In this thesis, I study how quantum computation and quantum communication can help large networks of computers to solve computational problems faster. I also connect the notion of locality between various models, including distributed quantum algorithms and online graph algorithms, and show that locality in online graph algorithms can be used to provide bounds for distributed quantum advantage. Towards proving distributed quantum advantage, I present the first family of LCL problems which shows a quantum advantage for distributed graph algorithms. Here LCLs, or Locally Checkable Labeling problems, are a family of graph problems described by a finite set of local constraints, and I mainly focus on them in this thesis. The models of distributed computing which this result separates are the classical LOCAL model and the quantum-LOCAL model. In both of these models, a network of computers exchanges messages in synchronous rounds, and the running time of the algorithm directly corresponds with locality, that is, how far the computers see in the network. In this thesis, I also introduce new models of computing that capture locality in stronger settings. Most notably, I introduce the online-LOCAL model which captures the locality of online graph algorithms, and show that it is, asymptotically, roughly as strong as the classical LOCAL model for solving LCL problems on rooted regular trees. I provide an online-LOCAL algorithm for finding a 3-coloring of a bipartite graph with lower locality than is possible in the classical LOCAL model, and show that the algorithm is tight. To draw things together, I show that quantum-LOCAL and online-LOCAL are indeed related to each other: any quantum-LOCAL algorithm can be simulated in the randomized online-LOCAL model. The converse does not hold in general, but an online-LOCAL algorithm solving an LCL problem in rooted, possibly non-regular, trees can be simulated in the classical LOCAL model—and thus in the quantum-LOCAL model—with an exponential cost in locality, putting indirectly a bound on the maximum possible attainable quantum advantage. Finally, I consider the sinkless orientation problem, which holds a central role in our understanding of the locality of LCL problems in the classical LOCAL model, and provide a simpler and more direct proof for its hardness using the supported LOCAL model. I also provide a simpler algorithm solving sinkless orientation in the SLOCAL model, which is a sequential version of the LOCAL model.
In this thesis, I study how quantum computation and quantum communication can help large networks of computers to solve computational problems faster. I also connect the notion of locality between various models, including distributed quantum algorithms and online graph algorithms, and show that locality in online graph algorithms can be used to provide bounds for distributed quantum advantage. Towards proving distributed quantum advantage, I present the first family of LCL problems which shows a quantum advantage for distributed graph algorithms. Here LCLs, or Locally Checkable Labeling problems, are a family of graph problems described by a finite set of local constraints, and I mainly focus on them in this thesis. The models of distributed computing which this result separates are the classical LOCAL model and the quantum-LOCAL model. In both of these models, a network of computers exchanges messages in synchronous rounds, and the running time of the algorithm directly corresponds with locality, that is, how far the computers see in the network. In this thesis, I also introduce new models of computing that capture locality in stronger settings. Most notably, I introduce the online-LOCAL model which captures the locality of online graph algorithms, and show that it is, asymptotically, roughly as strong as the classical LOCAL model for solving LCL problems on rooted regular trees. I provide an online-LOCAL algorithm for finding a 3-coloring of a bipartite graph with lower locality than is possible in the classical LOCAL model, and show that the algorithm is tight. To draw things together, I show that quantum-LOCAL and online-LOCAL are indeed related to each other: any quantum-LOCAL algorithm can be simulated in the randomized online-LOCAL model. The converse does not hold in general, but an online-LOCAL algorithm solving an LCL problem in rooted, possibly non-regular, trees can be simulated in the classical LOCAL model—and thus in the quantum-LOCAL model—with an exponential cost in locality, putting indirectly a bound on the maximum possible attainable quantum advantage. Finally, I consider the sinkless orientation problem, which holds a central role in our understanding of the locality of LCL problems in the classical LOCAL model, and provide a simpler and more direct proof for its hardness using the supported LOCAL model. I also provide a simpler algorithm solving sinkless orientation in the SLOCAL model, which is a sequential version of the LOCAL model.
We connect three distinct lines of research that have recently explored extensions of the classical LOCAL model of distributed computing: A. distributed quantum computing and non-signaling distributions [e.g. STOC 2024], B. finitely-dependent processes [e.g. Forum Math. Pi 2016], and C. locality in online graph algorithms and dynamic graph algorithms [e.g. ICALP 2023]. We prove new results on the capabilities and limitations of all of these models of computing, for locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs). We show that all these settings can be sandwiched between the classical LOCAL model and what we call the randomized online-LOCAL model. Our work implies limitations on the quantum advantage in the distributed setting, and we also exhibit a new barrier for proving tighter bounds. Our main technical results are these: 1. All LCL problems solvable with locality O(log⋆n) in the classical deterministic LOCAL model admit a finitely-dependent distribution with locality O(1). This answers an open question by Holroyd [2024], and also presents a new barrier for proving bounds on distributed quantum advantage using causality-based arguments. 2. In rooted trees, if we can solve an LCL problem with locality o(logloglogn) in the randomized online-LOCAL model (or any of the weaker models, such as quantum-LOCAL), we can solve it with locality O(log⋆n) in the classical deterministic LOCAL model. One of many implications is that in rooted trees, O(log⋆n) locality in quantum-LOCAL is not stronger than O(log⋆n) locality in classical LOCAL.
We present a distributed quantum algorithm that 3-colors cycles in O(1) rounds, with high probability. It follows that all locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) that have round complexity O(log∗n) in the classical LOCAL model can be solved in O(1) rounds in the quantum-LOCAL model, with high probability; this includes problems such as maximal independent set and maximal matching in bounded-degree graphs. This presents the first natural examples of graph problems with an asymptotic distributed quantum advantage for the LOCAL model; all prior examples that separate LOCAL and quantum-LOCAL are artificial problems constructed merely for the sake of demonstrating quantum advantage.
In this work, we give two results that put new limits on distributed quantum advantage in the context of the LOCAL model of distributed computing: 1) We show that there is no distributed quantum advantage for any linear program. Put otherwise, if there is a quantum-LOCAL algorithm 𝒜 that finds an α-approximation of some linear optimization problem Π in T communication rounds, we can construct a classical, deterministic LOCAL algorithm 𝒜' that finds an α-approximation of Π in T rounds. As a corollary, all classical lower bounds for linear programs, including the KMW bound, hold verbatim in quantum-LOCAL. 2) Using the above result, we show that there exists a locally checkable labeling problem (LCL) for which quantum-LOCAL is strictly weaker than the classical deterministic SLOCAL model. Our results extend from quantum-LOCAL to finitely dependent and non-signaling distributions, and one of the corollaries of our work is that the non-signaling model and the SLOCAL model are incomparable in the context of LCL problems: By prior work, there exists an LCL problem for which SLOCAL is strictly weaker than the non-signaling model, and our work provides a separation in the opposite direction.
The focus of this paper is on {\em quantum distributed} computation, where we investigate whether quantum communication can help in {\em speeding up} distributed network algorithms. Our main result is that for certain fundamental network problems such as minimum spanning tree, minimum cut, and shortest paths, quantum communication {\em does not} help in substantially speeding up distributed algorithms for these problems compared to the classical setting. In order to obtain this result, we extend the technique of Das Sarma et al. [SICOMP 2012] to obtain a uniform approach to prove non-trivial lower bounds for quantum distributed algorithms for several graph optimization (both exact and approximate versions) as well as verification problems, some of which are new even in the classical setting, e.g. tight randomized lower bounds for Hamiltonian cycle and spanning tree verification, answering an open problem of Das Sarma et al., and a lower bound in terms of the weight aspect ratio, matching the upper bounds of Elkin [STOC 2004]. Our approach introduces the {\em Server model} and {\em Quantum Simulation Theorem} which together provide a connection between distributed algorithms and communication complexity. The Server model is the standard two-party communication complexity model augmented with additional power; yet, most of the hardness in the two-party model is carried over to this new model. The Quantum Simulation Theorem carries this hardness further to quantum distributed computing. Our techniques, except the proof of the hardness in the Server model, require very little knowledge in quantum computing, and this can help overcoming a usual impediment in proving bounds on quantum distributed algorithms.
We study lower bounds for quantum distributed computing, where a set of nodes (representing quantum computers) interconnected by an underlying network consisting of (bandwidth-restricted) links, communicate using quantum communication. Nodes have unlimited computational power and may share an unlimited number of entangled qubits. Our main contribution is a simple uniform technique for proving lower bounds for quantum distributed algorithms. In particular, we identify a new quantum communication model called the Server model which provides a connection between distributed algorithms and communication complexity: it is strong enough to capture the hardness of several distributed computing problems, while weak enough that several hard problems in two-party communication complexity remain hard; to this end, we identify a set of communication complexity techniques that can be carried over to the Server model, namely techniques based on nonlocal games. We show that these techniques serve as a fundamental tool in proving lower bounds in quantum distributed computing. The new techniques help us to prove several non-trivial quantum distributed lower bounds (which are the first-known quantum bounds for fundamental global problems such as minimum spanning tree, shortest paths etc.), some of which are new even in the classical setting. First, it allows us to show that all previous classical lower bounds of more than twenty verification and optimization graph problems in [Das Sarma et al., STOC 11] also hold in the quantum setting. Many of these bounds are tight, implying a large class of problems that do not gain an advantage from quantum effects. Our results also imply the following new results in the classical communication models: (1) the first randomized lower bounds for Hamiltonian cycle and spanning tree verification problems in both the distributed computing and the communication complexity model, answering the open problem of Das Sarma et al. and subsuming many bounds in [Babai, Frankl, and Simon, FOCS 96], and (2) the first lower bound that is tight for all weight aspect ratios, matching previous upper bounds of [Elkin, STOC 04]. Submitted for a Regular Presentation. The full version of this paper can be found as [15] at http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5211. ∗Department of Computer Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel. E-mail: elkinm@cs.bgu.ac.il. †Division of Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371 & Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543. E-mail: hklauck@gmail.com. Research at the Centre for Quantum Technologies is funded by the Singapore Ministry of Education and the National Research Foundation. ‡Division of Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371. Work partially done while at University of Vienna, Austria. E-mail: danupon@gmail.com. §Division of Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371 & Department of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. E-mail: gopalpandurangan@gmail.com. Supported in part by the following research grants: Nanyang Technological University grant M58110000, Singapore MOE Academic Research Fund (AcRF) Tier 2 grant MOE2010-T2-2-082, and a grant from the US-Israeli Binational Science Foundation (BSF).
We give an almost complete characterization of the hardness of c-coloring χ-chromatic graphs with distributed algorithms, for a wide range of models of distributed computing. In particular, we show that these problems do not admit any distributed quantum advantage. To do that: 1) We give a new distributed algorithm that finds a c-coloring in χ-chromatic graphs in O~(nα1) rounds, with α=⌊χ−1c−1⌋. 2) We prove that any distributed algorithm for this problem requires Ω(nα1) rounds. Our upper bound holds in the classical, deterministic LOCAL model, while the near-matching lower bound holds in the non-signaling model. This model, introduced by Arfaoui and Fraigniaud in 2014, captures all models of distributed graph algorithms that obey physical causality; this includes not only classical deterministic LOCAL and randomized LOCAL but also quantum-LOCAL, even with a pre-shared quantum state. We also show that similar arguments can be used to prove that, e.g., 3-coloring 2-dimensional grids or c-coloring trees remain hard problems even for the non-signaling model, and in particular do not admit any quantum advantage. Our lower-bound arguments are purely graph-theoretic at heart; no background on quantum information theory is needed to establish the proofs.