Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Structure of the Schrödinger Dynamics

Kazuo Takatsuka

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-92-1910-0

Related papers

Hamiltonian Structure of the Schrödinger Classical Dynamical System

Massimo Tessarotto, M. Mond, Davide Batic

Foundations of Physics•May 19, 2016•14 citations

Schrödinger Equation From Coherent Persistence

Flip Boer

This paper derives Schrödinger evolution as a structural consequence of coherent persistence rather than as a postulate of quantum mechanics. Starting from minimal requirements for viable propagation—linearity, norm preservation, and continuity—we show that admissible evolution must be unitary and generated by a self-adjoint operator. The resulting Schrödinger equation describes reversible propagation within the space of viable states, while irreversible selection arises separately from the return operation. This separation clarifies the relation between unitary dynamics and measurement without introducing collapse mechanisms or stochastic dynamics. Schrödinger evolution thus emerges as the unique form of continuous, coherence-preserving propagation compatible with structural closure and return, completing the dynamical layer of the Structural Coherence framework.

•Feb 6, 2026•0 citations

Quantum dynamics: The Schroedinger equation

Advanced series in mathematical physics•Nov 1, 2005•0 citations

Hamiltonian Dynamics and the Schrodinger Equation

Leon Bess

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Jul 1, 1974•5 citations

Towards a Schrödinger–Type Dynamics from the Projective Dynamic Logo (PDL) A Relational Sketch Linking Coherence Cycles, Active Surfaces, and Effective Potentials

Cédric Laubscher

Preliminary sketch extending the Projective Dynamic Logo (PDL) framework toward an effective Schrödinger-type dynamics. The electron is modeled as a minimal $(4,6)$ signed graph and the proton as a hierarchical structure with valence cores, active surface, and relational sea. A discrete position toy model and a flux ansatz are used to motivate Laplacian-like kinetic and Coulomb-like potential terms, and to show that the structurally defined fine-structure constant $\alpha_{\mathrm{PDL}}$ is compatible with hydrogenic phenomenology. The work is programmatic and emphasises modelling assumptions and consistency checks rather than a full derivation of quantum dynamics.

•Feb 12, 2026•0 citations

Classical dynamics and the Schrödinger theory

Benjamin Liebowitz

Il Nuovo Cimento•Oct 1, 1965•1 citation
This paper derives Schrödinger evolution as a structural consequence of coherent persistence rather than as a postulate of quantum mechanics. Starting from minimal requirements for viable propagation—linearity, norm preservation, and continuity—we show that admissible evolution must be unitary and generated by a self-adjoint operator. The resulting Schrödinger equation describes reversible propagation within the space of viable states, while irreversible selection arises separately from the return operation. This separation clarifies the relation between unitary dynamics and measurement without introducing collapse mechanisms or stochastic dynamics. Schrödinger evolution thus emerges as the unique form of continuous, coherence-preserving propagation compatible with structural closure and return, completing the dynamical layer of the Structural Coherence framework.
Preliminary sketch extending the Projective Dynamic Logo (PDL) framework toward an effective Schrödinger-type dynamics. The electron is modeled as a minimal (4,6)(4,6)(4,6) signed graph and the proton as a hierarchical structure with valence cores, active surface, and relational sea. A discrete position toy model and a flux ansatz are used to motivate Laplacian-like kinetic and Coulomb-like potential terms, and to show that the structurally defined fine-structure constant αPDL\alpha_{\mathrm{PDL}}αPDL​ is compatible with hydrogenic phenomenology. The work is programmatic and emphasises modelling assumptions and consistency checks rather than a full derivation of quantum dynamics.