature and practically viable paradigms in quantum machine learning (QML). It explains how kernel methods separate quantum representation from classical learning, allowing quantum devices to define feature spaces through state preparation and kernel estimation while leaving optimization and inference to established classical algorithms. This hybrid structure makes quantum kernel methods especially well suited to near-term quantum hardware and provides a conceptually clean framework for studying the role of quantum-induced geometry in learning. This chapter examines the historical emergence of kernel methods in QML, their positioning relative to variational models, and the practical workflow of learning from precomputed quantum kernels. It then analyzes the issues of generalization, regularization, and kernel noise, showing how finite-shot estimation and hardware imperfections affect the learned geometry of the feature space. Two major models are developed in detail: quantum support vector machines (QSVMs), which perform margin maximization in quantum-induced Hilbert spaces, and quantum kernel ridge regression (QKRR), which provides a closed-form framework for studying stability and conditioning. Together, these models illustrate how quantum kernels can be integrated into standard classical learning pipelines while preserving both mathematical rigor and experimental feasibility.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 4, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Data Encoding and Feature Maps

Hamid D. Ismail

This chapter examines quantum data encoding as a foundational component of quantum machine learning (QML), emphasizing that the way classical data are embedded into quantum states strongly shapes model expressivity, trainability, and practical feasibility. It first develops a general framework in which encoding is viewed as a data-dependent unitary transformation and from a machine-learning perspective as a quantum feature map that defines the geometry of learning in Hilbert space. This chapter then compares the principal encoding strategies: basis encoding, valued for simplicity and interpretability but limited in expressive power; angle encoding, which is hardware-friendly and central to variational models; amplitude encoding, which offers exponential qubit compression but faces significant state-preparation challenges; and hybrid encoding, which combines multiple schemes to balance compression, expressivity, and implementability. A major theme of this chapter is that encoding should be understood as the construction of a quantum feature map whose induced quantum kernel determines similarity, decision boundaries, and generalization behavior. The discussion further highlights the role of encoding in variational quantum algorithms, the relationship between feature-map complexity and potential quantum advantage, and the practical constraints imposed by qubit count, circuit depth, noise, and measurement overhead.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 4, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Linear Algebra for Machine Learning

Hamid D. Ismail

This chapter examines quantum linear algebra as a foundational framework for quantum machine learning. Because many core learning tasks, including regression, dimensionality reduction, kernel evaluation, recommendation systems, and representation learning, depend on linear algebraic operations, this chapter explores how these operations can be reformulated in the quantum setting. Emphasis is placed on the shift from explicit numerical computation to coherent manipulation of quantum states and measurement-based access to information. This chapter introduces quantum inner product estimation as a primitive for similarity and kernel evaluation, highlighting the swap test and related overlap-estimation methods. It then develops quantum matrix inversion and the HHL algorithm, emphasizing the preparation of solution states rather than explicit solution vectors and discussing the importance of conditioning and regularization. Quantum singular value decomposition is presented through Hermitian embeddings, phase estimation, block encoding, and quantum singular value transformation, providing a unified framework for spectral filtering and low-rank approximation. This chapter concludes with quantum principal component analysis, in which covariance structure is represented by a density matrix and accessed through quantum phase estimation and density matrix exponentiation. Throughout, practical demonstrations in Qiskit and PennyLane illustrate the algorithms, while careful attention is given to the limitations imposed by state preparation, measurement, noise, and classical data loading.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 4, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Machine Learning in Feature Hilbert Spaces

Maria Schuld, Nathan Killoran

A basic idea of quantum computing is surprisingly similar to that of kernel methods in machine learning, namely, to efficiently perform computations in an intractably large Hilbert space. In this Letter we explore some theoretical foundations of this link and show how it opens up a new avenue for the design of quantum machine learning algorithms. We interpret the process of encoding inputs in a quantum state as a nonlinear feature map that maps data to quantum Hilbert space. A quantum computer can now analyze the input data in this feature space. Based on this link, we discuss two approaches for building a quantum model for classification. In the first approach, the quantum device estimates inner products of quantum states to compute a classically intractable kernel. The kernel can be fed into any classical kernel method such as a support vector machine. In the second approach, we use a variational quantum circuit as a linear model that classifies data explicitly in Hilbert space. We illustrate these ideas with a feature map based on squeezing in a continuous-variable system, and visualize the working principle with two-dimensional minibenchmark datasets.

arXiv:1803.07128•Physical Review Letters•Feb 1, 2019•1,856 citations

Quantum Kernels

Andreas Wichert

This chapter gives an example of quantum kernels and the swap test. Then, it describes quantum kernels and the inversion test. Quantum feature maps encodes classical data into quantum data via a parametrized quantum circuit. A quantum computer can estimate a quantum kernel and the estimate can be used by a kernel method on a classical computer. This is because the exponential quantum advantage in evaluating inner products allows to estimate the quantum kernel machines directly in the higher-dimensional space. Quantum feature maps encodes classical data into quantum data via a parametrized quantum circuit. Quantum feature maps encodes classical data into quantum data via a parametrized quantum circuit that are hard to simulate classically and is an active area of current research.

Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks•Nov 28, 2023•0 citations

Quantum Kernel Method in the Presence of Noise

Salman Beigi

Kernel method in machine learning consists of encoding input data into a vector in a Hilbert space called the feature space and modeling the target function as a linear map on the feature space. Given a cost function, computing such an optimal linear map requires computation of a kernel matrix whose entries equal the inner products of feature vectors. In the quantum kernel method it is assumed that the feature vectors are quantum states in which case the quantum kernel matrix is given in terms of the overlap of quantum states. In practice, to estimate entries of the quantum kernel matrix one should apply, e.g., the SWAP-test and the number of such SWAP-tests is a relevant parameter in evaluating the performance of the quantum kernel method. Moreover, quantum systems are subject to noise, so the quantum states as feature vectors cannot be prepared exactly and this is another source of error in the computation of the quantum kernel matrix. Taking both the above considerations into account, we prove a bound on the performance (generalization error) of the quantum kernel method.

arXiv:2210.08476•Oct 16, 2022•0 citations
This chapter develops the theory and practice of quantum feature maps and quantum kernels as a central framework in quantum machine learning (QML). Building on the data-encoding methods introduced in the previous chapter, it explains how classical inputs are embedded into quantum states and how similarity between data points is then defined through overlaps in Hilbert space. This chapter introduces the quantum kernel as the squared overlap between encoded states, establishes its fundamental algebraic properties, and shows how it satisfies the conditions required for direct use in classical kernel-learning methods such as support vector machines, kernel ridge regression, and Gaussian process models. A major focus is placed on the circuit-level realization and estimation of quantum kernels. This chapter presents kernel evaluation through encoding unitaries and examines three principal estimation methods: the SWAP test, the Hadamard test, and the direct return-probability method, with attention to their trade-offs in qubit overhead, circuit depth, and suitability for NISQ hardware. It also develops the geometric interpretation of quantum kernels in Hilbert space, relating kernel values to angular separation, decision boundaries, expressivity, and generalization. Together, these ideas provide a unified foundation for understanding how quantum circuits, feature maps, and classical learning algorithms interact in hybrid quantum-classical kernel models.
This chapter develops quantum kernel-based machine learning as one of the most mature and practically viable paradigms in quantum machine learning (QML). It explains how kernel methods separate quantum representation from classical learning, allowing quantum devices to define feature spaces through state preparation and kernel estimation while leaving optimization and inference to established classical algorithms. This hybrid structure makes quantum kernel methods especially well suited to near-term quantum hardware and provides a conceptually clean framework for studying the role of quantum-induced geometry in learning. This chapter examines the historical emergence of kernel methods in QML, their positioning relative to variational models, and the practical workflow of learning from precomputed quantum kernels. It then analyzes the issues of generalization, regularization, and kernel noise, showing how finite-shot estimation and hardware imperfections affect the learned geometry of the feature space. Two major models are developed in detail: quantum support vector machines (QSVMs), which perform margin maximization in quantum-induced Hilbert spaces, and quantum kernel ridge regression (QKRR), which provides a closed-form framework for studying stability and conditioning. Together, these models illustrate how quantum kernels can be integrated into standard classical learning pipelines while preserving both mathematical rigor and experimental feasibility.
This chapter examines quantum data encoding as a foundational component of quantum machine learning (QML), emphasizing that the way classical data are embedded into quantum states strongly shapes model expressivity, trainability, and practical feasibility. It first develops a general framework in which encoding is viewed as a data-dependent unitary transformation and from a machine-learning perspective as a quantum feature map that defines the geometry of learning in Hilbert space. This chapter then compares the principal encoding strategies: basis encoding, valued for simplicity and interpretability but limited in expressive power; angle encoding, which is hardware-friendly and central to variational models; amplitude encoding, which offers exponential qubit compression but faces significant state-preparation challenges; and hybrid encoding, which combines multiple schemes to balance compression, expressivity, and implementability. A major theme of this chapter is that encoding should be understood as the construction of a quantum feature map whose induced quantum kernel determines similarity, decision boundaries, and generalization behavior. The discussion further highlights the role of encoding in variational quantum algorithms, the relationship between feature-map complexity and potential quantum advantage, and the practical constraints imposed by qubit count, circuit depth, noise, and measurement overhead.
This chapter examines quantum linear algebra as a foundational framework for quantum machine learning. Because many core learning tasks, including regression, dimensionality reduction, kernel evaluation, recommendation systems, and representation learning, depend on linear algebraic operations, this chapter explores how these operations can be reformulated in the quantum setting. Emphasis is placed on the shift from explicit numerical computation to coherent manipulation of quantum states and measurement-based access to information. This chapter introduces quantum inner product estimation as a primitive for similarity and kernel evaluation, highlighting the swap test and related overlap-estimation methods. It then develops quantum matrix inversion and the HHL algorithm, emphasizing the preparation of solution states rather than explicit solution vectors and discussing the importance of conditioning and regularization. Quantum singular value decomposition is presented through Hermitian embeddings, phase estimation, block encoding, and quantum singular value transformation, providing a unified framework for spectral filtering and low-rank approximation. This chapter concludes with quantum principal component analysis, in which covariance structure is represented by a density matrix and accessed through quantum phase estimation and density matrix exponentiation. Throughout, practical demonstrations in Qiskit and PennyLane illustrate the algorithms, while careful attention is given to the limitations imposed by state preparation, measurement, noise, and classical data loading.
A basic idea of quantum computing is surprisingly similar to that of kernel methods in machine learning, namely, to efficiently perform computations in an intractably large Hilbert space. In this Letter we explore some theoretical foundations of this link and show how it opens up a new avenue for the design of quantum machine learning algorithms. We interpret the process of encoding inputs in a quantum state as a nonlinear feature map that maps data to quantum Hilbert space. A quantum computer can now analyze the input data in this feature space. Based on this link, we discuss two approaches for building a quantum model for classification. In the first approach, the quantum device estimates inner products of quantum states to compute a classically intractable kernel. The kernel can be fed into any classical kernel method such as a support vector machine. In the second approach, we use a variational quantum circuit as a linear model that classifies data explicitly in Hilbert space. We illustrate these ideas with a feature map based on squeezing in a continuous-variable system, and visualize the working principle with two-dimensional minibenchmark datasets.
This chapter gives an example of quantum kernels and the swap test. Then, it describes quantum kernels and the inversion test. Quantum feature maps encodes classical data into quantum data via a parametrized quantum circuit. A quantum computer can estimate a quantum kernel and the estimate can be used by a kernel method on a classical computer. This is because the exponential quantum advantage in evaluating inner products allows to estimate the quantum kernel machines directly in the higher-dimensional space. Quantum feature maps encodes classical data into quantum data via a parametrized quantum circuit. Quantum feature maps encodes classical data into quantum data via a parametrized quantum circuit that are hard to simulate classically and is an active area of current research.
Kernel method in machine learning consists of encoding input data into a vector in a Hilbert space called the feature space and modeling the target function as a linear map on the feature space. Given a cost function, computing such an optimal linear map requires computation of a kernel matrix whose entries equal the inner products of feature vectors. In the quantum kernel method it is assumed that the feature vectors are quantum states in which case the quantum kernel matrix is given in terms of the overlap of quantum states. In practice, to estimate entries of the quantum kernel matrix one should apply, e.g., the SWAP-test and the number of such SWAP-tests is a relevant parameter in evaluating the performance of the quantum kernel method. Moreover, quantum systems are subject to noise, so the quantum states as feature vectors cannot be prepared exactly and this is another source of error in the computation of the quantum kernel matrix. Taking both the above considerations into account, we prove a bound on the performance (generalization error) of the quantum kernel method.