SHORT VERSION The wave function is used here as a conceptual figure of compressed reality, not as a mathematical tool. Everything that vibrates expresses a wave function, and the wave function itself has its own wave function. In the informational field, instantaneous depth generates animation: emergence already contains compressed information that becomes conceivable only when unrolled. Conception acts as a volumetric constant of emergence, assigning animation. Animation and wave function coincide: only the conceived is applied wave function, actualized reality. This requires a spatial equation, not a linear one: possibilities must be unpacked before informing animation. In depth, problem and solution coexist simultaneously within the same informational configuration. Conception does not eliminate the problem; it unpacks it until the solution it already contains becomes conceivable. ABSTRACT (OpenAIRE) This text reinterprets the wave function as a conceptual figure of compressed reality rather than a mathematical expression of quantum probabilities. Conception is understood as applied wave function: information that becomes actualized through animation. The informational field is described as instantaneous depth, where information, possibility, and solution coexist simultaneously rather than linearly. Conception functions as a volumetric constant of emergence, requiring a spatial equation capable of unpacking possibilities already contained within compressed reality. Problem and solution are inscribed together within animation. Conception does not remove the problem but unfolds its configuration until the solution becomes conceivable.
SHORT VERSION The wave function is used here as a conceptual figure of compressed reality, not as a mathematical tool. Everything that vibrates expresses a wave function, and the wave function itself has its own wave function. In the informational field, instantaneous depth generates animation: emergence already contains compressed information that becomes conceivable only when unrolled. Conception acts as a volumetric constant of emergence, assigning animation. Animation and wave function coincide: only the conceived is applied wave function, actualized reality. This requires a spatial equation, not a linear one: possibilities must be unpacked before informing animation. In depth, problem and solution coexist simultaneously within the same informational configuration. Conception does not eliminate the problem; it unpacks it until the solution it already contains becomes conceivable. ABSTRACT (OpenAIRE) This text reinterprets the wave function as a conceptual figure of compressed reality rather than a mathematical expression of quantum probabilities. Conception is understood as applied wave function: information that becomes actualized through animation. The informational field is described as instantaneous depth, where information, possibility, and solution coexist simultaneously rather than linearly. Conception functions as a volumetric constant of emergence, requiring a spatial equation capable of unpacking possibilities already contained within compressed reality. Problem and solution are inscribed together within animation. Conception does not remove the problem but unfolds its configuration until the solution becomes conceivable.
SHORT DESCRIPTION (EN) A speculative‑ontological exploration of the atomic, energetic and informational layers of reality, proposing an animic‑informational field that underlies energy and enables the emergence of material form through resonance and observation. ABSTRACT (EN) Concise, phenomenological, Zenodo‑ready This work explores the layered structure of reality by examining the relationship between the atomic, energetic and informational planes. The author argues that while each field appears autonomous, deeper observation reveals functional interdependence. The text proposes the existence of an informational‑animic field underlying energy, responsible for animation and the collapse of energetic potential into material form. Speculation is presented as a legitimate and necessary method for accessing deeper layers of reality beyond the limits of conventional scientific inquiry. EXTENDED DESCRIPTION (EN) Full-length, structured, aligned with The Liminal Field This contribution develops a speculative‑ontological model of reality composed of three primary layers: the atomic‑material plane, the energetic‑subatomic plane and a deeper informational‑animic field. The author argues that while each field appears autonomous, their functions reveal a hierarchical and relational structure. The energetic field vitalizes matter, while the informational field animates energy, providing the implicit instructions that collapse indeterminate energetic states into crystallized material expressions. The text critiques the scientific tendency to dismiss the animic field as mystical or non‑investigable, highlighting how speculation has historically preceded scientific discovery. The informational field is described as a compressed, undifferentiated potential that becomes active when its implicit function is investigated, triggering the wave‑particle collapse. The liminal field mediates between layers, enabling progressive animation and the emergence of structured reality. The work concludes by proposing a deeper foundational field — a holographic point of total informational compression — from which all layers derive. This field represents the interior science of existence, accessible through speculative inquiry and experiential knowledge. OpenAIRE DESCRIPTION (EN) Semantic, indexable, research‑graph friendly This work examines the relational structure of atomic, energetic and informational fields, proposing an animic‑informational substrate responsible for animation and the collapse of energetic potential into material form. The text highlights the role of speculation in expanding scientific understanding and introduces a hierarchical ontology mediated by the liminal field. The contribution is relevant to research on energetic ontology, information theory, consciousness studies, liminality and speculative metaphysics. KEYWORDS (EN) OpenAIRE‑compatible Energetic field Informational field Animation Wave‑particle collapse Liminal field Speculative ontology Subatomic structure Emergence Interior science The Liminal Field
Wave Functions: Mathematics Is RealityIf the ultimate reality of anything is mathematical, it ensues that there must be some kind of 'personal' mathematical 'object', or property, or 'signature', attached to everything and anything, i.e. to any object or person or any definable, correlated collection or assembly of things -in brief, to every conceivable thing, object, or correlated collection of things in the universe.Indeed, that mathematical object must be, in some sense, more real than the object itself, because it must describe and determine that object across the range of all its possible realities, both actualized and potential, within any applicable dimensionality.
Wave equations -wave functions -are the mathematical way of describing the behavior of things in quantum mechanics. The physical basis of this is that on the microscopic level every object is at the same time both a particle a bundle of waves. So the mathematics that describes dynamics on this level turns out to be the mathematics of wave functions. Wave functions are far from being the easiest things in mathematics to solve compute with. To calculate the behavior of an atomic nucleus, for instance, involves working with dozens or hundreds of wave functions (each proton neutron has its own) that are related to one another in such a way that the solution to each one depends on all the others. They cannot be solved one by one; they have to be solved ensemble, dozens or hundreds of simultaneous equations, as mathematicians would describe By hand the task is formidable, perhaps practically impossible. However, at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, a Cray 1, one of the latest, biggest fastest of computers has now come to the rescue. Using it M. S. Weiss co-workers have been able to calculate what happens in various kinds of collisions of a krypton nucleus with a lanthanum nucleus. Then, with the latest computer graphics they are able to display these processes in an animated film. The two nuclei approach each other, collide, in some cases fuse, in others come apart, everything is decorated with bright false colors representing the density levels of matter inside the nuclei. The pictures the information in them represent the solution of 146 simultaneous wave functions, one for every two nucleons, every two particles in the two nuclei. There is one function for every two nucleons rather than every one because the mathematics contains one important approximation. Nucleons can come with two directions of spin, spin up or spin down. This theory does not distinguish between the two spin states, so each function actually represents the average of one of each. The pictures show a dozen instances, starting from a head-on collision proceeding to instances of greater greater offset between the centers of the two nuclei until they arrive at a sideswipe in which the nuclei hardly touch each other. The collisions near head-on result in fusion. A little offset contributes an angular momentum: The fusion product rotates. More offset the nuclei collide, losing a lot of energy, but retaining enough to come apart again. This is known as deep inelastic scattering. Finally, an instance where the two nuclei do not touch, but where distortions vibrations are produced in them by the force between them when they are close. Weiss says the film wakes physicists up when he shows it at the end of a talk. He mentions one experimentalist who came up said how nice it was to be able to actually see these things. At least four levels of abstraction, Weiss comments, and he talks about seeing it. Yet viewing the film, one can understand what the experimentalist meant. The calculations behind the film are quite accurate in predicting the main events of the collisions, that is what is really important. According to Weiss, they predict accurately the conditions under which fusion is likely, the proper range of deep inelastic scattering so forth. In the pictures the behavior looks like that of a fluid, liquid drops coming together. Weiss stresses that it is actually the sum of discrete motions, those 146 individual wave functions. One of the purposes of the exercise was to see whether it was possible to derive a macroscopic theory that is, one that would give a simpler mathematical expression for the over-all behavior of the nuclei, that would yield the desired predictions without having to start from the 146 individual wave functions. It turns out, Weiss says, that a macroscopic theory is possible in some particular cases, but the microscopic one, starting from the individual wave functions, remains the general one. Computation was the serious hindrance to doing it before now. As Weiss says, the theory itself was written down years ago by P. A. M. Dirac, one of the pioneer theorists of quantum mechanics. It took Weiss co-workers a year to figure out how to feed the computation to the Each of the dozen collisions which takes about 10-21 seconds in real time, but is displayed in extreme slow motion in the film-took an hour of computation time using the core of the Cray That's expensive computing, but, says Weiss, I would never try it on a lesser computer. O
Technical paper abstract: Significant open issues remain in conventional quantum theory that may need novel ideas to resolve. The usual model of a quantum wave function is an epistemic one in which the wave function encodes probabilities of future measurement outcomes. This model often falls short of adequately explaining certain basics, like the double slit experiment. We present here a new approach to modeling the wave function as a physical object, supported by analogies to the revolutionary theory of information conceived by Claude Shannon in the 1940’s. Our theory, we term Actualation Theory (AT), where actualation is a physical analog to information, provides a foundation for development of the physical, or ontic, wave function. We also provide some extension to Shannon Theory (ST) in developing comprehensive analogies to Actualation Theory (AT) in support of the physical wave function model.This paper does not represent a declaration that the concepts are valid and should be preferred, instead it is a proposal for consideration and further development.
I (consciousness) am, therefore, I think. Hence, there is a direct relationship between ‘Consciousness’ and ‘Thought’. This could be better understood if a concept of ‘Field of Consciousness’ is invoked. It is conjectured that the concept of ‘Fields’, may be helpful in understanding the propagation of ‘Thoughts’ (considered as ‘Energy’), in the ‘Field of Consciousness’. If this view is acceptable, then it may be worthwhile giving a mathematical expression to this abstract phenomenon of ‘Field of Consciousness’, linking it with ‘Thoughts’. The ‘Thought Waves’ which are the energy waves, actually are the ‘Quantum Waves - the Waves of Probability’, a concept similar to one hypothesized by Schrödinger and Max born in continuation of Louis de Broglie’s hypothesis in ‘Quantum Theory’. Thought waves will have a ‘Wave Function’. For a thought to materialize, it would be necessary for the ‘Wave Function’ to collapse in one’s mind.
The wave function gives not the density of stuff, but gives rather (on squaring its modulus) the density of probability. Probability of what, exactly? Not of the electron being there, but of the electron being found there, if its position is ‘measured’. Why this aversion to ‘being’ and insistence on ‘finding’? The founding fathers were unable to form a clear picture of things on the remote atomic scale . John S. Bell (1990) Introduction The physical meaning of the wave function is an important interpretative problem of quantum mechanics. Notwithstanding nearly ninety years of development of the theory, it is still an unsolved issue. During recent years, more and more research has been done on the ontological status and meaning of the wave function (see, e.g. Monton, 2002; Lewis, 2004; Gao, 2011a, 2011b; Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph, 2012; Ney and Albert, 2013). In particular, Pusey, Barrett and Rudolph (2012) demonstrated that under certain non-trivial assumptions such as the preparation independence assumption, the wave function of a quantum system is a representation of the physical state of the system. This poses a further question, namely whether the reality of the wave function can be argued without resorting to non-trivial assumptions. Moreover, a harder problem is to determine the ontological meaning of the wave function, which is still a hot topic of debate in the realistic alternatives to quantum mechanics such as the de Broglie–Bohm theory or Bohmian mechanics (Belot, 2012). In this chapter, we will first give a clearer argument for the reality of the wave function in terms of protective measurements, which does not depend on non-trivial assumptions and can also overcome existing objections. Next, based on an analysis of the mass and charge properties of a quantum system, we will propose a new ontological interpretation of the wave function. According to this interpretation, the wave function of an N -body system represents the state of ergodic motion of N particles.