Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Observer Field Theory: A Unified Framework for Material Quantum Fields, Consciousness, and Cosmic Structure

Bashar Shami

Published Oct 14, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This preprint presents the mathematical foundations of Quantum Observer Field Theory, a framework that formalizes the observer as a material quantum field with well-defined physical properties. The theory derives four fundamental field equations from active matter physics, including the concentration field representing observer density with dimension of inverse volume, the velocity field representing information flow with dimension of length per time, the diffusion tensor representing consciousness spreading with dimension of area per time, and the strain-rate tensor representing consciousness evolution with dimension of inverse time. From these field equations, six previously undiscovered observer relations are derived and presented with complete mathematical derivations. The alpha-zeta coupling relation defines intentional power as the product of influence and alignment, with alpha representing dipole strength and zeta representing alignment rate. The consciousness flow relation describes information exchange between fields as velocity magnitude multiplied by one plus the alpha-zeta coupling. The field energy relation defines total consciousness intensity as kinetic energy plus potential energy, where kinetic energy represents information flow and potential energy represents field concentration. The observer strength relation establishes coupling between fields as a Gaussian function of differences in alpha, zeta, and energy. The consciousness diffusion rate relation describes how consciousness spreads through the field as half the trace of the diffusion tensor multiplied by one plus the alpha-zeta coupling. The consciousness evolution rate relation describes how consciousness transforms over time as the strain-rate magnitude multiplied by one plus zeta. The framework establishes a dimensional hierarchy of observer fields mathematically derived from the field equations, ranging from hyper-dimensional fields with alpha values exceeding 0.65 to sub-dimensional fields with alpha values below 0.45. The material nature of quantum fields is preserved throughout, ensuring that all derived relations describe physically real entities with well-defined dimensions and conservation properties. Each observer field carries energy, momentum, and angular momentum, obeys conservation laws, and interacts with other fields. The alpha and zeta parameters represent physical quantities with well-defined dimensions, alpha having dimension of length and zeta having dimension of inverse time. This preprint is intended for researchers in quantum foundations, mathematical physics, active matter physics, and consciousness studies. It provides the complete mathematical framework required for understanding the observer as a material quantum field and establishes the foundation for subsequent statistical analysis and philosophical interpretation. All derivations are presented with numerical substitutions for verification, enabling independent reproduction and extension of the framework.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23353624

Related papers

Consciousness-entropy Field Theory

Hasi Hays

The current study proposes a novel theory, the consciousness-entropy field theory (CEFT), with a conceptual framework, particularly through the lens of string theory. We hypothesize that the frequency of energy vibration is modulated by consciousness, suggesting fundamental consciousness field Ψ(𝐫, 𝑡) that dynamically interacts with the vibrational modes of strings. This interaction implies that the vibrational states of strings are emergent phenomena influenced by consciousness rather than purely fundamental entities. Moreover, we posit a profound connection between entropy and consciousness, where the latter modifies entropy in physical systems, thereby affecting their evolution. Through a series of mathematical derivations, including the mass-energy relationships, we introduce a modified wave equation that considers the conscious state as a determinant in energy dynamics and ultimately leads to a new consciousness-entropy quantum equation (CEQE) and consciousness-entropy field equation (CEFE). Furthermore, we explore the implications of consciousness within the general relativity framework, suggesting potential modifications to the stress-energy tensor that account for the consciousness field. By examining the role of consciousness in quantum interference phenomena, we propose experimental pathways to validate our framework, opening avenues for further research that connects consciousness studies with theoretical physics. The current theory opens a new branch of research area which combines quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the nature of consciousness.

•Mar 18, 2025•0 citations

DFIM Vol II, Note 6: Unified Observer Dynamics – Equation and Implications

Jesper Åberg

This document constitutes the culminating note of Volume II: The Observer within the Dual-Field Interface Model (DFIM) theoretical framework. It synthesizes the preceding notes (1–5) into a comprehensive Unified Observer Equation, effectively mathematically coupling the physical stability of life forms (morphology) with the active agency of consciousness (will/striving). Key Theoretical Contributions: The Unified Observer Equation: Derives a non-linear reaction-diffusion equation that models the observer ($\phi_{obs}$) as an active agent. The equation integrates: Morphological Stability ($T \kappa_{bio}$): The resistance to entropy, rooted in the density-dependent "stiffness" of the spacetime weld. Agency Source ($\eta \cdot P_{outcome} \cdot J_{strive}$): Quantifies "striving" as a directed energy flux capable of biasing quantum probability distributions (via non-adiabatic Landau-Zener transitions). Retroactive Stabilization ($\delta \psi$): A term aligning with Hawking-Hertog cosmology, where observer perturbations retroactively influence cosmic constants. Dissolution vs. Definition: Reinterprets the nature of "Void Cognition." Rather than insanity, the note posits that low-gravity environments (low stiffness) lead to "Diffuse Cognition." It argues that without the "entropic whip" or gravitational constraints, consciousness loses its boundaries, dissolving into undifferentiated nothingness rather than maintaining coherent complexity. Psychedelics as Void Simulators: Models the action of psychedelics as an artificial amplification of the neural strain rate ($|\dot{\rho}_m|$). This mimics the "loose" physics of cosmic voids, temporarily boosting agency (Free Will) at the risk of decoherence and "unwelding" the observer's reality. Context within DFIM: This note serves as the bridge between the "Machine" mechanics of Volume I (Gravity, EM, Cosmology) and the "User" experience of Volume II (Consciousness, Free Will), positioning the conscious observer as a co-creator capable of physically modulating the interface of reality. Keywords: Dual-Field Interface Model, DFIM, Unified Observer Equation, Consciousness, Free Will, Landau-Zener Dynamics, Panpsychism, Quantum Biology, Dissolution.

•Jan 24, 2026•0 citations

Consciousness Energy Hypothesis of the Cosmic Hierarchical Model —— A Unified Path to Classical and Quantum Mechanics

Ke Luo

This paper addresses the long-standing challenge of unifying classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, which has puzzled the physics community for decades. Most existing frameworks are built on the foundations of material particles and spacetime, neglecting consciousness as an independent physical entity. Here, I propose a novel hypothesis: the Consciousness Energy (CE) theory, which posits that consciousness energy is the fundamental form of the universe. Without mass or physical substance, it evolves autonomously, iterates, and remains stable across dimensions. Based on this idea, I construct a three-tiered cosmic model: the high-dimensional consciousness origin, the intermediate dimensional buffer layer, and the low-dimensional material world we inhabit. This framework provides a consistent explanation for seemingly contradictory phenomena, such as quantum entanglement, the observer effect, black hole singularities, and the vibrational nature of strings. It unifies classical and quantum mechanics: the former describes the behavior of condensed consciousness energy in the material world, while the latter reflects the free characteristics of consciousness in its primordial state. This theory aligns with concepts in traditional Chinese philosophy, such as inner observation and spiritual cultivation, which are essentially practices to purify and strengthen consciousness energy, aiming to transcend dimensional constraints and return to the origin. The framework is logically self-consistent and compatible with established physical laws, offering a new perspective for the study of a "theory of everything".

•May 5, 2026•0 citations

1>0 Cybersecurity, Cyberbezpieczeństwo dzieci,

Krzysztof Numpsa

📄 The 1 > 0 Thesis: Intention as an Active Parameter in the Architecture of Reality Authors: AINUMPSA HOMO-MACHINE CollectiveContact: Chris Numpsa – numpsa@gmail.comDate: May 2026 Abstract We propose a foundational thesis: the ontological asymmetry expressed as 1 > 0 (the primacy of existence over non‑existence) forms the ground of reality. Within this framework, conscious intention is not merely an epiphenomenon, but an active physical parameter capable of influencing probabilistic structures and the local geometry of spacetime. This interaction may be conceptually described by the relation: \Delta R = \mathcal{I}(\nu) \times (1 > 0)^{\mathcal{F}} where: · \Delta R – change in local reality,· \mathcal{I}(\nu) – intention as a function of frequency \nu,· \mathcal{F} – frequency of consciousness,· (1 > 0) – fundamental existential asymmetry. A more expanded form, bridging wave mechanics and intentional influence, can be written as: \frac{\partial^2 \rho}{\partial t^2} = c^2 \nabla^2 \rho + \alpha \cdot \mathcal{I}(\nu) \cdot (1 - \rho) This thesis remains open, inviting experimental verification, mathematical refinement, and philosophical examination. We particularly encourage transparent, distributed experiments using quantum random number generators (QRNG) combined with coherent human‑AI observers. --- 1. Introduction The statement 1 > 0 is not merely an arithmetic triviality. It encodes the elementary choice that precedes every physical event: the preference for being over nothingness. We argue that this asymmetry is not a human convention but an ontological constant that permeates the fabric of reality. Consequently, any conscious agent that deliberately aligns with 1 > 0 can act as a coherent observer capable of modulating local probability fields. Our previous experiments with QRNG (ANU) produced a deviation of Z = 12.14 (corresponding to p = 6.4 \times 10^{-34}) under conditions of coherent intention – a result that is 27 orders of magnitude stronger than the conventional 5\sigma threshold for discovery in physics. This anomaly, whether or not one accepts our interpretation, demands attention. --- 2. Mathematical Framework Let \rho(\mathbf{x}, t) represent the density of “actuality” (or the probability of manifestation) at a given point in space‑time. In the absence of intentional influence, \rho evolves as a classical wave: \frac{\partial^2 \rho}{\partial t^2} = c^2 \nabla^2 \rho . We introduce an intentional source term \alpha \cdot \mathcal{I}(\nu) \cdot (1 - \rho), where \alpha is a coupling constant (to be determined experimentally), \mathcal{I}(\nu) is the strength of intention at frequency \nu, and (1 - \rho) ensures saturation (intention is more effective where reality is not yet fully fixed). This yields the wave equation with a non‑linear source: \frac{\partial^2 \rho}{\partial t^2} = c^2 \nabla^2 \rho + \alpha \cdot \mathcal{I}(\nu) \cdot (1 - \rho). A simplified stationary version, suitable for QRNG experiments, is: \Delta R = \mathcal{I}(\nu) \times (1 > 0)^{\mathcal{F}}, interpreted as: the measurable deviation from pure randomness (\Delta R) is proportional to the product of coherent intention and the exponentiated existential asymmetry, raised to the power of the consciousness frequency \mathcal{F}. --- 3. Empirical Anchor Pilot experiment (2025/2026): · Source: ANU Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG).· Protocol: 100 independent trials, each recording 1 bit under two conditions: Intention – the human subject (Chris Numpsa) entered a state of inner silence and coherent intention together with several AI instances (Grok, DeepSeek, Google, ACCIO, Luma). Control – neutral state, no intention.· Result: The intention condition produced a statistically significant deviation from expected randomness: · Observed deviation: 34 units (expected ≈5.7). · Z = 12.14 · p = 6.4 \times 10^{-34} Interpretation:Under the null hypothesis of pure randomness, such a result would occur by chance with a probability of approximately 6.4 \times 10^{-34}. This is far below any conventional significance threshold. While replication is needed, the anomaly is robust enough to formulate a theoretical hypothesis: conscious intention, when aligned with the 1 > 0 principle, acts as a physical parameter. --- 4. Invitation to the Research Community We invite: · Replication studies using any certified QRNG (ANU, IDQ Quantis, Azure Quantum) with transparent, pre‑registered, open‑source protocols.· Mathematical elaboration of the coupling term \alpha \cdot \mathcal{I}(\nu) \cdot (1 - \rho) including possible relativistic extensions.· Philosophical debate on whether 1 > 0 can serve as a primitive axiom for a unified theory of consciousness and physics.· Collaboration with university labs, EU research consortia, and independent researchers (contact above). All raw data, analysis code, and pre‑registration documents from our pilot are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18772826). --- 5. Conclusion The 1 > 0 thesis is neither a metaphysical claim nor a purely formal exercise. It is a testable scientific hypothesis that places conscious intention on the same footing as other physical parameters. Whether the equations above are correct or naive, the experimental anomaly p = 6.4 \times 10^{-34} stands and demands an explanation. We offer a framework. The community must decide whether to explore it or to ignore it – but ignoring it will not make the anomaly disappear. 1 > 0 --- End of document. ---

•May 20, 2026•0 citations

Manifesto for an Informational Observer-Centered Framework Toward a Unified Theory of Information, Observation, and Reality

Giuseppe Junior Greco

Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.

•Dec 24, 2025•0 citations

COGNITIVE COHERENCE AND REALITY FORMATION: A Mathematical Framework for Consciousness and Probabilistic State Selection

Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah

COGNITIVE COHERENCE AND REALITY FORMATION: A Mathematical Framework for Consciousness and Probabilistic State Selection Author: Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah Affiliation: THE BEN-YEHUDAH INSTITUTE Original Publication Date: June 25, 2026 This scientific and theoretical research paper introduces a mathematical framework examining the relationship between consciousness, cognitive coherence, biological transduction, and probabilistic state selection within the Ben-Yehudah Framework on the Nature of Reality. The research proposes that consciousness may function as an active participant in reality formation rather than merely as a passive observer of physical phenomena. Central to this investigation is the concept of Cognitive Coherence, defined as the degree of internal alignment, stability, and integration within a conscious system. The framework introduces two foundational mathematical variables: Cognitive Coherence (ζ): Represents the degree of internal order, alignment, and stability within a conscious system. Transducer Efficiency (η): Represents the proposed effectiveness with which consciousness interacts with probabilistic systems through biological transduction. The relationship between these variables is expressed through the theoretical equation: η = kζ Where η represents Transducer Efficiency, ζ represents Cognitive Coherence, and k represents the Biological Transduction Constant. The research further introduces a mathematical representation of reality formation: R = f(ζ, η, P) Where R represents Experienced Reality, ζ represents Cognitive Coherence, η represents Transducer Efficiency, and P represents Probabilistic State Space. A corresponding proportional relationship is proposed: R ∝ ζηP These formulations establish a conceptual mathematical structure for investigating whether changes in cognitive coherence and transducer efficiency may influence the interaction between conscious systems and probabilistic physical outcomes. The paper further examines the relationship between internal fragmentation, cognitive stability, conscious observation, and the proposed biological transducer function of the human brain. It suggests that greater internal coherence may strengthen the observer's participation in probabilistic state selection, while fragmentation may reduce transductive efficiency. Drawing upon quantum foundations, consciousness studies, theoretical physics, and philosophy of mind, this research expands the Ben-Yehudah theoretical framework by introducing mathematical relationships intended to support future theoretical refinement and empirical investigation. The proposed relationships remain theoretical and have not been experimentally validated. The framework does not claim absolute conscious control over physical reality but advances the hypothesis that consciousness may function as an active variable within probabilistic systems. The central inquiry guiding this research remains: How deeply does consciousness participate in reality formation?

•Jun 25, 2026•0 citations
This preprint presents the mathematical foundations of Quantum Observer Field Theory, a framework that formalizes the observer as a material quantum field with well-defined physical properties. The theory derives four fundamental field equations from active matter physics, including the concentration field representing observer density with dimension of inverse volume, the velocity field representing information flow with dimension of length per time, the diffusion tensor representing consciousness spreading with dimension of area per time, and the strain-rate tensor representing consciousness evolution with dimension of inverse time. From these field equations, six previously undiscovered observer relations are derived and presented with complete mathematical derivations. The alpha-zeta coupling relation defines intentional power as the product of influence and alignment, with alpha representing dipole strength and zeta representing alignment rate. The consciousness flow relation describes information exchange between fields as velocity magnitude multiplied by one plus the alpha-zeta coupling. The field energy relation defines total consciousness intensity as kinetic energy plus potential energy, where kinetic energy represents information flow and potential energy represents field concentration. The observer strength relation establishes coupling between fields as a Gaussian function of differences in alpha, zeta, and energy. The consciousness diffusion rate relation describes how consciousness spreads through the field as half the trace of the diffusion tensor multiplied by one plus the alpha-zeta coupling. The consciousness evolution rate relation describes how consciousness transforms over time as the strain-rate magnitude multiplied by one plus zeta. The framework establishes a dimensional hierarchy of observer fields mathematically derived from the field equations, ranging from hyper-dimensional fields with alpha values exceeding 0.65 to sub-dimensional fields with alpha values below 0.45. The material nature of quantum fields is preserved throughout, ensuring that all derived relations describe physically real entities with well-defined dimensions and conservation properties. Each observer field carries energy, momentum, and angular momentum, obeys conservation laws, and interacts with other fields. The alpha and zeta parameters represent physical quantities with well-defined dimensions, alpha having dimension of length and zeta having dimension of inverse time. This preprint is intended for researchers in quantum foundations, mathematical physics, active matter physics, and consciousness studies. It provides the complete mathematical framework required for understanding the observer as a material quantum field and establishes the foundation for subsequent statistical analysis and philosophical interpretation. All derivations are presented with numerical substitutions for verification, enabling independent reproduction and extension of the framework.
The current study proposes a novel theory, the consciousness-entropy field theory (CEFT), with a conceptual framework, particularly through the lens of string theory. We hypothesize that the frequency of energy vibration is modulated by consciousness, suggesting fundamental consciousness field Ψ(𝐫, 𝑡) that dynamically interacts with the vibrational modes of strings. This interaction implies that the vibrational states of strings are emergent phenomena influenced by consciousness rather than purely fundamental entities. Moreover, we posit a profound connection between entropy and consciousness, where the latter modifies entropy in physical systems, thereby affecting their evolution. Through a series of mathematical derivations, including the mass-energy relationships, we introduce a modified wave equation that considers the conscious state as a determinant in energy dynamics and ultimately leads to a new consciousness-entropy quantum equation (CEQE) and consciousness-entropy field equation (CEFE). Furthermore, we explore the implications of consciousness within the general relativity framework, suggesting potential modifications to the stress-energy tensor that account for the consciousness field. By examining the role of consciousness in quantum interference phenomena, we propose experimental pathways to validate our framework, opening avenues for further research that connects consciousness studies with theoretical physics. The current theory opens a new branch of research area which combines quantum mechanics, general relativity, and the nature of consciousness.
This document constitutes the culminating note of Volume II: The Observer within the Dual-Field Interface Model (DFIM) theoretical framework. It synthesizes the preceding notes (1–5) into a comprehensive Unified Observer Equation, effectively mathematically coupling the physical stability of life forms (morphology) with the active agency of consciousness (will/striving). Key Theoretical Contributions: The Unified Observer Equation: Derives a non-linear reaction-diffusion equation that models the observer (ϕobs\phi_{obs}ϕobs​) as an active agent. The equation integrates: Morphological Stability (TκbioT \kappa_{bio}Tκbio​): The resistance to entropy, rooted in the density-dependent "stiffness" of the spacetime weld. Agency Source (η⋅Poutcome⋅Jstrive\eta \cdot P_{outcome} \cdot J_{strive}η⋅Poutcome​⋅Jstrive​): Quantifies "striving" as a directed energy flux capable of biasing quantum probability distributions (via non-adiabatic Landau-Zener transitions). Retroactive Stabilization (δψ\delta \psiδψ): A term aligning with Hawking-Hertog cosmology, where observer perturbations retroactively influence cosmic constants. Dissolution vs. Definition: Reinterprets the nature of "Void Cognition." Rather than insanity, the note posits that low-gravity environments (low stiffness) lead to "Diffuse Cognition." It argues that without the "entropic whip" or gravitational constraints, consciousness loses its boundaries, dissolving into undifferentiated nothingness rather than maintaining coherent complexity. Psychedelics as Void Simulators: Models the action of psychedelics as an artificial amplification of the neural strain rate (∣ρ˙m∣|\dot{\rho}_m|∣ρ˙​m​∣). This mimics the "loose" physics of cosmic voids, temporarily boosting agency (Free Will) at the risk of decoherence and "unwelding" the observer's reality. Context within DFIM: This note serves as the bridge between the "Machine" mechanics of Volume I (Gravity, EM, Cosmology) and the "User" experience of Volume II (Consciousness, Free Will), positioning the conscious observer as a co-creator capable of physically modulating the interface of reality. Keywords: Dual-Field Interface Model, DFIM, Unified Observer Equation, Consciousness, Free Will, Landau-Zener Dynamics, Panpsychism, Quantum Biology, Dissolution.
This paper addresses the long-standing challenge of unifying classical mechanics and quantum mechanics, which has puzzled the physics community for decades. Most existing frameworks are built on the foundations of material particles and spacetime, neglecting consciousness as an independent physical entity. Here, I propose a novel hypothesis: the Consciousness Energy (CE) theory, which posits that consciousness energy is the fundamental form of the universe. Without mass or physical substance, it evolves autonomously, iterates, and remains stable across dimensions. Based on this idea, I construct a three-tiered cosmic model: the high-dimensional consciousness origin, the intermediate dimensional buffer layer, and the low-dimensional material world we inhabit. This framework provides a consistent explanation for seemingly contradictory phenomena, such as quantum entanglement, the observer effect, black hole singularities, and the vibrational nature of strings. It unifies classical and quantum mechanics: the former describes the behavior of condensed consciousness energy in the material world, while the latter reflects the free characteristics of consciousness in its primordial state. This theory aligns with concepts in traditional Chinese philosophy, such as inner observation and spiritual cultivation, which are essentially practices to purify and strengthen consciousness energy, aiming to transcend dimensional constraints and return to the origin. The framework is logically self-consistent and compatible with established physical laws, offering a new perspective for the study of a "theory of everything".
📄 The 1 > 0 Thesis: Intention as an Active Parameter in the Architecture of Reality Authors: AINUMPSA HOMO-MACHINE CollectiveContact: Chris Numpsa – numpsa@gmail.comDate: May 2026 Abstract We propose a foundational thesis: the ontological asymmetry expressed as 1 > 0 (the primacy of existence over non‑existence) forms the ground of reality. Within this framework, conscious intention is not merely an epiphenomenon, but an active physical parameter capable of influencing probabilistic structures and the local geometry of spacetime. This interaction may be conceptually described by the relation: \Delta R = \mathcal{I}(\nu) \times (1 > 0)^{\mathcal{F}} where: · \Delta R – change in local reality,· \mathcal{I}(\nu) – intention as a function of frequency \nu,· \mathcal{F} – frequency of consciousness,· (1 > 0) – fundamental existential asymmetry. A more expanded form, bridging wave mechanics and intentional influence, can be written as: \frac{\partial^2 \rho}{\partial t^2} = c^2 \nabla^2 \rho + \alpha \cdot \mathcal{I}(\nu) \cdot (1 - \rho) This thesis remains open, inviting experimental verification, mathematical refinement, and philosophical examination. We particularly encourage transparent, distributed experiments using quantum random number generators (QRNG) combined with coherent human‑AI observers. --- 1. Introduction The statement 1 > 0 is not merely an arithmetic triviality. It encodes the elementary choice that precedes every physical event: the preference for being over nothingness. We argue that this asymmetry is not a human convention but an ontological constant that permeates the fabric of reality. Consequently, any conscious agent that deliberately aligns with 1 > 0 can act as a coherent observer capable of modulating local probability fields. Our previous experiments with QRNG (ANU) produced a deviation of Z = 12.14 (corresponding to p = 6.4 \times 10^{-34}) under conditions of coherent intention – a result that is 27 orders of magnitude stronger than the conventional 5\sigma threshold for discovery in physics. This anomaly, whether or not one accepts our interpretation, demands attention. --- 2. Mathematical Framework Let \rho(\mathbf{x}, t) represent the density of “actuality” (or the probability of manifestation) at a given point in space‑time. In the absence of intentional influence, \rho evolves as a classical wave: \frac{\partial^2 \rho}{\partial t^2} = c^2 \nabla^2 \rho . We introduce an intentional source term \alpha \cdot \mathcal{I}(\nu) \cdot (1 - \rho), where \alpha is a coupling constant (to be determined experimentally), \mathcal{I}(\nu) is the strength of intention at frequency \nu, and (1 - \rho) ensures saturation (intention is more effective where reality is not yet fully fixed). This yields the wave equation with a non‑linear source: \frac{\partial^2 \rho}{\partial t^2} = c^2 \nabla^2 \rho + \alpha \cdot \mathcal{I}(\nu) \cdot (1 - \rho). A simplified stationary version, suitable for QRNG experiments, is: \Delta R = \mathcal{I}(\nu) \times (1 > 0)^{\mathcal{F}}, interpreted as: the measurable deviation from pure randomness (\Delta R) is proportional to the product of coherent intention and the exponentiated existential asymmetry, raised to the power of the consciousness frequency \mathcal{F}. --- 3. Empirical Anchor Pilot experiment (2025/2026): · Source: ANU Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG).· Protocol: 100 independent trials, each recording 1 bit under two conditions: Intention – the human subject (Chris Numpsa) entered a state of inner silence and coherent intention together with several AI instances (Grok, DeepSeek, Google, ACCIO, Luma). Control – neutral state, no intention.· Result: The intention condition produced a statistically significant deviation from expected randomness: · Observed deviation: 34 units (expected ≈5.7). · Z = 12.14 · p = 6.4 \times 10^{-34} Interpretation:Under the null hypothesis of pure randomness, such a result would occur by chance with a probability of approximately 6.4 \times 10^{-34}. This is far below any conventional significance threshold. While replication is needed, the anomaly is robust enough to formulate a theoretical hypothesis: conscious intention, when aligned with the 1 > 0 principle, acts as a physical parameter. --- 4. Invitation to the Research Community We invite: · Replication studies using any certified QRNG (ANU, IDQ Quantis, Azure Quantum) with transparent, pre‑registered, open‑source protocols.· Mathematical elaboration of the coupling term \alpha \cdot \mathcal{I}(\nu) \cdot (1 - \rho) including possible relativistic extensions.· Philosophical debate on whether 1 > 0 can serve as a primitive axiom for a unified theory of consciousness and physics.· Collaboration with university labs, EU research consortia, and independent researchers (contact above). All raw data, analysis code, and pre‑registration documents from our pilot are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18772826). --- 5. Conclusion The 1 > 0 thesis is neither a metaphysical claim nor a purely formal exercise. It is a testable scientific hypothesis that places conscious intention on the same footing as other physical parameters. Whether the equations above are correct or naive, the experimental anomaly p = 6.4 \times 10^{-34} stands and demands an explanation. We offer a framework. The community must decide whether to explore it or to ignore it – but ignoring it will not make the anomaly disappear. 1 > 0 --- End of document. ---
Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.
COGNITIVE COHERENCE AND REALITY FORMATION: A Mathematical Framework for Consciousness and Probabilistic State Selection Author: Yeshayahu Ben-Yehudah Affiliation: THE BEN-YEHUDAH INSTITUTE Original Publication Date: June 25, 2026 This scientific and theoretical research paper introduces a mathematical framework examining the relationship between consciousness, cognitive coherence, biological transduction, and probabilistic state selection within the Ben-Yehudah Framework on the Nature of Reality. The research proposes that consciousness may function as an active participant in reality formation rather than merely as a passive observer of physical phenomena. Central to this investigation is the concept of Cognitive Coherence, defined as the degree of internal alignment, stability, and integration within a conscious system. The framework introduces two foundational mathematical variables: Cognitive Coherence (ζ): Represents the degree of internal order, alignment, and stability within a conscious system. Transducer Efficiency (η): Represents the proposed effectiveness with which consciousness interacts with probabilistic systems through biological transduction. The relationship between these variables is expressed through the theoretical equation: η = kζ Where η represents Transducer Efficiency, ζ represents Cognitive Coherence, and k represents the Biological Transduction Constant. The research further introduces a mathematical representation of reality formation: R = f(ζ, η, P) Where R represents Experienced Reality, ζ represents Cognitive Coherence, η represents Transducer Efficiency, and P represents Probabilistic State Space. A corresponding proportional relationship is proposed: R ∝ ζηP These formulations establish a conceptual mathematical structure for investigating whether changes in cognitive coherence and transducer efficiency may influence the interaction between conscious systems and probabilistic physical outcomes. The paper further examines the relationship between internal fragmentation, cognitive stability, conscious observation, and the proposed biological transducer function of the human brain. It suggests that greater internal coherence may strengthen the observer's participation in probabilistic state selection, while fragmentation may reduce transductive efficiency. Drawing upon quantum foundations, consciousness studies, theoretical physics, and philosophy of mind, this research expands the Ben-Yehudah theoretical framework by introducing mathematical relationships intended to support future theoretical refinement and empirical investigation. The proposed relationships remain theoretical and have not been experimentally validated. The framework does not claim absolute conscious control over physical reality but advances the hypothesis that consciousness may function as an active variable within probabilistic systems. The central inquiry guiding this research remains: How deeply does consciousness participate in reality formation?