Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Superconducting simulators for quantum impurity models

Théo Sépulcre

Published Nov 19, 2021• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum impurity physics simulation with superconducting circuits I: perturbative regime

Nitish Mehta, Roman Kuzmin, Nicholas Grabon +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2019•0 citations

Quantum impurity physics simulation with superconducting circuits II: many-body regime

Roman Kuzmin, Nitish Mehta, Nicholas Grabon +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2019•0 citations

Quantum simulation of Anderson and Kondo lattices with superconducting qubits

Juan José García‐Ripoll, E. Solano, Miguel Angel Martin-Delgado

We introduce a mapping between a variety of superconducting circuits and a family of Hamiltonians describing localized magnetic impurities interacting with conduction bands. This includes the Anderson model, the single impurity one- and two-channel Kondo problem, as well as the one-dimensional Kondo lattice. We compare the requirements for performing quantum simulations using the proposed circuits to those of universal quantum computation with superconducting qubits, singling out the specific challenges that will have to be addressed.

arXiv:0709.1573•Physical Review B•Jan 24, 2008•41 citations

QUANTUM SIMULATION OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY

Masatoshi IMADA

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

QUANTUM SIMULATION OF SUPERCONDUCTIVITY

Masatoshi Imada

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•4 citations

Surrogate model solver for impurity-induced superconducting subgap states

V. Baran, Emil J. P. Frost, Jens Paaske

A simple impurity solver is shown to capture impurity-induced superconducting subgap states in quantitative agreement with the numerical renormalization group and quantum Monte Carlo simulations. The solver is based on the exact diagonalization of a single-impurity Anderson model with discretized superconducting reservoirs including only a small number of effective levels. Their energies and couplings to the impurity $d$ level are chosen so as to best reproduce the Matsubara frequency dependence of the hybridization function. We provide a number of critical benchmarks and demonstrate the solver's efficiency in combination with the reduced basis method [V. V. Baran and D. R. Nichita, Phys. Rev. B 107, 144503 (2023)] by calculating the phase diagram for an interacting three-terminal junction.

arXiv:2307.11646•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Dec 20, 2023•22 citations
We introduce a mapping between a variety of superconducting circuits and a family of Hamiltonians describing localized magnetic impurities interacting with conduction bands. This includes the Anderson model, the single impurity one- and two-channel Kondo problem, as well as the one-dimensional Kondo lattice. We compare the requirements for performing quantum simulations using the proposed circuits to those of universal quantum computation with superconducting qubits, singling out the specific challenges that will have to be addressed.
A simple impurity solver is shown to capture impurity-induced superconducting subgap states in quantitative agreement with the numerical renormalization group and quantum Monte Carlo simulations. The solver is based on the exact diagonalization of a single-impurity Anderson model with discretized superconducting reservoirs including only a small number of effective levels. Their energies and couplings to the impurity ddd level are chosen so as to best reproduce the Matsubara frequency dependence of the hybridization function. We provide a number of critical benchmarks and demonstrate the solver's efficiency in combination with the reduced basis method [V. V. Baran and D. R. Nichita, Phys. Rev. B 107, 144503 (2023)] by calculating the phase diagram for an interacting three-terminal junction.