This paper interprets quantum entanglement phenomena under the Primon substrate model. Based on three fundamental postulates, the model adopts a classical local physical framework and resolves the "action-at-a-distance" paradox of quantum entanglement. The measurement only reads the inherent symmetric properties of paired vibration units, without superluminal information transfer. This model differs from the local hidden variable framework discussed by Bell’s theorem. It further derives a testable unilateral non-symmetric stretching effect: the vibration unit propagating along the longer optical path undergoes self-structure stretching, while the unit on the shorter path retains its reference dimension. The stretching magnitude converges to a fixed physical upper limit rather than increasing linearly indefinitely. Three tiers of feasible decisive experimental schemes are proposed, including a high-precision benchmark scheme, an engineering-ready core scheme and a low-threshold preliminary test scheme. The model retains the mathematical framework of conventional quantum theory without numerical conflicts, and provides a causal physical entity mechanism. All predictions are open to experimental falsification. If future experimental data contradict the predictions, the author abandons this model.
This paper interprets quantum entanglement phenomena under the Primon substrate model. Based on three fundamental postulates, the model adopts a classical local physical framework and resolves the "action-at-a-distance" paradox of quantum entanglement. The measurement only reads the inherent symmetric properties of paired vibration units, without superluminal information transfer. This model differs from the local hidden variable framework discussed by Bell’s theorem. It further derives a testable unilateral non-symmetric stretching effect: the vibration unit propagating along the longer optical path undergoes self-structure stretching, while the unit on the shorter path retains its reference dimension. The stretching magnitude converges to a fixed physical upper limit rather than increasing linearly indefinitely. Three tiers of feasible decisive experimental schemes are proposed, including a high-precision benchmark scheme, an engineering-ready core scheme and a low-threshold preliminary test scheme. The model retains the mathematical framework of conventional quantum theory without numerical conflicts, and provides a causal physical entity mechanism. All predictions are open to experimental falsification. If future experimental data contradict the predictions, the author abandons this model.
The mainstream interpretation of quantum entanglement and its derivative phenomena has long relied on concepts such as non-locality and superposition, leading to a lack of dynamical mechanism description for wave function collapse and creating profound conflicts with physical causality. This paper, based on the "Great Tao Model" and its "Existence Field Theory," proposes a systematic and unified interpretation of quantum entanglement phenomena, exemplified by the experiments recognized by the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. First, it analyzes the erroneous presuppositions in the derivation of Bell's inequality based on Existence Field Theory and establishes a general classical interpretation framework grounded in "static initial correlations" and "local interactions." Subsequently, through a classical physical reconstruction of milestone experiments such as Aspect's, it demonstrates that this framework is sufficient to explain all observed phenomena self-consistently, without introducing "non-local superluminal action." Building on this, the paper successfully extends this interpretative framework to core quantum phenomena such as quantum decoherence, teleportation, and many-body entanglement, revealing that they also originate from classical conservation law constraints and local field interactions. Furthermore, this paper compares the Great Tao Model with hidden variable theories, finding that although both belong to the classical realism camp and oppose non-locality, the Great Tao Model requires no introduction of any hidden variables. Instead, it explains phenomena directly based on the specific physical properties (charge, mass) of elementary particles and the local dynamics of their existence fields, thus providing a more physically realistic and unified theoretical framework. This study offers a unified, causality-compliant classical explanation for a series of quantum phenomena claimed to exhibit "non-locality," fundamentally challenging the conceptual foundation of related quantum information technologies and providing a new path for physics to return to a theoretical paradigm based on realism, locality, and clear dynamical mechanisms.
The Complete Disenchantment of Quantum Entanglement—Failure of Measurement Independence and a Field-Theoretic Explanation of Electron Internal Structure This paper provides a physical explanation of quantum entanglement—the most central puzzle in quantum mechanics—without relying on "nonlocality." The violation of Bell's inequality is widely interpreted by mainstream physics as "experimental falsification of local realism," from which the conclusion "the world is nonlocal" is drawn. This paper points out that this chain of reasoning depends on a premise that has never been independently tested: the measurement process does not change the hidden variable that determines the measurement outcome. This theory divides all matter in the universe into Nie-matter entities (massive, Staticity) and Ji-matter entities (massless, Dynamicity). The electron is not a point particle, but a Nie-matter entity composed of Zhonghua Micro-Particles, possessing an internal Ji-matter field configuration (the electron self-field). When a measurement device operates, it inevitably releases a Ji-matter field; this field undergoes local coupling with the electron self-field, changing the electron's effective configuration from the original configuration λ₀ at production to the coupled effective configuration λ_eff(a) = C[λ₀, F_device(a)]. The measurement outcome is a function of λ_eff(a), not a function of λ₀ alone—therefore, the measurement-independence premise of Bell's theorem does not hold physically. This paper further argues: the electron's having internal structure is precisely the physical origin of the angle-dependent correlations. If the electron were an unstructured point particle, measurements at different angles should give the same result—but experiments observe angle-dependent correlations, which in itself already proves that the electron is not a point particle. Bell-inequality experiments have never been a "victory of nonlocality"—they are ironclad evidence that the electron has internal structure. This paper gives four core arguments: P6-4C (failure of the premises of Bell's inequality derivation), P6-4D (change of electron state by the measurement device's Ji-matter field), P6-5 (how a point particle absorbs a photon—the electron must have internal structure to accommodate an absorbed photon), P6-4A (Bell's inequality—ironclad evidence that the electron has internal structure), and P6-4B (local mechanism of Bell experiments and experimental test paths for electron internal structure). These include an order-of-magnitude estimate of the electron internal structure correction to g-2 (~10⁻¹⁸), a comparison with current experimental precision (~10⁻¹²), and future test paths. The full text does not claim that Bell's inequality is "overturned"—it is a mathematically correct theorem. What this paper claims is: the measurement-independence premise on which Bell's inequality depends does not hold under the physical picture in which measurement is local field coupling. Violating Bell's inequality is precisely evidence that the electron has an internal Ji-matter field configuration, not evidence for nonlocality.
Quantum entanglement represents one of the most profound and counterintuitive phenomena in modern physics, challenging our classical understanding of locality and causality. While the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics accurately predicts entanglement correlations, the lack of a physically intuitive mechanism has led to numerous interpretational difficulties and philosophical debates. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of existing interpretations of quantum entanglement, from the Copenhagen interpretation to many-worlds and hidden variable theories, highlighting their limitations and motivating a novel vortex-based interpretation grounded in the hydrodynamic behavior of a superfluid vacuum, drawing upon the author’s published work on electron, quark, and gravitational force dynamics. This vortex model provides a physically intuitive and causally consistent explanation for nonlocal correlations without invoking superluminal signaling, offering a bridge between classical physics and quantum mechanics. The proposed interpretation suggests that entangled particles are surface manifestations of deeper, coherent vortex structures within a continuous vacuum medium, analogous to connected vortices in a fluid system. This framework not only resolves the conceptual difficulties associated with “spooky action at a distance” but also provides a foundation for understanding quantum phenomena through classical hydrodynamic principles.
Quantum entanglement has no explanation in terms of local hidden variables (Bell 1964). The U-Cell Model (UCM) is an elastic lattice substrate — naively a local theory. We show that the UCM is in fact a non-local theory: entangled particles share a global pattern in the substrate network, not a local hidden variable. The transverse substrate modes ψ^a transform as spin-1/2 spinors under spatial rotations, a consequence of the cubic lattice symmetry and the Helmholtz decomposition. From this we derive that the UCM substrate reproduces the quantum-mechanical Bell correlation C(α,β) = −cos(α−β) exactly, including the maximum CHSH violation |S| = 2√2. The physical mechanism is the global substrate pattern maintained through the cell membranes, which propagate correlations instantaneously without carrying a usable signal. The UCM thus satisfies Bell's theorem, the no-communication theorem, and special relativity simultaneously. An open question is whether the membrane stiffness κ_mem/κ_cell is finite or infinite. If finite but very large, the UCM predicts a preferred frame — the substrate rest frame — as a testable departure from strict Lorentz invariance. Analysis code (ucm_bell.py) included for reproducibility. Part of the UCM preprint series (ORCID 0009-0005-5088-4339, records 19387201–19430524).
Standard quantum mechanics works. Its predictions are accurate to more decimal places than almost any other physical theory, and the mathematical formalism, Hilbert spaces, operators, Born rule, Schrödinger evolution, is clean and internally consistent. The problem is not the math. The problem is that the math comes with an ontological silence so loud it has generated a century of philosophical argument and left generations of students convinced that quantum mechanics is inherently mysterious. It is not.This paper proposes a unified interpretive framework in which the wavefunction ψ(x,t) is a literal oscillation pattern in a physical substrate, a continuous, structured medium that underlies all observable phenomena. In this framework: superposition is a physical mixture of mode shapes; measurement is mode locking; quantization is resonant mode selection; entanglement is a shared mode spanning multiple spatial regions; uncertainty is a Fourier-intrinsic property of any localized wave; particles are stable topological knot solutions; and tunneling is evanescent mode extension through a tension barrier.We do not throw out the math. We give it a physical home. Sections 2–10 develop each concept systematically with worked examples and comparisons to standard formalism. Section 11 assembles the unified picture. Section 12 identifies testable predictions. Section 13 concludes.
Quantum entanglement, a fundamental phenomenon in quantum mechanics, presents a significant challenge to classical physics. While entanglement is undeniably a bizarre and seemingly paradoxical aspect of the quantum world, its implications extend far beyond theoretical curiosity. This paper explores the potential of a novel modeling framework for quantum entanglement, grounded in the principles of non-locality. We propose a dynamic correlation model, parameterized by a "quantum correlation degree," that captures the inherent uncertainty and interconnectedness in entangled states. The framework utilizes a computational approach, specifically leveraging a modified quantum algorithm, to simulate and analyze entangled systems. This work introduces a new perspective on entanglement, moving beyond traditional approaches that primarily focus on local realism. We argue that this framework offers a robust and flexible approach to understanding and potentially manipulating entanglement, opening avenues for novel quantum algorithms and potential advancements in quantum information processing. The core claim is that this model provides a mathematically rigorous, computationally feasible framework for understanding and modeling non-local entanglement.