Circuit Design Problems in Binary Polynomial Quantum Optimization

Solving combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum computers mainly relies on their quadratic unconstrained binary formulation. Lately, binary polynomial formulations start to take the center stage, having a better scaling with respect to the number of used qubits. However, while quadratic forms are straightforward to implement on quantum circuits, polynomial forms of degree $d$ incur in circuit depth overheads, due to the lack of $d$ -qubit gates, for $d\geq 3$ , on current hardware. In this paper, we study the problem of designing the shallowest quantum circuit for a given polynomial form. We formulate it as a classical binary linear problem and we prove the \textsf{NP}-completeness of a variant of it. On the algorithmic side, we offer a scalable and performant heuristic method to tackle it, Tempura, as well as faster binary linear problem formulations, which offer computational feasibility while sacrificing optimality. Our performance evaluation shows that the algorithms yield far shorter circuits than the state-of-the-art approaches, and Tempura is mostly comparable with them in terms of runtime.Solving combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum computers mainly relies on their quadratic unconstrained binary formulation. Lately, binary polynomial formulations start to take the center stage, having a better scaling with respect to the number of used qubits. However, while quadratic forms are straightforward to implement on quantum circuits, polynomial forms of degree $d$ incur in circuit depth overheads, due to the lack of $d$-qubit gates, for $d\geq 3$, on current hardware. In this paper, we study the problem of designing the shallowest quantum circuit for a given polynomial form. We formulate it as a classical binary linear problem and we prove the \textsf{NP}-completeness of a variant of it. On the algorithmic side, we offer a scalable and performant heuristic method to tackle it, Tempura, as well as faster binary linear problem formulations, which offer computational feasibility while sacrificing optimality. Our performance evaluation shows that the algorithms yield far shorter circuits than the state-of-the-art approaches, and Tempura is mostly comparable with them in terms of runtime.

quant-pharXiv:2610.13283Oct 12, 20260 citations

Optimizing Variational Circuits for Higher-Order Binary Optimization

Zoé Verchère, Sourour Elloumi, Andrea Simonetto

Variational quantum algorithms have been advo-cated as promising candidates to solve combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum computers. Their methodology involves transforming the optimization problem into a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem. While this transformation offers flexibility and a ready-to-implement circuit involving only two-qubit gates, it has been shown to be less than optimal in the number of employed qubits and circuit depth, especially for polynomial optimization. On the other hand, strategies based on higher-order binary optimization (HOBO) could save qubits, but they would introduce additional circuit layers, given the presence of higher-than-two-qubit gates. In this paper, we study HOBO problems and propose new approaches to encode their Hamiltonian into a ready-to-implement circuit involving only two-qubit gates. Our methodology relies on formulating the circuit design as a combinatorial optimization problem, in which we seek to minimize circuit depth. We also propose handy simplifications and heuristics that can solve the circuit design problem in polynomial time. We evaluate our approaches by comparing them with the state of the art, showcasing clear gains in terms of circuit depth.Variational quantum algorithms have been advo-cated as promising candidates to solve combinatorial optimization problems on near-term quantum computers. Their methodology involves transforming the optimization problem into a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem. While this transformation offers flexibility and a ready-to-implement circuit involving only two-qubit gates, it has been shown to be less than optimal in the number of employed qubits and circuit depth, especially for polynomial optimization. On the other hand, strategies based on higher-order binary optimization (HOBO) could save qubits, but they would introduce additional circuit layers, given the presence of higher-than-two-qubit gates. In this paper, we study HOBO problems and propose new approaches to encode their Hamiltonian into a ready-to-implement circuit involving only two-qubit gates. Our methodology relies on formulating the circuit design as a combinatorial optimization problem, in which we seek to minimize circuit depth. We also propose handy simplifications and heuristics that can solve the circuit design problem in polynomial time. We evaluate our approaches by comparing them with the state of the art, showcasing clear gains in terms of circuit depth.

arXiv:2307.16756IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)Sep 17, 20236 citations

Towards large-scale quantum optimization solvers with few qubits

Marco Sciorilli, Lucas Borges, Taylor L. Patti +4 more

Quantum computers hold the promise of more efficient combinatorial optimization solvers, which could be game-changing for a broad range of applications. However, a bottleneck for materializing such advantages is that, in order to challenge classical algorithms in practice, mainstream approaches require a number of qubits prohibitively large for near-term hardware. Here we introduce a variational solver for MaxCut problems over $m={{\mathcal{O}}}({n}^{k})$ binary variables using only n qubits, with tunable k > 1. The number of parameters and circuit depth display mild linear and sublinear scalings in m, respectively. Moreover, we analytically prove that the specific qubit-efficient encoding brings in a super-polynomial mitigation of barren plateaus as a built-in feature. Altogether, this leads to high quantum-solver performances. For instance, for m = 7000, numerical simulations produce solutions competitive in quality with state-of-the-art classical solvers. In turn, for m = 2000, experiments with n = 17 trapped-ion qubits feature MaxCut approximation ratios estimated to be beyond the hardness threshold 0.941. Our findings offer an interesting heuristics for quantum-inspired solvers as well as a promising route towards solving commercially-relevant problems on near-term quantum devices. Combinatorial optimization problems might be solvable more efficiently with quantum computing, but near-term quantum optimization solvers are limited in qubit size. Here, the authors propose and demonstrate a variational quantum algorithm that polynomially reduces the qubit overhead for applications like MaxCut.Quantum computers hold the promise of more efficient combinatorial optimization solvers, which could be game-changing for a broad range of applications. However, a bottleneck for materializing such advantages is that, in order to challenge classical algorithms in practice, mainstream approaches require a number of qubits prohibitively large for near-term hardware. Here we introduce a variational solver for MaxCut problems over $$m={{\mathcal{O}}}({n}^{k})$$ binary variables using only n qubits, with tunable k > 1. The number of parameters and circuit depth display mild linear and sublinear scalings in m, respectively. Moreover, we analytically prove that the specific qubit-efficient encoding brings in a super-polynomial mitigation of barren plateaus as a built-in feature. Altogether, this leads to high quantum-solver performances. For instance, for m = 7000, numerical simulations produce solutions competitive in quality with state-of-the-art classical solvers. In turn, for m = 2000, experiments with n = 17 trapped-ion qubits feature MaxCut approximation ratios estimated to be beyond the hardness threshold 0.941. Our findings offer an interesting heuristics for quantum-inspired solvers as well as a promising route towards solving commercially-relevant problems on near-term quantum devices. Combinatorial optimization problems might be solvable more efficiently with quantum computing, but near-term quantum optimization solvers are limited in qubit size. Here, the authors propose and demonstrate a variational quantum algorithm that polynomially reduces the qubit overhead for applications like MaxCut.

arXiv:2401.09421Nature CommunicationsJan 8, 202547 citations

Boosting quantum annealing performance through direct polynomial unconstrained binary optimization

Sebastian Nagies, Kevin T. Geier, Javed Akram +3 more

Abstract Quantum annealing aims at solving optimization problems of practical relevance using quantum-computing hardware. Problems of interest are typically formulated in terms of quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) Hamiltonians. However, many optimization problems are much more naturally formulated in terms of polynomial unconstrained binary optimization (PUBO) functions of higher order. As we show with various problem examples, leveraging the PUBO formulation can bring considerable savings in terms of required number of qubits. Moreover, in numerical benchmarks for the paradigmatic 3-SAT problem, we find scenarios where the scaling of the minimum energy gap during the optimization sweep differs significantly, suggesting the possibility of an exponentially faster annealing time when using the PUBO as compared to the QUBO formulation. This advantage persists even when considering the overhead caused by the higher-order interactions necessary for PUBO cost Hamiltonians. As an interesting side effect, the analysis on minimum energy gaps of different 3-SAT instance generators reveals different degrees of hardness, which will be of interest also for classical benchmark calculations. Our findings show a promising path to improving the resource efficiency and sweeping speed of quantum annealing protocols on both analog and digital platforms, which are important prerequisites when aiming at solving larger optimization problems with relevance to industry.Abstract Quantum annealing aims at solving optimization problems of practical relevance using quantum-computing hardware. Problems of interest are typically formulated in terms of quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) Hamiltonians. However, many optimization problems are much more naturally formulated in terms of polynomial unconstrained binary optimization (PUBO) functions of higher order. As we show with various problem examples, leveraging the PUBO formulation can bring considerable savings in terms of required number of qubits. Moreover, in numerical benchmarks for the paradigmatic 3-SAT problem, we find scenarios where the scaling of the minimum energy gap during the optimization sweep differs significantly, suggesting the possibility of an exponentially faster annealing time when using the PUBO as compared to the QUBO formulation. This advantage persists even when considering the overhead caused by the higher-order interactions necessary for PUBO cost Hamiltonians. As an interesting side effect, the analysis on minimum energy gaps of different 3-SAT instance generators reveals different degrees of hardness, which will be of interest also for classical benchmark calculations. Our findings show a promising path to improving the resource efficiency and sweeping speed of quantum annealing protocols on both analog and digital platforms, which are important prerequisites when aiming at solving larger optimization problems with relevance to industry.

arXiv:2412.04398Quantum Science and TechnologyApr 9, 20254 citations

Enhancing Quantum Algorithms for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization via Integer Programming

Friedrich Wagner, Jonas Nüßlein, Frauke Liers

To date, research in quantum computation promises potential for outperforming classical heuristics in combinatorial optimization. However, when aiming at provable optimality, one has to rely on classical exact methods like integer programming. State-of-the-art integer programming algorithms can compute strong relaxation bounds even for hard instances, but may have to enumerate a large number of subproblems for determining an optimum solution. If the potential of quantum computing is realized, it can be expected that in particular finding high-quality solutions for hard problems can be done fast. Still, near-future quantum hardware considerably limits the size of treatable problems. In this work, we go one step into integrating the potentials of quantum and classical techniques for combinatorial optimization. We propose a hybrid heuristic for the weighted maximum-cut problem and for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization. The heuristic employs a linear programming relaxation, rendering it well-suited for integration into exact branch-and-cut algorithms. For large instances, we reduce the problem size according to a linear relaxation such that the reduced problem can be handled by quantum machines of limited size. Moreover, we improve the applicability of depth-1 QAOA, a parameterized quantum algorithm, by deriving a parameter estimate for arbitrary instances. We present numerous computational results from real quantum hardware.To date, research in quantum computation promises potential for outperforming classical heuristics in combinatorial optimization. However, when aiming at provable optimality, one has to rely on classical exact methods like integer programming. State-of-the-art integer programming algorithms can compute strong relaxation bounds even for hard instances, but may have to enumerate a large number of subproblems for determining an optimum solution. If the potential of quantum computing is realized, it can be expected that in particular finding high-quality solutions for hard problems can be done fast. Still, near-future quantum hardware considerably limits the size of treatable problems. In this work, we go one step into integrating the potentials of quantum and classical techniques for combinatorial optimization. We propose a hybrid heuristic for the weighted maximum-cut problem and for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization. The heuristic employs a linear programming relaxation, rendering it well-suited for integration into exact branch-and-cut algorithms. For large instances, we reduce the problem size according to a linear relaxation such that the reduced problem can be handled by quantum machines of limited size. Moreover, we improve the applicability of depth-1 QAOA, a parameterized quantum algorithm, by deriving a parameter estimate for arbitrary instances. We present numerous computational results from real quantum hardware.

arXiv:2302.05493ACM Transactions on Quantum ComputingJan 13, 20252 citations

Polynomial Reduction Methods and their Impact on QAOA Circuits

Lukas Schmidbauer, Karen Wintersperger, Elisabeth Lobe +1 more

Abstraction layers are of paramount importance in software architecture, as they shield the higher-level formulation of payload computations from lower-level details. Since quantum computing (QC) introduces many such details that are often unaccustomed to computer scientists, an obvious desideratum is to devise appropriate abstraction layers for QC. For discrete optimisation, one such abstraction is to cast problems in quadratic unconstrained binary optimisation (QUBO) form, which is amenable to a variety of quantum approaches. However, different mathematically equivalent forms can lead to different behaviour on quantum hardware, ranging from ease of mapping onto qubits to performance scalability. In this work, we show how using higher-order problem formulations (that provide better expressivity in modelling optimisation tasks than plain QUBO formulations) and their automatic transformation into QUBO form can be used to leverage such differences to prioritise between different desired non-functional properties for quantum optimisation. Based on a practically relevant use-case and a graph-theoretic analysis, we evaluate how different transformation approaches influence widely used quantum performance metrics (circuit depth, gates count, gate distribution, qubit scaling), and also consider the classical computational efforts required to perform the transformations, as they influence possibilities for achieving future quantum advantage. Furthermore, we establish more general properties and invariants of the transformation methods. Our quantitative study shows that the approach allows us to satisfy different trade-offs, and suggests various possibilities for the future construction of general-purpose abstractions and automatic generation of useful quantum circuits from high-level problem descriptions.Abstraction layers are of paramount importance in software architecture, as they shield the higher-level formulation of payload computations from lower-level details. Since quantum computing (QC) introduces many such details that are often unaccustomed to computer scientists, an obvious desideratum is to devise appropriate abstraction layers for QC. For discrete optimisation, one such abstraction is to cast problems in quadratic unconstrained binary optimisation (QUBO) form, which is amenable to a variety of quantum approaches. However, different mathematically equivalent forms can lead to different behaviour on quantum hardware, ranging from ease of mapping onto qubits to performance scalability. In this work, we show how using higher-order problem formulations (that provide better expressivity in modelling optimisation tasks than plain QUBO formulations) and their automatic transformation into QUBO form can be used to leverage such differences to prioritise between different desired non-functional properties for quantum optimisation. Based on a practically relevant use-case and a graph-theoretic analysis, we evaluate how different transformation approaches influence widely used quantum performance metrics (circuit depth, gates count, gate distribution, qubit scaling), and also consider the classical computational efforts required to perform the transformations, as they influence possibilities for achieving future quantum advantage. Furthermore, we establish more general properties and invariants of the transformation methods. Our quantitative study shows that the approach allows us to satisfy different trade-offs, and suggests various possibilities for the future construction of general-purpose abstractions and automatic generation of useful quantum circuits from high-level problem descriptions.

arXiv:2406.08889IEEE International Conference on Quantum Software (QSW)Jul 7, 202412 citations

d

incur in circuit depth overheads, due to the lack of

d

-qubit gates, for

d\geq 3

, on current hardware. In this paper, we study the problem of designing the shallowest quantum circuit for a given polynomial form. We formulate it as a classical binary linear problem and we prove the \textsf{NP}-completeness of a variant of it. On the algorithmic side, we offer a scalable and performant heuristic method to tackle it, Tempura, as well as faster binary linear problem formulations, which offer computational feasibility while sacrificing optimality. Our performance evaluation shows that the algorithms yield far shorter circuits than the state-of-the-art approaches, and Tempura is mostly comparable with them in terms of runtime.

m={{\mathcal{O}}}({n}^{k})

binary variables using only n qubits, with tunable k > 1. The number of parameters and circuit depth display mild linear and sublinear scalings in m, respectively. Moreover, we analytically prove that the specific qubit-efficient encoding brings in a super-polynomial mitigation of barren plateaus as a built-in feature. Altogether, this leads to high quantum-solver performances. For instance, for m = 7000, numerical simulations produce solutions competitive in quality with state-of-the-art classical solvers. In turn, for m = 2000, experiments with n = 17 trapped-ion qubits feature MaxCut approximation ratios estimated to be beyond the hardness threshold 0.941. Our findings offer an interesting heuristics for quantum-inspired solvers as well as a promising route towards solving commercially-relevant problems on near-term quantum devices. Combinatorial optimization problems might be solvable more efficiently with quantum computing, but near-term quantum optimization solvers are limited in qubit size. Here, the authors propose and demonstrate a variational quantum algorithm that polynomially reduces the qubit overhead for applications like MaxCut.