Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Universally Composable Secure Computation with (Malicious) Physically Uncloneable Functions

Rafail Ostrovsky, Alessandra Scafuro, Ivan Visconti, Akshay Wadia

Published Jan 1, 2013• 62 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_41

Related papers

An Attack to Universally Composable Commitments from Malicious Physically Uncloneable Functions and How to Avoid It

Lourenço Abecasis, Paulo Mateus, Chrysoula Vlachou

Lecture notes in computer science•Oct 10, 2025•0 citations

Physically Uncloneable Functions in the Universal Composition Framework

Christina Brzuska, Marc Fischlin, Heike Schröder +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2011•118 citations

Universally Composable Commitments with Communicating Malicious Physically Uncloneable Functions

Lourenço Abecasis, Paulo Mateus, Chrysoula Vlachou

In this work, we explore the possibility of universally composable (UC)-secure commitments using Physically Uncloneable Functions (PUFs) within a new adversarial model. We introduce the communicating malicious PUFs, i.e. malicious PUFs that can interact with their creator even when not in their possession, obtaining a stronger adversarial model. Prior work [ASIACRYPT 2013, LNCS, vol. 8270, pp. 100-119] proposed a compiler for constructing UC-secure commitments from ideal extractable commitments, and our task would be to adapt the ideal extractable commitment scheme proposed therein to our new model. However, we found an attack and identified a few other issues in that construction, and to address them, we modified the aforementioned ideal extractable commitment scheme and introduced new properties and tools that allow us to rigorously develop and present security proofs in this context. We propose a new UC-secure commitment scheme against adversaries that can only create stateless malicious PUFs which can receive, but not send, information from their creators. Our protocol is more efficient compared to previous proposals, as we have parallelized the ideal extractable commitments within it. The restriction to stateless malicious PUFs is significant, mainly since the protocol from [ASIACRYPT 2013, LNCS, vol. 8270, pp. 100-119] assumes malicious PUFs with unbounded state, thus limiting its applicability. However it is the only way we found to address the issues of the original construction. We hope that in future work this restriction can be lifted, and along the lines of our work, UC-secure commitments with fewer restrictions on both the state and communication can be constructed.

arXiv:2504.10120•Apr 14, 2025•0 citations

Universally Composable Secure Computation with (Malicious) Physically Uncloneable Functions.

Rafail Ostrovsky, Alessandra Scafuro, Ivan Visconti +1 more

Physically Uncloneable Functions (PUFs) [Pap01] are noisy physical sources of randomness. As such, they are naturally appealing for cryptographic applications, and have caught the interest of both theoreticians and practitioners. A major step towards understanding and securely using PUFs was recently taken in [Crypto 2011] where Brzuska, Fischlin, Schroder and Katzenbeisser model PUFs in the Universal Composition (UC) framework of Canetti [FOCS 2001]. Their model considers trusted PUFs only, and thus real-world adversaries can not create malicious PUFs, and can access the physical object only via the prescribed procedure. However, this does not accurately reflect real-life scenarios, where an adversary could be able to create and use malicious PUFs, or access the PUF through other procedures. The goal of this work is to extend the model proposed in [Crypto 2011] in order to capture such real-world attacks. The main contribution of this work is the study of the Malicious PUFs model. Namely, we extend the PUF functionality of Brzuska et al. so that it allows the adversary to create arbitrarily malicious PUFs. Then, we provide positive results in this, more realistic, model. We show that, under computational assumptions, it is possible to UC-securely realize any functionality. Furthermore, we achieve unconditional (not UC) security with malicious PUFs, by showing a statistically hiding statistically binding commitment scheme that uses one PUF only, and such PUF can be malicious. As an additional contribution, we investigate another attack model, where adversaries access to a trusted PUF in a different way (i.e., not following the prescribed procedure). Technically this attack translates into the fact that the simulator cannot observe the queries made to an honest PUF. In this model, queries are oblivious to the simulator, and we call it the “Oblivious Query” model. We are able to achieve unconditionally UC-secure computation, even in this more severe model. This protocol is secure against stronger adversaries compared to the ones of Brzuska et al. Finally, we show the impossibility of UC secure computation in the combination of the above two new models, where the real-world adversary can create malicious PUFs and maliciously access to honest PUFs. Our work sheds light on the significant power and applicability of PUFs in the design of cryptographic protocols modeling adversaries that misbehave with PUFs.

•Jan 1, 2012•2 citations

Universally Composable Secure Computation with Corrupted Tokens

Nishanth Chandran, Wutichai Chongchitmate, Rafail Ostrovsky +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2019•5 citations

Concurrently Composable Non-interactive Secure Computation

Andrew Morgan, Rafael Pass

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations
In this work, we explore the possibility of universally composable (UC)-secure commitments using Physically Uncloneable Functions (PUFs) within a new adversarial model. We introduce the communicating malicious PUFs, i.e. malicious PUFs that can interact with their creator even when not in their possession, obtaining a stronger adversarial model. Prior work [ASIACRYPT 2013, LNCS, vol. 8270, pp. 100-119] proposed a compiler for constructing UC-secure commitments from ideal extractable commitments, and our task would be to adapt the ideal extractable commitment scheme proposed therein to our new model. However, we found an attack and identified a few other issues in that construction, and to address them, we modified the aforementioned ideal extractable commitment scheme and introduced new properties and tools that allow us to rigorously develop and present security proofs in this context. We propose a new UC-secure commitment scheme against adversaries that can only create stateless malicious PUFs which can receive, but not send, information from their creators. Our protocol is more efficient compared to previous proposals, as we have parallelized the ideal extractable commitments within it. The restriction to stateless malicious PUFs is significant, mainly since the protocol from [ASIACRYPT 2013, LNCS, vol. 8270, pp. 100-119] assumes malicious PUFs with unbounded state, thus limiting its applicability. However it is the only way we found to address the issues of the original construction. We hope that in future work this restriction can be lifted, and along the lines of our work, UC-secure commitments with fewer restrictions on both the state and communication can be constructed.
Physically Uncloneable Functions (PUFs) [Pap01] are noisy physical sources of randomness. As such, they are naturally appealing for cryptographic applications, and have caught the interest of both theoreticians and practitioners. A major step towards understanding and securely using PUFs was recently taken in [Crypto 2011] where Brzuska, Fischlin, Schroder and Katzenbeisser model PUFs in the Universal Composition (UC) framework of Canetti [FOCS 2001]. Their model considers trusted PUFs only, and thus real-world adversaries can not create malicious PUFs, and can access the physical object only via the prescribed procedure. However, this does not accurately reflect real-life scenarios, where an adversary could be able to create and use malicious PUFs, or access the PUF through other procedures. The goal of this work is to extend the model proposed in [Crypto 2011] in order to capture such real-world attacks. The main contribution of this work is the study of the Malicious PUFs model. Namely, we extend the PUF functionality of Brzuska et al. so that it allows the adversary to create arbitrarily malicious PUFs. Then, we provide positive results in this, more realistic, model. We show that, under computational assumptions, it is possible to UC-securely realize any functionality. Furthermore, we achieve unconditional (not UC) security with malicious PUFs, by showing a statistically hiding statistically binding commitment scheme that uses one PUF only, and such PUF can be malicious. As an additional contribution, we investigate another attack model, where adversaries access to a trusted PUF in a different way (i.e., not following the prescribed procedure). Technically this attack translates into the fact that the simulator cannot observe the queries made to an honest PUF. In this model, queries are oblivious to the simulator, and we call it the “Oblivious Query” model. We are able to achieve unconditionally UC-secure computation, even in this more severe model. This protocol is secure against stronger adversaries compared to the ones of Brzuska et al. Finally, we show the impossibility of UC secure computation in the combination of the above two new models, where the real-world adversary can create malicious PUFs and maliciously access to honest PUFs. Our work sheds light on the significant power and applicability of PUFs in the design of cryptographic protocols modeling adversaries that misbehave with PUFs.