Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Topological Quantum Machine Learning on a Majorana Zero-Mode Processor for Non-Rigid MRI-to-Ultrasound Surface Registration and Fusion: Finite-Mathematics Formulations and Statistical Verifiability

Cartik Sharma

Published Oct 16, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.13140/rg.2.2.10625.01128

Related papers

Braid Group Representations, Modular Data, and the Classification of Majorana Zero Mode Fusion Rules in 2D Topological Superconductors

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

We investigate whether the braid group representation on $N$ anyons uniquely determines the modular data ($S$ and $T$ matrices) of a non-Abelian topological order, and whether this framework classifies all fusion rules for Majorana zero modes (MZMs) in 2D topological superconductors. We show that the local $N$-anyon braid group representation constrains the modular data up to finite gauge ambiguity but does not uniquely fix the global $S$-matrix without specifying the underlying spin structure. For MZMs, the braid generators satisfy the Ising anyon $R$-matrix with the asymptotic Hecke relation $\sigma_i^2 = 1$ (up to phase), which rigidly fixes the local $F$ and $R$ symbols of the Ising category. Consequently, the fusion rules are strictly of Ising type ($\sigma \times \sigma = 1 + \psi$), precluding alternative non-Abelian fusion rules. The $T$-matrix is determined by topological spins, but the full $S$-matrix depends on the spin structure of the underlying manifold, reflecting the super-modular structure of the theory. ## 1. Introduction Topological quantum computation exploits the non-Abelian statistics of anyons—quasiparticle excitations in two-dimensional systems whose braiding operations are represented by non-commuting unitary matrices on a degenerate ground-state manifold [1]. A central question is whether the local braiding data of $N$ anyons suffices to reconstruct the full modular data of the underlying topological order (TO), or whether additional global information is required. This question has direct physical consequences for 2D topological superconductors (TSCs) hosting Majorana zero modes (MZMs), where the anyonic excitations are vortices binding MZMs and the fermionic quasiparticle is a transparent (local) fermion [2,3]. The modular data of a TO consists of the $S$-matrix, which encodes the mutual braiding statistics of anyons, and the $T$-matrix, which encodes the topological spins. Together, these matrices form a projective representation of t

•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations

Quantum algorithm for topological and geometric analysis of data

Seth Lloyd, Paolo Zanardi A, Silvano Garnerone

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2015•3 citations

Braid Group Representations, Modular Data, and the Classification of Majorana Zero Mode Fusion Rules in 2D Topological Superconductors

Rowan Brad Quni-Gudzinas

Majorana zero modes (MZMs) localized on vortices of a two-dimensional topological superconductor carry a projective representation of the braid group, and the associated anyon theory is encoded in a modular tensor category whose fusion rules and modular data ($S$ and $T$ matrices) determine the topological order. We address two questions: whether the braid group representation on $N$ anyons uniquely determines the modular data of the underlying non-Abelian topological order, and whether a representation-theoretic framework can classify all possible fusion rules for MZMs in 2D topological superconductors. We develop a classification pipeline that (i) fixes the local MZM algebra as the Clifford algebra generated by $2n$ Majorana operators, (ii) imposes the pentagon and hexagon coherence equations on candidate braided fusion structures, and (iii) filters candidates by modular-data consistency conditions, including the Verlinde formula and Frobenius–Schur indicators. As a fully worked example we compute, with explicit arithmetic, the modular $S$ matrix and total quantum dimension for the Ising-type theory relevant to chiral $p$-wave superconductors, obtaining $\mathcal{D} = 2$ and verifying unitarity of $S$ to machine precision. We then analyze metaplectic categories $SO(N)_2$, which generalize the Ising/MZM fusion pattern, and show how Property F (finiteness of braid images) constrains the classification. We argue that the framework classifies MZM fusion rules up to gauging and extension operations, but that non-semisimple and non-unitary candidates escape the semisimple machinery; we state falsification criteria and open problems. ## 1. Introduction A two-dimensional topological superconductor (2D TSC) supports vortices that bind Majorana zero modes (MZMs): self-adjoint fermionic operators $\gamma_i = \gamma_i^\dagger$ obeying the Clifford algebra $\{\gamma_i,\gamma_j\} = 2\delta_{ij}$. Exchanging vortices $i$ and $j$ acts on the ground-state manifold by the operato Full text and updates: papers.qnfo.org/papers/braid-group-representations-modular-data-and-the-classification-of-majo-5099abb8/

•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Topological Quantum Computing for Engineers

Srinjoy Ganguly, Shalini Devendrababu, Hasan Mustafa +2 more

Communications in computer and information science•Dec 26, 2024•0 citations

Milestones toward Majorana-based quantum computing: Fusion rule detection and topological qubit validation

Ryan V. Mishmash, David Aasen, Michael Hell +8 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 14, 2016•0 citations

Microsoft Claims First Topological Qubit via Majorana Zero Modes for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Microsoft claims first topological qubit using Majorana zero modes in a nanowire device, enabling fault-tolerant quantum computing. | MATH: Majorana zero modes satisfy non-Abelian braiding statistics: \( \gamma_i^\dagger = \gamma_i \), \( \{\gamma_i, \gamma_j\} = 2\delta_{ij} \). Braid group \( B_n \) generators \( \sigma_i \) act on ground state degeneracy \( 2^{n/2} \). Topological qubit encoded in parity \( P = i\gamma_1\gamma_2 \). | CONNECTION: Braiding matrices correspond to Fibonacci anyons with golden ratio \( \phi = 1.618 \) fusion rules: \( \tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau \), dimension \( d_\tau = \phi \). Lattice structure: Kitaev honeycomb model with \( \mathbb{Z}_2 \) gauge fields. | DEPTH: 8 — if verified, enables inherently error-corrected qubits; mathematical structure tied to modular tensor categories and quantum groups at roots of unity (e.g., \( q = e^{i\pi/5} \)). Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 13, 2026•0 citations
We investigate whether the braid group representation on NNN anyons uniquely determines the modular data (SSS and TTT matrices) of a non-Abelian topological order, and whether this framework classifies all fusion rules for Majorana zero modes (MZMs) in 2D topological superconductors. We show that the local NNN-anyon braid group representation constrains the modular data up to finite gauge ambiguity but does not uniquely fix the global SSS-matrix without specifying the underlying spin structure. For MZMs, the braid generators satisfy the Ising anyon RRR-matrix with the asymptotic Hecke relation σi2=1\sigma_i^2 = 1σi2​=1 (up to phase), which rigidly fixes the local FFF and RRR symbols of the Ising category. Consequently, the fusion rules are strictly of Ising type (σ×σ=1+ψ\sigma \times \sigma = 1 + \psiσ×σ=1+ψ), precluding alternative non-Abelian fusion rules. The TTT-matrix is determined by topological spins, but the full SSS-matrix depends on the spin structure of the underlying manifold, reflecting the super-modular structure of the theory. ## 1. Introduction Topological quantum computation exploits the non-Abelian statistics of anyons—quasiparticle excitations in two-dimensional systems whose braiding operations are represented by non-commuting unitary matrices on a degenerate ground-state manifold [1]. A central question is whether the local braiding data of NNN anyons suffices to reconstruct the full modular data of the underlying topological order (TO), or whether additional global information is required. This question has direct physical consequences for 2D topological superconductors (TSCs) hosting Majorana zero modes (MZMs), where the anyonic excitations are vortices binding MZMs and the fermionic quasiparticle is a transparent (local) fermion [2,3]. The modular data of a TO consists of the SSS-matrix, which encodes the mutual braiding statistics of anyons, and the TTT-matrix, which encodes the topological spins. Together, these matrices form a projective representation of t
Majorana zero modes (MZMs) localized on vortices of a two-dimensional topological superconductor carry a projective representation of the braid group, and the associated anyon theory is encoded in a modular tensor category whose fusion rules and modular data (SSS and TTT matrices) determine the topological order. We address two questions: whether the braid group representation on NNN anyons uniquely determines the modular data of the underlying non-Abelian topological order, and whether a representation-theoretic framework can classify all possible fusion rules for MZMs in 2D topological superconductors. We develop a classification pipeline that (i) fixes the local MZM algebra as the Clifford algebra generated by 2n2n2n Majorana operators, (ii) imposes the pentagon and hexagon coherence equations on candidate braided fusion structures, and (iii) filters candidates by modular-data consistency conditions, including the Verlinde formula and Frobenius–Schur indicators. As a fully worked example we compute, with explicit arithmetic, the modular SSS matrix and total quantum dimension for the Ising-type theory relevant to chiral ppp-wave superconductors, obtaining D=2\mathcal{D} = 2D=2 and verifying unitarity of SSS to machine precision. We then analyze metaplectic categories SO(N)2SO(N)_2SO(N)2​, which generalize the Ising/MZM fusion pattern, and show how Property F (finiteness of braid images) constrains the classification. We argue that the framework classifies MZM fusion rules up to gauging and extension operations, but that non-semisimple and non-unitary candidates escape the semisimple machinery; we state falsification criteria and open problems. ## 1. Introduction A two-dimensional topological superconductor (2D TSC) supports vortices that bind Majorana zero modes (MZMs): self-adjoint fermionic operators γi=γi†\gamma_i = \gamma_i^\daggerγi​=γi†​ obeying the Clifford algebra {γi,γj}=2δij\{\gamma_i,\gamma_j\} = 2\delta_{ij}{γi​,γj​}=2δij​. Exchanging vortices iii and jjj acts on the ground-state manifold by the operato Full text and updates: papers.qnfo.org/papers/braid-group-representations-modular-data-and-the-classification-of-majo-5099abb8/
FINDING: Microsoft claims first topological qubit using Majorana zero modes in a nanowire device, enabling fault-tolerant quantum computing. | MATH: Majorana zero modes satisfy non-Abelian braiding statistics: γi†=γi \gamma_i^\dagger = \gamma_i γi†​=γi​, {γi,γj}=2δij \{\gamma_i, \gamma_j\} = 2\delta_{ij} {γi​,γj​}=2δij​. Braid group Bn B_n Bn​ generators σi \sigma_i σi​ act on ground state degeneracy 2n/2 2^{n/2} 2n/2. Topological qubit encoded in parity P=iγ1γ2 P = i\gamma_1\gamma_2 P=iγ1​γ2​. | CONNECTION: Braiding matrices correspond to Fibonacci anyons with golden ratio ϕ=1.618 \phi = 1.618 ϕ=1.618 fusion rules: τ×τ=1+τ \tau \times \tau = 1 + \tau τ×τ=1+τ, dimension dτ=ϕ d_\tau = \phi dτ​=ϕ. Lattice structure: Kitaev honeycomb model with Z2 \mathbb{Z}_2 Z2​ gauge fields. | DEPTH: 8 — if verified, enables inherently error-corrected qubits; mathematical structure tied to modular tensor categories and quantum groups at roots of unity (e.g., q=eiπ/5 q = e^{i\pi/5} q=eiπ/5). Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com