The Wigner quasiprobability, along with some of its essentialproperties, is introduced and discussed in two versions, first covering real canonical variables such as W(q,p) and second a pair of complex conjugate coordinates such as W(α,α*). The reconstruction of the density operator ϱ of states is also given. Building upon the Susskind–Glogower concept of quantum phase operators, further aspects of phase operator algebras in the quantum optics of a harmonic oscillator are discussed in relation to the realization of the su(1,1) Lie algebra. Coherent phase states |ε⟩ are introduced in analogy to the common coherent states |α⟩ in two ways, as both eigenstates of certain operators and as states generated from a ground state |0⟩ by operators of the Lie group SU(1,1). The limiting transition to the non-normalizable Fritz London phase states |eiφ⟩ on the unit circle and an (over)-completeness relation for the coherent phase states are derived. The Wigner quasiprobability W(q,p) for the coherent phase states is calculated and graphically represented. From the Wigner quasiprobability, a phase distribution W(φ) is calculated by integrating over the radius, and its uncertainty is defined and presented. The Hilbert–Schmidt distance is discussed as a measure of the non-classicality of states, where most of our with Viktor Dodonov work was carried out.
Starting from Wigner's definition of the function named now after him we systematically develop different representation of this quasiprobability with emphasis on symmetric representations concerning the canonical variables ( ) , q p of phase space and using the known relation to the parity operator.One of the representations is by means of the Laguerre 2D polynomials which is particularly effective in quantum optics.For the coherent states we show that their Fourier transforms are again coherent states.We calculate the Wigner quasiprobability to the eigenstates of a particle in a square well with infinitely high impenetrable walls which is not smooth in the spatial coordinate and vanishes outside the wall boundaries.It is not well suited for the calculation of expectation values.A great place takes on the calculation of the Wigner quasiprobability for coherent phase states in quantum optics which is essentially new.We show that an unorthodox entire function plays there a role in most formulae which makes all calculations difficult.The Wigner quasiprobability for coherent phase states is calculated and graphically represented but due to the involved unorthodox function it may be considered only as illustration and is not suited for the calculation of expectation values.By another approach via the number representation of the states and using the recently developed summation formula by means of Generalized Eulerian numbers it becomes possible to calculate in approximations with good convergence the basic expectation values, in particular, the basic uncertainties which are additionally represented in graphics.Both considered examples, the square well and the coherent phase states, belong to systems with ( ) 1,1 SU symmetry with the same index 1 2 k = of unitary irreducible representations.
Correct use of the Wigner representation of quantum mechanics, which is realized with joint distributions of quasiprobabilities in phase space, requires the use of certain specific rules and attention to a number of properties which distinguish the quasiprobability from a true probability. This paper is mainly concerned with these problems. In the Wigner representation the quantum Liouville equation appears instead of the Schroedinger equation. The solution may have no physical meaning unless it is subjected to a necessary and sufficient condition which selects an allowed class of distributions which describe quantum-mechanical pure states. This condition contains Planck's constant and imposes, besides the uncertainty relations, severe restrictions on the possible form of the Wigner function. When this condition is satisfied, one can reconstruct the wave function from the Wigner function. In the case of an oscillator, the quantization condition for the energies of the stationary states does not follow from the Liouville equation, but from this supplementary condition. Unlike the true probability density, any Wigner function (except Gaussian ones) of a pure state takes on negative values. Another important peculiarity is that the quasiprobability is not concentrated on certain hypersurfaces, but is smeared out over the entire phase space. These and other features considered in this paper should be kept in mind when using the Wigner representation in quantum-mechanical problems.
Wigner representation In classical optics (Born and Wolf, 1999), the state of the electromagnetic oscillator is perfectly described by the statistics of the classical amplitude α . The amplitude may be completely fixed (then the field is coherent), or α may fluctuate (then the field is partially coherent or incoherent). In classical optics as well as in classical mechanics, we can characterize the statistics of the complex amplitude?or, equivalently, the statistics of the components position q and momentum p introducing a phase space distribution W ( q , p ). (As explained in Section 3.1, the real and the imaginary part of the complex amplitude α can be regarded as the position and the momentum of the electromagnetic oscillator.) The distribution W ( q , p ) quantifies the probability of finding a particular pair of q and p values in their simultaneous measurement. Knowing the phase space probability distribution, all statistical quantities of the electromagnetic oscillator can be predicted by calculation. In this sense the phase space distribution describes the state in classical physics. All this is much more subtle in quantum mechanics. First of all, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle prevents us from observing position momentum simultaneously and precisely. So it seems there is no point in thinking about quantum phase space. But wait! In quantum mechanics we cannot directly observe quantum states either. Nevertheless, we are legitimately entitled to use the concept of states as if they were existing entities (whatever they are). We use their properties to predict the statistics of observations.
The problem of expanding a density operator $\ensuremath{\rho}$ in forms that simplify the evaluation of important classes of quantum-mechanical expectation values is studied. The weight function $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ of the
P representation, the Wigner distribution $W(\ensuremath{\alpha})$, and the function $〈\ensuremath{\alpha}|\ensuremath{\rho}|\ensuremath{\alpha}〉$, where $|\ensuremath{\alpha}〉$ is a coherent state, are discussed from a unified point of view. Each of these quasiprobability distributions is examined as the expectation value of a Hermitian operator, as the weight function of an integral representation for the density operator and as the function associated with the density operator by one of the operator-function correspondences defined in the preceding paper. The weight function $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ of the
P representation is shown to be the expectation value of a Hermitian operator all of whose eigenvalues are infinite. The existence of the function $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ as an infinitely differentiable function is found to be equivalent to the existence of a well-defined antinormally ordered series expansion for the density operator in powers of the annihilation and creation operators
a and ${a}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}$. The Wigner distribution $W(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ is shown to be a continuous, uniformly bounded, square-integrable weight function for an integral expansion of the density operator and to be the function associated with the symmetrically ordered power-series expansion of the density operator. The function $〈\ensuremath{\alpha}|\ensuremath{\rho}|\ensuremath{\alpha}〉$, which is infinitely differentiable, corresponds to the normally ordered form of the density operator. Its use as a weight function in an integral expansion of the density operator is shown to involve singularities that are closely related to those which occur in the
P representation. A parametrized integral expansion of the density operator is introduced in which the weight function $W(\ensuremath{\alpha},s)$ may be identified with the weight function $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ of the
P representation, with the Wigner distribution $W(\ensuremath{\alpha})$, and with the function $〈\ensuremath{\alpha}|\ensuremath{\rho}|\ensuremath{\alpha}〉$ when the order parameter
s assumes the values $s=+1, 0, \ensuremath{-}1$, respectively. The function $W(\ensuremath{\alpha},s)$ is shown to be the expectation value of the ordered operator analog of the $\ensuremath{\delta}$ function defined in the preceding paper. This operator is in the trace class for
Res<0, has bounded eigenvalues for
Res=0, and has infinite eigenvalues for
s=1. Marked changes in the properties of the quasiprobability distribution $W(\ensuremath{\alpha},s)$ are exhibited as the order parameter
s is varied continuously from $s=\ensuremath{-}1$, corresponding to the function $〈\ensuremath{\alpha}|\ensuremath{\rho}|\ensuremath{\alpha}〉$, to
s=+1, corresponding to the function $P(\ensuremath{\alpha})$. Methods for constructing these functions and for using them to compute expectation values are presented and illustrated with several examples. One of these examples leads to a physical characterization of the density operators for which the
P representation is appropriate.
A relation of the Wigner quasiprobability to the Bargmann representation of pure and mixed states by convolution is derived and generalized to the main class of quasiprobabilities and its inversion is given. The derivation uses a realization of the abstract group SU (1,1) by second-order differentiation and multiplication operators for a pair of complex conjugated variables and disentanglement of exponential functions of these operators by group-theoretical methods. Examples for the calculation of the Wigner quasiprobability via the Bargmann representation of states demonstrate the action of this relation. A short collection of different basic representations of the Wigner quasiprobability is given. An appendix presents results for the disentanglement of SU (1,1)-group operators by products of special operators in different ordering.