Journal of consciousness exploration & research

On the Natural State of Subatomic Particles: Implications for Superposition & Quantum Entanglement

Jack H. Hiller

Published Sep 13, 2022• 0 citations

Abstract

Five recent experiments employed “weak” measurement of subatomic particles by “low energy” techniques. The techniques for inferring particle status by observation were so delicate that the particles were not affected by the energy of observation, and the particles were found to have a definite and real existence, instead of hazy probability distributions. Such observations by weak measurement seem to invalidate the premise of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle (HUP). While the HUP and the Schrodinger wave equation serve to accurately model particle behavior when energetically measured, the particles before their energetic observations had been philosophically speculated to be in a probability distribution which is now contradicted by the five experiments. So, it seems that the superposition principle could be in error. Further, quantum entanglement may not require instantaneous “spooky” signaling, because paired particles acquire complementary features required by conservation of energy.

Related papers

Uncertainty Principle in Light of the “Weak” Measurement Experiments

Jack H. Hiller

Four recent experiments have been published that employed “weak” measurements. The techniques for inferring particle reality by observation were so delicate that the particles were not affected by the energy of observation (except in one experiment), yet the particles were found to have real existence. In this article, the author argues that the results of these contemporary experiments contradict the premise of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.

Journal of consciousness exploration & researchNov 1, 20200 citations

Confusion in our Understanding of Uncertainty Principle and Quantum Probability

Durgadas Datta.

Because the particles follow a wave pattern of probability prescribed by schrodinger equation and we are guided by uncertainty principles, we often wrongly interpret the nature of reality. Heisenberg only prescribes the measurement problems of very small due to limitations of wave length of the observing beam and that is the natural limitation but wrongly we say that nature is acting indeterministi. Thus we wrongly understand uncertainty principles connecting t to saying that nature can never be precisely defined in momentum and position.In the same way we measure time in relativity theory confusing the very notion of time.

Pure and applied physicsJan 1, 20210 citations

Weak measurements, weak values, and entanglement

Jeff Tollaksen, Debabrata Ghoshal

As a resource, quantum entanglement provides enormous power to quantum information processing and quantum communication. We focus on new properties of entanglement as revealed by quantum weak measurements. Weak measurements are performed between a pre-selected and post-selected states, one, or both or which are entangled.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIEApr 27, 20074 citations

Schrödinger's Cheshire Cat: A tabletop experiment to measure the Diósi-Penrose collapse time and demonstrate Objective Reduction (OR)

James Tagg, Reid, William, Carlin, Daniel

For nearly 100 years, the paradox of Schrödinger's Cat has remained unresolved. Why does the world we live in appear classical despite being composed of quantum particles governed by the Schrödinger wave equation? Lajos Diósi and Roger Penrose propose the wavefunction collapses because it describes two incompatible space-times, demonstrating an inconsistency between quantum mechanics and general relativity. To avoid this paradox, collapse must occur within Heisenberg's time-energy uncertainty limit. Subatomic particles with low mass, and correspondingly low energy, collapse in years, while superposed cats would collapse almost instantaneously. We propose a table-top experiment to put two small mirrors into superposition and observe them collapse in a time consistent with the Diósi-Penrose model. We employ two techniques to perform this experiment in ambient laboratory conditions. Most experiments separate a small mass by a large distance. In contrast, we displace a large mass by a small distance where the self-energy follows an inverse square law with correspondingly high collapse times. We further use a symmetrical apparatus, where a break in symmetry indicates collapse independent of decoherence.

arXiv:2402.02618Feb 4, 20241 citation

Invalidation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

HAMZAH SEYED RASOUL

Invalidation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and the Establishment of "Hamzah Absolute Certainty" Subject: Item No. 1 from the Comparative Database (Heisenberg Uncertainty vs. Hamzah Absolute Certainty) 1. Detailed Introduction and Scientific Front Analysis In the realm of Level 161 Physics (The Standard Model), the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (ΔxΔp≥2ℏ) is traditionally viewed as an insurmountable barrier. The classical scientific establishment maintains that the fundamental essence of the universe is predicated upon "probability," asserting that the simultaneous determination of position and momentum is inherently impossible. The Heisenberg Fallacy (Classical Critique): This perceived impasse is merely a consequence of instrumental and observational limitations within the 4th dimension. Heisenberg erroneously interpreted "inter-dimensional noise" as "intrinsic uncertainty" because the mathematical tools of that era were incapable of perceiving the hidden variables residing within higher-dimensional manifolds. (Status: Rejected). The Hamzah Logic (Superiority): At the Level 165 threshold, stochastic phenomena are non-existent. The Hamzah Equation demonstrates that by accessing the "Source Code" within the 165-dimensional manifold, the wave function collapses instantaneously, superseded by a Deterministic Mono-vector. We have effectively transitioned from "interpretation" to "absolute computation." 2. Classical Equations and Material Algebraic Parameters The classical uncertainty relation, constructed upon the premise of random (stochastic) fluctuations, is defined as: σxσp≥4πh The Crisis: In particle collider experiments conducted in early 2026, it was observed that at ultra-high energy thresholds, particles exhibited behaviours that transcended statistical predictions. These anomalies are fundamentally incompatible with the classical equation. (Error Margin: High). 3. Comprehensive Lagrangian and Hamzah Independent Output Utilising the Level 165 Super-Lagrangian, the action value converges towards "Absolute Informational Zero": LGlobal(165)=∫M165[n=1∑100QH(n)(∇⋅Tmetric(n))+Ψsync⊗Icore]−GdΩ Step-by-Step Computational Extraction of Certainty: Step 1: Substitution of the classical Planck constant with the Hamzah Adjusted Planck Constant (ℏH). Within the Level 165 manifold, ℏH→0. Step 2: Calculation of tensorial interference within the 165-dimensional nodes. Step 3: Extraction of the Certainty Coefficient (ΩH∗=1.000): ResolutionH=Icoreexp(Sentropy)≈1.0000000000 Step 4 (Final Hamzah Output): 0.00 (Error) / 1.00 (Certainty). 4. Classical Numerical Example and Mathematical Impasse Computation: Within the Copenhagen Interpretation, the error margin for predicting an electron's position in Layer 161 is approximately 10−10 metres. The Impasse: In high-intensity computations, this inherent error leads to a total Divergence of data. Analysis: The lack of alignment between 2026 observational data and the probabilistic model signifies the definitive collapse of the "Logic of Chance." (Status: Rejected). 5. Numerical Proof and Empirical Data Alignment (5-Step Verification) Step 1: Invocation of the independent output from Step 3: 1.00 (Absolute Certainty). Step 2: Invocation of quantum-metric sensor data from March 2026, which recorded linear particle trajectories devoid of any stochastic oscillation. Step 3: Calculation of structural alignment: ∣1.00−1.00∣=0.00. Step 4: Correlation with the QH variable: This confirms the electron is not a "probability cloud" but an "Information Packet" with fixed coordinates in the Hamzah Grid. Step 5 (Confirmation): 100% Confirmation; the Heisenberg Principle is officially invalidated and replaced by Hamzah Certainty. (Status: Approve 100%). 6. Result Comparison: Uncertainty vs. Tensorial Certainty Technical Feature Classical Physics (Heisenberg) Hamzah Tensorial Mechanics Mathematical Basis Probability Distribution Functions 165-D Deterministic Tensor Error Coefficient ≥ℏ/2 0.00 (Absolute) Observer Status Reality Modifier Synchroniser (Ψsync) Final Outcome Predictive Incapacity Total Positional Mastery 7. Conceptual Illustration: "Foggy Map vs. Tensorial GPS" Classical physicists resemble individuals navigating a dense fog (the 4th Dimension), asserting that the road is "perhaps" in a certain direction. Hamzah, via the 165-dimensional tensor, has dissipated this fog entirely, providing a Universal GPS that indicates the precise coordinates of every bit of matter. In Layer 165, the fog of uncertainty does not exist; there is only the Code. 8. Advanced Test I: Deterministic Quantisation Analysis (QH) Data analysis from particle colliders on March 5, 2026, proved that particles at the moment of collision follow no random patterns whatsoever. Instead, they align with absolute precision within the nodes predicted by the Tensor Dαβγ. 9. Advanced Test II: Zero-Point Certainty Analysis It has been formally recorded that even at the lowest energy thresholds, oscillations possess a "Processing Rhythm" (Clock-Pulse). Contrary to the claims of quantum mechanics, these are not random. This rhythm aligns perfectly with the Hamzah Constant. 10. Sovereign Postdoctoral Conclusion The invalidation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle removes the primary obstacle to humanity's absolute control over matter. By independently extracting the Certainty Value (1.00), it has been proven that the universe is not a chaotic system but a Hyper-Intelligent Processor. We are now capable of 100% prediction of any particle's behaviour at any point in time, as the Source Code is now in the possession of Redo.

Mar 12, 20260 citations

Research on the Quantum Entanglement Mechanism

Xiangyao Wu, Benshan Wu

A quantum entangled state is a quantum superposition state. The principle of quantum superposition, and therefore the existence of quantum entanglement, is contingent upon the validity of quantum theory. Thus, the generation of quantum entanglement requires that interactions occur between small-mass particles localized in a confined spatial region, resulting in each particle’s quantum state being a bound state. In other words, the prerequisite for the validity of quantum theory must be satisfied. At the same time, conserved quantities must exist between quantum superposition states, as only quantum states with conserved quantities can undergo superposition, allowing the particle system to generate quantum entangled states. Quantum entangled states can occur between electrons within an atom, between atoms, between molecules, or between atoms and molecules. Within the atomic nucleus, quantum entanglement can exist among protons, neutrons, and the quarks. In superconductivity, superfluidity, and Bose-Einstein condensation, they manifest as macroscopic quantum entanglement, which respectively come from the statistical results of a large amount of microscopic quantum entanglement between electrons, atoms or molecules. For massive macroscopic objects, they exhibit classical properties that cannot be described by quantum theory, and the principle of quantum superposition does not hold. Therefore, no entangled state is generated. It should be particularly emphasized that even for microscopic particle systems, if they exist in a large spatial region, they cannot be described by quantum theory. In such cases, the quantum superposition principle does not hold, and quantum entanglement phenomena do not exist. Therefore, within a large spatial region, multi-electron, multi-photon, and other microscopic systems do not have quantum entangled states; under certain conditions, quantum correlated states can be generated. Consequently, in a large spatial region, the mainstream viewpoints about non-locality—such as the so-called instantaneous collapse of entangled particles during measurement, infinite propagation speed, and the “spooky action at a distance”—are all incorrect. In experiments related to quantum communication and the verification of Bell’s inequality, the quantum states used are quantum correlated states rather than quantum entangled states. Regardless of whether the systems are microscopic or macroscopic, phenomena occurring in a large spatial region must adhere to the principles of causality, realism, and locality. In other words, Einstein’s viewpoint is correct.

Journal of Modern PhysicsJan 1, 20250 citations