Replication Package and Codebase: A Tight Lower Bound on Generalization in Quantum Machine Learning via Dynamical Lie Algebra Dimension
Ayad Alhusseiny
Abstract
Orbit dimension, not parameter count, bounds quantum sample complexity. For continuous parameterized quantum circuits on $n$ qubits, the minimax estimation risk obeys \[ \mathcal{R}(d_{\mathrm{eff}}, M) \;\geq\; \Omega\!\left(\sqrt{\frac{d_{\mathrm{eff}}}{M}}\right), \] where $d_{\mathrm{eff}} = \dim(\mathcal{O}_O)$ is the real dimension of the observable's adjoint orbit under the dynamical Lie group. For balanced Pauli observables $O = Z^{\otimes n}$, quotienting the dynamical Lie algebra by the stabilizer subgroup yields the complex Grassmannian $Gr(2^{n-1}, 2^n)$ of real dimension $d_{\mathrm{eff}} = 2^{2n-1} = \frac{1}{2}4^n \approx \frac{1}{2}\dim(\mathfrak{g})$, which matches upper bounds of Caro et al.~(2022) and Ohno~(2025) up to a universal constant and resolves the exact tightness rate $\Theta(\sqrt{\dim(\mathfrak{g})/M})$. For rank-1 projective observables, the orbit contracts instead to complex projective space $\mathbb{CP}^{2^n-1}$ with dimension $d_{\mathrm{eff}} = 2(2^n-1)$. Sample requirements therefore explode exponentially with qubit count. The scaling identifies Wang \& Wu's (2025) dimension-independent $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{M})$ uniform convergence bound as an artifact of uniform stability rather than true estimation power. PennyLane benchmarks across $n=1,2,3,4$ qubits confirm this exponential threshold. Barren plateaus and statistical sample bottlenecks stem from an identical geometric origin: volume growth in $SU(2^n)$ simultaneously suppresses gradient variances as $\sim 1/\dim(\mathfrak{g})$ and drives sample complexity up to $\sim \sqrt{\dim(\mathfrak{g})/M}$.