Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

An Exact Resource Analysis of USp(6)-Covariant Quantum Compression

Dustin Ogle

Published Sep 27, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This record gives an exact, machine-checked resource analysis of a specific USp(6) = Sp(3)-covariant quantum compression construction, and the reproducible certificates behind it. The carrier is W = V14 ⊕ V21 (dimension 35), the memory is the sixdimensional irreducible V6, the source is the balanced sector-mixed state with weights (1/28, 1/42), and the figure of merit is the Schumacher entanglement fidelity 𝜔. The construction and its coherent witness are inherited from the companion compression paper (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21744306), which certifies F*_effEB,V6 ≤ 1/100 < 1/40 < 39587/1382976 = 𝜔(witness): a coherent covariant channel through the six-dimensional memory beats every entanglement-breaking channel through that memory. Four results, each verified exactly over the rationals, answer one coherent question — what preserves the compression advantage in this symmetry-constrained construction: (1) Sector-dephasing benchmark. Removing all coherence between the two output sectors drops the fidelity from 39587/1382976 to the within-sector value 55/3528, which still exceeds the 1/100 entanglement-breaking upper bound; the certified advantage survives, and the coarse output-sector label is blind to the input. (2) Branch entanglement. The two normalized output-sector channels N14 and N21 (output sector restricted, input/reference kept full) are both completely positive, trace-preserving, and have a negative partial transpose; each retains reference entanglement, so neither is entanglement-breaking. (3) Branch replacement. Replacing one branch at a time by an entanglement-breaking channel, at fixed sector probabilities and through the same memory, keeps the V14 branch (M14, 𝜔 = 835/74088 > 1/100) above the bound while the V21-retaining channel (M21, 𝜔 = 263/49392 < 1/100) does not clear it; both complete channels remain NPT. (4) Entanglement-breaking comparator. An explicit admissible covariant entanglementbreaking channel through the same memory strictly outperforms M21, with 𝜔 = 1544075/288004752 > 263/49392 (exact margin 5261/144002376 > 0). This resolves the previously open comparison and brackets the entanglement-breaking optimum as 1544075/288004752 ≤ F*_effEB,V6 ≤ 1/100. The overall lesson is objective-specific: retaining reference entanglement and obtaining a task-specific quantum advantage are distinct here. Every claim is checked by an exact rational verifier (python-flint): Choi positivity and partial-transpose tests use the certificate’s own Gram metric, and the comparator’s score is confirmed by reconstructing the actual channel and re-evaluating the original objective. Scope and caveats: the results have been audited for correctness by an independent reviewer; this record does not claim comprehensive novelty relative to the existing literature on quantum-memory resource theories and operational benchmarks, nor establish journal suitability. Any connection to the author’s broader “Presence Hypothesis” program is

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22984773

Related papers

Exact Reduction and Machine-Verifiable Bounds for USp(4)-Covariant Quantum Compression

Dustin Ogle

We study the canonical USp(4)-covariant quantum compression problem in which the fifteen-dimensional carrier W = V5 ⊕ V10 is encoded through a four-dimensional covariant memory M = V4 and decoded, and we ask for the optimal entanglement fidelity F*(p) of the composite channel on a trace-one, sector-weighted reference state ρ_p. This problem is the operational face of a structural fact: the same pair of sectors 5 ⊕ 10 that makes USp(4) on C^4 state-homogeneous but not observable-uniform is exactly the modal content a minimal covariant memory is asked to carry. Our contribution is not a resolution of the underlying capacity question but a demonstration that this problem admits an exact reduction and a machine-checkable global bound: the reduction and the final lower- and upper-bound certificates are exact, while only the intermediate relaxation-solving step is numerical. We give an exact representation-theoretic reduction — Wedderburn splitting of the covariant commutant over Q(i), an induced-involution positivity bridge, and an exact trace-preservation reduction to fifteen free rational coordinates — turning F*(p) into a bilinear polynomial optimization over a product of two explicit semialgebraic bodies, each the affine preimage of the product cone (R+ × SOC4 × SOC4). Exploiting correlative sparsity we build an order-two sum-of-squares relaxation, solve it numerically for discovery, reconstruct the resulting SOS upper bounds in exact rational arithmetic, and separately certify exact rational feasible lower bounds from explicit witnesses. At p = 1/2 and p = 7/8: 0.0749 ≤ F*(1/2) ≤ 0.21, and 0.1546 ≤ F*(7/8) ≤ 0.643 (exact rationals in the paper). The upper bounds are Positivstellensatz certificates whose polynomial identity and positive semidefiniteness are verified with no optimizer in the loop by a standalone verifier we provide. Throughout we keep three visibly separate registers — exact theorems, numerical diagnostics, and open or conditional interpretations — and we are explicit that the exact optimum, the exactness of the relaxation, and the width of the certified interval remain open. Package: this record includes the manuscript, a single 30-page combined archival PDF (cover + manuscript + auditable reduction-supplement listing) inside the package, and a verification package with two independent machine-checkable obligations (the exact reduction chain and the certified two-sided enclosure). Manuscript licensed CC BY 4.0; code licensed MIT.

•Jul 30, 2026•1 citation

Exact Reduction and a Machine-Verifiable First-Tower-Step Separation for USp(6)-Covariant Quantum Compression

Dustin Ogle

This is the successor to the USp(4) result (doi:10.5281/zenodo.21694560) in the Satyalogos operational-integration program, extending it to the first nontrivial rank step of the symplectic tower, USp(6) = Sp(3). In the USp(6) = Sp(3) covariant compression model the carrier is W = V14 ⊕ V21 = sl(6) (dimension 35), encoded through a six-dimensional covariant memory M = V6 and decoded. Working entirely over the Gaussian rationals Q(i), we reduce the effective-channel physical- and PPT-positivity cones to seven Hermitian isotypic blocks by exact Gram-dual congruence, identify the correct 36-dimensional real metric-Hermitian outer span, certify a coherent lower witness by exact construction, and certify an outer-PPT upper bound by an exact rational sum-of-Hermitian-squares dual whose defining identity holds with zero residual. The result is the exact chain F*_effEB,V6 ≤ F*_outerPPT,36 ≤ 1/100 < 1/40 < 39587/1382976 ≤ F*_coh(Sp3), so a specific coherent covariant channel strictly outperforms every entanglement-breaking effective channel through the six-dimensional memory V6. Two standalone verifiers — one dependency-free (Python standard library only), one a full reconstruction — recheck the certificates with no optimizer and no floating point in the proof path; both return ALL PASS. Three registers are kept visibly separate: [T] exact theorem, [N] numerical diagnostic, [O] open/conditional. The exact optima, the tightness of the 1/100 bound, and any general Sp(n) or capacity interpretation remain open. The Sp(2) and Sp(3) objectives are analogous covariant functionals — shown distinct by an exact normalization-bridge computation — so the tower correspondence is structural rather than one identical functional carried up the tower. The attached bundle contains the manuscript, both verifiers, the exact-rational datasets, run scripts, and SHA-256 manifests for full reproducibility.

•Aug 1, 2026•1 citation

Sector-Overlap Scores for Covariant Channels

Dustin Ogle

A completely positive channel N that is covariant for a group G acting on a carrier W = ⊕_s V_s (pairwise inequivalent irreducibles) admits two natural bilinear read-outs of its sector structure: a "realign reading" A_phys[s,t] = Tr[P_s N(P_t)]/d_s, the channel's coefficient matrix on the sector algebra, and a "no-realign reading" A_ext[s,t] = (1/d_s) sum_{a,A} <a|P_s N(|a><A|) P_t|A>, a score. We prove three things. First, covariance forces N(P_t) to be block-scalar, so A_phys is the coefficient matrix c_{st} in N(P_t) = sum_s c_{st} P_s (Schur's lemma). Second, the score is the Gram matrix of the channel's sector-overlap vectors, A_ext[s,t] = (1/d_s) <w_s, w_t> with w_s = (Tr[P_s K_k])_k; hence its diagonal is a manifest sum of squares (nonnegative for any channel) and D·beta is Hermitian positive semidefinite in the sector-trace metric D = diag(d_s), where beta = A_ext. Third, the score equals the sector-return diagonal, A_ext = diag(A_phys), if and only if two independent conditions hold: (I) the overlap vectors of distinct sectors are orthogonal, and (II) within each sector a trace/Frobenius balance sum_k |Tr K_k^{(ss)}|^2 = sum_k ||K_k^{(ss)}||_F^2. Condition (II) has a Schumacher entanglement-fidelity reading: the maximally-mixed entanglement fidelity of the sector-s diagonal sub-channel equals A_phys[s,s]/d_s. We call channels meeting (I)+(II) sector-return. A specific Sp(3) = USp(6)-covariant channel on the 35-dimensional sl(6) adjoint (split 14 + 21) is sector-return exactly, while generic covariant channels — the identity among them — are not; in the correct metric its diagonal sub-channels are scalar-unital and sit exactly at the (II)-balance, and a numerical spectral pass from exact-rational operators resolves them as Hermitian positive semidefinite of Choi rank D^2 = 36 (D = 6 the memory dimension), with dimension-indexed spectra whose leading eigenvalue is the sector-return coefficient. We close with the open problem this sharpens: whether covariant compression through a finite memory (a D-dimensional auxiliary memory, not a minimal Stinespring environment) forces sector-return.

•Sep 11, 2026•0 citations

Quantum limits and one-qubit advantage in optical predictive compression

Zixuan He

What should an optical memory retain when only a limited amount of source information can be kept? This paper gives the complete quantum information frontier for a fixed Gaussian source and relevance channel, and identifies when a single retained qubit preserves correlations that every classical record loses. It also turns that advantage into a concrete test of whether received light belongs to its stored source preparation. The physical experiment and the complete frontier A fixed Gaussian state on \(A\) is prepared with its actual purifier \(C\). A normal encoder acts on \(C\) to produce memory \(M\), while a prescribed Gaussian channel maps \(A\) to the relevant optical output \(B\). The source-information cost and useful correlation are \(r=I(A:M)\) and \(v=I(B:M)\), respectively. All logarithms are natural. The paper determines \[ C_{\mathrm Q}(R)=\sup_{\mathcal N:\,I(A:M)\le R}I(B:M). \] For every fixed faithful finite-mode Gaussian source and finite-mode Gaussian relevance channel, optimization over arbitrary normal quantum encoders reduces to Gaussian supporting values and a mixture of at most two Gaussian branches. The branch flag is physically retained. The unrestricted frontier is a supremum with no imposed memory dimension or memory-energy cap; an explicit finite approximation gives an error uniform in the information budget. Hard finite-dimensional implementations are treated separately. Why one qubit can preserve the leading low-brightness information For a thermal source with mean photon number \(n\) and a thermal attenuator with transmissivity \(0<\eta<1\), write the output occupation as \(\eta n+b\), where \(b\ge0\) is the environment's added thermal occupation. With \(g(x)=(x+1)\log(x+1)-x\log x\), the exact optimum over all normal classical records is \[ C_{\mathrm{cl}}(n,R)=g(\eta n+b)-g(\eta u_R+b),\qquad u_R=g^{-1}\!\bigl(\max\{g(n)-R,0\}\bigr). \] A legal encoder applies vacuum loss with transmissivity \(\lambda\) to the purifier and then coherently retains two levels, resetting the entire higher-photon tail. For fixed \(b>0\) and \(0<\lambda<1/2\), at the common budget \(R_n=g(n)+g(\lambda n)-g((1-\lambda)n)\), its actual relevance satisfies \[ v_2=\frac{\eta\lambda}{1+b}\,n\log(1/n)+O(n),\qquad C_{\mathrm{cl}}(n,R_n)=2\lambda\eta\log(1+1/b)\,n+O\!\left(\frac{n}{\log(1/n)}\right). \] The full optical tail is included in the resource accounting. At \(n=0.01\), \(\eta=b=0.5\), \(\lambda=0.2\) and \(R=0.023875\), the certified predictive-mutual-information advantage exceeds 85%. The leading correlation is quantified by memory-side discord and can survive when the final output–memory state is separable. The vacuum-environment endpoint is evaluated separately for the same encoder. A same-resource correlation decision The receiver distinguishes matched source pairs from independent systems with identical marginals. For \(k\) uses, the retained predictive memory obeys \(\dim K_k\le2^k\) and \(I(A^k:K_k)\le kR\), including all retained flags. Both competitors may make arbitrary joint binary measurements on the received optical modes and their retained memory. The received modes are common observation access, outside the predictive-memory cap. Let \(\alpha_k\) be the missed-correlation probability and \(\beta_k\) the false-match probability. For every classical block encoder, even with an unrestricted classical alphabet, the fixed-error converse is \[ \alpha_k\le\epsilon\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \beta_k\ge\exp\!\left[-\frac{k c_nR+\log2}{1-\epsilon}\right],\qquad c_n=\eta\frac{\log(1+1/(\eta n+b))}{\log(1+1/n)}. \] At the finite parameters above and \(\epsilon=0.1\), the product-qubit encoder achieves an asymptotic false-match exponent of 0.0049 nats per pair, whereas every classical block strategy has exponent below 0.003138386231. This uses one qubit per source pair and identical measurement permissions. It is an asymptotic discrimination guarantee, distinct from the 85% single-copy information comparison; it specifies neither a finite-sample threshold nor a laboratory receiver circuit. The integrated paper contains the complete proofs, resource accounting and figures. The exact thermal classical comparator, the finite-memory construction and the block-testing connection have explicit proof dependencies separate from the general Gaussian-frontier reduction.

•Oct 25, 2026•0 citations

A certified lower bound on the quantum-capacity threshold of the depolarizing channel

Artus Krohn-Grimberghe

The noise threshold below which the qubit depolarizing channel retains positive quantum capacity has been studied since 1996. The classic constructions come with exact finite formulae, but in every reported threshold to date -- most recently the record of Agarwal et al. -- the final step, the sign of the coherent information at the reported point, is a floating-point evaluation. We give the first exact-arithmetic, independently machine-checkable positivity proofs in this regime: an explicit 45-copy rank-two input state $A$, published as a 1,472-byte witness, with certified $I_c > 0$ at the exact rational $p = 16239/250000 = 0.064956$ (per-Pauli convention; total error rate $3p = 0.194868$) -- beyond both the best value printed in the Agarwal et al. paper ($0.064657$) and the strongest state in the same authors' public repository ($\approx 0.064911$), both numerical. Because the depolarizing family is a semigroup under composition, fixed-input coherent information is nonincreasing in $p$ on $[0,1/4]$, so a single certified point extends to the entire interval below it. The same machinery confines the positivity boundaries of $A$ and of the strongest public state of Agarwal et al. to disjoint rational intervals separated by more than $1/25000$ -- to our knowledge the first proven ordering of the positivity boundaries of two explicit competing code states. Every computational claim in the paper reduces to a finite list of big-integer comparisons, checkable by a dependency-free few-hundred-line verifier whose soundness rests on three self-contained half-page lemmas. Payloads, certificates, and verifier accompany the paper as a supplementary artifact.

quant-pharXiv:2608.15870•Aug 18, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Source Completions and Memory Environment Tradeoffs

Jeremy Rodgers

How much internal quantum memory is needed to reproduce a stationary stochastic process, and how does reducing that memory change the environmental resources required when output records are retained? This paper establishes exact quantum-source constructions and resource bounds under explicitly specified readout and retained-output conditions. A general completion theorem identifies the minimum Hilbert-space dimension for stationary triple data in the orthogonal-current-symbol source class: it equals the sum of the complex positive-semidefinite ranks of the middle-symbol slices. An attaining construction reproduces the entire canonical stationary order-two process. For the delayed trine process, the minimum classical hidden Markov model requires nine states at every non-independent parameter value. Quantum instruments reproduce the same complete output law using four-dimensional memory throughout the parameter range, with four dimensions proved necessary in a certified low-noise regime and three dimensions both sufficient and necessary on an explicit high-noise interval. The paper then separates reusable memory dimension from environmental dilation cost. On the certified high-noise interval, the exact one-step Pareto frontier consists of a three-dimensional source with recorded-channel Choi rank nine and a four-dimensional source with rank three. Here, Choi rank measures the minimum initially pure environmental remainder dimension for the channel retaining both the emitted classical symbol and final quantum memory. A separate mixed-support qutrit construction at noise parameter 0.99 improves complete-history costs and gives upper bounds close to universal lower bounds. These results show why optimizing a single step need not optimize a retained multi-step history. The analysis also distinguishes complete channels, fixed-input states and archive-only outputs, and demonstrates how access to a retained reference can distinguish generators with identical passive output statistics. Full-word proofs, algebraic complete-positivity certificates, a technical companion and reproducibility materials accompany the results. The exact intermediate memory boundary and complete-history optimum remain open. All results use standard quantum probabilities and apply to the stated operational resource models; they do not establish total hardware, energy or thermodynamic minima.

•Oct 28, 2026•0 citations
This record gives an exact, machine-checked resource analysis of a specific USp(6) = Sp(3)-covariant quantum compression construction, and the reproducible certificates behind it. The carrier is W = V14 ⊕ V21 (dimension 35), the memory is the sixdimensional irreducible V6, the source is the balanced sector-mixed state with weights (1/28, 1/42), and the figure of merit is the Schumacher entanglement fidelity 𝜔. The construction and its coherent witness are inherited from the companion compression paper (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21744306), which certifies F_effEB,V6 ≤ 1/100 < 1/40 < 39587/1382976 = 𝜔(witness): a coherent covariant channel through the six-dimensional memory beats every entanglement-breaking channel through that memory. Four results, each verified exactly over the rationals, answer one coherent question — what preserves the compression advantage in this symmetry-constrained construction: (1) Sector-dephasing benchmark. Removing all coherence between the two output sectors drops the fidelity from 39587/1382976 to the within-sector value 55/3528, which still exceeds the 1/100 entanglement-breaking upper bound; the certified advantage survives, and the coarse output-sector label is blind to the input. (2) Branch entanglement. The two normalized output-sector channels N14 and N21 (output sector restricted, input/reference kept full) are both completely positive, trace-preserving, and have a negative partial transpose; each retains reference entanglement, so neither is entanglement-breaking. (3) Branch replacement. Replacing one branch at a time by an entanglement-breaking channel, at fixed sector probabilities and through the same memory, keeps the V14 branch (M14, 𝜔 = 835/74088 > 1/100) above the bound while the V21-retaining channel (M21, 𝜔 = 263/49392 < 1/100) does not clear it; both complete channels remain NPT. (4) Entanglement-breaking comparator. An explicit admissible covariant entanglementbreaking channel through the same memory strictly outperforms M21, with 𝜔 = 1544075/288004752 > 263/49392 (exact margin 5261/144002376 > 0). This resolves the previously open comparison and brackets the entanglement-breaking optimum as 1544075/288004752 ≤ F_effEB,V6 ≤ 1/100. The overall lesson is objective-specific: retaining reference entanglement and obtaining a task-specific quantum advantage are distinct here. Every claim is checked by an exact rational verifier (python-flint): Choi positivity and partial-transpose tests use the certificate’s own Gram metric, and the comparator’s score is confirmed by reconstructing the actual channel and re-evaluating the original objective. Scope and caveats: the results have been audited for correctness by an independent reviewer; this record does not claim comprehensive novelty relative to the existing literature on quantum-memory resource theories and operational benchmarks, nor establish journal suitability. Any connection to the author’s broader “Presence Hypothesis” program is
We study the canonical USp(4)-covariant quantum compression problem in which the fifteen-dimensional carrier W = V5 ⊕ V10 is encoded through a four-dimensional covariant memory M = V4 and decoded, and we ask for the optimal entanglement fidelity F*(p) of the composite channel on a trace-one, sector-weighted reference state ρ_p. This problem is the operational face of a structural fact: the same pair of sectors 5 ⊕ 10 that makes USp(4) on C^4 state-homogeneous but not observable-uniform is exactly the modal content a minimal covariant memory is asked to carry. Our contribution is not a resolution of the underlying capacity question but a demonstration that this problem admits an exact reduction and a machine-checkable global bound: the reduction and the final lower- and upper-bound certificates are exact, while only the intermediate relaxation-solving step is numerical. We give an exact representation-theoretic reduction — Wedderburn splitting of the covariant commutant over Q(i), an induced-involution positivity bridge, and an exact trace-preservation reduction to fifteen free rational coordinates — turning F*(p) into a bilinear polynomial optimization over a product of two explicit semialgebraic bodies, each the affine preimage of the product cone (R+ × SOC4 × SOC4). Exploiting correlative sparsity we build an order-two sum-of-squares relaxation, solve it numerically for discovery, reconstruct the resulting SOS upper bounds in exact rational arithmetic, and separately certify exact rational feasible lower bounds from explicit witnesses. At p = 1/2 and p = 7/8: 0.0749 ≤ F*(1/2) ≤ 0.21, and 0.1546 ≤ F*(7/8) ≤ 0.643 (exact rationals in the paper). The upper bounds are Positivstellensatz certificates whose polynomial identity and positive semidefiniteness are verified with no optimizer in the loop by a standalone verifier we provide. Throughout we keep three visibly separate registers — exact theorems, numerical diagnostics, and open or conditional interpretations — and we are explicit that the exact optimum, the exactness of the relaxation, and the width of the certified interval remain open. Package: this record includes the manuscript, a single 30-page combined archival PDF (cover + manuscript + auditable reduction-supplement listing) inside the package, and a verification package with two independent machine-checkable obligations (the exact reduction chain and the certified two-sided enclosure). Manuscript licensed CC BY 4.0; code licensed MIT.
This is the successor to the USp(4) result (doi:10.5281/zenodo.21694560) in the Satyalogos operational-integration program, extending it to the first nontrivial rank step of the symplectic tower, USp(6) = Sp(3). In the USp(6) = Sp(3) covariant compression model the carrier is W = V14 ⊕ V21 = sl(6) (dimension 35), encoded through a six-dimensional covariant memory M = V6 and decoded. Working entirely over the Gaussian rationals Q(i), we reduce the effective-channel physical- and PPT-positivity cones to seven Hermitian isotypic blocks by exact Gram-dual congruence, identify the correct 36-dimensional real metric-Hermitian outer span, certify a coherent lower witness by exact construction, and certify an outer-PPT upper bound by an exact rational sum-of-Hermitian-squares dual whose defining identity holds with zero residual. The result is the exact chain F*_effEB,V6 ≤ F*_outerPPT,36 ≤ 1/100 < 1/40 < 39587/1382976 ≤ F*_coh(Sp3), so a specific coherent covariant channel strictly outperforms every entanglement-breaking effective channel through the six-dimensional memory V6. Two standalone verifiers — one dependency-free (Python standard library only), one a full reconstruction — recheck the certificates with no optimizer and no floating point in the proof path; both return ALL PASS. Three registers are kept visibly separate: [T] exact theorem, [N] numerical diagnostic, [O] open/conditional. The exact optima, the tightness of the 1/100 bound, and any general Sp(n) or capacity interpretation remain open. The Sp(2) and Sp(3) objectives are analogous covariant functionals — shown distinct by an exact normalization-bridge computation — so the tower correspondence is structural rather than one identical functional carried up the tower. The attached bundle contains the manuscript, both verifiers, the exact-rational datasets, run scripts, and SHA-256 manifests for full reproducibility.
A completely positive channel N that is covariant for a group G acting on a carrier W = ⊕_s V_s (pairwise inequivalent irreducibles) admits two natural bilinear read-outs of its sector structure: a "realign reading" A_phys[s,t] = Tr[P_s N(P_t)]/d_s, the channel's coefficient matrix on the sector algebra, and a "no-realign reading" A_ext[s,t] = (1/d_s) sum_{a,A} <a|P_s N(|a><A|) P_t|A>, a score. We prove three things. First, covariance forces N(P_t) to be block-scalar, so A_phys is the coefficient matrix c_{st} in N(P_t) = sum_s c_{st} P_s (Schur's lemma). Second, the score is the Gram matrix of the channel's sector-overlap vectors, A_ext[s,t] = (1/d_s) <w_s, w_t> with w_s = (Tr[P_s K_k])_k; hence its diagonal is a manifest sum of squares (nonnegative for any channel) and D·beta is Hermitian positive semidefinite in the sector-trace metric D = diag(d_s), where beta = A_ext. Third, the score equals the sector-return diagonal, A_ext = diag(A_phys), if and only if two independent conditions hold: (I) the overlap vectors of distinct sectors are orthogonal, and (II) within each sector a trace/Frobenius balance sum_k |Tr K_k^{(ss)}|^2 = sum_k ||K_k^{(ss)}||_F^2. Condition (II) has a Schumacher entanglement-fidelity reading: the maximally-mixed entanglement fidelity of the sector-s diagonal sub-channel equals A_phys[s,s]/d_s. We call channels meeting (I)+(II) sector-return. A specific Sp(3) = USp(6)-covariant channel on the 35-dimensional sl(6) adjoint (split 14 + 21) is sector-return exactly, while generic covariant channels — the identity among them — are not; in the correct metric its diagonal sub-channels are scalar-unital and sit exactly at the (II)-balance, and a numerical spectral pass from exact-rational operators resolves them as Hermitian positive semidefinite of Choi rank D^2 = 36 (D = 6 the memory dimension), with dimension-indexed spectra whose leading eigenvalue is the sector-return coefficient. We close with the open problem this sharpens: whether covariant compression through a finite memory (a D-dimensional auxiliary memory, not a minimal Stinespring environment) forces sector-return.
What should an optical memory retain when only a limited amount of source information can be kept? This paper gives the complete quantum information frontier for a fixed Gaussian source and relevance channel, and identifies when a single retained qubit preserves correlations that every classical record loses. It also turns that advantage into a concrete test of whether received light belongs to its stored source preparation. The physical experiment and the complete frontier A fixed Gaussian state on AAA is prepared with its actual purifier CCC. A normal encoder acts on CCC to produce memory MMM, while a prescribed Gaussian channel maps AAA to the relevant optical output BBB. The source-information cost and useful correlation are r=I(A:M)r=I(A:M)r=I(A:M) and v=I(B:M)v=I(B:M)v=I(B:M), respectively. All logarithms are natural. The paper determines CQ(R)=sup⁡N: I(A:M)≤RI(B:M). C_{\mathrm Q}(R)=\sup_{\mathcal N:\,I(A:M)\le R}I(B:M). CQ​(R)=supN:I(A:M)≤R​I(B:M). For every fixed faithful finite-mode Gaussian source and finite-mode Gaussian relevance channel, optimization over arbitrary normal quantum encoders reduces to Gaussian supporting values and a mixture of at most two Gaussian branches. The branch flag is physically retained. The unrestricted frontier is a supremum with no imposed memory dimension or memory-energy cap; an explicit finite approximation gives an error uniform in the information budget. Hard finite-dimensional implementations are treated separately. Why one qubit can preserve the leading low-brightness information For a thermal source with mean photon number nnn and a thermal attenuator with transmissivity 0<η<10<\eta<10<η<1, write the output occupation as ηn+b\eta n+bηn+b, where b≥0b\ge0b≥0 is the environment's added thermal occupation. With g(x)=(x+1)log⁡(x+1)−xlog⁡xg(x)=(x+1)\log(x+1)-x\log xg(x)=(x+1)log(x+1)−xlogx, the exact optimum over all normal classical records is Ccl(n,R)=g(ηn+b)−g(ηuR+b),uR=g−1 ⁣(max⁡{g(n)−R,0}). C_{\mathrm{cl}}(n,R)=g(\eta n+b)-g(\eta u_R+b),\qquad u_R=g^{-1}\!\bigl(\max\{g(n)-R,0\}\bigr). Ccl​(n,R)=g(ηn+b)−g(ηuR​+b),uR​=g−1(max{g(n)−R,0}). A legal encoder applies vacuum loss with transmissivity λ\lambdaλ to the purifier and then coherently retains two levels, resetting the entire higher-photon tail. For fixed b>0b>0b>0 and 0<λ<1/20<\lambda<1/20<λ<1/2, at the common budget Rn=g(n)+g(λn)−g((1−λ)n)R_n=g(n)+g(\lambda n)-g((1-\lambda)n)Rn​=g(n)+g(λn)−g((1−λ)n), its actual relevance satisfies v2=ηλ1+b nlog⁡(1/n)+O(n),Ccl(n,Rn)=2ληlog⁡(1+1/b) n+O ⁣(nlog⁡(1/n)). v_2=\frac{\eta\lambda}{1+b}\,n\log(1/n)+O(n),\qquad C_{\mathrm{cl}}(n,R_n)=2\lambda\eta\log(1+1/b)\,n+O\!\left(\frac{n}{\log(1/n)}\right). v2​=1+bηλ​nlog(1/n)+O(n),Ccl​(n,Rn​)=2ληlog(1+1/b)n+O(log(1/n)n​). The full optical tail is included in the resource accounting. At n=0.01n=0.01n=0.01, η=b=0.5\eta=b=0.5η=b=0.5, λ=0.2\lambda=0.2λ=0.2 and R=0.023875R=0.023875R=0.023875, the certified predictive-mutual-information advantage exceeds 85%. The leading correlation is quantified by memory-side discord and can survive when the final output–memory state is separable. The vacuum-environment endpoint is evaluated separately for the same encoder. A same-resource correlation decision The receiver distinguishes matched source pairs from independent systems with identical marginals. For kkk uses, the retained predictive memory obeys dim⁡Kk≤2k\dim K_k\le2^kdimKk​≤2k and I(Ak:Kk)≤kRI(A^k:K_k)\le kRI(Ak:Kk​)≤kR, including all retained flags. Both competitors may make arbitrary joint binary measurements on the received optical modes and their retained memory. The received modes are common observation access, outside the predictive-memory cap. Let αk\alpha_kαk​ be the missed-correlation probability and βk\beta_kβk​ the false-match probability. For every classical block encoder, even with an unrestricted classical alphabet, the fixed-error converse is αk≤ϵ⟹βk≥exp⁡ ⁣[−kcnR+log⁡21−ϵ],cn=ηlog⁡(1+1/(ηn+b))log⁡(1+1/n). \alpha_k\le\epsilon\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \beta_k\ge\exp\!\left[-\frac{k c_nR+\log2}{1-\epsilon}\right],\qquad c_n=\eta\frac{\log(1+1/(\eta n+b))}{\log(1+1/n)}. αk​≤ϵ⟹βk​≥exp[−1−ϵkcn​R+log2​],cn​=ηlog(1+1/n)log(1+1/(ηn+b))​. At the finite parameters above and ϵ=0.1\epsilon=0.1ϵ=0.1, the product-qubit encoder achieves an asymptotic false-match exponent of 0.0049 nats per pair, whereas every classical block strategy has exponent below 0.003138386231. This uses one qubit per source pair and identical measurement permissions. It is an asymptotic discrimination guarantee, distinct from the 85% single-copy information comparison; it specifies neither a finite-sample threshold nor a laboratory receiver circuit. The integrated paper contains the complete proofs, resource accounting and figures. The exact thermal classical comparator, the finite-memory construction and the block-testing connection have explicit proof dependencies separate from the general Gaussian-frontier reduction.
The noise threshold below which the qubit depolarizing channel retains positive quantum capacity has been studied since 1996. The classic constructions come with exact finite formulae, but in every reported threshold to date -- most recently the record of Agarwal et al. -- the final step, the sign of the coherent information at the reported point, is a floating-point evaluation. We give the first exact-arithmetic, independently machine-checkable positivity proofs in this regime: an explicit 45-copy rank-two input state AAA, published as a 1,472-byte witness, with certified Ic>0I_c > 0Ic​>0 at the exact rational p=16239/250000=0.064956p = 16239/250000 = 0.064956p=16239/250000=0.064956 (per-Pauli convention; total error rate 3p=0.1948683p = 0.1948683p=0.194868) -- beyond both the best value printed in the Agarwal et al. paper (0.0646570.0646570.064657) and the strongest state in the same authors' public repository (≈0.064911\approx 0.064911≈0.064911), both numerical. Because the depolarizing family is a semigroup under composition, fixed-input coherent information is nonincreasing in ppp on [0,1/4][0,1/4][0,1/4], so a single certified point extends to the entire interval below it. The same machinery confines the positivity boundaries of AAA and of the strongest public state of Agarwal et al. to disjoint rational intervals separated by more than 1/250001/250001/25000 -- to our knowledge the first proven ordering of the positivity boundaries of two explicit competing code states. Every computational claim in the paper reduces to a finite list of big-integer comparisons, checkable by a dependency-free few-hundred-line verifier whose soundness rests on three self-contained half-page lemmas. Payloads, certificates, and verifier accompany the paper as a supplementary artifact.
How much internal quantum memory is needed to reproduce a stationary stochastic process, and how does reducing that memory change the environmental resources required when output records are retained? This paper establishes exact quantum-source constructions and resource bounds under explicitly specified readout and retained-output conditions. A general completion theorem identifies the minimum Hilbert-space dimension for stationary triple data in the orthogonal-current-symbol source class: it equals the sum of the complex positive-semidefinite ranks of the middle-symbol slices. An attaining construction reproduces the entire canonical stationary order-two process. For the delayed trine process, the minimum classical hidden Markov model requires nine states at every non-independent parameter value. Quantum instruments reproduce the same complete output law using four-dimensional memory throughout the parameter range, with four dimensions proved necessary in a certified low-noise regime and three dimensions both sufficient and necessary on an explicit high-noise interval. The paper then separates reusable memory dimension from environmental dilation cost. On the certified high-noise interval, the exact one-step Pareto frontier consists of a three-dimensional source with recorded-channel Choi rank nine and a four-dimensional source with rank three. Here, Choi rank measures the minimum initially pure environmental remainder dimension for the channel retaining both the emitted classical symbol and final quantum memory. A separate mixed-support qutrit construction at noise parameter 0.99 improves complete-history costs and gives upper bounds close to universal lower bounds. These results show why optimizing a single step need not optimize a retained multi-step history. The analysis also distinguishes complete channels, fixed-input states and archive-only outputs, and demonstrates how access to a retained reference can distinguish generators with identical passive output statistics. Full-word proofs, algebraic complete-positivity certificates, a technical companion and reproducibility materials accompany the results. The exact intermediate memory boundary and complete-history optimum remain open. All results use standard quantum probabilities and apply to the stated operational resource models; they do not establish total hardware, energy or thermodynamic minima.