Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Anyon Amplitude Is an Algebraic Integer: Exact, Cross-Validated, Kernel-Checked Topological Quantum Computation

The Institute for Applied Ontological Mathematics

Published Oct 11, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Fibonacci-anyon quantum computer evaluates the Jones polynomial of a knot at a fifth root of unity; the value is the amplitude of a braiding process. We show that this value is an algebraic integer—it lives in the cyclotomic ring Z[ζ5 ]—and that a classical machine can therefore compute it exactly, with no floating point and no Hilbert space, and a proof kernel can certify that it did. The braiding gates become 2 × 2 matrices over Z[ζ5 ] in which the golden ratio satisfies φ2 = φ + 1 as an arithmetic identity; the Kauffman loop value is φ on the nose. We build the amplitude two independent ways—an algebraic Temperley–Lieb trace and a topological state sum that counts loops in a closed braid diagram—and the two agree, bit for bit, on the unknot, the Hopf link, the trefoil, and the figure-eight (the first knot that is not a torus link). Writhe normalization turns the framed value into a genuine link invariant, and we prove its invariance: under Reidemeister I and Markov conjugation—in general, for every braid, by showing the matrix trace over Z[ζ5 ] is cyclic—and under Markov stabilization of either sign for every braid, since the union–find loop count is sign-independent and the spectator surgery closes σ and σ −1 alike (framing factors −A3 and −A−3 ). A diagrammatic runtime recovers the Temperley–Lieb relations not as axioms but as theorems that fall out of contracting wires and collapsing loops. We prove, in the kernel, that the loop count the topological engine returns is the number of connected components of the closed braid diagram—a verified union–find theory whose load-bearing fact is that one merge step drops the component count by exactly one—which reduces the last step of the general invariance theorem to a single component-count comparison. Against an independent floating-point recomputation the exact values agree to 1.3 × 10−15 , the residual being the float error, not ours. The naive state sum is exponential, but it need not be: a confluent reduction that carries the whole Temperley–Lieb element and merges equal diagrams computes the same amplitude in time polynomial in the crossings for braids of bounded strand width, and the kernel certifies it equals the exponential sum—for a torus link σ1k , a collapse from 2k to O(k). Every result is machine-checked in Cubical Agda. We do not claim a quantum speedup, and we do not overturn the #P-hardness of the general problem; what we show is that the classical amplitude is an exact object, that exactness can be certified, and that the certified computation is—in the bounded-width regime—exponentially faster than the simulation it replaces. The same construction carries the Ising anyon over the ring Z[ζ16 ]: the two theories are two evaluation points of one bracket polynomial, and the gap between the universal model and √ the classically-simulable one is, at the level of the ring, the gap between φ2 = φ + 1 and ( 2)2 = 2. Because equality in Z[ζ5 ] is decidable, the exact invariant decides topology a float cannot: we prove the trefoil is chiral—its invariant differs from its mirror's, exactly—and the figure-eight amphichiral. Published by The Institute for Applied Ontological Mathematics.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23304145

Related papers

Fibonacci Anyons Achieve Universal Quantum Computation via Braiding Alone — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Fibonacci anyons achieve universal quantum computation through braiding alone — no non-topological gates required | MATH: Braiding matrices ρ(σ₁), ρ(σ₂) generate a dense subgroup of SU(2); Fibonacci fusion rule τ⊗τ = 1⊕τ; quantum dimension d_τ = φ = (1+√5)/2 ≈ 1.618; total quantum dimension D = √(1+φ²) = √(2+φ) ≈ 1.902; F-matrix and R-matrix satisfy pentagon and hexagon equations with entries in ℚ(√5) | CONNECTION: φ = 1.618 (golden ratio) is the quantum dimension; the pentagon equation governing fusion associativity is literally the pentagon — five-fold symmetry is the algebraic backbone of the braid group representation; Jones polynomial evaluations at roots of unity connect to the Temperley–Lieb algebra with loop value −φ² = −2.618 | DEPTH: 9 FINDING: Penrose tiling demonstrates aperiodic long-range order with exact five-fold rotational symmetry, forbidden to classical crystallography | MATH: Two rhombi (36°/72° and 72°/108°) tile the plane aperiodically; inflation/deflati Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 27, 2026•0 citations

Introduction to topological quantum computation with non-Abelian anyons

Bernard Field, Tapio Simula

Abstract Topological quantum computers promise a fault tolerant means to perform quantum computation. Topological quantum computers use particles with exotic exchange statistics called non-Abelian anyons, and the simplest anyon model which allows for universal quantum computation by particle exchange or braiding alone is the Fibonacci anyon model. One classically hard problem that can be solved efficiently using quantum computation is finding the value of the Jones polynomial of knots at roots of unity. We aim to provide a pedagogical, self-contained, review of topological quantum computation with Fibonacci anyons, from the braiding statistics and matrices to the layout of such a computer and the compiling of braids to perform specific operations. Then we use a simulation of a topological quantum computer to explicitly demonstrate a quantum computation using Fibonacci anyons, evaluating the Jones polynomial of a selection of simple knots. In addition to simulating a modular circuit-style quantum algorithm, we also show how the magnitude of the Jones polynomial at specific points could be obtained exactly using Fibonacci or Ising anyons. Such an exact algorithm seems ideally suited for a proof of concept demonstration of a topological quantum computer.

arXiv:1802.06176•Quantum Science and Technology•Jun 6, 2018•135 citations

Topological Qubits via Anyon Braiding: Majorana 1 and Braid Group Gates — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Topological quantum computing encodes logical qubits in non-local, global degrees of freedom of matter — braiding anyonic excitations — making them immune to local decoherence; Microsoft's Majorana 1 is the first hardware claim of this paradigm. | MATH: Braiding operators are unitary representations of the braid group B_n, generated by σ_i with relations σ_iσ_{i+1}σ_i = σ_{i+1}σ_iσ_{i+1} (Yang–Baxter) and σ_iσ_j = σ_jσ_i (|i−j|≥2). Gates = images of B_n in U(N). Fibonacci anyons: braiding matrices have entries in ℤ[φ], φ = (1+√5)/2 = 1.618…; the Fibonacci F-matrix and R-matrix satisfy (R^F)^3 = 1, and the quantum dimension d_τ = φ. Ising anyons: d_σ = √2, braiding generates only the Clifford group (not universal). | CONNECTION: The Fibonacci anyon model is literally named for the golden ratio — its Hilbert-space dimension grows as φ^n, and the Jones polynomial evaluated at roots of unity (e.g., e^{2πi/5}) governs the braiding phases. φ = 1.618, 1/φ = 0.618, φ² = 2.618 all appe Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 31, 2026•0 citations

Anyon Braiding: Theoretical Promise, No Experimental Breakthrough — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Anyon braiding provides non-abelian statistics for topological quantum computation, but the search results are mostly pedagogical videos and one unrelated LHC paper — no experimental breakthrough or new equation is presented. | MATH: Anyons obey fractional statistics: exchange phase θ = π·(1/m) for abelian anyons (m ∈ ℤ), or non-abelian braid group representations for Ising/Fibonacci anyons (e.g., Fibonacci anyon fusion: τ ⊗ τ = 1 ⊕ τ, with quantum dimension φ = (1+√5)/2 ≈ 1.618). Braiding matrices are unitary representations of the braid group B_n, not the permutation group. | CONNECTION: The Fibonacci anyon quantum dimension is exactly the golden ratio φ = 1.618 — a direct geometric harmony constant. The braid group's relation to the Temperley–Lieb algebra uses the parameter δ = φ + φ⁻¹ = √5 ≈ 2.236, and the Jones polynomial evaluates at roots of unity linked to φ. Crystallographic symmetry appears via the fractional quantum Hall effect's Laughlin wavefunction, which has a U Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 10, 2026•0 citations

Classical simulation of a topological quantum computer

B.O. Field, Tapio Simula

Topological quantum computers promise a fault tolerant means to perform quantum computation. Topological quantum computers use particles with exotic exchange statistics called non-Abelian anyons, and the simplest anyon model which allows for universal quantum computation by particle exchange or braiding alone is the Fibonacci anyon model. One classically hard problem that can be solved efficiently using quantum computation is finding the value of the Jones polynomial of knots at roots of unity. We aim to provide a pedagogical, self-contained, review of topological quantum computation with Fibonacci anyons, from the braiding statistics and matrices to the layout of such a computer and the compiling of braids to perform specific operations. Then we use a simulation of a topological quantum computer to explicitly demonstrate a quantum computation using Fibonacci anyons, evaluating the Jones polynomial of a selection of simple knots.

•Feb 17, 2018•1 citation

A polynomial quantum algorithm for approximating the Jones polynomial

Dorit Aharonov, Vaughan F. R. Jones, Zeph A. Landau

The Jones polynomial, discovered in 1984 [18], is an important knot invariant in topology. Among its many connections to various mathematical and physical areas, it is known (due to Witten [32]) to be intimately connected to Topological Quantum Field Theory (TQFT). The works of Freedman, Kitaev, Larsen and Wang [13, 14] provide an efficient simulation of TQFT by a quantum computer, and vice versa. These results implicitly imply the existence of an efficient quantum algorithm that provides a certain additive approximation of the Jones polynomial at the fifth root of unity, e2π i/5, and moreover, that this problem is BQP-complete. Unfortunately, this important algorithm was never explicitly formulated. Moreover, the results in [13, 14] are heavily based on TQFT, which makes the algorithm essentially inaccessible to computer scientists.We provide an explicit and simple polynomial quantum algorithm to approximate the Jones polynomial of an n strands braid with m crossings at any primitive root of unity e2π i/k, where the running time of the algorithm is polynomial in m,n and k. Our algorithm is based, rather than on TQFT, on well known mathematical results (specifically, the path model representation of the braid group and the uniqueness of the Markov trace for the Temperly Lieb algebra). By the results of [14], our algorithm solves a BQP complete problem.The algorithm we provide exhibits a structure which we hope is generalizable to other quantum algorithmic problems. Candidates of particular interest are the approximations of other downwards self-reducible P-hard problems, most notably, the Potts model.

ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC)•May 21, 2006•133 citations
A Fibonacci-anyon quantum computer evaluates the Jones polynomial of a knot at a fifth root of unity; the value is the amplitude of a braiding process. We show that this value is an algebraic integer—it lives in the cyclotomic ring Z[ζ5 ]—and that a classical machine can therefore compute it exactly, with no floating point and no Hilbert space, and a proof kernel can certify that it did. The braiding gates become 2 × 2 matrices over Z[ζ5 ] in which the golden ratio satisfies φ2 = φ + 1 as an arithmetic identity; the Kauffman loop value is φ on the nose. We build the amplitude two independent ways—an algebraic Temperley–Lieb trace and a topological state sum that counts loops in a closed braid diagram—and the two agree, bit for bit, on the unknot, the Hopf link, the trefoil, and the figure-eight (the first knot that is not a torus link). Writhe normalization turns the framed value into a genuine link invariant, and we prove its invariance: under Reidemeister I and Markov conjugation—in general, for every braid, by showing the matrix trace over Z[ζ5 ] is cyclic—and under Markov stabilization of either sign for every braid, since the union–find loop count is sign-independent and the spectator surgery closes σ and σ −1 alike (framing factors −A3 and −A−3 ). A diagrammatic runtime recovers the Temperley–Lieb relations not as axioms but as theorems that fall out of contracting wires and collapsing loops. We prove, in the kernel, that the loop count the topological engine returns is the number of connected components of the closed braid diagram—a verified union–find theory whose load-bearing fact is that one merge step drops the component count by exactly one—which reduces the last step of the general invariance theorem to a single component-count comparison. Against an independent floating-point recomputation the exact values agree to 1.3 × 10−15 , the residual being the float error, not ours. The naive state sum is exponential, but it need not be: a confluent reduction that carries the whole Temperley–Lieb element and merges equal diagrams computes the same amplitude in time polynomial in the crossings for braids of bounded strand width, and the kernel certifies it equals the exponential sum—for a torus link σ1k , a collapse from 2k to O(k). Every result is machine-checked in Cubical Agda. We do not claim a quantum speedup, and we do not overturn the #P-hardness of the general problem; what we show is that the classical amplitude is an exact object, that exactness can be certified, and that the certified computation is—in the bounded-width regime—exponentially faster than the simulation it replaces. The same construction carries the Ising anyon over the ring Z[ζ16 ]: the two theories are two evaluation points of one bracket polynomial, and the gap between the universal model and √ the classically-simulable one is, at the level of the ring, the gap between φ2 = φ + 1 and ( 2)2 = 2. Because equality in Z[ζ5 ] is decidable, the exact invariant decides topology a float cannot: we prove the trefoil is chiral—its invariant differs from its mirror's, exactly—and the figure-eight amphichiral. Published by The Institute for Applied Ontological Mathematics.
FINDING: Fibonacci anyons achieve universal quantum computation through braiding alone — no non-topological gates required | MATH: Braiding matrices ρ(σ₁), ρ(σ₂) generate a dense subgroup of SU(2); Fibonacci fusion rule τ⊗τ = 1⊕τ; quantum dimension d_τ = φ = (1+√5)/2 ≈ 1.618; total quantum dimension D = √(1+φ²) = √(2+φ) ≈ 1.902; F-matrix and R-matrix satisfy pentagon and hexagon equations with entries in ℚ(√5) | CONNECTION: φ = 1.618 (golden ratio) is the quantum dimension; the pentagon equation governing fusion associativity is literally the pentagon — five-fold symmetry is the algebraic backbone of the braid group representation; Jones polynomial evaluations at roots of unity connect to the Temperley–Lieb algebra with loop value −φ² = −2.618 | DEPTH: 9 FINDING: Penrose tiling demonstrates aperiodic long-range order with exact five-fold rotational symmetry, forbidden to classical crystallography | MATH: Two rhombi (36°/72° and 72°/108°) tile the plane aperiodically; inflation/deflati Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
Abstract Topological quantum computers promise a fault tolerant means to perform quantum computation. Topological quantum computers use particles with exotic exchange statistics called non-Abelian anyons, and the simplest anyon model which allows for universal quantum computation by particle exchange or braiding alone is the Fibonacci anyon model. One classically hard problem that can be solved efficiently using quantum computation is finding the value of the Jones polynomial of knots at roots of unity. We aim to provide a pedagogical, self-contained, review of topological quantum computation with Fibonacci anyons, from the braiding statistics and matrices to the layout of such a computer and the compiling of braids to perform specific operations. Then we use a simulation of a topological quantum computer to explicitly demonstrate a quantum computation using Fibonacci anyons, evaluating the Jones polynomial of a selection of simple knots. In addition to simulating a modular circuit-style quantum algorithm, we also show how the magnitude of the Jones polynomial at specific points could be obtained exactly using Fibonacci or Ising anyons. Such an exact algorithm seems ideally suited for a proof of concept demonstration of a topological quantum computer.
FINDING: Topological quantum computing encodes logical qubits in non-local, global degrees of freedom of matter — braiding anyonic excitations — making them immune to local decoherence; Microsoft's Majorana 1 is the first hardware claim of this paradigm. | MATH: Braiding operators are unitary representations of the braid group B_n, generated by σ_i with relations σ_iσ_{i+1}σ_i = σ_{i+1}σ_iσ_{i+1} (Yang–Baxter) and σ_iσ_j = σ_jσ_i (|i−j|≥2). Gates = images of B_n in U(N). Fibonacci anyons: braiding matrices have entries in ℤ[φ], φ = (1+√5)/2 = 1.618…; the Fibonacci F-matrix and R-matrix satisfy (R^F)^3 = 1, and the quantum dimension d_τ = φ. Ising anyons: d_σ = √2, braiding generates only the Clifford group (not universal). | CONNECTION: The Fibonacci anyon model is literally named for the golden ratio — its Hilbert-space dimension grows as φ^n, and the Jones polynomial evaluated at roots of unity (e.g., e^{2πi/5}) governs the braiding phases. φ = 1.618, 1/φ = 0.618, φ² = 2.618 all appe Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Anyon braiding provides non-abelian statistics for topological quantum computation, but the search results are mostly pedagogical videos and one unrelated LHC paper — no experimental breakthrough or new equation is presented. | MATH: Anyons obey fractional statistics: exchange phase θ = π·(1/m) for abelian anyons (m ∈ ℤ), or non-abelian braid group representations for Ising/Fibonacci anyons (e.g., Fibonacci anyon fusion: τ ⊗ τ = 1 ⊕ τ, with quantum dimension φ = (1+√5)/2 ≈ 1.618). Braiding matrices are unitary representations of the braid group B_n, not the permutation group. | CONNECTION: The Fibonacci anyon quantum dimension is exactly the golden ratio φ = 1.618 — a direct geometric harmony constant. The braid group's relation to the Temperley–Lieb algebra uses the parameter δ = φ + φ⁻¹ = √5 ≈ 2.236, and the Jones polynomial evaluates at roots of unity linked to φ. Crystallographic symmetry appears via the fractional quantum Hall effect's Laughlin wavefunction, which has a U Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
Topological quantum computers promise a fault tolerant means to perform quantum computation. Topological quantum computers use particles with exotic exchange statistics called non-Abelian anyons, and the simplest anyon model which allows for universal quantum computation by particle exchange or braiding alone is the Fibonacci anyon model. One classically hard problem that can be solved efficiently using quantum computation is finding the value of the Jones polynomial of knots at roots of unity. We aim to provide a pedagogical, self-contained, review of topological quantum computation with Fibonacci anyons, from the braiding statistics and matrices to the layout of such a computer and the compiling of braids to perform specific operations. Then we use a simulation of a topological quantum computer to explicitly demonstrate a quantum computation using Fibonacci anyons, evaluating the Jones polynomial of a selection of simple knots.
The Jones polynomial, discovered in 1984 [18], is an important knot invariant in topology. Among its many connections to various mathematical and physical areas, it is known (due to Witten [32]) to be intimately connected to Topological Quantum Field Theory (TQFT). The works of Freedman, Kitaev, Larsen and Wang [13, 14] provide an efficient simulation of TQFT by a quantum computer, and vice versa. These results implicitly imply the existence of an efficient quantum algorithm that provides a certain additive approximation of the Jones polynomial at the fifth root of unity, e2π i/5, and moreover, that this problem is BQP-complete. Unfortunately, this important algorithm was never explicitly formulated. Moreover, the results in [13, 14] are heavily based on TQFT, which makes the algorithm essentially inaccessible to computer scientists.We provide an explicit and simple polynomial quantum algorithm to approximate the Jones polynomial of an n strands braid with m crossings at any primitive root of unity e2π i/k, where the running time of the algorithm is polynomial in m,n and k. Our algorithm is based, rather than on TQFT, on well known mathematical results (specifically, the path model representation of the braid group and the uniqueness of the Markov trace for the Temperly Lieb algebra). By the results of [14], our algorithm solves a BQP complete problem.The algorithm we provide exhibits a structure which we hope is generalizable to other quantum algorithmic problems. Candidates of particular interest are the approximations of other downwards self-reducible P-hard problems, most notably, the Potts model.