Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Geometric Quantum Speed Limits and Time-Cost Trade-Off in Time-Dependent Quantum Control

Hong Ge Tao, Zhi‐Xiang Jin

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.7519472

Related papers

Geometric Methods for Analysing Quantum Speed Limits: Time-Dependent Controlled Quantum Systems with Constrained Control Functions

Benjamin Russell, Susan Stepney

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•6 citations

Control cost and quantum speed limit time in controlled almost-exact state transmission in open systems

Shen-Shuang Nie, Feng-Hua Ren, Run-Hong He +2 more

We investigate the influence of environment noise on the control cost and the quantum speed limit time (QSLT) in the process of almost-exact state transmission (AEST) through a spin chain under pulse control. The chain is immersed in its surrounding non-Markovian, finite-temperature heat baths. We find that AEST can be realized in weak system-bath coupling, low temperature, and strong non-Markovian baths under effective external control. Correspondingly, the control cost and QSLT increase with increasing bath temperature and coupling strength. It is noticeable that non-Markovianity from the baths can be helpful to reduce the control cost and shorten the QSLT. Furthermore, we find that there exists a trade-off between the control cost and transmission fidelity and that higher fidelity requires higher cost. In addition, the minimum control cost has been found to obtain certain transmission fidelity.

arXiv:2106.09298•Physical Review A•Nov 22, 2021•14 citations

A geometric approach to quantum control in a classical-like framework

Davide Pastorello

•Aug 28, 2015•0 citations

Balancing the Quantum Speed Limit and Instantaneous Energy Cost in Adiabatic Quantum Evolution

Jianwen Xu, Yujia Zhang, Wen Zheng +9 more

Adiabatic time-optimal quantum controls are extensively used in quantum technologies to break the constraints imposed by short coherence times. However, practically it is crucial to consider the trade-off between the quantum evolution speed and instantaneous energy cost of process because of the constraints in the available control Hamiltonian. Here, we experimentally show that using a transmon qubit that, even in the presence of vanishing energy gaps, it is possible to reach a highly time-optimal adiabatic quantum driving at low energy cost in the whole evolution process. This validates the recently derived general solution of the quantum Zermelo navigation problem, paving the way for energy-efficient quantum control which is usually overlooked in conventional speed-up schemes, including the well-known counter-diabatic driving. By designing the control Hamiltonian based on the quantum speed limit bound quantified by the changing rate of phase in the interaction picture, we reveal the relationship between the quantum speed limit and instantaneous energy cost. Consequently, we demonstrate fast and high-fidelity quantum adiabatic processes by employing energy-efficient driving strengths, indicating a promising strategy for expanding the applications of time-optimal quantum controls in superconducting quantum circuits.

Chinese Physics Letters•Mar 26, 2024•7 citations

Geometric quantum speed limits and short-time accessibility to unitary operations

Pablo M. Poggi

The notion of a quantum speed limit (QSL) refers to the fundamental fact that two quantum states become completely distinguishable upon dynamical evolution only after a finite amount of time, called the QSL time. A different but related concept is that of minimum control time (MCT), which is the minimum evolution time needed for a state to be driven (by suitable, generally time-dependent, control fields) to a given target state. While the QSL can give information about the MCT, it usually imposes little restrictions on it and is thus impractical for control purposes. In this work, we revisit this issue by first presenting a theory of geometrical QSL for unitary transformations, rather than for states, and discuss its implications and limitations. Then, we propose a framework for bounding the MCT for realizing unitary transformations that goes beyond the QSL results and gives much more meaningful information to understand the controlled dynamics of the system at short times.

arXiv:1901.02042•Physical Review A•Apr 22, 2019•36 citations

Geometric Optimal Control of Simple Quantum Systems

Dominique Sugny

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations
We investigate the influence of environment noise on the control cost and the quantum speed limit time (QSLT) in the process of almost-exact state transmission (AEST) through a spin chain under pulse control. The chain is immersed in its surrounding non-Markovian, finite-temperature heat baths. We find that AEST can be realized in weak system-bath coupling, low temperature, and strong non-Markovian baths under effective external control. Correspondingly, the control cost and QSLT increase with increasing bath temperature and coupling strength. It is noticeable that non-Markovianity from the baths can be helpful to reduce the control cost and shorten the QSLT. Furthermore, we find that there exists a trade-off between the control cost and transmission fidelity and that higher fidelity requires higher cost. In addition, the minimum control cost has been found to obtain certain transmission fidelity.
Adiabatic time-optimal quantum controls are extensively used in quantum technologies to break the constraints imposed by short coherence times. However, practically it is crucial to consider the trade-off between the quantum evolution speed and instantaneous energy cost of process because of the constraints in the available control Hamiltonian. Here, we experimentally show that using a transmon qubit that, even in the presence of vanishing energy gaps, it is possible to reach a highly time-optimal adiabatic quantum driving at low energy cost in the whole evolution process. This validates the recently derived general solution of the quantum Zermelo navigation problem, paving the way for energy-efficient quantum control which is usually overlooked in conventional speed-up schemes, including the well-known counter-diabatic driving. By designing the control Hamiltonian based on the quantum speed limit bound quantified by the changing rate of phase in the interaction picture, we reveal the relationship between the quantum speed limit and instantaneous energy cost. Consequently, we demonstrate fast and high-fidelity quantum adiabatic processes by employing energy-efficient driving strengths, indicating a promising strategy for expanding the applications of time-optimal quantum controls in superconducting quantum circuits.
The notion of a quantum speed limit (QSL) refers to the fundamental fact that two quantum states become completely distinguishable upon dynamical evolution only after a finite amount of time, called the QSL time. A different but related concept is that of minimum control time (MCT), which is the minimum evolution time needed for a state to be driven (by suitable, generally time-dependent, control fields) to a given target state. While the QSL can give information about the MCT, it usually imposes little restrictions on it and is thus impractical for control purposes. In this work, we revisit this issue by first presenting a theory of geometrical QSL for unitary transformations, rather than for states, and discuss its implications and limitations. Then, we propose a framework for bounding the MCT for realizing unitary transformations that goes beyond the QSL results and gives much more meaningful information to understand the controlled dynamics of the system at short times.