The Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) has emerged as a leading candidate for near-term quantum advantage in combinatorial optimisation, but most evaluations remain confined to synthetic benchmarks such as random MaxCut instances. Translating QAOA to real-world problem instances -- with irregular graph structures, heterogeneous constraint types, and practical scale requirements -- introduces additional challenges including QUBO formulation overhead, hardware embedding costs, and the performance gap between QAOA on structured real instances vs. random benchmarks. This paper presents the Real-World QAOA (RW-QAOA) framework, a systematic methodology for applying QAOA to four real-world application domains: supply chain network optimisation, financial portfolio rebalancing, telecommunications frequency assignment, and traffic signal timing optimisation. RW-QAOA introduces three methodological contributions: a domain-adaptive QUBO formulator (DAQF) encoding real-world constraints as penalised QUBO terms with penalty coefficient auto-tuning; a warm-start initialisation strategy (WSIS) using classical heuristic solutions to seed QAOA parameter search; and a layered noise adaptation protocol (LNAP) adjusting circuit depth based on real-time device calibration data. RW-QAOA is evaluated on real problem instances from industry partners across all four domains on IBM Quantum Eagle (127-qubit). RW-QAOA achieves solution quality within 4.2% of classical exact solvers across all four domains, outperforming classical greedy heuristics by 12.4% (SD = 3.8%) on average. WSIS reduces QAOA parameter convergence iterations by 48.4%. LNAP improves approximation ratio by 8.4pp vs. fixed-depth QAOA under device noise variation.
The Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) has emerged as a leading candidate for near-term quantum advantage in combinatorial optimisation, but most evaluations remain confined to synthetic benchmarks such as random MaxCut instances. Translating QAOA to real-world problem instances -- with irregular graph structures, heterogeneous constraint types, and practical scale requirements -- introduces additional challenges including QUBO formulation overhead, hardware embedding costs, and the performance gap between QAOA on structured real instances vs. random benchmarks. This paper presents the Real-World QAOA (RW-QAOA) framework, a systematic methodology for applying QAOA to four real-world application domains: supply chain network optimisation, financial portfolio rebalancing, telecommunications frequency assignment, and traffic signal timing optimisation. RW-QAOA introduces three methodological contributions: a domain-adaptive QUBO formulator (DAQF) encoding real-world constraints as penalised QUBO terms with penalty coefficient auto-tuning; a warm-start initialisation strategy (WSIS) using classical heuristic solutions to seed QAOA parameter search; and a layered noise adaptation protocol (LNAP) adjusting circuit depth based on real-time device calibration data. RW-QAOA is evaluated on real problem instances from industry partners across all four domains on IBM Quantum Eagle (127-qubit). RW-QAOA achieves solution quality within 4.2% of classical exact solvers across all four domains, outperforming classical greedy heuristics by 12.4% (SD = 3.8%) on average. WSIS reduces QAOA parameter convergence iterations by 48.4%. LNAP improves approximation ratio by 8.4pp vs. fixed-depth QAOA under device noise variation.
Large-scale combinatorial and continuous optimisation problems remain intractable for classical algorithms as problem dimensionality scales. Quantum computing offers advantages through parallelism, amplitude amplification, and tunnelling, but practical realisation on near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices demands careful algorithm design balancing advantage against noise resilience and circuit depth constraints. This paper presents the Quantum Optimisation Algorithm Suite (QOAS), a systematic framework across four algorithmic paradigms: Adaptive QAOA with dynamic depth scheduling; Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) for QUBO problems; hybrid Quantum Annealing (QA); and Grover-enhanced Branch and Bound (GBB) for constrained integer programming. QOAS is benchmarked on five problem classes (MaxCut, TSP, Portfolio, Drug-Target, Feature Selection) across n = 12-84 qubits on IBM Quantum Eagle (127-qubit) and Falcon (27-qubit). Adaptive QAOA achieves approximation ratio 0.924 (SD = 0.018) for MaxCut at n = 48 -- outperforming standard QAOA (0.848) and Goemans-Williamson (0.878) at equivalent wall-clock time. GBB achieves 28.4x speedup over classical branch-and-bound for the n = 24 drug-target problem. QOAS provides systematic methodology for algorithm selection, circuit depth optimisation, and noise mitigation for NISQ workloads.
The transition from theoretical quantum computing to practical real-world applications heavily relies onhybrid quantum-classical architectures designed for NoisyIntermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Among these approaches, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm(QAOA) is a prominent strategy for addressing complex combinatorial optimization challenges, such as the NP-hard MaxCut problem. Instead of performing the entire computationon a quantum processor, QAOA utilizes a quantum circuit toevaluate a parameterized cost function, whereas a classical optimizer refines the parameters iteratively. This study presentsa rigorous empirical evaluation comparing the performanceof QAOA against established classical solvers on small-scaleMax-Cut instances. All experiments were implemented andexecuted using Python (Qiskit Aer) on a state-vector simulator.Using Erdős–Rényi random graphs and regular graphs with4 to 20 nodes, we benchmark QAOA at depths p = 2 andp = 3 against simulated annealing, the Goemans–WilliamsonSDP-based algorithm, and a linear-time greedy heuristic. Ourexperimental results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA implementations exhibit severe performance degradation, prohibitive computational overhead (O(2^n) scaling), and low convergencerates compared to mature classical algorithms. At 20 nodes,QAOA (p = 2) achieves only a 0.467 approximation ratio versus0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, with a 210× runtime slowdownover greedy heuristics
Quantum computers are expected to offer advantages in solving optimization problems challenging for classical computers. Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems represent an important class of problems with relevance in finance and logistics. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a prominent candidate for solving QUBO problems on near-term quantum devices. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of both the standard QAOA and the adaptive derivative assembled problem tailored QAOA (ADAPT-QAOA) to solve QUBO problems of varying sizes and hardnesses for financial feature selection problems. Our main observation is that ADAPT-QAOA achieves substantially higher approximation ratios than standard QAOA for harder feature-selection problems (α = 0.6) with statistically significant improvements observed for problem sizes n = 6 and 14. However, the standard QAOA remains competitive for simpler problems. Additionally, we evaluate the practical feasibility and limitations of QAOA through a hardware-aware scaling analysis based on the real-device calibration data for various hardware platforms. We estimate that standard QAOA implementation on superconducting quantum computers provides a shorter time-to-solution compared to trapped-ion devices, while trapped-ion devices yield more favorable error rates. Our findings provide a comprehensive overview of the challenges, trade-offs, and strategies for deploying QAOA-based methods on near-term quantum hardware.
This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.
This study presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) within a hybrid quantum-classical framework for solving the NP-hard Max-Cut problem. Using Python and Qiskit Aer statevector simulations, we benchmark QAOA (depths p = 2 and p = 3) against established classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, the Goemans–Williamson algorithm, and greedy heuristics, across Erdős–Rényi and regular graphs with 4 to 20 nodes (100 instances per size). Results demonstrate that low-depth QAOA suffers from significant performance degradation, achieving a 0.467 approximation ratio at 20 nodes compared to 0.856 for Goemans–Williamson, alongside a 210× runtime overhead. Convergence analysis further reveals low optimality probabilities and high iteration costs, highlighting limitations of variational optimization in NISQ-era devices. This work provides a reproducible benchmarking framework and contributes to a realistic assessment of near-term quantum advantage.
This thesis is devoted to four modern quantum optimisation algorithms and their applications. In the first chapter, we provide a complete Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) pipeline for the discrete global minimum-variance portfolio (DGMVP) problem. We introduce an ansatz with efficient initial-state preparation, new hard mixing operators satisfying the constraints of the DGMVP problem, and scalable cost operators utilising binary encoding of the qubits. Benchmarking the method with the most effective optimisation strategies---dual annealing and unfrozen layerwise optimisation---indicates a scaling advantage over classical methods in finding the global optimum of the DGMVP problem. In the second chapter, we show an end-to-end quantum/quantum-inspired Goemans-Williamson semidefinite programming (SDP) method for relaxing Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation (QUBO) problems and extracting their rounding energy. Our method identifies a class of QUBO instances that is effectively solvable in polylogarithmic time relative to the problem dimension, under the assumptions of Pauli sparsification of the QUBO cost matrix, reducibility of the diagonal constraints, and efficient evaluation of the corresponding Gibbs-state expectation values. Further, we identify the commuting 1D Hamiltonian and the Kronecker graph as practically important instances. Our numerical experiments show that our method solves the SDP and QUBO with up to 250 variables for 1D Hamiltonian instances and achieves results competitive with the best classical solver for Kronecker graphs, giving strong evidence of the power of our algorithm. In the third chapter, we improve the current QAOA method with an iterative warm-start initial-state preparation method. We implement the t-th order statistic state as the warm-start initial state generated from each QAOA optimisation loop. We achieve an improved approximation ratio when solving the 3-regular MaxCut problem, and find that the worst-case approximation ratio converges to that of the best classical algorithm for p=1 QAOA. Additionally, our method achieves more favourable scaling than standalone QAOA, single-string warm-started QAOA, and a classical constrained-sampling approach when solving the DGMVP problem. In the fourth chapter, we provide a hard-constrained Grover adaptive search (GAS) method for fixed-sum quadratic binary optimisation problems, and an extension of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework for fixed-sum quartic binary optimisation. Our method guarantees at least a quadratic speed-up over the classical method, and exponentially reduces the gate count for solving fixed-sum binary optimisation when compared with the soft-constrained GAS in the fault-tolerant quantum computing regime. In summary, our contributions include efficient algorithms and novel frameworks that substantially improve performance and broaden the applicability of these quantum optimisation methods. The proposed methods exhibit favourable scaling behaviour and indicate potential quantum advantages in solving challenging optimisation problems, thereby motivating further research at the interface of quantum computing and optimisation.