Operational Distances Between Collapse Models: A Quantitative Comparison of CSL and the Schrödinger–Newton Model
Dewan Sajid Islam
Abstract
We present a quantitative operational comparison of the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model and the deterministic Schrödinger–Newton model within a specific operational context. Using a common operational pseudometric, we compare standard quantum mechanics, CSL, and the Schrödinger–Newton model for a harmonic oscillator with a position measurement. Within the Gaussian-closure and Gaussian-harmonic approximations adopted here, the three models yield Gaussian position distributions. The CSL sector is treated using Gaussian-closure moment dynamics, while the Schrödinger–Newton sector is evaluated numerically within the Gaussian harmonic approximation. We derive the corresponding total-variation distances and prove two structural properties of the operational pseudometric: monotonicity under coarse-graining and a data-processing inequality. We also establish a perturbative scaling result for the quantum-mechanical versus Schrödinger–Newton distance for a specific protocol. For representative parameters, the CSL effect is extremely small, with a QM–CSL distance of approximately 7.6 × 10⁻¹⁸, whereas the Gaussian-harmonic Schrödinger–Newton calculation gives a substantially larger QM–SN distance of approximately 0.75. We investigate the mass dependence of these distances and identify protocol-dependent crossover scales. The results provide a quantitative operational framework for comparing collapse models and for assessing their distinguishability in prospective experiments.