Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Freewill Concept in WUCC & BVP

Prasanth Retnakaran Saraswathy

Published Oct 3, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

WUCC–BVP is a proposed theoretical/modeling framework, not an experimentally established physical theory. Equations inherited from standard quantum mechanics, field theory, and neuroscience are distinguished from WUCC–BVP hypotheses and interpretations. The purpose of this article is to formulate a logically consistent and testable free-will extension without treating speculative claims as established facts.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.23126022

Related papers

Observer & Universe in WUCC & BVP

Prasanth Retnakaran Saraswathy

The quantum measurement problem remains one of the central conceptual challenges in modern physics. Standard quantum mechanics accurately predicts experimental outcomes but leaves unresolved the physical origin of wave-function collapse and the emergence of definite observations. This work proposes a speculative extension of quantum theory within the Wavy Universe Conscious Cycle (WUCC) and Binary Vacuum Paradox (BVP) framework. Rather than treating the observer as an external classical system, the framework models observation as an interaction between a physical quantum state and its phase-conjugate dual within a coupled Hilbert-space structure. The proposal preserves conventional quan-tum mechanics in known experimental regimes while introducing an additional dynamical sector that may become relevant in cosmology, black-hole physics, and quantum gravity. Although speculative, the framework generates several experimentally testable predictionsthat distinguish it from standard interpretation

•Aug 5, 2026•0 citations

The Theoretical Framework of Quantum Will: A Speculative Hypothesis on the Role of Consciousness in Guiding Interaction Pathways Prior to the Femtosecond Level

mohamed kamal arafa elrakhawi

The Theoretical Framework of Quantum Will: A Speculative Hypothesis on the Role of Consciousness in Guiding Interaction Pathways Prior to the Femtosecond Level

•Jun 15, 2026•0 citations

Double Slit Result– From Phase to Face: A Hypothesis A WUCC Interpretation of the Manifest and Unmanifest

Prasanth Retnakaran-Saraswathy

This article proposes a conceptual interpretation of quantum interference through the WavyUniverse Consciousness Cycle and Binary Vacuum Paradox framework, referred to here asWUCC&BVP.Thecentral idea is that an underlying phase relationship may remain unmanifestuntil it interacts with a detector or informational system. Through that interaction, phase information becomes correlated with a measurable configuration—a visible “face” of the field. Adouble-slit experiment provides a useful physical illustration: the interference pattern is the visible manifestation of an underlying relative phase, while the loss of interference under which-pathdetection represents phase decoherence and informational closure. The proposal is compatiblewith established quantum mechanics at the level of interference, entanglement, decoherence,and measurement correlation. However, the WUCC interpretation remains speculative unlessit produces a mathematical model and experimentally distinguishable predictions.

•Sep 15, 2026•0 citations

Taxonomy for physics beyond quantum mechanics

E Adlam, Jonte R. Hance, S Hossenfelder +1 more

We propose terminology to classify interpretations of quantum mechanics and models that modify or complete quantum mechanics. Our focus is on models which have previously been referred to as superdeterministic (strong or weak), retrocausal (with or without signalling, dynamical or nondynamical), future-input-dependent, atemporal and all-at-once, not always with the same meaning or context. Sometimes, these models are assumed to be deterministic, sometimes not, the word deterministic has been given different meanings, and different notions of causality have been used when classifying them. This has created much confusion in the literature, and we hope that the terms proposed here will help to clarify the nomenclature. The general model framework that we will propose may also be useful to classify other interpretations and modifications of quantum mechanics. This document grew out of the discussions at the 2022 Bonn Workshop on Superdeterminism and Retrocausality.

•Jul 24, 2024•0 citations

The Schrödinger Equation as an Effective Description of Binary Vacuum Dynamics: A Formal Framework for the Wavy Universe Conscious Cycle (WUCC)

Prasanth Retnakaran Saraswathy

We present a formal treatment of the Wavy Universe Conscious Cycle (WUCC), a speculative ontological framework in which physical reality is fundamentally wave-based and inwhich the quantum-mechanical wavefunction is reinterpreted as a phase-coherent vacuumresonance rather than an abstract probability amplitude. Central to the proposal is the Binary Vacuum Paradox (BVP): the hypothesis that the vacuum admits two complementaryphase branches, related by complex conjugation, whose coupling generates the dynamics weobserve as unitary quantum evolution. We (i) state provisional but internally consistentdefinitions of the core constructs; (ii) recast the standard Schrödinger equation in a twobranch formalism; (iii) propose a candidate extended dynamical equation with an explicitinter-branch phase-coupling operator; (iv) sketch the conditions under which the standardSchrödinger equation is recovered as an effective (reduced) description; and (v) enumerateconcrete, in-principle-falsifiable predictions that would distinguish WUCC from textbookquantum mechanics. We stress throughout the demarcation between established physics,which is not in dispute, and the speculative WUCC interpretation, for which there is atpresent no experimental support. The scientific value of WUCC hinges entirely on whetherit can (a) derive the Schrödinger equation from binary vacuum dynamics rather than merelyrelabel its terms, and (b) predict measurable deviations from standard quantum mechanics.We argue that the reinterpretation as it currently stands is, at best, empirically equivalentto standard quantum mechanics and therefore not yet a distinct physical theory.Keywords: foundations of quantum mechanics; wavefunction ontology; vacuum states;phase coherence; effective theories; falsifiability

•Jul 23, 2026•0 citations

Taxonomy for physics beyond quantum mechanics

Emily Adlam, Jonte R. Hance, Sabine Hossenfelder +1 more

We propose terminology to classify interpretations of quantum mechanics and models that modify or complete quantum mechanics. Our focus is on models which have previously been referred to as superdeterministic (strong or weak), retrocausal (with or without signalling, dynamical or non-dynamical), future-input-dependent, atemporal and all-at-once, not always with the same meaning or context. Sometimes, these models are assumed to be deterministic, sometimes not, the word deterministic has been given different meanings, and different notions of causality have been used when classifying them. This has created much confusion in the literature, and we hope that the terms proposed here will help to clarify the nomenclature. The general model framework that we will propose may also be useful to classify other interpretations and modifications of quantum mechanics. This document grew out of the discussions at the 2022 Bonn Workshop on Superdeterminism and Retrocausality.

arXiv:2309.12293•Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Jul 1, 2024•6 citations
WUCC–BVP is a proposed theoretical/modeling framework, not an experimentally established physical theory. Equations inherited from standard quantum mechanics, field theory, and neuroscience are distinguished from WUCC–BVP hypotheses and interpretations. The purpose of this article is to formulate a logically consistent and testable free-will extension without treating speculative claims as established facts.
The quantum measurement problem remains one of the central conceptual challenges in modern physics. Standard quantum mechanics accurately predicts experimental outcomes but leaves unresolved the physical origin of wave-function collapse and the emergence of definite observations. This work proposes a speculative extension of quantum theory within the Wavy Universe Conscious Cycle (WUCC) and Binary Vacuum Paradox (BVP) framework. Rather than treating the observer as an external classical system, the framework models observation as an interaction between a physical quantum state and its phase-conjugate dual within a coupled Hilbert-space structure. The proposal preserves conventional quan-tum mechanics in known experimental regimes while introducing an additional dynamical sector that may become relevant in cosmology, black-hole physics, and quantum gravity. Although speculative, the framework generates several experimentally testable predictionsthat distinguish it from standard interpretation
This article proposes a conceptual interpretation of quantum interference through the WavyUniverse Consciousness Cycle and Binary Vacuum Paradox framework, referred to here asWUCC&BVP.Thecentral idea is that an underlying phase relationship may remain unmanifestuntil it interacts with a detector or informational system. Through that interaction, phase information becomes correlated with a measurable configuration—a visible “face” of the field. Adouble-slit experiment provides a useful physical illustration: the interference pattern is the visible manifestation of an underlying relative phase, while the loss of interference under which-pathdetection represents phase decoherence and informational closure. The proposal is compatiblewith established quantum mechanics at the level of interference, entanglement, decoherence,and measurement correlation. However, the WUCC interpretation remains speculative unlessit produces a mathematical model and experimentally distinguishable predictions.
We propose terminology to classify interpretations of quantum mechanics and models that modify or complete quantum mechanics. Our focus is on models which have previously been referred to as superdeterministic (strong or weak), retrocausal (with or without signalling, dynamical or nondynamical), future-input-dependent, atemporal and all-at-once, not always with the same meaning or context. Sometimes, these models are assumed to be deterministic, sometimes not, the word deterministic has been given different meanings, and different notions of causality have been used when classifying them. This has created much confusion in the literature, and we hope that the terms proposed here will help to clarify the nomenclature. The general model framework that we will propose may also be useful to classify other interpretations and modifications of quantum mechanics. This document grew out of the discussions at the 2022 Bonn Workshop on Superdeterminism and Retrocausality.
We present a formal treatment of the Wavy Universe Conscious Cycle (WUCC), a speculative ontological framework in which physical reality is fundamentally wave-based and inwhich the quantum-mechanical wavefunction is reinterpreted as a phase-coherent vacuumresonance rather than an abstract probability amplitude. Central to the proposal is the Binary Vacuum Paradox (BVP): the hypothesis that the vacuum admits two complementaryphase branches, related by complex conjugation, whose coupling generates the dynamics weobserve as unitary quantum evolution. We (i) state provisional but internally consistentdefinitions of the core constructs; (ii) recast the standard Schrödinger equation in a twobranch formalism; (iii) propose a candidate extended dynamical equation with an explicitinter-branch phase-coupling operator; (iv) sketch the conditions under which the standardSchrödinger equation is recovered as an effective (reduced) description; and (v) enumerateconcrete, in-principle-falsifiable predictions that would distinguish WUCC from textbookquantum mechanics. We stress throughout the demarcation between established physics,which is not in dispute, and the speculative WUCC interpretation, for which there is atpresent no experimental support. The scientific value of WUCC hinges entirely on whetherit can (a) derive the Schrödinger equation from binary vacuum dynamics rather than merelyrelabel its terms, and (b) predict measurable deviations from standard quantum mechanics.We argue that the reinterpretation as it currently stands is, at best, empirically equivalentto standard quantum mechanics and therefore not yet a distinct physical theory.Keywords: foundations of quantum mechanics; wavefunction ontology; vacuum states;phase coherence; effective theories; falsifiability
We propose terminology to classify interpretations of quantum mechanics and models that modify or complete quantum mechanics. Our focus is on models which have previously been referred to as superdeterministic (strong or weak), retrocausal (with or without signalling, dynamical or non-dynamical), future-input-dependent, atemporal and all-at-once, not always with the same meaning or context. Sometimes, these models are assumed to be deterministic, sometimes not, the word deterministic has been given different meanings, and different notions of causality have been used when classifying them. This has created much confusion in the literature, and we hope that the terms proposed here will help to clarify the nomenclature. The general model framework that we will propose may also be useful to classify other interpretations and modifications of quantum mechanics. This document grew out of the discussions at the 2022 Bonn Workshop on Superdeterminism and Retrocausality.