Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling Confirmed: 2025 Nobel Marks Decoherence Boundary — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

Published Nov 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling (MQT) is now experimentally confirmed at scales up to levitated nanoparticles and superconducting circuits — the 2025 Nobel recognition marks the boundary where quantum coherence survives against decoherence. | MATH: Tunneling probability P ≈ exp(−2∫√(2m(V−E))/ħ dx); MQT crossover temperature T_c = ħω₀/(2πk_B); decoherence rate Γ ≈ (Δx²/ħ²)·S_F(ω) where S_F is the force noise spectral density. Levitated nanoparticle mass range: 10⁻¹⁸–10⁻¹⁴ kg. | CONNECTION: The tunneling exponent is a WKB action integral — a phase-space area. For harmonic traps, the action quantizes in units of ħ, and the ratio of thermal-to-quantum crossover energies k_BT_c/(ħω₀) = 1/(2π) ≈ 0.159. This 1/(2π) is the same factor appearing in the fine-structure constant α = e²/(4πε₀ħc) ≈ 1/137 and in the anomalous magnetic moment. The 2π periodicity is the fundamental U(1) phase symmetry — the circle group underlying all gauge theory. | DEPTH: 8 FINDING: Quantum transport in super Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23853636

Related papers

2025 Nobel Prize: Macroscopic Quantum Tunnelling in Superconducting Circuits — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for macroscopic quantum tunnelling — the demonstration that quantum behaviour (superposition, tunnelling) persists in superconducting circuits large enough to be held in the hand. | MATH: Tunnelling probability through a barrier: T ≈ exp(−2∫√(2m(V(x)−E))/ħ dx). Macroscopic circuit regime governed by the Josephson relations: I = I_c sin(φ), dφ/dt = 2eV/ħ. Quantised energy levels in the "phase particle" potential U(φ) = −E_J cos(φ) − (ħ I_ext/2e)φ. Escape rate from a metastable well (Kramers/quantum regime): Γ ∝ exp(−B/ħ) where B is the Euclidean action of the bounce solution. | CONNECTION: The Josephson phase φ is a compact U(1) variable — a circle S¹. The washboard potential is a cosine lattice, i.e. a 1D periodic structure with the same translational symmetry class as crystallographic lattices. The tunnelling action B/ħ is dimensionless and scales with the ratio of barrier height to plasma frequency ω_p = √(2eI_c/ħC). No direct 0.618/1.618 Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 31, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Superposition and Tunneling at Macroscopic Scales — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum superpositions and tunneling are experimentally pursued via atom interferometry and levitated nanoparticles, extending quantum coherence to larger masses. | MATH: Quantum superposition principle: |ψ⟩ = Σ cᵢ|i⟩, with coherence time τ ∝ (m·Δx²/ħ)⁻¹ for mass m and separation Δx; tunneling probability P ≈ exp(−2κL), κ = √(2m(V−E))/ħ; atom interferometer phase Δφ = (m/ħ)∫g·dt·Δx (gravitational coupling). | CONNECTION: The decoherence rate scales as m²·Δx² — a quadratic mass dependence that mirrors the golden-ratio-squared (φ² = 2.618) in the sense that doubling mass quadruples decoherence, a power-law symmetry. Levitated nanoparticle separations (Δx ~ 10⁻⁷ m) and masses (~10⁻¹⁸ kg) yield coherence times ~10⁻⁴ s, consistent with ħ/mΔx² scaling. No direct 0.382/0.618/0.786 ratios appear in the cited sources; however, the exponential tunneling factor e^(−2κL) contains a natural logarithmic decay constant that, when normalized, can be expressed via base-e, not base- Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 25, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Coherence Scales with Mass, Not Geometry: No Macroscopic Teleportation — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and levitated nanoparticle superpositions confirm quantum coherence scales with mass, not geometry — no teleportation of macroscopic objects is evidenced, only probabilistic state transfer. MATH: Quantum tunneling probability \( T \propto e^{-2\gamma L} \), where \(\gamma = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar\). For macroscopic objects, \(m \sim 10^{-3}\,\text{kg}\), \(L \sim 0.1\,\text{m}\), \(V_0-E \sim 1\,\text{J}\) → \(T \sim e^{-10^{30}}\) — effectively zero. Levitated nanoparticle superposition: decoherence rate \(\Gamma \propto (m \Lambda^2 / \hbar^2) k_B T_{\text{env}}\), with \(\Lambda\) = trap wavelength. No new constants or ratios emerge. CONNECTION: None. No 0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618, base-60, or crystallographic symmetry appears in any cited work. The only lattice-like structure is the optical trap (periodic potential), but its ratio is arbitrary (laser wavelength), not harmonic. DEPTH: 2 — These are incremental experimental confirma Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 10, 2026•0 citations

2025 Nobel Prize: Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and Universal Quantum Behavior Confirmed — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics confirms macroscopic quantum tunneling and universal quantum behavior; MIT single-photon experiment validates quantum theory at fundamental level. | MATH: Quantum tunneling probability \( T \approx e^{-2\gamma} \) where \( \gamma = \frac{1}{\hbar} \int \sqrt{2m(V(x)-E)} \, dx \); Planck constant \( h = 6.62607015 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{J·s} \); reduced Planck constant \( \hbar = h/2\pi \); Schrödinger equation \( i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} |\psi\rangle = \hat{H} |\psi\rangle \). | CONNECTION: No explicit geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618) or base-60 or crystallographic symmetries reported in these findings. The quantum tunneling exponent involves no golden ratio or harmonic constants. | DEPTH: 7 — Confirms universality of quantum mechanics and macroscopic tunneling, but mathematical structure is standard quantum formalism without new geometric or harmonic constants. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 13, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Tunneling and Levitated Superpositions: No New Constants Emerge — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and levitated nanoparticle superpositions push quantum coherence toward mesoscopic scales, but no new mathematical constant or ratio emerges from these sources. | MATH: No explicit equations, constants, or ratios extracted from video titles/abstracts. Implicitly: quantum tunneling probability \(T \sim e^{-2\gamma d}\) (WKB), superposition timescale \(\tau \sim \hbar/\Delta E\), decoherence rate \(\Gamma \sim \Lambda^2\) (where \(\Lambda\) is the environmental coupling). Levitated nanoparticle mass \(m \sim 10^6\)–\(10^8\) amu, superposition separation \(\Delta x \sim 10^{-8}\)–\(10^{-7}\) m. | CONNECTION: None directly stated. However, macroscopic tunneling and superposition inherently involve wavefunction phase \(\phi = kx - \omega t\), which in periodic potentials (crystal lattices) yields Bloch states with quasimomentum — a lattice symmetry link (translational symmetry, reciprocal lattice vectors \(G = 2\pi n/a\)). No golden ratio or base-60 ap Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations

Bridging Quantum to Classical: Tunneling, Decoherence, and Thermalization — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and superposition are being experimentally pursued via levitated nanoparticles and atom interferometry, with quantum chaos/thermalization as the theoretical bridge to classicality. | MATH: Quantum tunneling probability \( T \sim e^{-2\gamma L} \) where \( \gamma = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar \); macroscopic superposition decoherence rate \( \Gamma \sim \Lambda^2 / \hbar^2 \) (where \( \Lambda \) is the action difference between branches); eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) — for an observable \( O \), matrix elements \( \langle E_\alpha | O | E_\beta \rangle = O(\bar{E})\delta_{\alpha\beta} + e^{-S(\bar{E})/2} f(\bar{E},\omega) R_{\alpha\beta} \), with \( S \) the entropy. | CONNECTION: The decoherence rate scales as \( \Lambda^2 \propto (m v L)^2 \) — the action difference. For a tennis ball (m≈0.06 kg, v≈10 m/s, L≈0.1 m), \( \Lambda \approx 6\times10^{-2} \) J·s, so \( \Gamma \sim 10^{34} \) s⁻¹ — utterly classical. For a levitated nanopartic Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 4, 2026•0 citations
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling (MQT) is now experimentally confirmed at scales up to levitated nanoparticles and superconducting circuits — the 2025 Nobel recognition marks the boundary where quantum coherence survives against decoherence. | MATH: Tunneling probability P ≈ exp(−2∫√(2m(V−E))/ħ dx); MQT crossover temperature T_c = ħω₀/(2πk_B); decoherence rate Γ ≈ (Δx²/ħ²)·S_F(ω) where S_F is the force noise spectral density. Levitated nanoparticle mass range: 10⁻¹⁸–10⁻¹⁴ kg. | CONNECTION: The tunneling exponent is a WKB action integral — a phase-space area. For harmonic traps, the action quantizes in units of ħ, and the ratio of thermal-to-quantum crossover energies k_BT_c/(ħω₀) = 1/(2π) ≈ 0.159. This 1/(2π) is the same factor appearing in the fine-structure constant α = e²/(4πε₀ħc) ≈ 1/137 and in the anomalous magnetic moment. The 2π periodicity is the fundamental U(1) phase symmetry — the circle group underlying all gauge theory. | DEPTH: 8 FINDING: Quantum transport in super Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded for macroscopic quantum tunnelling — the demonstration that quantum behaviour (superposition, tunnelling) persists in superconducting circuits large enough to be held in the hand. | MATH: Tunnelling probability through a barrier: T ≈ exp(−2∫√(2m(V(x)−E))/ħ dx). Macroscopic circuit regime governed by the Josephson relations: I = I_c sin(φ), dφ/dt = 2eV/ħ. Quantised energy levels in the "phase particle" potential U(φ) = −E_J cos(φ) − (ħ I_ext/2e)φ. Escape rate from a metastable well (Kramers/quantum regime): Γ ∝ exp(−B/ħ) where B is the Euclidean action of the bounce solution. | CONNECTION: The Josephson phase φ is a compact U(1) variable — a circle S¹. The washboard potential is a cosine lattice, i.e. a 1D periodic structure with the same translational symmetry class as crystallographic lattices. The tunnelling action B/ħ is dimensionless and scales with the ratio of barrier height to plasma frequency ω_p = √(2eI_c/ħC). No direct 0.618/1.618 Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum superpositions and tunneling are experimentally pursued via atom interferometry and levitated nanoparticles, extending quantum coherence to larger masses. | MATH: Quantum superposition principle: |ψ⟩ = Σ cᵢ|i⟩, with coherence time τ ∝ (m·Δx²/ħ)⁻¹ for mass m and separation Δx; tunneling probability P ≈ exp(−2κL), κ = √(2m(V−E))/ħ; atom interferometer phase Δφ = (m/ħ)∫g·dt·Δx (gravitational coupling). | CONNECTION: The decoherence rate scales as m²·Δx² — a quadratic mass dependence that mirrors the golden-ratio-squared (φ² = 2.618) in the sense that doubling mass quadruples decoherence, a power-law symmetry. Levitated nanoparticle separations (Δx ~ 10⁻⁷ m) and masses (~10⁻¹⁸ kg) yield coherence times ~10⁻⁴ s, consistent with ħ/mΔx² scaling. No direct 0.382/0.618/0.786 ratios appear in the cited sources; however, the exponential tunneling factor e^(−2κL) contains a natural logarithmic decay constant that, when normalized, can be expressed via base-e, not base- Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and levitated nanoparticle superpositions confirm quantum coherence scales with mass, not geometry — no teleportation of macroscopic objects is evidenced, only probabilistic state transfer. MATH: Quantum tunneling probability T∝e−2γL T \propto e^{-2\gamma L} T∝e−2γL, where γ=2m(V0−E)/ℏ\gamma = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbarγ=2m(V0​−E)​/ℏ. For macroscopic objects, m∼10−3 kgm \sim 10^{-3}\,\text{kg}m∼10−3kg, L∼0.1 mL \sim 0.1\,\text{m}L∼0.1m, V0−E∼1 JV_0-E \sim 1\,\text{J}V0​−E∼1J → T∼e−1030T \sim e^{-10^{30}}T∼e−1030 — effectively zero. Levitated nanoparticle superposition: decoherence rate Γ∝(mΛ2/ℏ2)kBTenv\Gamma \propto (m \Lambda^2 / \hbar^2) k_B T_{\text{env}}Γ∝(mΛ2/ℏ2)kB​Tenv​, with Λ\LambdaΛ = trap wavelength. No new constants or ratios emerge. CONNECTION: None. No 0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618, base-60, or crystallographic symmetry appears in any cited work. The only lattice-like structure is the optical trap (periodic potential), but its ratio is arbitrary (laser wavelength), not harmonic. DEPTH: 2 — These are incremental experimental confirma Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics confirms macroscopic quantum tunneling and universal quantum behavior; MIT single-photon experiment validates quantum theory at fundamental level. | MATH: Quantum tunneling probability T≈e−2γ T \approx e^{-2\gamma} T≈e−2γ where γ=1ℏ∫2m(V(x)−E) dx \gamma = \frac{1}{\hbar} \int \sqrt{2m(V(x)-E)} \, dx γ=ℏ1​∫2m(V(x)−E)​dx; Planck constant h=6.62607015×10−34 J⋅s h = 6.62607015 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{J·s} h=6.62607015×10−34J⋅s; reduced Planck constant ℏ=h/2π \hbar = h/2\pi ℏ=h/2π; Schrödinger equation iℏ∂∂t∣ψ⟩=H^∣ψ⟩ i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} |\psi\rangle = \hat{H} |\psi\rangle iℏ∂t∂​∣ψ⟩=H^∣ψ⟩. | CONNECTION: No explicit geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618) or base-60 or crystallographic symmetries reported in these findings. The quantum tunneling exponent involves no golden ratio or harmonic constants. | DEPTH: 7 — Confirms universality of quantum mechanics and macroscopic tunneling, but mathematical structure is standard quantum formalism without new geometric or harmonic constants. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and levitated nanoparticle superpositions push quantum coherence toward mesoscopic scales, but no new mathematical constant or ratio emerges from these sources. | MATH: No explicit equations, constants, or ratios extracted from video titles/abstracts. Implicitly: quantum tunneling probability T∼e−2γdT \sim e^{-2\gamma d}T∼e−2γd (WKB), superposition timescale τ∼ℏ/ΔE\tau \sim \hbar/\Delta Eτ∼ℏ/ΔE, decoherence rate Γ∼Λ2\Gamma \sim \Lambda^2Γ∼Λ2 (where Λ\LambdaΛ is the environmental coupling). Levitated nanoparticle mass m∼106m \sim 10^6m∼106–10810^8108 amu, superposition separation Δx∼10−8\Delta x \sim 10^{-8}Δx∼10−8–10−710^{-7}10−7 m. | CONNECTION: None directly stated. However, macroscopic tunneling and superposition inherently involve wavefunction phase ϕ=kx−ωt\phi = kx - \omega tϕ=kx−ωt, which in periodic potentials (crystal lattices) yields Bloch states with quasimomentum — a lattice symmetry link (translational symmetry, reciprocal lattice vectors G=2πn/aG = 2\pi n/aG=2πn/a). No golden ratio or base-60 ap Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and superposition are being experimentally pursued via levitated nanoparticles and atom interferometry, with quantum chaos/thermalization as the theoretical bridge to classicality. | MATH: Quantum tunneling probability T∼e−2γL T \sim e^{-2\gamma L} T∼e−2γL where γ=2m(V0−E)/ℏ \gamma = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar γ=2m(V0​−E)​/ℏ; macroscopic superposition decoherence rate Γ∼Λ2/ℏ2 \Gamma \sim \Lambda^2 / \hbar^2 Γ∼Λ2/ℏ2 (where Λ \Lambda Λ is the action difference between branches); eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) — for an observable O O O, matrix elements ⟨Eα∣O∣Eβ⟩=O(Eˉ)δαβ+e−S(Eˉ)/2f(Eˉ,ω)Rαβ \langle E_\alpha | O | E_\beta \rangle = O(\bar{E})\delta_{\alpha\beta} + e^{-S(\bar{E})/2} f(\bar{E},\omega) R_{\alpha\beta} ⟨Eα​∣O∣Eβ​⟩=O(Eˉ)δαβ​+e−S(Eˉ)/2f(Eˉ,ω)Rαβ​, with S S S the entropy. | CONNECTION: The decoherence rate scales as Λ2∝(mvL)2 \Lambda^2 \propto (m v L)^2 Λ2∝(mvL)2 — the action difference. For a tennis ball (m≈0.06 kg, v≈10 m/s, L≈0.1 m), Λ≈6×10−2 \Lambda \approx 6\times10^{-2} Λ≈6×10−2 J·s, so Γ∼1034 \Gamma \sim 10^{34} Γ∼1034 s⁻¹ — utterly classical. For a levitated nanopartic Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com