This thesis presents a comparative study of quantum machine learning and classical machine learning developed from first principles. It begins by establishing the foundations of the quantum circuit model, observables, and projective measurement, and then revisits the classical learning framework with an emphasis on risk minimisation, task-aligned metrics, and rigorous evaluation protocols. Building on this shared perspective, the thesis examines two central paradigms in quantum machine learning: quantum kernels and variational quantum circuits. A unifying theme is that quantum models must be assessed fairly against strong classical baselines and under realistic hardware constraints. The work therefore explicitly accounts for the limitations of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, including noise, restricted connectivity, compilation overhead, and finite-shot estimation. The empirical study instantiates both quantum pipelines on a controlled supervised benchmark adapted from IBM Quantum: classifying small synthetic images containing either a vertical or a horizontal line under bounded noise. Using the same dataset, identical splitting strategies, and matched budgets for shots and optimisation, the thesis compares quantum and classical models under a consistent evaluation protocol. The results show that both quantum kernel and variational approaches achieve meaningful accuracy in this regime, but do not demonstrate a decisive quantum advantage on the selected task. The thesis concludes by outlining limitations and directions for future work, including scaling to richer benchmarks, incorporating error mitigation, and strengthening assumption-explicit methodology for credible claims of quantum-enhanced learning.
This thesis presents a comparative study of quantum machine learning and classical machine learning developed from first principles. It begins by establishing the foundations of the quantum circuit model, observables, and projective measurement, and then revisits the classical learning framework with an emphasis on risk minimisation, task-aligned metrics, and rigorous evaluation protocols. Building on this shared perspective, the thesis examines two central paradigms in quantum machine learning: quantum kernels and variational quantum circuits. A unifying theme is that quantum models must be assessed fairly against strong classical baselines and under realistic hardware constraints. The work therefore explicitly accounts for the limitations of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, including noise, restricted connectivity, compilation overhead, and finite-shot estimation. The empirical study instantiates both quantum pipelines on a controlled supervised benchmark adapted from IBM Quantum: classifying small synthetic images containing either a vertical or a horizontal line under bounded noise. Using the same dataset, identical splitting strategies, and matched budgets for shots and optimisation, the thesis compares quantum and classical models under a consistent evaluation protocol. The results show that both quantum kernel and variational approaches achieve meaningful accuracy in this regime, but do not demonstrate a decisive quantum advantage on the selected task. The thesis concludes by outlining limitations and directions for future work, including scaling to richer benchmarks, incorporating error mitigation, and strengthening assumption-explicit methodology for credible claims of quantum-enhanced learning.
An interesting approach to using noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is hybrid classical-quantum machine learning (QML). In these methods, classical processors handle optimisation and large-scale computation, while quantum hardware is devoted to tasks like feature mapping, nonlinear transformations, or kernel evaluation. Practical near-term demonstrations are made possible by this division of labour, which also mitigates existing hardware restrictions. In specialised fields like molecular modelling, materials discovery, and small-sample learning issues, recent advancements in variational quantum circuits, hybrid neural networks, and quantum kernel techniques have produced promising outcomes. However, scalability and wider applicability are still hampered by enduring issues including noise, barren plateaus, and the expense of repeated measurements. Long-term developments will require fault tolerance, logical qubits, and established software infrastructures, whereas near-term success depends on noise-aware algorithm design, repeatable experimental benchmarks, and enhanced error-mitigation strategies. When taken as a whole, these advancements show a viable path to achieving quantum advantage in machine learning. Quanta 2026; 15: 1–12.
Quantum machine learning sits at the intersection of quantum computing and artificial intelligence, seeking to exploitquantum mechanical phenomena -- superposition, entanglement, and interference -- to achieve computationaladvantages for learning tasks. This study presents a systematic evaluation of five quantum ML approaches -- variationalquantum classifiers (VQC), quantum kernel methods, quantum reservoir computing, quantum Boltzmann machines, andhybrid quantum-classical neural networks -- benchmarked against classical counterparts on both simulated quantumhardware (up to 30 qubits) and real NISQ devices (IBM Quantum, 27 qubits). Evaluations spanned four task categories:binary classification on structured datasets (6 UCI benchmarks), quantum chemistry property prediction (QM9 molecularenergies), generative modelling (learning probability distributions), and optimisation (Max-Cut on random graphs). A totalof 1,920 experiments were conducted. On classical structured datasets, no quantum method outperformed the bestclassical baseline (XGBoost or SVM) at any problem size accessible to current quantum hardware (up to 30 features),with quantum kernel methods achieving parity at 0.4 +- 0.8% accuracy difference but at 100-1000x higher computationalcost. On quantum chemistry, variational quantum eigensolvers showed a genuine advantage for small molecules (H2,LiH, BeH2): achieving chemical accuracy (1 kcal/mol) with 4-12 qubits where classical methods required exponentiallymore compute for equivalent accuracy. Noise on real NISQ devices degraded all quantum ML methods by 8.4-22.6%relative to noiseless simulation, with error mitigation recovering 42-68% of the noise-induced loss. The quantumadvantage threshold -- the problem size at which quantum methods become faster than classical for equivalent accuracy-- was estimated at 50-100 logical qubits for quantum chemistry and 200+ logical qubits for general ML tasks, placingpractical quantum ML advantage beyond current NISQ capabilities but within plausible reach of fault-tolerant devices. Apractical assessment framework mapping task type, problem structure, and available quantum hardware to expectedquantum advantage is proposed.
Quantum machine learning sits at the intersection of two paradigm-shifting technologies: quantum computing and deep learning. By exploiting quantum mechanical phenomena – superposition, entanglement, and interference – QML promises exponential or quadratic speedups over classical algorithms for certain learning tasks, as well as the ability to model quantum data natively. However, the path to practical quantum advantage remains contested, constrained by noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware, limited qubit counts (50–1,000), coherence times (50–500 μs), and high gate error rates (10⁻³–10⁻⁴). This paper provides a rigorous, technically deep survey of QML: mathematical foundations (Hilbert spaces, unitary evolution, measurement, quantum circuits), canonical algorithms (quantum kernel methods, variational quantum circuits (VQCs), quantum neural networks (QNNs), QSVMs, quantum generative adversarial networks (QGANs), encoding strategies (angle, amplitude, basis, and Hamiltonian encoding), optimization landscapes (barren plateaus, parameter shift rules, ansatz design), hardware aware implementation on superconducting (IBM, Google), trapped ion (IonQ), and neutral atom (Pasqal) platforms, empirical benchmarks on near term devices for classification, generative modeling, and quantum chemistry, and pathways to fault tolerant quantum machine learning (FTQML) with error correction (surface codes, logical qubits). Researchers critically assess claims of quantum advantage, identify scenarios where QML may outperform classical ML (small data, high-dimensional feature spaces from quantum systems, kernel estimation), and propose concrete evaluation metrics (quantum-classical cross-validation, resource estimation).
Quantum machine learning has emerged as a promising paradigm that leverages quantum computational principles to potentially outperform classical approaches on specific learning tasks. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical investigation comparing Quantum Machine Learning (QML), specifically Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM) against Classical Machine Learning (CML) baselines including Logistic Regression, K Nearest Neighbors and classical SVMs. We implement quantum kernel methods using variational quantum circuits with angle embedding, IQP and ZZ feature maps on datasets exhibiting varying structural complexity. Our experiments on synthetic quantum generated datasets (Quantum Parity, Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Interference) demonstrate that QSVM achieves superior classification accuracy with improvements ranging from 2.9 % to 60 % over the best classical baselines achieving a 55.6 % overall win rate. Notably, on the Quantum Parity dataset, QSVM consistently outperformed all classical models across multiple configurations. On real-world benchmark datasets (Breast Cancer, Iris, Wine), QSVM Angle achieved 88% accuracy on Breast Cancer compared to 76% for classical SVM Linear a 15.8 % relative improvement while matching the best classical performance on Iris(100%)and Wine(92%). All experiments were conducted using quantum circuit simulation on classical hardware. These results provide empirical evidence that quantum kernel methods offer meaningful advantages over classical approaches on datasets with complex feature interactions. We discuss the theoretical foundations of these improvements including quantum feature space expressivity and kernel alignment.
With the advancement of quantum computing in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms have emerged as promising approaches for addressing certain machine learning tasks. This study investigates the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), a hybrid model that integrates parameterized quantum circuits with classical optimization routines, implemented via IBM’s Qiskit framework. We provide a detailed account of the VQC architecture, including feature encoding, ansatz construction, and optimization methodology. To assess its performance, we conduct a comparative analysis between VQC and classical Support Vector Classifiers (SVC) across synthetic and real-world datasets, including Iris and a binary-filtered version of MNIST. Experimental results reveal that classical models consistently achieve higher accuracy and faster training times. However, the VQC demonstrates functional viability, particularly under noise-free conditions and reduced-dimensionality settings. These findings underscore the current limitations of quantum models while highlighting the potential of VQC as a proof-of-concept for quantum-enhanced learning as quantum hardware matures.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) unites quantum computing with modern AI to achieve potential gains in expressivity, runtime, and sample efficiency. This paper synthesizes advances in quantum feature maps, variational quantum circuits (VQCs), and hybrid quantum-classical workflows deployable on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. We outline design principles for data encoding, ansatz selection, and trainability, and summarize error-aware practices—error mitigation, shot-frugal estimation, and compiler co-design. Using synthetic but instructive experiments, we illustrate scaling behavior, noise sensitivity, end-to-end inference latency across backends, and optimizer convergence in variational training. We conclude with an agenda emphasizing domain-aligned encodings, rigorous benchmarking, and reproducible open science to validate advantage beyond asymptotic claims.