Quantum computing poses distinct risks to blockchain security: Shor’s algorithm threatens signatures associated with exposed public keys, while Grover’s algorithm reduces the security margin of hash-based mechanisms. This systematic mapping study examines quantum-resistant blockchain defenses and the evidence supporting their practical use. A total of 387 peer-reviewed primary studies published between 2018 and 2026 were identified through IEEE Xplore, the MDPI journal collection, and citation searching, and classified by contribution type and evidence maturity. The findings show that post-quantum cryptographic constructions dominate the literature (56.1%), followed by quantum-native designs (26.6%) and hybrid migration approaches (13.7%). Despite substantial research on these defenses, only 16.0% of the studies report real-platform laboratory experiments, and 1.3% reach public-testnet evaluation. Hybrid migration studies demonstrate greater progress toward platform-level evaluation than other defense categories, but practical validation remains limited. These findings highlight the gap between proposed quantum-resistant mechanisms and their evaluation under realistic blockchain conditions, emphasizing the need for reproducible system-level testing and migration strategies addressing interoperability, governance, and operational continuity.
Quantum computing poses distinct risks to blockchain security: Shor’s algorithm threatens signatures associated with exposed public keys, while Grover’s algorithm reduces the security margin of hash-based mechanisms. This systematic mapping study examines quantum-resistant blockchain defenses and the evidence supporting their practical use. A total of 387 peer-reviewed primary studies published between 2018 and 2026 were identified through IEEE Xplore, the MDPI journal collection, and citation searching, and classified by contribution type and evidence maturity. The findings show that post-quantum cryptographic constructions dominate the literature (56.1%), followed by quantum-native designs (26.6%) and hybrid migration approaches (13.7%). Despite substantial research on these defenses, only 16.0% of the studies report real-platform laboratory experiments, and 1.3% reach public-testnet evaluation. Hybrid migration studies demonstrate greater progress toward platform-level evaluation than other defense categories, but practical validation remains limited. These findings highlight the gap between proposed quantum-resistant mechanisms and their evaluation under realistic blockchain conditions, emphasizing the need for reproducible system-level testing and migration strategies addressing interoperability, governance, and operational continuity.
This paper examines the growing threat that quantum computing presents to blockchain security. Core blockchain cryptographic frameworks, specifically the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm and the Secure Hash Algorithm 256, are vulnerable to quantum algorithms. Both the Shor algorithm and the Grover algorithm are capable of breaking the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm, enabling attackers to calculate private keys from public keys, while the Grover algorithm can also compromise hash-based systems that depend on brute-force methods, such as Proof-of-Work. On-chain analysis indicates that billions of dollars’ worth of crypto-assets are held in addresses susceptible to these quantum attacks. A proposed countermeasure is migration to Post-Quantum Cryptography, which incorporates quantum-resistant algorithms, such as CRYSTALS-Dilithium and Falcon. However, this migration introduces a trilemma among network security, decentralization, and performance. Post-Quantum Cryptography algorithms significantly increase transaction sizes and computational costs, which pose economic and technical challenges for large blockchain networks. The paper further discusses how the timeline for quantum advancements will be shaped by geopolitical competition, and how the catch-the-crop, decrypt-later strategy puts current data at risk from future quantum decryption. It emphasizes that active migration to Post-Quantum Cryptography is urgent, calling on stakeholders to prioritize system audits, transition to cryptographically flexible infrastructures, promote research into quantum-resistant solutions, and establish governance frameworks that enable prompt and decentralized upgrades.
The advent of Quantum Computing (QC) poses significant threats to the cryptographic foundations of Blockchain (BC) systems, as quantum algorithms like Shor’s and Grover’s undermine the security of public-key cryptography and hash functions. This research conducts a comprehensive risk assessment of quantum vulnerabilities across critical BC components, including consensus mechanisms, smart contracts, and digital wallets. Leveraging the STRIDE threat modeling framework, we analyze threat vectors specific to QC, identifying key areas most susceptible to quantum-enabled attacks, such as private key compromise, consensus disruptions, and smart contract integrity risks. Our contributions provide actionable mitigation strategies, including a detailed security blueprint for quantum resilience, encompassing the integration of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) and the adoption of quantum-resistant hash functions. We offer implementation best practices, focusing on key management, secure coding, and network security to strengthen BC components against quantum threats. To mitigate the risk of QC during transition from classical to quantum-resistant BCs, we present two hybrid BC architectures. As part of a comprehensive quantum resilience strategy, these architectures facilitate a secure and scalable migration by integrating platform-specific adaptations that balance security, adaptability, and operational efficiency. Our analysis extends to major BC platforms, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin, and Zcash, providing platform-specific vulnerability assessments and highlighting unique weaknesses in the quantum era. By identifying vulnerabilities, developing proactive defense strategies, and adopting a structured hybrid migration approach, this research equips BC stakeholders with a robust framework to achieve long-term quantum resilience. Finally, we explore challenges and research directions for integrating emerging technologies, including quantum machine learning, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Web3, with BC systems, and discuss new threats that may arise from this convergence in the QC era.
Quantum computing poses a significant threat to blockchain systems that rely on elliptic curve cryptography and other classical security mechanisms. Algorithms such as Shor’s and Grover’s can weaken or completely break the cryptographic foundations of current blockchain networks, exposing them to risks including private key recovery, transaction forgery, consensus manipulation, and harvest-now-decrypt-later attacks. This paper presents a systems framework for designing quantum-resilient blockchains by integrating post-quantum cryptographic standards, threat modeling, architectural redesign, governance mechanisms, and migration planning. The study evaluates major post-quantum cryptographic primitives, assesses their suitability for blockchain environments, and proposes a layered architecture grounded in crypto-agility, defense-in-depth, and forward secrecy. A structured migration strategy is also introduced to support the transition of existing blockchain networks toward post-quantum security while maintaining operational continuity and stakeholder trust. The framework provides practical guidance for researchers, developers, and policymakers preparing blockchain ecosystems for the post-quantum era.
Quantum computers pose a significant threat to blockchain technology’s security, which heavily relies on public-key cryptography and hash functions. The cryptographic algorithms used in blockchains, based on large odd prime numbers and discrete logarithms, can be easily compromised by quantum computing algorithms like Shor’s algorithm and its future qubit variations. This survey paper comprehensively examines the impact of quantum computers on blockchain security and explores potential mitigation strategies. The survey focuses on the quantum security of blockchain’s fundamental building blocks, including digital signatures, hash functions, consensus algorithms, and smart contracts. We analyze the vulnerabilities introduced by quantum computers and discuss potential countermeasures and enhancements to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of blockchain systems. Furthermore, we investigate the quantum attack surface of blockchains, identifying potential avenues for exploiting quantum computing to strengthen existing attacks. We emphasize the need for developing quantum-resistant defenses and explore solutions for mitigating the threat of quantum computers to blockchains, including the adoption of quantum and post-quantum blockchain architectures. The paper also discusses the limitations of current efforts, such as the computational overhead of post-quantum algorithms and the practical challenges in real-world deployment, illustrated through case studies of Bitcoin and Ethereum. Future research directions include developing scalable quantum-resistant blockchain protocols, optimizing cryptographic implementations for embedded devices, and establishing standardized security frameworks to mitigate emerging quantum attacks.
With the advent of quantum computing, cryptocurrencies that rely on blockchain technology face mounting cryptographic vulnerabilities. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review evaluating how quantum algorithms—specifically Shor’s and Grover’s—could disrupt the foundational security mechanisms of cryptocurrencies. Shor’s algorithm poses a threat to public-key cryptographic schemes by enabling efficient factorization and discrete logarithm solving, thereby endangering digital signature systems. Grover’s algorithm undermines hash-based functions, increasing the feasibility of 51% attacks and hash collisions. By examining the internal mechanisms of major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Monero, and Zcash, this review identifies specific vulnerabilities in transaction and consensus processes. It further analyses the current hardware limitations of quantum systems and estimates when such attacks could become feasible. In anticipation, it investigates countermeasures including Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), and protocol-level modifications such as memory-intensive proof-of-work algorithms and multi-signature schemes. The discussion integrates recent advancements in quantum error correction, hardware scalability, and NIST-standardized cryptographic algorithms. This review concludes that while quantum computers are not yet advanced enough to pose an immediate threat, proactive integration of quantum-resistant solutions is essential. The findings underscore the urgent need for cryptocurrencies to adopt post-quantum cryptographic standards to preserve the decentralized trust, integrity, and security that define blockchain-based digital cryptocurrencies.
Amid breakthroughs in quantum computing, blockchain systems are experiencing a dual-track evolution characterized by threats from quantum attacks and empowerment through quantum technologies. Traditional blockchain architectures, which rely on public-private key cryptography and hash functions, face systemic risks to core functions such as transaction integrity verification and consensus security when exposed to quantum attacks. This paper systematically analyzes and compares two distinct technical approaches in the field of quantum-secure blockchain: post-quantum blockchain and quantum blockchain. The former enhances existing systems by integrating post-quantum cryptographic algorithms to resist quantum threats, aiming for a smooth transition from current architectures. The latter reconstructs distributed ledger technology based on quantum information properties such as entanglement, forming novel architectures involving quantum key distribution networks, quantum digital signatures, and quantum consensus algorithms. The feasibility and development potential of these approaches are examined in application scenarios such as industrial IoT. A comparative analysis is conducted on their technical constraints and implementation challenges from the perspectives of transaction efficiency, security model validation, and standardization maturity. This lays a foundation for future empirical research. Finally, potential development paths are discussed, and targeted research directions such as diversified migration and dynamic hybrid strategies are proposed to guide further studies.