We present our perspectives on the current status of, integer factoring and discrete logarithm, algorithms underlying the strength of classical public-key cryptography protocols used in key-exchange, encryption and digital signatures. We present an expository overview of the algebraic, number-theoretic and algorithmic principles behind the canonical, powerful algorithms used in the factoring of large, composite RSA modulii. These cover the two main ideas of group order based methods, and quadratic congruence based methods. We provide the resource estimates for the record breaking factoring based on the general number field sieve. Next we present an overview of the algorithmic theory of quantum computation behind, the polynomial time Shor's quantum algorithm for, period finding in hidden subgroup structure problems. This algorithm has played a key role in advancing post-quantum cryptography, and also in the exciting, contemporary developments in quantum computing, networking, sensing, and materials science as a whole. Latest advances in quantum computing rest on a variety of physics, engineering, algorithms, compilation, hardware, software techniques. There are several tradeoffs based on number of qubits, coherence times, control issues, errors and fault tolerance. In this environment, nuances of mathematical ideas, behind every step of the intricate arithmetical and algebraic computations under quantum models plays a significant role. We provide an overview of some of the recent ideas behind such algorithms. We conclude with a recent deep question on the ultimate feasibility of ultra large-scale, error-free, discrete, quantum computations required typically in cryptanalysis.
We present our perspectives on the current status of, integer factoring and discrete logarithm, algorithms underlying the strength of classical public-key cryptography protocols used in key-exchange, encryption and digital signatures. We present an expository overview of the algebraic, number-theoretic and algorithmic principles behind the canonical, powerful algorithms used in the factoring of large, composite RSA modulii. These cover the two main ideas of group order based methods, and quadratic congruence based methods. We provide the resource estimates for the record breaking factoring based on the general number field sieve. Next we present an overview of the algorithmic theory of quantum computation behind, the polynomial time Shor's quantum algorithm for, period finding in hidden subgroup structure problems. This algorithm has played a key role in advancing post-quantum cryptography, and also in the exciting, contemporary developments in quantum computing, networking, sensing, and materials science as a whole. Latest advances in quantum computing rest on a variety of physics, engineering, algorithms, compilation, hardware, software techniques. There are several tradeoffs based on number of qubits, coherence times, control issues, errors and fault tolerance. In this environment, nuances of mathematical ideas, behind every step of the intricate arithmetical and algebraic computations under quantum models plays a significant role. We provide an overview of some of the recent ideas behind such algorithms. We conclude with a recent deep question on the ultimate feasibility of ultra large-scale, error-free, discrete, quantum computations required typically in cryptanalysis.
Quantum computers with the ability to solve difficult mathematical problems exponentially faster pose an immediate danger to conventional encryption procedures, which are currently thought to be secure in the world of classical computing. This paper explores the fundamental effects of quantum computing on cryptography, showing how quantum algorithms, like Shor's algorithm, may effectively factor big numbers and solve discrete logarithm issues, making popular encryption techniques susceptible. The study looks into how susceptible traditional encryption methods like RSA and ECC are to quantum assaults, highlighting how urgent it is to switch to quantum-resistant cryptographic solutions. This paper also presents an overview of quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms currently being developed, and investigates quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols as a viable countermeasure. This study highlights the urgent requirement for a proactive strategy in creating quantum-safe cryptographic standards by examining the difficulties presented by quantum computing and assessing the possible directions in post-quantum cryptography. The results underline the need for a united effort from academics, business leaders, and governments to lessen the imminent threat posed by quantum computers and safeguard the integrity and security of digital communication in the future.
The advent of quantum computing poses an existential threat to classical cryptographic systems. Shor’s algorithm (1994) can factor large integers and compute discrete logarithms in polynomial time, breaking widely used schemes like RSA, ECC, and Diffie-Hellman. This paper surveys the state-of-the-art in quantum cryptanalysis, examining its impact on symmetric and asymmetric cryptography, recent progress in quantum attacks, and defenses via post-quantum cryptography (PQC). We analyze key quantum algorithms (Shor’s, Grover’s), their real-world feasibility given current hardware (NISQ-era limitations), and emerging PQC standards (NIST’s CRYSTALS-Kyber, Dilithium). We also discuss novel attack vectors (e.g., hybrid quantum-classical cryptanalysis) and future research directions.
This thesis contains a collection of efficient quantum algorithms and classical pre- and post-processing algorithms for various number- and group-theoretical problems with concrete cryptanalytical applications. More specifically, the focus is on the integer factoring problem (IFP), the discrete logarithm problem (DLP), and the order-finding problem (OFP), and on certain important variations of these problems. It is for example explained how the OFP and complete IFP may be solved efficiently in a single run of a reduced version of Shor's algorithm for the OFP with very high success probability, as evidenced by a lower bound that is 1 − o(1), how the short DLP in groups of unknown order may be solved efficiently and with an advantage over Shor's algorithm for the DLP (that furthermore requires the order to be known), as evidenced by a lower bound on the single-run success probability that is 1 − o(1), how the RSA IFP may be solved efficiently and with an advantage over Shor's algorithm for the IFP, by reducing the RSA IFP to a short DLP, how the DLP may heuristically be solved efficiently, and with high success probability that is 1 − o(1), in a single run of a reduced version of Shor’s algorithm for the DLP that admits efficient implementation, how the DLP may be solved in groups of unknown order, such as Schnorr groups, by jointly solving an OFP and a DLP at lower overall cost but higher per-run cost compared to first solving the OFP and then the DLP, how tradeoffs — between the number of group operations that are evaluated quantumly and the number of runs that are required — may be achieved in all of the aforementioned algorithms, and how all of the aforementioned algorithms may be simulated efficiently classically, for arbitrary large cryptographically relevant problem instances, when the solution to the instance is known, enabling the number of runs required when performing tradeoffs to be tightly estimated. It is furthermore for example explained how Regev's recent quantum algorithm for the IFP may be extended to the DLP and OFP, yielding i) a reduction in the circuit size and depth by a factor compared to Shor for these problems when working in , for N an n-bit integer, at the expense of performing runs, and ii) slight improvements of Regev's orginal algorithm for the IFP, how the above algorithms may be simulated efficiently classically, for large special-form problem instances that are classically tractable, and that Regev’s post-processing, and the post-processing for our extensions, are robust to an arbitrarily large fraction < 1 of the runs being bad. The above has implications for cryptography based on the intractability of the IFP and DLP — including but not limited to for widely used schemes such as RSA, DSA and Diffie–Hellman. The algorithms in this thesis are all derived from, and make notable improvements to, the seminal works of Shor. Some of the contributions are joint works with other authors.
Modern public key cryptosystems rely on two assumptions regarding computational difficulty: the integer factorization problem (RSA) and the discrete logarithm problem (elliptic curve cryptography).These problems have stood the test of time for four decades of cryptanalysis.Yet, their algebraic and periodic nature makes them vulnerable to quantum algorithms, most notably Shor's algorithm (1994).This paper presents a detailed comparison between classical and quantum-resistant cryptographic systems with an emphasis on lattice-based systems.The Learning With Errors (LWE) problem and its variants (Ring-LWE, Module-LWE) do not have the same periodicity that makes problems like integer factorization and discrete logarithms susceptible to quantum algorithms.Furthermore, LWE problems have reductions from worst-case lattice problems and have mathematical proofs of quantum resistance.Due to the vulnerability of ECDSA algorithms for cryptocurrencies, it is estimated that current cryptocurrencies will no longer be secure once quantum computer technology matures within the next 10-30 years, potentially compromising holdings estimated at between $260 billion and $390 billion as of August 2026.The implications of cryptanalysis on public key cryptography systems motivate mathematical recommendations regarding the security of current cryptosystems and the need for a shift to post-quantum cryptographic standards.
Quantum computing poses a fundamental threat to modern cryptographic protocols by exploiting quantum algorithms that surpass classical computational limits. Shor’s algorithm can efficiently factor large integers, breaking RSA and other public-key cryptosystems, while Grover’s algorithm accelerates brute-force attacks against symmetric encryption. As quantum hardware advances, traditional cryptographic schemes risk obsolescence, necessitating the development of quantum-resistant cryptographic techniques. This paper explores the theoretical foundations of quantum cryptanalysis, examining key algorithms, their implications for cybersecurity, and the current state of post-quantum cryptographic solutions. By analyzing resource estimates for quantum attacks and potential mitigation strategies, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving cryptographic landscape in the quantum era.
Today we witness an explosive growth in attention to Q-computing. Q-computing technologies, along with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies, cloud and foggy computing, as well as technologies for collecting and streaming processing of Big Data and ETL, are constantly leading the lists of ""end-to-end"" information technologies for the digital economy of technologically developed countries of the world. One of the main reasons for this is the potential ability of quantum computers to solve some computational problems more efficiently than any of the most modern classical computers of the von Neumann architecture (supercomputers). The most expressive and interesting, from an applied point of view, examples of such problems are integer factorization, effectively performed by Shor's quantum algorithm, as well as record search in an unordered database, effectively solved by Grover's algorithm. This monograph contains the best practice for solving problems of quantum cryptanalysis to improve cyber security and resilience of the digital economy. The book discusses well-known and author's software implementations of promising quantum Shor algorithms, Grover, Simon et al. Shor's algorithm provides exponential acceleration of solving factorization problems, discrete logarithm problems (DLPs) and elliptic curve discrete logarithm problems (ECDLPs). The mentioned tasks are widely used in TLS, SSH or IPsec cryptographic applications of Internet/Intranet and IIoT/IoT networks, communication protocols based on Diffie–Hellman key agreements (dependent on the strength of the DLP or ECDLP), digital signature algorithms (DSA, ECDSA, RSA-PSS), public key encryption algorithms (El Gamal, RSA-OAEP), etc. In other words, Shor's quantum algorithm is potentially capable of violating these algorithms, and with them all the mechanisms of public-key cryptography deployed in cyberspace.