Motion is simply the manner in which objects transform their location with time. In this paper I have provided a brief overview of the theories explaining motion, its history starting with the ancient conceptions of Galileo and Newton and all the way up to the relativity theory of Einstein and the modern quantum mechanics. Considering the approach of kinematics, dynamics, and the more recent theories, I would like to show how our understanding of motion has evolved to become so simple and super complex so as to enable us know the large as well as the tiny particles in the universe. Once we have discussed the classical era we move on to the major paradigm shifts of the 20th century which actually broke the biscuit of the Newtonian worldview. Starting with Einstein Special and General Relativity, which disturbed the concept of absolute simultaneity. Relativity is a vivid picture of a dynamic and interwoven space in which the speed of light remains the same to all people, and gravity ceases to be a force but rather a curvature of space.
Motion is simply the manner in which objects transform their location with time. In this paper I have provided a brief overview of the theories explaining motion, its history starting with the ancient conceptions of Galileo and Newton and all the way up to the relativity theory of Einstein and the modern quantum mechanics. Considering the approach of kinematics, dynamics, and the more recent theories, I would like to show how our understanding of motion has evolved to become so simple and super complex so as to enable us know the large as well as the tiny particles in the universe. Once we have discussed the classical era we move on to the major paradigm shifts of the 20th century which actually broke the biscuit of the Newtonian worldview. Starting with Einstein Special and General Relativity, which disturbed the concept of absolute simultaneity. Relativity is a vivid picture of a dynamic and interwoven space in which the speed of light remains the same to all people, and gravity ceases to be a force but rather a curvature of space.
The mathematician plays a game in which he himself invents the rules, while the physicist plays a game in which the rules are provided by nature, but as time goes on, it becomes increasingly evident that the rules which the mathematician finds interesting are the same as those which nature has chosen. (Paul A. M. Dirac) As described in Chapter 5, classical ( Newtonian ) mechanics is centered around Hamilton's principle and the associated Newton's second law, particularly as applied to statics and dynamics of nondeformable (discrete) and deformable (continuous) bodies. Such systems are typically of O (1) size operating at O (1) speeds. Modern physics generally refers to branches of physics that have arisen since Einstein's relativity theory in the early part of the twentieth century, including special relativity, general relativity, and quantum mechanics, for example. Modern physics addresses physical phenomena that occur at very small sizes, such as atoms, or very large sizes, such as galaxies, and/or very high speeds close to the speed of light. We focus on the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, both of which reduce to the classical mechanics limit that has occupied our considerations thus far. Relativity reduces to classical mechanics when υ ≪ c , where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, and υ is a characteristic velocity of the system; quantum mechanics reduces to classical mechanics when length scales dominant within the system are much larger than Planck's universal constant ħ.
The aim of this chapter is to present some very basic principles of classical mechanics. They can help us understand the novelty of quantum theory. Classical mechanics was founded by Newton and contemporary 17th-century natural philosophers, and further developed in the 18th and 19th centuries by many physicists and mathematicians, as a result of the search for a rational, causal, and scientific explanation of the universe. In classical mechanics, real-world objects are modeled as a collection of point particles, i.e., objects with negligible size. The motion of a point particle is characterized by a small number of parameters such as its position, mass, velocity, and the forces applied to it. The position of a point particle is defined with respect to an arbitrary fixed reference point in the three- dimensional Euclidean space, which is usually chosen as the origin of some coordinate system. The velocity of a point particle is the rate of change of its position with time. The force applied to a point particle (called the external force) is the cause for the point particle x y z A to undergo a certain change in its velocity, i.e., an acceleration (Newton’s second law of motion). For the sake of simplicity, here we shall refer to a point particle or a collection of point particles simply as an object. Newton’s first law of motion states that if an object experiences no net external force, then its velocity is constant, i.e., the object is either at rest or it moves in a straight line with a constant speed. The first law of motion postulates the existence of a certain set of frames of reference called inertial reference frames, relative to which the motion of an object not subject to external forces is a straight line at a constant speed. For this reason, Newton’s first law is also referred to as the law of inertia.
The early twentieth century was a revolutionary time in the history of physics. People often think of Einstein's special theory of relativity of 1905, which changed our conceptions of time and space. But among physicists, quantum mechanics is usually regarded as an even more radical change in our thinking about the physical world. Quantum mechanics, which was developed between 1900 and 1926, began as a theory of atoms and light but has now become the framework in terms of which all basic physical theories are expected to be cast. We need quantum ideas not only to understand atoms, molecules, and elementary particles, but also to understand the electronic properties of solids and even certain astronomical phenomena such as the stability of white dwarf stars. The theory was radical in part because it introduced probabilistic behavior as a fundamental aspect of the world, but even more because it seems to allow mutually exclusive situations to exist simultaneously in a “quantum superposition.” We will see later that the possibility of quantum superposition is largely responsible for a quantum computer's distinctive advantage over an ordinary computer. The present chapter is devoted to introducing the basic principles of quantum mechanics. There are essentially four components of the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. We need to know how to represent (i) states, (ii) measurements, (iii) reversible transformations, and (iv) composite systems. We will develop the first three in stages, starting with a very simple case – linear polarization of photons – and working toward the most general case.
In the 20th century, two new terms were added to the scientific lexicon: relativistic mechanics and quantum mechanics. The challenge to the concept of the absoluteness of space and time started at the end of the 19th century and gave birth to Einstein's special relativity theory in 1905. This unified space and time to a single entity, space–time, and we have been introduced to many new concepts such as time dilation, space contraction, mass–energy relation, and the space–time continuum in relativity theory. We have also learned that the highest possible velocity in this universe is that of light and that nothing in the universe can move faster than light. Einstein's general theory of relativity took into consideration gravitation and established the chronogeometric concept of gravity. Quantum mechanics developed by Bohr, de Broglie, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and others gave us knowledge in the atomic and subatomic domain and led to the wave–particle duality of de Broglie, the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg, the wave mechanics of Schrödinger, and so forth. We have learned that three distinct chords are at the heart of quantum mechanics—granularity, relational, and indeterminism. Although quantum mechanics is a weird subject, as we will discuss, the modern physics is totally based on it.
This paper takes a look at the two cornerstones of modern physics--Quantum Mechanics and The Theory of Relativity (Both Special and General). The differences and similarities for the two subjects are presented. More of their differences and similarities will emerge with new developments in physics. One can't rule out the possibility of the two being unified into one one fine day. That will herald another triumphant moment in physics. Introduction In 1905, Albert Einstein at the age of twenty-six formulated single-handedly, among others, the Theory of Special Relativity together with his other seminal papers on photoelectricity, Brownian motions of atoms and molecular dimensions. The year has been universally declared the Miraculous Year [1]. Ten years later, he came up with the theory of General Relativity--a new and revolutionary framework on gravity. Meanwhile in Europe a group of young physicists played pivotal role in the birth of Quantum Mechanics. Many of them went on to win Nobel prizes for their monumental contributions. Einstein also won the coveted prize not for Relativity but ironically for Photoelectric Effect. Irony has been part of physics in its history. Relativity with its weird 'Twin Paradox', constancy of the speed of light and the interchangebility between mass and energy (E=[mc.sup.2]) enthralls the public and scientists alike. It provides a way to measure particle masses [2]. The Quantum Theory has its fair share of weirdness and bewilderment. Both Quantum Mechanics and the Theory of Relativity bring forth new ideas in human thoughts. They are among Joanne Baker's 50 physics ideas [3]. Quantum Mechanics and the Theory of Relativity The quantum world where counterintuition reigns supreme is couched in uncertainty as epitomised by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Things do not behave in a deterministic way as enshrined and expected in classical Newtonian physics. The microscopic world of the electrons was dictated by randomness and indeterminacy. Albert Einstein was appalled by such dictates that he famously declared: 'God does not play dice with the universe.' The famous Danish physicist Neils Bohr sprang to his feet by saying: 'Stop telling God what to do with his dice.' The sparring between the two stalwarts in physics is legendary. According to Trefil [4], there are a couple of things that need to be said about the uncertainty principle: it does not imply that we cannot know either the position or the velocity of a particle, and it does not require the presence of a conscious mind. Marcus Chown [5] wraps up by saying 'The bitter irony, not lost on Einstein, was that he was the one who, by postulating the existence of the photon, had inadvertently set loose the genie of randomness of physics. The two theories of relativity by Einstein are not couched in randomness however. According to Smoot [6], both implied a radically new cosmology. Many people are of the opinion that with Einstein's theory of relativity, old classical physics is no more in vogue. According to Angier [7], Albert Einstein did not prove that Isaac Newton was wrong. Instead, he showed that Newton's theories of motion and gravity were incomplete, and that new equations were needed to explain the behavior of objects under extreme circumstances, such as when tiny particles travel at or near the speed of light. …
Unlike special relativity, quantum mechanics was not the inspired product of one mind. It developed, in fits and starts, over a period of 25 years (1900–1925), and many cooks stirred the broth. Even now, a century later, quantum mechanics raises profound conceptual questions. Every competent physicist can “do” quantum mechanics, and the predictions it makes are in spectacularly good agreement with experimental results; there can be little doubt that quantum mechanics is “right.” On the other hand, as Richard Feynman once remarked, “nobody understands quantum mechanics.” I'll tell the story in two parts. First the history (how the essential pieces of the puzzle were assembled), and then the implications (what the finished picture has to say about our world). Photons Like relativity, quantum mechanics began with the study of light. In both cases, this historical association is misleading. Relativity, really, has nothing to do with light – to be sure, it involves that magic speed limit, c , and of course the most familiar thing that travels at speed c is light. So light is a convenient vehicle for introducing the subject. But it is perfectly possible to imagine a universe in which there is no such thing as light, and yet relativity might still be valid. Quantum mechanics, too, starts with light – in this case the “quantum” of light (the photon). But, as it turns out, this is just one rather specialized example of much more general principles – in fact, a rather bad example, because photons are by their nature relativistic (they travel at the speed of light), and it would be more natural to begin with the quantum mechanics of slow-moving objects, in analogy with Newtonian mechanics.