Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Comparison of Minimum Distance Bounds on Tanner/Expander Codes

H. L. Janwa, A. K. Lal

Published Oct 3, 2001• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

On tightness of Tanner's lower bound for the minimum distance of regular LDPC codes

Tomoharu Shibuya

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

On Tanner Codes: Minimum Distance and Decoding

Heeralal Janwa, Arbind Kumar Lal

Applicable Algebra in Engineering Communication and Computing•Feb 1, 2003•25 citations

Improved Decoding of Tanner Codes

Zhaienhe Zhou, Zeyu Guo

In this paper, we present improved decoding algorithms for expander-based Tanner codes. We begin by developing a randomized linear-time decoding algorithm that, under the condition that$\delta d_{0}>2$, corrects up to$\alpha n$errors for a Tanner code$T\left(G, C_{0}\right)$, where$G$is a ($c, d, \alpha, \delta$) bipartite expander with$n$left vertices, and$C_{0} \subseteq \mathbb{F}_{2}^{d}$is a linear inner code with minimum distance$d_{0}$. This result improves upon the previous work of Cheng, Ouyang, Shangguan, and Shen (RANDOM 2024), which required$\delta d_{0}>3$. We further derandomize the algorithm to obtain a deterministic linear-time decoding algorithm with the same decoding radius. Our algorithm improves upon the previous deterministic algorithm of Cheng et al. by achieving a decoding radius of$\alpha n$, compared with the previous radius of$\frac{2 \alpha}{d_{0}(1+0.5 c \delta)} n$. Additionally, we investigate the size-expansion trade-off introduced by the recent work of Chen, Cheng, Li, and Ouyang (IEEE TIT 2023), and use it to provide new bounds on the minimum distance of Tanner codes. Specifically, we prove that the minimum distance of a Tanner code$T\left(G, C_{0}\right)$is approximately$f_{\delta}^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{d_{0}}\right) \alpha n$, where$f_{\delta}(\cdot)$is the Size-Expansion Function. As another application, we improve the decoding radius of our decoding algorithms from$\alpha n$to approximately$f_{\delta}^{-1}\left(\frac{2}{d_{0}}\right) \alpha n$.

arXiv:2501.12293•IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jun 22, 2025•2 citations

Eigenvalue bounds on the pseudocodeword weight of expander codes

Christine A. Kelley, Deepak Sridhara

Four different ways of obtaining low-density parity-check codesfrom expander graphs are considered. For each case, lower bounds on the minimum stopping set size and the minimum pseudocodeword weight of expander (LDPC) codes are derived. These bounds are compared with the known eigenvalue-based lower bounds on the minimum distance of expander codes. Furthermore, Tanner's parity-oriented eigenvalue lower bound on the minimumdistance is generalized to yield a new lower bound on the minimum pseudocodeword weight. These bounds are useful in predicting the performance of LDPC codes under graph-based iterative decoding and linear programming decoding.

arXiv:0708.2462•Advances in Mathematics of Communications•Jan 1, 2007•11 citations

An Improvement to Generalized-Minimum-Distance Decoding

Steven S. Pietrobon, Robert Huijie Deng, A. Lafanechere +1 more

•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Bounds for error-correcting codes (Corresp.)

W. W. Peterson

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jan 1, 1962•2 citations
In this paper, we present improved decoding algorithms for expander-based Tanner codes. We begin by developing a randomized linear-time decoding algorithm that, under the condition thatδd0>2\delta d_{0}>2δd0​>2, corrects up toαn\alpha nαnerrors for a Tanner codeT(G,C0)T\left(G, C_{0}\right)T(G,C0​), whereGGGis a (c,d,α,δc, d, \alpha, \deltac,d,α,δ) bipartite expander withnnnleft vertices, andC0⊆F2dC_{0} \subseteq \mathbb{F}_{2}^{d}C0​⊆F2d​is a linear inner code with minimum distanced0d_{0}d0​. This result improves upon the previous work of Cheng, Ouyang, Shangguan, and Shen (RANDOM 2024), which requiredδd0>3\delta d_{0}>3δd0​>3. We further derandomize the algorithm to obtain a deterministic linear-time decoding algorithm with the same decoding radius. Our algorithm improves upon the previous deterministic algorithm of Cheng et al. by achieving a decoding radius ofαn\alpha nαn, compared with the previous radius of2αd0(1+0.5cδ)n\frac{2 \alpha}{d_{0}(1+0.5 c \delta)} nd0​(1+0.5cδ)2α​n. Additionally, we investigate the size-expansion trade-off introduced by the recent work of Chen, Cheng, Li, and Ouyang (IEEE TIT 2023), and use it to provide new bounds on the minimum distance of Tanner codes. Specifically, we prove that the minimum distance of a Tanner codeT(G,C0)T\left(G, C_{0}\right)T(G,C0​)is approximatelyfδ−1(1d0)αnf_{\delta}^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{d_{0}}\right) \alpha nfδ−1​(d0​1​)αn, wherefδ(⋅)f_{\delta}(\cdot)fδ​(⋅)is the Size-Expansion Function. As another application, we improve the decoding radius of our decoding algorithms fromαn\alpha nαnto approximatelyfδ−1(2d0)αnf_{\delta}^{-1}\left(\frac{2}{d_{0}}\right) \alpha nfδ−1​(d0​2​)αn.
Four different ways of obtaining low-density parity-check codesfrom expander graphs are considered. For each case, lower bounds on the minimum stopping set size and the minimum pseudocodeword weight of expander (LDPC) codes are derived. These bounds are compared with the known eigenvalue-based lower bounds on the minimum distance of expander codes. Furthermore, Tanner's parity-oriented eigenvalue lower bound on the minimumdistance is generalized to yield a new lower bound on the minimum pseudocodeword weight. These bounds are useful in predicting the performance of LDPC codes under graph-based iterative decoding and linear programming decoding.