Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Identification of Boolean Oracles

亮周 河内, Akinori Kawachi

Published Jan 1, 2004• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum Identification of Boolean Oracles

Andris Ambainis, Kazuo Iwama, Akinori Kawachi +3 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2004•36 citations

Quantum Identification of Boolean Oracles

Andris Ambainis, Kazuo Iwama, Akinori Kawachi +2 more

arXiv:quant-ph/0403056•Springer eBooks•Jun 15, 2006•2 citations

Improved algorithms for quantum identification of boolean oracles

Andris Ambainis, Kazuo Iwama, 河内亮周 +3 more

•May 12, 2009•0 citations

Improved Algorithms for Quantum Identification of Boolean Oracles

Andris Ambainis, Kazuo Iwama, Akinori Kawachi +2 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2006•2 citations

Closed-Form Optimal Quantum Circuits for Single-Query Identification of Boolean Functions

Leonardo Bohac

We study minimum-error identification of an unknown single-bit Boolean function given black-box (oracle) access with one allowed query. Rather than stopping at an abstract optimal measurement, we give a fully constructive solution: an explicit state preparation and an explicit measurement unitary whose computational-basis readout achieves the Helstrom-optimal success probability 3/4 for distinguishing the four possible functions. The resulting circuit is low depth, uses a fixed gate set, and (in this smallest setting) requires no entanglement in the input state. Beyond the specific example, the main message is operational. It highlights a regime in which optimal oracle discrimination is not only well-defined but implementably explicit: the optimal POVM collapses to a compact gate-level primitive that can be compiled, verified, and composed inside larger routines. Motivated by this, we discuss a "what if" question that is open in spirit: for fixed (n,m,k), could optimal k-query identification (possibly for large hypothesis classes) admit deterministic, closed-form descriptions of the inter-query unitaries and the final measurement unitary acting on the natural n+m-qubit input--output registers (and, if needed, small work registers)? Even when such descriptions are not compact and do not evade known circuit-complexity barriers for generic Boolean functions, making the optimum constructive at the circuit level would be valuable for theory-to-hardware translation and for clarifying which forms of "oracle access" are physically meaningful.

quant-pharXiv:2512.15901•Dec 19, 2025•0 citations

Improved algorithms for quantum identification of Boolean oracles

Andris Ambainis, Kazuo Iwama, Akinori Kawachi +2 more

Theoretical Computer Science•Dec 26, 2006•15 citations
We study minimum-error identification of an unknown single-bit Boolean function given black-box (oracle) access with one allowed query. Rather than stopping at an abstract optimal measurement, we give a fully constructive solution: an explicit state preparation and an explicit measurement unitary whose computational-basis readout achieves the Helstrom-optimal success probability 3/4 for distinguishing the four possible functions. The resulting circuit is low depth, uses a fixed gate set, and (in this smallest setting) requires no entanglement in the input state. Beyond the specific example, the main message is operational. It highlights a regime in which optimal oracle discrimination is not only well-defined but implementably explicit: the optimal POVM collapses to a compact gate-level primitive that can be compiled, verified, and composed inside larger routines. Motivated by this, we discuss a "what if" question that is open in spirit: for fixed (n,m,k), could optimal k-query identification (possibly for large hypothesis classes) admit deterministic, closed-form descriptions of the inter-query unitaries and the final measurement unitary acting on the natural n+m-qubit input--output registers (and, if needed, small work registers)? Even when such descriptions are not compact and do not evade known circuit-complexity barriers for generic Boolean functions, making the optimum constructive at the circuit level would be valuable for theory-to-hardware translation and for clarifying which forms of "oracle access" are physically meaningful.