Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science
Optimized Quantum Circuit Design and Grover Search Resource Estimation for the Camellia Block Cipher
Vandana B Patil
Abstract
With the advancement of quantum computing, quantum circuit implementations of symmetric cryptographic algorithms are essential for evaluating their resistance to quantum attacks. As an ISO-standardized cipher, the efficient quantum circuit construction of Camellia is of great significance. Focusing on minimizing the DW-cost (qubits × Toffoli-depth) while balancing ancilla qubits and Toffoli-depth, this paper proposes an optimized quantum circuit design for Camellia. Specifically: (1) using a serial-multiplication and out-of-place inversion architecture under composite-field decomposition, combined with hierarchical screening for parallelizing bilinear multiplications, a compact in-place S-box quantum circuit is constructed with a DW-cost of 276, 28% lower than the state of the art; (2) a low-gate-count linear-layer circuit is obtained via heuristic search, and gate-sequence reordering then reduces the full depth from 9 to 7 without increasing the gate count; (3) Camellia-128/192/256 quantum circuits are constructed with DW-costs of 119,168, 257,664, and 257,664, achieving reductions of 48%, 52%, and 52% respectively over prior work. A pipelined Grover oracle is further designed and the total resources required for a full Grover search attacking Camellia are evaluated. For Camellia-128, the complete Grover search requires a T-depth of 2.10 × 2⁷⁶ and a total TDW-cost (qubits × T-depth) of 1.00 × 2⁸⁶, reducing T-depth by 75% and TDW-cost by 84% over prior work. The first full Grover search resource estimates for Camellia-192/256 are also presented, with T-depths of 7.20 × 2¹⁰⁸ and 8.11 × 2¹⁴⁰ and TDW-costs of 2.03 × 2¹²³ and 2.79 × 2¹⁵³, respectively. These results show that Grover's attack on Camellia requires fewer quantum resources than on AES at the 128-bit level, implying comparatively weaker post-quantum security at that key size, while the picture reverses at larger key sizes (Section 4).