Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Reproducible Evaluation Framework for Quantum Algorithms and Hybrid Scientific Workflows

Softquantus

Published Oct 12, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Reproducible Evaluation Framework for QuantumAlgorithms and Hybrid Scientific Workflows
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23313784

Related papers

Paving the way to hybrid quantum–classical scientific workflows

Sandeep S. Cranganore, Vincenzo De Maio, Ivona Brandić +1 more

arXiv:2404.10389•Future Generation Computer Systems•Apr 22, 2024•36 citations

Analysis and Rewrite of Quantum Workflows: Improving the Execution of Hybrid Quantum Algorithms

Benjamin Weder, Johanna Barzen, Martin Beisel +1 more

International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science•Jan 1, 2022•10 citations

HQPEF-Py: Metrics, Python Patterns, and Guidance for Evaluating Hybrid Quantum Programs

Osei, Michael Adjei, Shapiro, Sidney

We study how to evaluate hybrid quantum programs as end-to-end workflows rather than as isolated devices or algorithms. Building on the Hybrid Quantum Program Evaluation Framework (HQPEF), we formalize a workflow-aware Quantum Readiness Level (QRL) score; define a normalized speedup under quality constraints for the Utility of Quantumness (UQ); and provide a timing-and-drift audit for hybrid pipelines. We complement these definitions with concise Python reference implementations that illustrate how to instantiate the metrics and audit procedures with state-of-the-art classical and quantum solvers (e.g., via Qiskit or PennyLane), while preserving matched-budget discipline and reproducibility.

arXiv:2511.18506•Nov 23, 2025•0 citations

GalaxyQ: A Platform for Reproducible and Provenance-Driven Hybrid Quantum-Classical Scientific Workflows

Bryan A. Raubenolt, Daniel J Blankenberg

Quantum computing has the potential to reshape scientific research in areas like materials science, chemistry, biology, and more. But many researchers still face hurdles, especially when trying to integrate quantum tools into existing analysis pipelines. In this paper, we explore how the Galaxy Project, a platform known for enabling reproducible computational research, can be extended to support hybrid quantum-classical workflows. By combining Galaxy's user-friendly, provenance-aware environment with quantum programming tools, we offer scientists a practical way to build and share workflows that include both quantum and classical components. This GalaxyQ approach lowers the entry barrier for quantum computing and promotes transparency, collaboration, and reproducibility in scientific computing.

IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Aug 30, 2025•0 citations

Quantum–Classical Hybrid Systems Running on Commercial Hardware: How and Why

Stieve, Jonathan

We present the UHF SZTM BorgAI OmniPoint Recursive Human–AI Co-Evolution framework for hybrid quantum–classical simulations on commercial hardware. Our work demonstrates how a CPU-first workflow can validate the robustness, stability, and reproducibility of quantum simulations before GPU acceleration enables real-time computation. All outputs—including eigenvalue and eigenvector overlaps, tunneling modifications, energy shifts, and stability indices—are fully logged and reproducible. This approach highlights the critical role of human-guided AI recursion in optimizing multi-domain scientific workflows and establishing a scalable, extensible platform for hybrid quantum–classical research. All results are testable, falsifiable, and publicly verifiable.

•Nov 14, 2025•0 citations

Evaluating Quantum Algorithms for Linear Solver Workflows

Sophia Kolak, Hamed Mohammadbagherpoor, Konstantis Daloukas +5 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2023•1 citation
We study how to evaluate hybrid quantum programs as end-to-end workflows rather than as isolated devices or algorithms. Building on the Hybrid Quantum Program Evaluation Framework (HQPEF), we formalize a workflow-aware Quantum Readiness Level (QRL) score; define a normalized speedup under quality constraints for the Utility of Quantumness (UQ); and provide a timing-and-drift audit for hybrid pipelines. We complement these definitions with concise Python reference implementations that illustrate how to instantiate the metrics and audit procedures with state-of-the-art classical and quantum solvers (e.g., via Qiskit or PennyLane), while preserving matched-budget discipline and reproducibility.
Quantum computing has the potential to reshape scientific research in areas like materials science, chemistry, biology, and more. But many researchers still face hurdles, especially when trying to integrate quantum tools into existing analysis pipelines. In this paper, we explore how the Galaxy Project, a platform known for enabling reproducible computational research, can be extended to support hybrid quantum-classical workflows. By combining Galaxy's user-friendly, provenance-aware environment with quantum programming tools, we offer scientists a practical way to build and share workflows that include both quantum and classical components. This GalaxyQ approach lowers the entry barrier for quantum computing and promotes transparency, collaboration, and reproducibility in scientific computing.
We present the UHF SZTM BorgAI OmniPoint Recursive Human–AI Co-Evolution framework for hybrid quantum–classical simulations on commercial hardware. Our work demonstrates how a CPU-first workflow can validate the robustness, stability, and reproducibility of quantum simulations before GPU acceleration enables real-time computation. All outputs—including eigenvalue and eigenvector overlaps, tunneling modifications, energy shifts, and stability indices—are fully logged and reproducible. This approach highlights the critical role of human-guided AI recursion in optimizing multi-domain scientific workflows and establishing a scalable, extensible platform for hybrid quantum–classical research. All results are testable, falsifiable, and publicly verifiable.