Contract-Relative Quantum Realisations of Classical Processes
Mark Whitlock
Paper 6 of 11 — A General Theory of Answerability The eleven-paper TUS OS mathematical research programme Abstract This paper develops a general theory of how the exact resource cost of representing an independently fixed native system depends on the operational access contract imposed on that system. Rather than assigning a single intrinsic “dimension” to a process or operational object, the paper treats realisation as a fully typed problem determined jointly by the native system, the access contract, the admitted realisation category and the tolerated error. The framework defines contract-indexed achievable resource regions, declared-memory closure, lawful contract restriction and resource monotonicity. Strengthening a contract can require a realisation to preserve or recover distinctions that a weaker behavioural contract is permitted to compress, while the independently fixed native system itself remains unchanged. Lawful contract restriction induces reverse inclusion of achievable regions, but strict separation requires additional lower and upper certificates. For stochastic processes, the paper introduces causal-state transparency as a recovery obligation imposed on an exact autonomous predictor at a declared inspection boundary. All persistent quantum, classical, controller, history and source-side information available at that boundary is included in the resource account. A direct-sum classical–quantum identity-capacity theorem proves that uniform worst-case recovery probability τ across N intrinsic causal classes requires identity capacity at least ⌈τN⌉. The theorem is then applied to two external stochastic-process families. Periodically modulated decay processes exhibit an unbounded finite separation: exact autonomous prediction has minimum identity capacity 2, exact causal-state transparency has minimum capacity N, and every fixed positive transparency threshold forces a lower bound growing as ⌈τN⌉. For the dual-Poisson process, an exact qubit predictor exists under the weak prediction contract, while every positive uniform worst-case transparency threshold makes the finite-capacity achievable region empty. This is a contract-induced loss of finite feasibility on the same native process, not a claim that the process itself ceases to exist or that no larger infinite-capacity realisation could exist. The paper then returns to the TUS OS discovery instance from which the general problem arose. The same independently fixed 64-state canonical target admits a complete static quantum-operational Atlas of exact minimum Hilbert dimension 4, while recovery-complete LANDING selected-line instrument access, GUIDANCE selected-line readout and GUIDANCE selected-line-and-endpoint joint-instrument access each have exact minimum Hilbert dimension 64 within the same declared representation category. The native target does not change; the operational access obligation does. Together, the TUS OS, periodically modulated decay and dual-Poisson results establish three distinct exact contract-relative regimes: strict finite separation: 4 → 64; unbounded finite separation: 2 → N; finite-capacity breakdown: 2 → ∅finite for every τ > 0. These are three instances of one general structural law, not three identical recovery mechanisms. TUS OS uses admitted experiment families that collectively separate its canonical carriers, whereas the stochastic-process results use direct causal-state decoding at a declared inspection boundary. The results establish that finite-capacity behavioural sufficiency does not imply positive uniform worst-case recoverability of native predictive identity, and that exact representation cost is not a context-free property of the native system alone. It depends on the complete typed obligation imposed on an admitted realisation. The paper does not claim physical quantum execution, quantum advantage, a universal scalar resource, equivalence of TUS OS recovery with causal-state transparency, or finite-capacity breakdown for prior-weighted dual-Poisson transparency. Supporting General Theory Programme This paper is Paper 6 in the TUS OS quantum-operational and Answerability research programme. Building on Papers 1–5, it develops the general theory of contract-relative quantum realisations of classical processes, showing that quantum resource requirements are not intrinsic to a process alone but depend on the governing observational, recovery, and transparency contract. Paper 7 extends this into operational observability and the classification of contract-induced resource transitions; Papers 8–9 develop generic Answerability theory and calculus; Paper 10 proves the protected and executable realisation of TUS OS within that calculus; and Paper 11 closes the programme with A General Theory of Answerability, establishing Structural Identity, Recognition, the canonical mandatory protected core, and lawful Realisation Freedom. Paper 1 — Canonical Tetrahedral Qubit-State Geometry in the TUS OS TriadXOR Completion, Receipt Verification and the Qubit-Geometric Semantic WitnessEstablishes the canonical tetrahedral geometry, unique XOR completion, exact qubit-SIC representation and centred-face trine geometry. Paper 2 — The TUS OS Operational CalculusClassical Construction of Exact Qubit Prepare–Measure Behaviour from a Receipt-Custodied Engine ArchitectureEstablishes exact full-carrier qubit prepare–measure behaviour from the deterministic classical engine under the declared Coordinate-Incidence Operational Harness. For each lawful foundation, the 64 six-bit carriers map to exactly 27 anchor-relative qubit preparations, while the separately declared face Harness gives the exact trine table. Paper 3 — From Finite Relational Structure to Qubit Operational FormAmbient Foundations, Canonical Subatlas, Exact Global Quantum Dimension, GUIDANCE Witness, Sequential Closure and Global Representation in TUS OSEstablishes the repeated-common-effect static Atlas, its exact minimum complex Hilbert dimension 4, exact carrier-reconstruction structure and deterministic predictive-state minimum 64 for the frozen complete principal future language. Paper 4 — Technical Volume I — Formal Foundations and the Complete-Future CorpusNative Contract, Statistical Discrimination and the Invariant Probability ModuleEstablishes the frozen complete principal terminal future-experiment language, complete statistical separation of distinct carrier pairs, exact parity-resolved discrimination results, complement reachability and the 33-dimensional rational invariant probability module. Paper 4 — Technical Volume II — Orthogonality, Process Closure and Native Triadic SynthesisEstablishes universal complement-support orthogonality and its propagation under exact common-CPTP dynamics, the resulting common-CPTP process bounds, recovery-complete LANDING and GUIDANCE results, exact 64-dimensional selected-line instrument/readout minima at their declared contracts, an exact classical–quantum hybrid construction, and the native structural/predictive quotient correspondence. The state-only common-CPTP minimum remains bounded within 32–64 rather than being fixed at 64. Paper 5 — TUS OS as an Anchored Analog Quantum SystemNative Witnesses, Predictive Synthesis, and Access-Contract Resource SeparationDefines Analog Quantum Views and Anchored Analog Quantum Systems, proves that TUS OS is a proper Anchored Analog Quantum System on its 64-input abstract canonical corpus, elevates the inherited structural/predictive correspondence into the Predictive Synthesis Identity Theorem, and composes the recognition, predictive, resource and downstream-conservation results into the TUS OS Anchored Analog Quantum System Theorem. Paper 6 — Contract-Relative Quantum Realisations of Classical ProcessesPredictive Compression, Vanishing Worst-Case Causal-State Transparency, and Finite-Dimensional BreakdownGeneralises the access-dependent resource phenomenon beyond the TUS-specific discovery corpus by formalising the contract-relative achievable-resource object (S,C,𝔐,ε) ⟼ Ach(S,C;𝔐,ε), and establishes three exact contract-relative regimes: strict finite separation, unbounded finite separation and finite-capacity breakdown. These are instantiated respectively by the TUS OS 4→64 separation, the periodically modulated decay 2→N exact prediction-to-transparency separation, and dual-Poisson finite-capacity breakdown for every positive uniform worst-case transparency threshold. Paper 7 — Operational Observability and Contract-Induced Resource Transitions in Quantum RealisabilityStructural Classification, Family Scaling, and Finite-Resource BreakdownDevelops a structural classification theory for contract-induced representation-resource transitions, introducing the Contract Distinction System (CDS), CRC cofinal/refinement equivalence, and Certified Observability Transport Theory (COTT). It separates internal divergence from family divergence, classifies baseline-feasible strengthenings as resource-neutral, strict finite, finite-resource breakdown, or UNRESOLVED, and proves exact and asymptotic witnesses including an interface-induced 2→3 separation, the TUS OS 4→64 transition, incrementally unbounded finite separation for periodically modulated decay processes, and finite-resource breakdown for positive-threshold dual-Poisson transparency. Paper 8 — The Resource Geometry of Answerable InferenceIrreducible Answerability Structure, Minimal Sufficient Cores, and Certified Inference-Resource BoundariesDevelops the resource geometry of answerable inference. It formalises lawful-discharge semantics, source-level inferential obligations, answerability-sufficient reductions and irreducible sufficient cores, while keeping semantic structure, certified lower bounds and operational feasibility independently constituted. Gate E establishes a local answerability-to-resource threshold result; globally, exact closure identifies the Pareto-minimal inference-resource
•Aug 14, 2026•0 citations