Wigner-positive light can carry more vacuum–one-photon coherence than every Gaussian mixture under the same mean photon-number budget. We determine the exact Gaussian benchmark and the sharp low-energy scales of this separation. Relative to the unconstrained ceiling \(U(E)=\sqrt{E(1-E)}\), the Gaussian coherence shortfall is \(U(E)-M_G(E)\sim E^{5/2}\), whereas the optimum over all Wigner-positive states satisfies \(\lim_{E\downarrow0}E\log[U(E)-M_\infty(E)]=-1/2\). A hard Fock cutoff changes the cost: with support on levels \(0,\ldots,K\), the shortfall is \((KK!/2)E^{K+1/2}[1+O(K^2E)]\), uniformly for \(K\geq2\) as \(K^2E\to0\). The same comparison gives a direct certification rule and its phase-noise budget. After Gaussian random phase fluctuations of variance \(\Gamma\), the optimized Wigner-positive source exceeds the full Gaussian coherence benchmark precisely below \(\Gamma_{\rm cert}(E)=2E^2+O(E^3)\). Contact constraints determine the rank and leading mixed population of finite-support optimizers; a complete three-level frontier gives an exact test case. The exact benchmark lets an energy-and-coherence measurement exclude all Gaussian-mixture explanations and sets the phase-noise tolerance of that test.
Wigner-positive light can carry more vacuum–one-photon coherence than every Gaussian mixture under the same mean photon-number budget. We determine the exact Gaussian benchmark and the sharp low-energy scales of this separation. Relative to the unconstrained ceiling (U(E)=\sqrt{E(1-E)}), the Gaussian coherence shortfall is (U(E)-M_G(E)\sim E^{5/2}), whereas the optimum over all Wigner-positive states satisfies (\lim_{E\downarrow0}E\log[U(E)-M_\infty(E)]=-1/2). A hard Fock cutoff changes the cost: with support on levels (0,\ldots,K), the shortfall is ((KK!/2)E^{K+1/2}[1+O(K^2E)]), uniformly for (K\geq2) as (K^2E\to0). The same comparison gives a direct certification rule and its phase-noise budget. After Gaussian random phase fluctuations of variance (\Gamma), the optimized Wigner-positive source exceeds the full Gaussian coherence benchmark precisely below (\Gamma_{\rm cert}(E)=2E^2+O(E^3)). Contact constraints determine the rank and leading mixed population of finite-support optimizers; a complete three-level frontier gives an exact test case. The exact benchmark lets an energy-and-coherence measurement exclude all Gaussian-mixture explanations and sets the phase-noise tolerance of that test.
How much high-photon quantum coherence is controlled by a nonnegative phase-space distribution? This article gives quantitative guarantees for approximating an optical state by a finite photon-number block, and constructs physical states showing why the guarantee cannot be inferred from mean energy or Wigner positivity alone at the strength available for a Gaussian-mixture source. Source classes and scope. The comparison concerns one optical mode with [Q,P]=i, mean photon number at most E>0, and a known parity centre. The full class WE consists of normal Wigner-positive states at the exact vacuum min-entropy endpoint, equivalently states supported on the even photon sector in that frame. The subclass GE consists of actual probability mixtures of centred pure squeezed vacua. Mixture labels are unavailable, component energies may be arbitrarily large, and their true average energy is charged. Infinite photon tails are retained. A hierarchy of coherent-tail guarantees. Let PL project onto photon numbers at most L, and define the cutoff error by eL(ρ)=21∥ρ−PLρPL∥1. This quantity includes both discarded photon population and coherence across the cutoff. A mean-energy constraint alone gives the standard OE(L−1/2) guarantee. At the exact Wigner endpoint, the article proves supρ∈WEeL(ρ)≤CE(L+1)−3/4,supρ∈GEeL(ρ)≤L+14E,L≥2. The stronger endpoint bound combines operator positivity and Wigner positivity on the same density kernel, followed by a controlled conversion to trace norm. It requires only mean energy, without a uniform second photon moment. Physical coherence beyond the Gaussian-mixture bound. A family τd∈WE has exact energy E, covariance (E+1/2)I, strictly positive Wigner functions and nonzero population at every even photon number. For cutoffs Ld=Θ(d3), eLd(τd)≥cEd−5/2,(Ld+1)eLd(τd)⟶∞. Thus the Gaussian-mixture L−1 law fails uniformly on the full endpoint class. The construction preserves coherence through an actual optical partial trace and pays its physical energy cost. Positive phase mixing further yields distinct states with identical complete photon statistics and covariance but nearly indistinguishable bounded optical responses. The rare bright branches obey the prescribed mean-energy budget; no efficient experimental preparation protocol or uniform branch-energy bound is assumed. Consequences for a specified measurement system. Each independent copy is measured by bounded centred squeezing followed by a vacuum/nonvacuum binary test. At fixed energy, squeezing range and confidence, let nX(δ) be the minimum worst-case number of copies for trace-distance accuracy δ over source class X. As δ↓0, the bounds are lognGE(δ)=Θ(δ−1),cδ−6/5≤lognWE(δ)≤Cδ−4/3. These are measurement-restricted reconstruction costs. The lower bounds allow adaptive randomized settings. The upper bounds use finite designs and estimates in the original source class, with the energy budget respected for every record; they establish statistical existence rather than an efficient catalogue-generation algorithm. The full-class exponents remain distinct lower and upper bounds. The article also characterizes infinite-order Wigner entropy equality by displaced even-parity support and corrects the pure-Gaussian-only equality clause at infinite order in Dias and Prata (2023). The 27-page integrated article includes the complete proofs, figures and references.
How does the shape of detector noise affect optical communication? Two receivers can have the same noise covariance yet support different communication rates. This work determines both the quantum noise floor and the photon scale for approaching the capacity ceiling of specified non-Gaussian optical measurements. The central distinction is between the size of a high-energy communication advantage and the finite signal energy needed to realize it. Exact quantum noise floor. The receiver is a displacement-covariant measurement with a fixed, unflagged ancillary state. For every vacuum–single-photon seed σt=(1−t)∣0⟩⟨0∣+t∣1⟩⟨1∣, with 0≤t≤1/2, the output Shannon entropy is minimized uniquely by coherent states over all normal quantum inputs, without an input energy or photon-number cutoff. A separate entropy theorem covers three-level seeds σ=p0∣0⟩⟨0∣+p1∣1⟩⟨1∣+p2∣2⟩⟨2∣ with p1≤0.1, p2≤0.001, and p0=1−p1−p2. A capacity decomposition with a matched thermal benchmark. Let E be the mean signal photon budget per use, μ the fixed mean ancillary photon number, k the coherent-input response, and G1+μ the circular Gaussian density with the same second moment. With natural logarithms, the unassisted classical capacity satisfies Cσ(E)=ln(1+1+μE)+D(k∥G1+μ)−Δσ(E). The first term is the exact capacity of the matched thermal receiver, allowing arbitrary quantum encoders. The relative entropy is the limiting high-energy capacity gain. The deficit Δσ(E)=Uσ(E)−Cσ(E), where Uσ(E)=1+ln(E+1+μ)−h(k), is the finite-energy shortfall from that gain. The converse permits mixed, non-Gaussian and entangled block codewords under an average total signal-photon constraint. Response zeros determine the sharp convergence rate. For each fixed nonvacuum seed in the stated families, write the coherent-response transform as k(ξ)=e−uP(u), where u=∣ξ∣2, P(u)=1−μu+vu2, and v=p2/2. Then limE→∞E−lnΔσ(E)=2minP(ζ)=0∣ζ∣. Positive classical modulation of coherent states attains this exponent with exact signal-energy accounting. In the nonvacuum two-level family, ordinary Gaussian modulation instead leaves an algebraic deficit. Uniform estimates cover compact three-level parameter families through the merger of two real zeros into a complex pair. Thus the response's relative entropy determines the high-energy gain, while its zeros determine the leading photon cost of approaching that gain. Finite-energy guarantees. Explicit bounds compare ordinary Gaussian modulation with a positive variance-mixture preparation and an upper bound valid for every quantum code. For t=1/2 and E=1, the capacity gain over the thermal receiver with the same ancillary mean photon number obeys 0.009742<Cσ1/2(1)−Cτ1/2(1)<0.010469nat/use. The better achievable bound depends on signal energy; no exact finite-energy optimizer is assumed. The matched-covariance noise comparison builds on classical additive-noise results of Ihara and Diggavi–Cover. The contribution here connects an exact all-input quantum noise floor to a sharp capacity remainder and positive, energy-accounted preparations. The results concern the stated receiver families and ideal measurement model; ancillary preparation and implementation overhead are separate resources. The integrated article includes complete proofs and five figures.
Loss can restore the vacuum entropy bound without erasing non-Gaussian structure. This paper determines when an entropy statement justifies a coherent-state approximation, when non-Gaussian structure survives optical loss, and what mode and source-request budgets are needed to use that structure. The results give quantum-optics researchers separate criteria for entropy recovery, state approximation, Gaussian concentration and conversion to a specified output. Version 1.5 — revised 10 October 2026. The 96-page PDF contains the main article, Methods, Supplementary Information and references. This revision connects the exact loss boundary to a mode-uniform near-equality certificate, finite-data validation, a conversion-cost lower bound for the same thermally repaired source, and an exact equal-entropy comparison of sources with different conversion-cost exponents. The central figures are updated accordingly. 1. Near-vacuum states can have an unbounded entropy deficit Write νm for the m-mode vacuum and define Δα,m(ρ)=Hα(Wνm)−Hα(Wρ), using natural logarithms; H1 is Shannon entropy. Positive deficit means entropy below vacuum. We construct physical Wigner-positive states satisfying, simultaneously, Em=Tr(Nmρm)→0,21∥ρm−νm∥1→0,dFm(ρm)→0,Δ1,m(ρm)→+∞. Here Fm is the trace-norm-closed convex hull of Gaussian states and dFm uses half the trace norm. Thus proximity to the entire Gaussian model does not control Wigner entropy uniformly in mode number. Independent weak modes amplify a one-mode entropy effect while their total excitation vanishes. For the same sequence, half loss instead gives −Em≤Δ1,m(L1/2⊗mρm)≤0, so the entropy difference from vacuum tends to zero. 2. The exact pure-loss recovery boundary For Wigner-positive inputs, intensity transmissivity η and any fixed positive total input-energy budget E, the sharp threshold is ηc(α)={1/2,α/2,0<α≤1,1<α<2. With Pm,E={ρ:Wρ≥0,Tr(Nmρ)≤E}, supm≥1supρ∈Pm,EΔα,m(Lη⊗mρ)={0,+∞,η≤ηc(α),η>ηc(α). The recovery statement includes the boundary itself and is independent of mode number. Half loss also restores vacuum majorization for arbitrary density operators. For α≥2, established Wigner-norm bounds give the vacuum entropy bound at every transmissivity for Wigner-positive outputs. These statements distinguish a universal guarantee from the earlier sign crossing that a particular source may exhibit. 3. Near equality gives a certificate for the entire input For an arbitrary input ρ, define the half-loss output Shannon excess s(ρ)=h(WL1/2⊗mρ)−m(1+lnπ)≥0. The half-loss identity identifies this quantity with the input's total Wehrl entropy excess. Applying mode-uniform Wehrl stability yields infa∥ρ−∣a⟩⟨a∣∥12≤ln264s(ρ). The bound controls the full input state, with no energy or photon-support restriction. One coherent reference then controls every subsequent quantum channel and every unconditional measurement event. In particular, an event-probability error at most ϵ is guaranteed by s≤(ln2)ϵ2/16. Conversely, a surviving output Gaussian-hull gap enforces s(ρ)≥16ln2dFm(L1/2⊗mρ)2. Recovery of the inequality and proximity to equality therefore support different physical inferences: the former permits residual non-Gaussian structure, while the latter certifies a coherent-state approximation. 4. Surviving structure has mode and conversion costs A thermally repaired vacuum–three-photon source with per-mode occupation c/m has total input energy tending to 3c. Along the recovery boundary, its attenuated state obeys liminfm→∞dFm(ρm,ηc)≥cηc3exp{−c[1−(1−ηc)3]}>0. At half transmission this lower bound is g(c)=(c/8)e−7c/8. Starting from one complete block, Gaussian processing requires Θ(m) output modes to retain any fixed positive gap below this bound at success probability at least a fixed p0>0. Gaussian ancillary states, adaptive Gaussian measurements, feedback, discarding and postselection are included. A distinct task requests fresh independent blocks of this same half-loss source to produce the one-mode target τ∗=(18∣0⟩⟨0∣+6∣1⟩⟨1∣+∣2⟩⟨2∣)/25 within half trace distance 10−6. Let Cm be the infimum of expected complete-block requests divided by success probability, including all failed requests. For fixed 0<c≤1, every achieving Gaussian protocol obeys the asymptotic lower bound logCm≥1281(m/c)1/3−logm−O(1). This is a source-request lower bound; the optimal achievable cost for this source remains undetermined. The proof evaluates a curvature-controlled input certificate for the actual thermally repaired state and applies the Gaussian conversion theorem of the companion paper cited below. 5. Exactly equal entropy does not fix conversion cost For two separate two-mode quartic source families, their mixture probabilities can be adjusted so that their half-loss Shannon entropies are exactly equal. Under a common target, tolerance and failure-inclusive accounting, the inherited matching conversion laws become h(WωA)=h(WωB)=2(1+lnπ)+s,logCA(s)=Θ(s−1/3),logCB(s)=Θ(s−1/2). The target tolerance is held fixed in these asymptotics. The delivered energies after entropy matching satisfy EA,EB∼s/2. At exactly equal energy, the two excesses instead share si(E)=2E−(35/8)E2+O(E3) and differ by sA(E)−sB(E)=15E3+O(E4). Entropy alone therefore cannot select the cheaper source for a fixed output task. 6. Finite data and finite mode budgets Under a declared displaced-input photon-tail bound Tr[N1N>Kσa]≤τK, trusted half loss and all-mode on/off detection with efficiency at least ξmin, the click probability q gives s(σ)≤AKq+τK,AK=1−(1−ξmin/2)KK. A one-sided binomial bound turns this into an entropy confidence certificate. An explicit undisplaced four-photon-cutoff example uses K=4, τK=0, ξ=0.8 and N=3,517,336 independent validation blocks, accepting at most 41 clicks, to certify unconditional event error at most 0.05 with false-acceptance probability at most 0.001 and missed acceptance at most 0.001 on the stated low-click alternative class. All vacuum results count; training, calibration and source heralding are separate costs. When coherent-state approximation alone is the task, the same click measurement supplies a stronger direct fidelity test. The paper also gives all-input finite-budget exclusions above the loss-recovery line. For example, at E=1, α=1.9, η=0.9505 and m=105, the certified bound Δα<0.06942 rules out a target deficit of 0.1 nat. A separate finite single-mode preparation model predicts positive Shannon deficit near η=0.97, negative deficit near η=0.85, and a Gaussian-hull witness above 4.4×10−3 at half transmission, with explicit preparation, measurement-error and raw-trial budgets in the PDF. 7. Dimensional scales, a strict entropy floor and ORCS Near order two, put α=2−δ and L=ln(1/δ). For the maximum deficit Dm,E at fixed total energy, Dm,E(2−δ)=Θm,E(δ/L)for fixed m,Th(δ,E)=ΘE,h(L/δ), where Th is the first mode number allowing a fixed positive deficit h. Beyond a sufficiently large fixed multiple of L/δ, Dm,E(2−δ)=ΘE(mδ). The manuscript separates proved sufficient fronts from necessary exit bounds; the sharp first-crossing coefficient remains open. At every fixed mode number, an energy-unrestricted strict Shannon floor also holds: h(Wρ)≥mln(2π)+εm with εm>0 for all Wigner-positive states. The ordering-resolved coherence spectrum (ORCS) supplies an exact single-mode loss coordinate. With Cr,k denoting the ordering-weighted norm of photon-number-difference block k, Cr,k(Lηρ)=CTη(r),k(ρ),Tη(r)=1−η1−r. For vacuum–n-photon coherence and 1<α<2, C1−α/2(Lη∣n⟩⟨0∣)=(α2η)n. This formula exposes the high-order coherence mechanism at the loss threshold; the universal recovery result is proved through the full nonlinear Wigner-norm inequality. Related papers and history The counterexample paper Wigner entropy below vacuum: physical counterexamples and stability limits expands arXiv:2609.13312v1, submitted on 10 September 2026. This stability paper develops the dimensional, loss-dependent and operational consequences. Its state-approximation and conversion interfaces use the companion results From phase-space entropy to coherent-state error: mode-uniform Rényi–Wehrl stability and Phase records control the conversion cost of non-Gaussian light. The mode-retention comparison connects to Limits to Gaussian concentration of non-Gaussian light.
Positive Wigner functions can have less Shannon entropy than the vacuum, even arbitrarily close to the vacuum state. We construct physical counterexamples and identify the competition that controls their entropy: the relative entropy to the vacuum phase-space density can exceed twice the mean photon number. A two-level family exhibits a finite window in which coherence lowers entropy while preserving global Wigner positivity. A complementary construction repairs a remote negative tail with an exponentially small thermal admixture; an explicit mixing weight of 2×10−21 preserves a rigorously established entropy decrease. Optimisation over all one-mode Wigner-nonnegative states gives the sharp low-energy scale Eγ/[ln(1/E)]β, with γ≃0.7412 and β≃0.5861. Because γ<1, tensor products can have vanishing total energy and trace distance from vacuum while their entropy deficit diverges. We derive the exact half-transmission threshold for universal Shannon-entropy recovery and connect it to companion results showing residual non-Gaussian structure. The counterexamples reveal distinct controls on entropy: coherence sets the local descent, mode number amplifies it, and loss restores the vacuum bound.
Positive Wigner functions can have less Shannon entropy than the vacuum, even arbitrarily close to the vacuum state. We construct physical counterexamples and identify the competition that controls their entropy: the relative entropy to the vacuum phase-space density can exceed twice the mean photon number. A two-level family exhibits a finite window in which coherence lowers entropy while preserving global Wigner positivity. A complementary construction repairs a remote negative tail with an exponentially small thermal admixture; an explicit mixing weight of 2 × 10−21 preserves a rigorously established entropy decrease. Optimisation over all one-mode Wigner-nonnegative states gives the sharp low-energy scale Eγ/[ln(1/E)]β, with γ ≃ 0.7412 and β ≃ 0.5861. Because γ < 1, tensor products can have vanishing total energy and trace distance from vacuum while their entropy deficit diverges. We derive the exact half-transmission threshold for universal Shannon-entropy recovery and connect it to companion results showing residual non-Gaussian structure. The counterexamples reveal distinct controls on entropy: coherence sets the local descent, mode number amplifies it, and loss restores the vacuum bound. Version history. This is an expanded revision of arXiv:2609.13312v1, submitted on 10 September 2026 under the title "Physical Counterexamples to the Wigner Shannon Entropy Conjecture". That version already presented physical Wigner-positive counterexamples, finite-support families, a sixth-order one-photon-core construction, minimum thermal-repair asymptotics and the sharp one-mode low-energy deficit scale. The present revision develops the dimensional and loss-dependent consequences, supplies explicit rational entropy-sign certificates and a smaller thermal-repair example, and connects these results to the companion studies cited in the manuscript.
How much classical information can a noisy optical channel carry when both signal energy and preshared entanglement are limited? This work gives an exact capacity frontier for this joint resource problem. It allows one to determine the best asymptotic communication rate, price the benefit of additional entanglement, and distinguish the effect of tolerating errors from that of changing how entanglement is supplied. Exact capacity under two resource constraints The setting is any fixed bosonic Gaussian channel Φ with finitely many input and output modes. Signal energy is measured by a positive quadratic Hamiltonian HG=21RTGR, with G>0 and ground energy E0; R collects the canonical quadratures. The budgets satisfy E≥E0 and P≥0. For an n-use code, the mean total signal energy is at most nE, while the same initially shared maximally entangled state has Schmidt rank Kn satisfying logKn≤nP. Thus P is a strictly supplied entanglement rate. Encoders may be arbitrary joint quantum operations, and decoding may be collective. The classical capacity is C(E,P)=maxU≥Vphysical21Tr(GU)≤E,SG(V)≤P[SG(ΦU)+SG(V)−SG(ΦcV)]. Here V is a Gaussian seed covariance, U is the average-input covariance, and U−V is the displacement-modulation covariance. A covariance is physical when V+iΩ/2≥0, where Ω is the canonical commutation matrix and the vacuum covariance is I/2. The notation SG denotes Gaussian von Neumann entropy, and Φc is the full complementary channel, including any environment purification. All logarithms are natural, so rates are in nats per channel use. This formula replaces optimization over arbitrary quantum block codes by a finite-dimensional covariance optimization. It supplies both an achievable rate and a converse against non-Gaussian, correlated encodings. At P=0, it also determines the unassisted capacity of general fixed finite-mode Gaussian channels, including channels without a passive decomposition into independent modes. The reduction specifies the exact capacity value; it does not require a closed-form optimizer for every device. Energy and strict entanglement supply respond differently to errors For a fixed allowed average error 0≤ε<1, the exact capacity under the mean-energy constraint is Cε(E,P)=C(E0+1−εE−E0,P). Allowing failure rescales the mean energy above the ground state, but leaves the strict initial entanglement budget unchanged. The proof uses an exponential strong converse for codes whose inputs obey a hard total-energy cutoff. In a different model, where a readable flag permits random entanglement supply constrained only on average, the work establishes an achievable bound and a strict small-supply advantage for thermal attenuation at positive energy and fixed nonzero error. That comparison identifies the operational importance of the supply rule; it is not a complete capacity characterization of the flagged model. The communication value of entanglement For a thermal attenuator, let 0<η<1 be the transmissivity, b>0 the output mean photon number for vacuum input, and N the input mean photon number. Write its capacity as CN(P), and define g(N)=(N+1)log(N+1)−NlogN. The gain from entanglement obeys the sharp bound 0≤CN(P)−CN(0)≤1+bηP. For every fixed N>0, the coefficient η/(1+b) is attained as the initial right derivative at P=0. In the low-photon limit, the stronger resource law is CN(P)−CN(0)=1+bηmin{P,g(N)}+O(N),N↓0. The remainder is uniform over P≥0 at fixed η and positive b. Noise therefore determines the conversion efficiency, while g(N)∼Nlog(1/N) sets the entanglement scale sufficient for saturation. This uniform limit concerns the entanglement budget, not a simultaneous limit of vanishing thermal noise. Multimode resource allocation and scope A coupled two-mode example demonstrates how the frontier can guide resource allocation. A global resource-price certificate proves that a legal covariance pair exceeds the entire common-passive-frame Gaussian profile hull by at least 10−5 nat per two-mode use at specified budgets. The comparison includes all common passive frames, local squeezing and average-resource mixtures. The mechanism is the freedom to choose different mode allocations for the seed and average input; the benchmark is this precisely defined Gaussian class, rather than all unentangled encodings. The universal scope is the stated family of fixed finite-mode Gaussian channels, positive quadratic signal costs and strict initial maximally entangled Schmidt-rank supply, with unrestricted joint encoding and collective decoding. The model has no feedback or credit for returned entanglement. The capacity frontier and its resource consequences provide a common way to assess optical communication designs under these operational constraints.