QUANTUM TUNNELING DEBUNKED

Delája Schuppers

Published Oct 26, 2026• 0 citations

Abstract

QUANTUM TUNNELING DEBUNKED Author: Delája Schuppers Date: 26 October 2026 Framework: Uniphied Realativity Copyright: 4.0 CC International Abstract Modern quantum mechanics relies on the probabilistic Copenhagen interpretation to explain the crossing of a potential energy barrier by a particle, mathematically treated as an exponential decay of a non-physical wave function (\(\psi \)). This paper provides a deterministic, materialist alternative using the foundational axioms of Uniphied Realativity. We demonstrate that "quantum tunneling" is a conceptual artifact born from an incomplete understanding of ‘vacuum’ geometry. By modeling matter not as isolated, point-like entities but as localized, non-singular Möbius torus sinks embedded within a continuous, linear neutrino ether field (not a vacuum) pumped macroscopically by Sagittarius A*, the paper shows that the particle does not teleport or cheat energy conservation. Instead, the medium entering the barrier is structurally identical to the medium emerging from it. Quantum in and quantum out represent the exact same continuous field, rendering the magical interpretation of quantum tunneling fully debunked.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23680514

Related papers

What is Quantum Tunnelling: The Framework of Zulfia Mapping Z = η + ∆ : η meets ∆ (1973 Observable Magic Tunnelling to 2026 Information Tunnelling)

DR. ZULFIQAR ALI KHAN

AbstractThis work re-examines the 1973 concept of quantum tunnelling, historically described asa Magic Tunnelling phenomenon where a particle crosses a barrier without a physicalmechanism. In conventional quantum mechanics, tunnelling is treated as barrier penetrationprobability based on wave leakage, T ∼ e−2kL, without defining what tunnelling is.We introduce a conceptual framework for quantum tunnelling denoted as Z = η + ∆, calledZulfia Mapping. Here η is defined as the discrete, quantal state carrying invariant identityI(η), which cannot travel alone, while ∆ represents the continuous, contextual field of natureand barrier. Wave does not travel alone; it must hold the finger of η.In Z-language, we convert the magic concept into a real concept. Tunnelling is re-definednot as crossing the barrier, but as the formation of a new state Z via η + ∆ → Z, underidentity conservation I(T (η)) = I(η). Thus, the barrier is not an obstacle to be crossed,but a context to meet.Consequently, Z → η1, η2 provides a built-in origin for entanglement, and the observableend-state is defined as the MI Communication State ZM I = ηmessage + ∆channel. This marksthe transition from 1973 Magic Tunnelling to 2026 MI Tunnelling — from magicsafar to MI safari. This formalism provides a foundation for analysing information transferacross physical and natural systems

Aug 25, 20260 citations

QUANTUM TUNNELING RE-INTERPRETATION

Robert Bobo Ostojić

This work presents a structural reinterpretation of quantum tunneling based on stratified electron-field continuity. Potential barriers are described as suppression zones that selectively attenuate electron-field strata rather than blocking particles. Tunneling emerges as coherent field propagation across stratified layers, offering a deterministic and physically intuitive alternative to probabilistic transmission models.

Dec 30, 20250 citations

QUANTUM TUNNELING RE-INTERPRETATION

Robert Bobo Ostojić

Jan 1, 20250 citations

On the Submicroscopic Physics Underlying the Term “Quantum Tunnelling”

Volodymyr Krasnoholovets

This paper re-examines quantum tunnelling—the penetration of a potential barrier by a subatomic particle—through the lens of classical wave dynamics. The author contends that applying the standard Schrödinger equation to this phenomenon lacks a solid physical foundation, whereas a classical wave description inherently necessitates a propagation medium. This requirement provides further evidence for a discrete, submicroscopic spatial structure: the tessellattice. By treating space as a physical substrate rather than an empty vacuum, this study identifies the source of intrinsic noise in quantum systems as inertons—mass perturbations generated by the internal dynamics of the tessellattice. While current quantum technologies rely on extreme cryogenic cooling to suppress noise, this paper argues that the abstract mathematical framework of standard quantum mechanics cannot fundamentally account for these vacuum-based fluctuations. By treating the tessellattice as a dynamic substrate, this work establishes a novel physical basis for understanding and mitigating qubit decoherence, offering a concrete, structural alternative to conventional cryogenic noise-reduction strategies.

Quantum ReportsJul 8, 20260 citations

Interpretation of quantum mechanics

Benjamín de Zayas

The standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics relies on a set of historically established, ad hoc postulates to describe particle-wave duality, measurement, and non-locality. In this paper, we propose a single foundational axiom that fully reproduces the standard mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics while eliminating the need for supplementary assumptions. From this singular postulate, we rigorously derive the fundamental origin of the wave function and the mathematical generator of the Schrödinger equation. Furthermore, we demonstrate via isomorfism that all seemingly inexplicable quantum phenomena—including wave-function collapse and quantum entanglement—are mathematically and conceptually reducible to the underlying dynamics of the double-slit experiment. By establishing a direct fundamental correlation between the double-slit interference mechanism and the Monty Hall phenomenon, we prove that these effects are distinct manifestations of the exact same principle. We framed the double-slit experiment as an interference of the space of possibilities affected by information and simetrys. Ultimately, by anchoring the existing quantum mathematical framework to this unique axiom, this work provides a coherent, paradox-free ontological foundation that resolves the interpretational crisis of quantum mechanics without altering its empirical predictive power.

Oct 5, 20260 citations

Time Field Theory XIX: Quantum Tunneling from First Principles — Strict Separation of Electric-Phase Coupling and Mass-Phase Locking

Huowang Huang

This work is the nineteenth installment in the Time Field Theory (TFT) series, succeeding Time Field Theory XVIII: Entanglement, Common Phase Splitting, and the Local Interpretation of Bell Experiments. This work presents a fully transparent, first-principles physical framework with no black-box operations or uninterpreted postulates. All dynamical processes are derived deterministically from time-field axioms, with clear, traceable physical mechanisms at every step. Within the TFT framework, quantum tunneling is derived without reliance on conventional quantum mechanics or probabilistic interpretation. Two fundamental mechanisms are distinguished: (1) electric potential coupling responsible for phase modulation, interference, and tunneling attenuation; (2) mass/time-field gradient responsible for phase locking, measurement, and localization. Tunneling is interpreted as deterministic time-field splitting rather than probabilistic selection: a portion of the time-field oscillation is retained inside the barrier with real energy deposition, while the remainder transmits. The tunneling transmission coefficient is verified against experimental data and shows quantitative agreement. A 2025 observation of under-barrier recollision supports real interactions inside the barrier, consistent with TFT. This work contributes to the unification of gravity, special relativity, and quantum mechanics within a self-consistent, locally realistic, and fully transparent time-field dynamics framework.

Apr 26, 20260 citations