A section–square law for Pauli quadrics, and an independently regenerated proof that the four-qubit elliptic quadric has contextuality degree 315
Brent W. Jonah
Abstract
We prove, computer-assisted, that every elliptic quadric Q−(7,2) of the four-qubit symplectic polar space W(7,2) has contextuality degree 315. Hence d(W(7,2)) = 1575, closing the published bracket 1071 ≤ d ≤ 1575 (Muller et al., J. Phys. A 58 (2025) 215302), and every five-qubit hyperbolic quadric has d(Q+(9,2)) = 6975. These results settle the first open problem of Li, Gupta and Ganesh (arXiv:2610.26465) and answer their question whether d(Q+(9,2)) = 4743 in the negative. The optimal assignments of Q−(7,2) (391,680 gauge classes), W(7,2) (1,175,040) and Q+(9,2) (2,350,080) each form a single orbit of the symmetry group. For the hyperbolic quadric Q+(7,2), the degree 315 and the 240 optimal classes (one orbit) were first proved by Li, Gupta and Ganesh; our independent count agrees. The note also proves a section–square law: for a quadric Q of the n-qubit space and a point d off it, the completion problem of a section carrier on Q ∩ d⊥ ≅ W(2n−3,2) is governed by the anticommutator action of the (n−1)-qubit carrier operator on the exterior square (elliptic Q) or symmetric square (hyperbolic Q), with spectrum {(μi + μj)/2}. At four qubits this explains the two tight carriers of Q−(7,2): the Hoggar carrier (spectrum {21, −3^7}; its optimal completions are exactly the 144 sign vectors of one eigenspace) and a second carrier with characteristic polynomial (t+3)^5 (t^3 − 15t^2 − 117t + 579). The proof is regenerated here with new code in intrinsic three-qubit coordinates, and every input is shipped. The package contains the exhaustive census program (C), 42 exact lower-bound certificates checked by integer Bareiss elimination, a standard-library Python verifier that rebuilds the Pauli algebra from 2×2 matrices (ALL CHECKS PASS in seconds; 13 single-input mutations rejected), the classification programs, every run record, and the report of an independent re-implementation (a separate AI agent writing its own code from the definitions) that reproduced the census, every completion minimum and all 42 certificates. A proof log for the census step (LRAT, checked with the formally verified checker cake_lpr) was produced separately and is not part of this record. Computer-assisted; not formally verified; not peer reviewed. Computations and drafting were carried out with an AI assistant (Claude, Anthropic) under the author's direction.