Two-Configuration Talbot-Lau Feature-Transport Preregistration: A Blind Test of the A7U Completed-Event Migration Law

Attar Ali

Published Sep 3, 2026• 1 citation

Abstract

Can an integer completed-event fingerprint move between independently calibrated matter-wave configurations exactly as the frozen transport law requires? \[ \boxed{ \begin{gathered} v_B=\Lambda_{AB}v_A,\qquad \Lambda_{AB}=\frac{L_Bd_A^2\mathcal B_A}{L_Ad_B^2\mathcal B_B},\\ N_{\Gamma,n}^{(B)}(\Lambda_{AB}v)=N_{\Gamma,n}^{(A)}(v),\qquad F_n^{(B)}(\Lambda_{AB}v)=F_n^{(A)}(v). \end{gathered}} \] Executable joint-ensemble prediction. The fixed-mass formula is the monochromatic specialization. The physical prediction now integrates the source factor over each calibrated joint mass-velocity node inside the ordinary complex kernel. Both prediction and actual analysis inputs are bound to the full reviewed pre-data manifest. The source law and historical decision thresholds are unchanged. The current reconstruction preserves directory paths and includes regression tests for missing evidence, substituted covariance or tangents, and mass averaging. A design separation of five standard deviations is not an observed five-sigma discovery. Physical activation and observations remain pending. Version: 1.1 State: Source transport theorem closed; Stage-0 test sealed; configuration pair and physical target not activated; observation pending Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22282943 Author: Ali Attar, ORCID 0009-0008-9931-2691 This is the separate Test B companion to the single-configuration Fourth-Face Talbot-Lau preregistration. Test A remains unchanged. Test B asks a harder question: if a completed-event visibility fingerprint is real, does the entire integer structure move to the new velocity coordinates fixed by a controlled change of source mass, grating separation, or grating period? The registered source branch is n = 1 with kappaA = kappaB = 1. It contains zero target-fitted QTT parameters. Each of fourteen physical target components is built by inserting the frozen A7U factor inside the independently calibrated complex Talbot/environment kernel before taking the modulus. A source-only curve may never substitute for that physical prediction. The experiment must pass two pre-data design gates: \[ R_0\ge5,\qquad R_{\rm move}\ge5. \] The first requires at least five-sigma projected separation from the ordinary null. The second requires at least five-sigma projected separation from a frozen competitor in which the same source-shaped feature stays at the old laboratory velocity coordinates. The configuration pair is selected deterministically from a complete candidate ledger using calibration-only inputs. Arbitrary post-data polynomial nuisances, fitted amplitudes, branch changes, and pair shopping are forbidden. The sealed fork is ordinary null versus transported A7U target versus non-migrating source-shaped competitor. Every activation field defaults false. An unactivated, underpowered, incorrectly mapped, or incompletely calibrated run returns INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT; once every gate passes, a null remains a real scoped falsifier. A first primary match is only GREEN-TRANSPORT-CANDIDATE. Hard green requires the same frozen result in a sequestered holdout or a preregistered third configuration or species. This test directly adjudicates the A7U completed-event migration law. A stronger interpretation as a measurement of the Access-Law projector weight requires the additional frozen camera identities W†MW = Pa and Cobs = (1 - eta)Cu + eta Ca in both configurations. Without that certificate, the A7U verdict remains valid and the Access-Law eta verdict remains ineligible. The Pedalino sodium-nanoparticle experiment establishes the relevant platform class with more than 7,000 atoms, masses above 170,000 Da, and a three-grating optical Talbot-Lau interferometer. Its public archive does not execute this prospectively frozen two-configuration test. The published quantum and classical contrast curves also share one fitted global factor of 0.78, so that archive cannot identify a constant extra sector by itself. QTT is a speculative new theory. This record publishes a parameter-free prospective discriminator, full schemas, blind audit, adversarial mutation tests, protocol seal, and reconstruction source. It reports no observation and makes no claim of direct metrology of the completed-event four-volume. Scientific anchors: Single-configuration Fourth-Face Talbot-Lau Test A A7U Molecular Visibility Transport A7U source framework Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Pedalino et al., Nature experiment Public experimental archive QTT Observatory · DOI map

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22282943

Related papers

Fourth-Face Talbot-Lau Completed-Event Preregistration: An Activation-Gated Blind Test of A7U Matter-Wave Transport

Attar Ali

Can a finite Talbot chamber produce a nonconstant visibility shape after the ordinary interferometer kernel is frozen? \[ \boxed{ \begin{aligned} H_0:&\ \mathbf y_\perp=0,\\ H_{\mathrm{A7U}}:&\ \mathbf y_\perp=P_{\mathrm{prof}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}},\\ g_r^{\mathrm{phys}}=&\ \log\left|\frac{\int_{\Delta v_r}W_r(v)B_1^{\mathrm{QM/env}}(v)F_1^{\mathrm{A7U}}(v)\,dv}{\int_{\Delta v_r}W_r(v)B_1^{\mathrm{QM/env}}(v)\,dv}\right|,\\ &\ \frac{\partial\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}}}{\partial\mathbf y}=0. \end{aligned}} \] Version: 1.2 State: Stage-0 sealed; physical target activation pending; observation pending Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22010227 Author: Ali Attar, ORCID 0009-0008-9931-2691 Version note: v1.2 is an append-only source-projector-camera scope upgrade. The historical v1.0.1 branch, source equations, seven-bin vector, thresholds, PDF hash, and protocol-seal hash remain preserved. The v1.1 calibration-orthogonality gate also remains unchanged. The new outer wrapper separates the sealed A7U source-harmonic verdict from any stronger interpretation as a measurement of the central Access-Law projector weight. This preregistration asks for a seven-bin, first-harmonic matter-wave shape, not a constant loss of fringe contrast. The source branch is fixed before observation, but the final laboratory prediction is legal only after the ordinary complex Talbot kernel, event weights, operating point, calibration uncertainty object, physics-generated tangent basis, covariance, extraction operator, and the apparatus proof of kappa = 1 are independently frozen. The finite source law is \[ \Delta_n(v)=\left\|n^2\frac{hL}{d^2mv}\right\|_{\mathbb Z},\qquad N_{\Gamma,n}=\left\lceil\Delta_n^{-1}\right\rceil,\qquad F_n^{\mathrm{A7U}}=\sqrt{1-2\kappa_n\frac{2}{N_{\Gamma,n}}\left(1-\frac{1}{N_{\Gamma,n}}\right)}. \] The release seals a high-precision source-only feasibility vector, but proves why that vector cannot be substituted for the physical instrument prediction. Complex Talbot coefficients must be combined inside each velocity-bin integral before taking their modulus. This is the central wrong-falsification firewall: source-only forecast ≠ physical instrument prediction ≠ observation. A central Access-Law interpretation requires the additional prospectively frozen certificate \[ W^\dagger M W=P_a, \qquad C_n^{\mathrm{obs}}=(1-\eta)C_{n,u}+\eta C_{n,a}, \qquad \frac{\partial(W,M,C_{n,u},C_{n,a})}{\partial\mathbf y}=0. \] Without it, the test still adjudicates the activated A7U Talbot-Lau branch, but the lawful projector label is INELIGIBLE_NO_ACCESS_LAW_ETA_VERDICT. This prevents both wrong falsification and false promotion without weakening the sealed test. The calibration-orthogonality gate is \[ U_{\mathrm{phys}}=[\mathbf 1,\partial_{\theta_1}\log|\bar B_1^0|,\ldots],\qquad R_{\mathrm{sens}}^{\mathrm{cal}}= \sqrt{(P_{\mathrm{phys}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}})^T (P_{\mathrm{phys}}\Sigma P_{\mathrm{phys}}^T)^+ (P_{\mathrm{phys}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}})}\ge5. \] If the apparatus or data packet does not pass every activation gate, the deterministic result is TARGET-NOT-ACTIVATED or INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT. The source-only forecast is 96.51% linear in velocity, so a generic constant-only nuisance model is not sufficient; the activated mass, phase, velocity-width, grating, and separation derivatives must be projected explicitly. These pre-data gates cannot be altered after a null. A qualified null therefore remains a real scoped falsifier. The public Pedalino sodium-nanoparticle archive establishes that the high-mass Talbot-Lau platform is real and experimentally mature, but it does not contain the complete velocity-resolved visibility, covariance, ordinary-kernel, and path-provenance packet required for a retrospective execution. Its published ordinary theory curves share a fitted global contrast factor of 0.78, so a constant additional suppression is not separately identifiable. This is therefore a prospective sealed test, not an observation claim. Stable scientific anchors: A7U Molecular Visibility Transport A7U source framework Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Pedalino et al., Nature experiment Public experimental archive QTT Observatory · DOI map

Aug 19, 20263 citations

A7U Molecular Visibility Transport: Closed Source Floor, Access Transport, and Existing-Data Consistency Rows

Attar Ali

Jun 22, 20263 citations

Artian's Physical Contact Transfer Test

Attar Ali

A preregistered one- and two-excitation trapped-ion benchmark \[\boxed{p_\eta(\mathbf y\mid u)=\operatorname{Tr}[\mathcal I_{y_m,\eta}^{u_m}\circ\cdots\circ\mathcal I_{y_1,\eta}^{u_1}(\rho_\eta)].}\] One interaction, selected before the data, must predict several observations. This prospective trapped-ion protocol fixes one- and two-excitation time scans, relative-phase scans and an even-curvature null control. It uses 18 contexts, 62 complete raw-count coordinates and 900,000 initiated validation attempts. The same independently constructed contact supplies the time-transfer predictions \[p_{10\to01}=\sin^2\Theta,\qquad p_{11\to11}=\cos^2(F\Theta).\] Preparation, detector response, physical insertion class and uncertainty are frozen in a separately timestamped laboratory capsule before acquisition. No validation-fitted exchange frequency, capacity, phase origin or contrast is allowed. Failed attempts and null outcomes remain in the count denominators. A sensitivity gate prevents an unresponsive detector from passing. The finite-sample analysis has separate rejection, equivalence, inconclusive and ineligible decisions. Its total conditional false-rejection budget is 5.7330314376 × 10−7, numerically the conventional two-sided five-sigma tail. This is a design threshold, not a reported discovery. Successful equivalence requires every probability coordinate to meet a five-percentage-point tolerance. Design-stage preregistration. This deposit fixes the test today. Independent apparatus qualification, a public or verifiably escrowed Stage B capsule and new validation observations remain required. The canonical branch is shared with matched microscopic QM; a finite-slot comparison tests only the independently selected physical models. The package includes the protocol, frozen design, count analyzer, synthetic verification, deliberately incomplete laboratory templates and exact checksums. Companion: QTT Physical Contact Selection and Predictive Transfer Theorem. Source dependencies: Completed-Event Transport and Quantum Coherence; QTT Main Book. Independent experimental context: Hou et al., Nature Physics (2024). Browse the corpus. The main PDF is the preview; the ZIP contains the full reconstruction package.

Sep 26, 20261 citation

QTT Carrier-Deletion Finite-Window and Timing-Access Blind Test Extension

Attar Ali

Aug 14, 20260 citations

Artian Absolute-Clock Two-Test Preregistration: Matter-Wave Sagnac and Faraday Polarization-Coherence Tests

Attar Ali

Jul 15, 20268 citations

Artian A1 Quantum-Clock Reference-Switch Theorem: A Prospective Delocalized-Clock Test of the QTT Two-Clock Projection

Attar Ali

Jul 29, 20262 citations

Two-Configuration Talbot-Lau Feature-Transport Preregistration: A Blind Test of the A7U Completed-Event Migration Law

Attar Ali

Published Sep 3, 2026• 1 citation

Publisher

Abstract

Can an integer completed-event fingerprint move between independently calibrated matter-wave configurations exactly as the frozen transport law requires? [ \boxed{ \begin{gathered} v_B=\Lambda_{AB}v_A,\qquad \Lambda_{AB}=\frac{L_Bd_A^2\mathcal B_A}{L_Ad_B^2\mathcal B_B},\ N_{\Gamma,n}^{(B)}(\Lambda_{AB}v)=N_{\Gamma,n}^{(A)}(v),\qquad F_n^{(B)}(\Lambda_{AB}v)=F_n^{(A)}(v). \end{gathered}} ] Executable joint-ensemble prediction. The fixed-mass formula is the monochromatic specialization. The physical prediction now integrates the source factor over each calibrated joint mass-velocity node inside the ordinary complex kernel. Both prediction and actual analysis inputs are bound to the full reviewed pre-data manifest. The source law and historical decision thresholds are unchanged. The current reconstruction preserves directory paths and includes regression tests for missing evidence, substituted covariance or tangents, and mass averaging. A design separation of five standard deviations is not an observed five-sigma discovery. Physical activation and observations remain pending. Version: 1.1 State: Source transport theorem closed; Stage-0 test sealed; configuration pair and physical target not activated; observation pending Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22282943 Author: Ali Attar, ORCID 0009-0008-9931-2691 This is the separate Test B companion to the single-configuration Fourth-Face Talbot-Lau preregistration. Test A remains unchanged. Test B asks a harder question: if a completed-event visibility fingerprint is real, does the entire integer structure move to the new velocity coordinates fixed by a controlled change of source mass, grating separation, or grating period? The registered source branch is n = 1 with kappaA = kappaB = 1. It contains zero target-fitted QTT parameters. Each of fourteen physical target components is built by inserting the frozen A7U factor inside the independently calibrated complex Talbot/environment kernel before taking the modulus. A source-only curve may never substitute for that physical prediction. The experiment must pass two pre-data design gates: [ R_0\ge5,\qquad R_{\rm move}\ge5. ] The first requires at least five-sigma projected separation from the ordinary null. The second requires at least five-sigma projected separation from a frozen competitor in which the same source-shaped feature stays at the old laboratory velocity coordinates. The configuration pair is selected deterministically from a complete candidate ledger using calibration-only inputs. Arbitrary post-data polynomial nuisances, fitted amplitudes, branch changes, and pair shopping are forbidden. The sealed fork is ordinary null versus transported A7U target versus non-migrating source-shaped competitor. Every activation field defaults false. An unactivated, underpowered, incorrectly mapped, or incompletely calibrated run returns INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT; once every gate passes, a null remains a real scoped falsifier. A first primary match is only GREEN-TRANSPORT-CANDIDATE. Hard green requires the same frozen result in a sequestered holdout or a preregistered third configuration or species. This test directly adjudicates the A7U completed-event migration law. A stronger interpretation as a measurement of the Access-Law projector weight requires the additional frozen camera identities W†MW = Pa and Cobs = (1 - eta)Cu + eta Ca in both configurations. Without that certificate, the A7U verdict remains valid and the Access-Law eta verdict remains ineligible. The Pedalino sodium-nanoparticle experiment establishes the relevant platform class with more than 7,000 atoms, masses above 170,000 Da, and a three-grating optical Talbot-Lau interferometer. Its public archive does not execute this prospectively frozen two-configuration test. The published quantum and classical contrast curves also share one fitted global factor of 0.78, so that archive cannot identify a constant extra sector by itself. QTT is a speculative new theory. This record publishes a parameter-free prospective discriminator, full schemas, blind audit, adversarial mutation tests, protocol seal, and reconstruction source. It reports no observation and makes no claim of direct metrology of the completed-event four-volume. Scientific anchors: Single-configuration Fourth-Face Talbot-Lau Test A A7U Molecular Visibility Transport A7U source framework Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Pedalino et al., Nature experiment Public experimental archive QTT Observatory · DOI map

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22282943

Related papers

Fourth-Face Talbot-Lau Completed-Event Preregistration: An Activation-Gated Blind Test of A7U Matter-Wave Transport

Attar Ali

Can a finite Talbot chamber produce a nonconstant visibility shape after the ordinary interferometer kernel is frozen? $\boxed{ \begin{aligned} H_0:&\ \mathbf y_\perp=0,\\ H_{\mathrm{A7U}}:&\ \mathbf y_\perp=P_{\mathrm{prof}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}},\\ g_r^{\mathrm{phys}}=&\ \log\left|\frac{\int_{\Delta v_r}W_r(v)B_1^{\mathrm{QM/env}}(v)F_1^{\mathrm{A7U}}(v)\,dv}{\int_{\Delta v_r}W_r(v)B_1^{\mathrm{QM/env}}(v)\,dv}\right|,\\ &\ \frac{\partial\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}}}{\partial\mathbf y}=0. \end{aligned}}$ Version: 1.2 State: Stage-0 sealed; physical target activation pending; observation pending Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22010227 Author: Ali Attar, ORCID 0009-0008-9931-2691 Version note: v1.2 is an append-only source-projector-camera scope upgrade. The historical v1.0.1 branch, source equations, seven-bin vector, thresholds, PDF hash, and protocol-seal hash remain preserved. The v1.1 calibration-orthogonality gate also remains unchanged. The new outer wrapper separates the sealed A7U source-harmonic verdict from any stronger interpretation as a measurement of the central Access-Law projector weight. This preregistration asks for a seven-bin, first-harmonic matter-wave shape, not a constant loss of fringe contrast. The source branch is fixed before observation, but the final laboratory prediction is legal only after the ordinary complex Talbot kernel, event weights, operating point, calibration uncertainty object, physics-generated tangent basis, covariance, extraction operator, and the apparatus proof of kappa = 1 are independently frozen. The finite source law is $\Delta_n(v)=\left\|n^2\frac{hL}{d^2mv}\right\|_{\mathbb Z},\qquad N_{\Gamma,n}=\left\lceil\Delta_n^{-1}\right\rceil,\qquad F_n^{\mathrm{A7U}}=\sqrt{1-2\kappa_n\frac{2}{N_{\Gamma,n}}\left(1-\frac{1}{N_{\Gamma,n}}\right)}.$ The release seals a high-precision source-only feasibility vector, but proves why that vector cannot be substituted for the physical instrument prediction. Complex Talbot coefficients must be combined inside each velocity-bin integral before taking their modulus. This is the central wrong-falsification firewall: source-only forecast ≠ physical instrument prediction ≠ observation. A central Access-Law interpretation requires the additional prospectively frozen certificate $W^\dagger M W=P_a, \qquad C_n^{\mathrm{obs}}=(1-\eta)C_{n,u}+\eta C_{n,a}, \qquad \frac{\partial(W,M,C_{n,u},C_{n,a})}{\partial\mathbf y}=0.$ Without it, the test still adjudicates the activated A7U Talbot-Lau branch, but the lawful projector label is INELIGIBLE_NO_ACCESS_LAW_ETA_VERDICT. This prevents both wrong falsification and false promotion without weakening the sealed test. The calibration-orthogonality gate is $U_{\mathrm{phys}}=[\mathbf 1,\partial_{\theta_1}\log|\bar B_1^0|,\ldots],\qquad R_{\mathrm{sens}}^{\mathrm{cal}}= \sqrt{(P_{\mathrm{phys}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}})^T (P_{\mathrm{phys}}\Sigma P_{\mathrm{phys}}^T)^+ (P_{\mathrm{phys}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}})}\ge5.$ If the apparatus or data packet does not pass every activation gate, the deterministic result is TARGET-NOT-ACTIVATED or INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT. The source-only forecast is 96.51% linear in velocity, so a generic constant-only nuisance model is not sufficient; the activated mass, phase, velocity-width, grating, and separation derivatives must be projected explicitly. These pre-data gates cannot be altered after a null. A qualified null therefore remains a real scoped falsifier. The public Pedalino sodium-nanoparticle archive establishes that the high-mass Talbot-Lau platform is real and experimentally mature, but it does not contain the complete velocity-resolved visibility, covariance, ordinary-kernel, and path-provenance packet required for a retrospective execution. Its published ordinary theory curves share a fitted global contrast factor of 0.78, so a constant additional suppression is not separately identifiable. This is therefore a prospective sealed test, not an observation claim. Stable scientific anchors: A7U Molecular Visibility Transport A7U source framework Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Pedalino et al., Nature experiment Public experimental archive QTT Observatory · DOI mapCan a finite Talbot chamber produce a nonconstant visibility shape after the ordinary interferometer kernel is frozen? \[ \boxed{ \begin{aligned} H_0:&\ \mathbf y_\perp=0,\\ H_{\mathrm{A7U}}:&\ \mathbf y_\perp=P_{\mathrm{prof}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}},\\ g_r^{\mathrm{phys}}=&\ \log\left|\frac{\int_{\Delta v_r}W_r(v)B_1^{\mathrm{QM/env}}(v)F_1^{\mathrm{A7U}}(v)\,dv}{\int_{\Delta v_r}W_r(v)B_1^{\mathrm{QM/env}}(v)\,dv}\right|,\\ &\ \frac{\partial\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}}}{\partial\mathbf y}=0. \end{aligned}} \] Version: 1.2 State: Stage-0 sealed; physical target activation pending; observation pending Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22010227 Author: Ali Attar, ORCID 0009-0008-9931-2691 Version note: v1.2 is an append-only source-projector-camera scope upgrade. The historical v1.0.1 branch, source equations, seven-bin vector, thresholds, PDF hash, and protocol-seal hash remain preserved. The v1.1 calibration-orthogonality gate also remains unchanged. The new outer wrapper separates the sealed A7U source-harmonic verdict from any stronger interpretation as a measurement of the central Access-Law projector weight. This preregistration asks for a seven-bin, first-harmonic matter-wave shape, not a constant loss of fringe contrast. The source branch is fixed before observation, but the final laboratory prediction is legal only after the ordinary complex Talbot kernel, event weights, operating point, calibration uncertainty object, physics-generated tangent basis, covariance, extraction operator, and the apparatus proof of kappa = 1 are independently frozen. The finite source law is \[ \Delta_n(v)=\left\|n^2\frac{hL}{d^2mv}\right\|_{\mathbb Z},\qquad N_{\Gamma,n}=\left\lceil\Delta_n^{-1}\right\rceil,\qquad F_n^{\mathrm{A7U}}=\sqrt{1-2\kappa_n\frac{2}{N_{\Gamma,n}}\left(1-\frac{1}{N_{\Gamma,n}}\right)}. \] The release seals a high-precision source-only feasibility vector, but proves why that vector cannot be substituted for the physical instrument prediction. Complex Talbot coefficients must be combined inside each velocity-bin integral before taking their modulus. This is the central wrong-falsification firewall: source-only forecast ≠ physical instrument prediction ≠ observation. A central Access-Law interpretation requires the additional prospectively frozen certificate \[ W^\dagger M W=P_a, \qquad C_n^{\mathrm{obs}}=(1-\eta)C_{n,u}+\eta C_{n,a}, \qquad \frac{\partial(W,M,C_{n,u},C_{n,a})}{\partial\mathbf y}=0. \] Without it, the test still adjudicates the activated A7U Talbot-Lau branch, but the lawful projector label is INELIGIBLE_NO_ACCESS_LAW_ETA_VERDICT. This prevents both wrong falsification and false promotion without weakening the sealed test. The calibration-orthogonality gate is \[ U_{\mathrm{phys}}=[\mathbf 1,\partial_{\theta_1}\log|\bar B_1^0|,\ldots],\qquad R_{\mathrm{sens}}^{\mathrm{cal}}= \sqrt{(P_{\mathrm{phys}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}})^T (P_{\mathrm{phys}}\Sigma P_{\mathrm{phys}}^T)^+ (P_{\mathrm{phys}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}})}\ge5. \] If the apparatus or data packet does not pass every activation gate, the deterministic result is TARGET-NOT-ACTIVATED or INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT. The source-only forecast is 96.51% linear in velocity, so a generic constant-only nuisance model is not sufficient; the activated mass, phase, velocity-width, grating, and separation derivatives must be projected explicitly. These pre-data gates cannot be altered after a null. A qualified null therefore remains a real scoped falsifier. The public Pedalino sodium-nanoparticle archive establishes that the high-mass Talbot-Lau platform is real and experimentally mature, but it does not contain the complete velocity-resolved visibility, covariance, ordinary-kernel, and path-provenance packet required for a retrospective execution. Its published ordinary theory curves share a fitted global contrast factor of 0.78, so a constant additional suppression is not separately identifiable. This is therefore a prospective sealed test, not an observation claim. Stable scientific anchors: A7U Molecular Visibility Transport A7U source framework Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Pedalino et al., Nature experiment Public experimental archive QTT Observatory · DOI map

Aug 19, 20263 citations

A7U Molecular Visibility Transport: Closed Source Floor, Access Transport, and Existing-Data Consistency Rows

Attar Ali

A matter-wave visibility floor becomes physics only when a frozen source certificate produces a surviving experimental shape. The paper inserts the A7U source factor into the ordinary Talbot-Lau transport rather than replacing environmental decoherence: $B_n^{\rm QTT}(v) = B_n^{\rm QM/env}(v)F_n^{\rm A7U}(v), \qquad F_n^{\rm A7U}(v)=\left|1-\frac{2}{N_{\Gamma,n}^{\rm TL}(v)}\right|.$ Version 10.1 executes this factor inside the public Pedalino complex first-harmonic mass/velocity kernel. The ordinary public kernel gives chi-square 44.539 for 31 nominal degrees of freedom; the saturated A7U branch gives 70.439 under the same diagonal-error treatment and the same one-contrast profiling rule. The nominal branch is therefore a reproducible stressed diagnostic. Version 10.1 also closes the projector-harmonic type boundary. The A7U factor above is a source-conditioned harmonic transport coefficient. The Access-Law quantity eta = Tr(rho M) is the state weight of a bounded central projector. Their exact bridge is the sector-resolved Fourier camera $C_n^{\rm obs}=(1-\eta)C_{n,u}+\eta C_{n,a}.$ A single visibility does not identify eta generically. The simple rule Vobs/Vu = 1 - eta is exact only after a physical intertwiner, equal DC throughput, zero aligned-sector analyzed harmonic, independent ordinary camera, and full covariance are certified before the target row is opened. The public Pedalino archive does not contain those objects, so it remains a camera diagnostic and carries no Access-Law eta verdict. That result is not a sigma exclusion. The fixed curves are nonnested, and the public archive does not contain the full observation covariance or the target-blind physical calibration tangent packet required by the separately sealed Fourth-Face activation theorem. The lawful status is: Nominal public branch: stressed diagnostic.Theory verdict: ineligible.Blind A7U observation: pending. The release also closes the multi-operating-point rank-lift theorem. With a target-blind ordinary tangent matrix $U_{\rm phys}$ , full covariance $\Sigma$ , and frozen A7U shape $g$ , define $P_{\rm cal} = I-U_{\rm phys} \left(U_{\rm phys}^{T}\Sigma^{-1}U_{\rm phys}\right)^{+} U_{\rm phys}^{T}\Sigma^{-1}.$ The A7U shape is identifiable exactly when $P_{\rm cal}g\ne0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad g\notin{\rm col}(U_{\rm phys}).$ This converts the present ambiguity into a finite experimental requirement: predeclare multiple operating points, freeze the physical calibration tangent space and full covariance before target-data access, and require calibrated sensitivity of at least five. Missing activation objects block favorable and adverse verdicts equally; a packet that passes before unblinding cannot be withdrawn after a qualified null. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20796924 Fourth-Face test: 10.5281/zenodo.22010227 Main book: 10.5281/zenodo.17527179 Website: quantumtraction.orgA matter-wave visibility floor becomes physics only when a frozen source certificate produces a surviving experimental shape. The paper inserts the A7U source factor into the ordinary Talbot-Lau transport rather than replacing environmental decoherence: \[ B_n^{\rm QTT}(v) = B_n^{\rm QM/env}(v)F_n^{\rm A7U}(v), \qquad F_n^{\rm A7U}(v)=\left|1-\frac{2}{N_{\Gamma,n}^{\rm TL}(v)}\right|. \] Version 10.1 executes this factor inside the public Pedalino complex first-harmonic mass/velocity kernel. The ordinary public kernel gives chi-square 44.539 for 31 nominal degrees of freedom; the saturated A7U branch gives 70.439 under the same diagonal-error treatment and the same one-contrast profiling rule. The nominal branch is therefore a reproducible stressed diagnostic. Version 10.1 also closes the projector-harmonic type boundary. The A7U factor above is a source-conditioned harmonic transport coefficient. The Access-Law quantity eta = Tr(rho M) is the state weight of a bounded central projector. Their exact bridge is the sector-resolved Fourier camera \[ C_n^{\rm obs}=(1-\eta)C_{n,u}+\eta C_{n,a}. \] A single visibility does not identify eta generically. The simple rule Vobs/Vu = 1 - eta is exact only after a physical intertwiner, equal DC throughput, zero aligned-sector analyzed harmonic, independent ordinary camera, and full covariance are certified before the target row is opened. The public Pedalino archive does not contain those objects, so it remains a camera diagnostic and carries no Access-Law eta verdict. That result is not a sigma exclusion. The fixed curves are nonnested, and the public archive does not contain the full observation covariance or the target-blind physical calibration tangent packet required by the separately sealed Fourth-Face activation theorem. The lawful status is: Nominal public branch: stressed diagnostic.Theory verdict: ineligible.Blind A7U observation: pending. The release also closes the multi-operating-point rank-lift theorem. With a target-blind ordinary tangent matrix $U_{\rm phys}$, full covariance $\Sigma$, and frozen A7U shape $g$, define \[ P_{\rm cal} = I-U_{\rm phys} \left(U_{\rm phys}^{T}\Sigma^{-1}U_{\rm phys}\right)^{+} U_{\rm phys}^{T}\Sigma^{-1}. \] The A7U shape is identifiable exactly when \[ P_{\rm cal}g\ne0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad g\notin{\rm col}(U_{\rm phys}). \] This converts the present ambiguity into a finite experimental requirement: predeclare multiple operating points, freeze the physical calibration tangent space and full covariance before target-data access, and require calibrated sensitivity of at least five. Missing activation objects block favorable and adverse verdicts equally; a packet that passes before unblinding cannot be withdrawn after a qualified null. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20796924 Fourth-Face test: 10.5281/zenodo.22010227 Main book: 10.5281/zenodo.17527179 Website: quantumtraction.org

Jun 22, 20263 citations

Artian's Physical Contact Transfer Test

Attar Ali

A preregistered one- and two-excitation trapped-ion benchmark $\boxed{p_\eta(\mathbf y\mid u)=\operatorname{Tr}[\mathcal I_{y_m,\eta}^{u_m}\circ\cdots\circ\mathcal I_{y_1,\eta}^{u_1}(\rho_\eta)].}$ One interaction, selected before the data, must predict several observations. This prospective trapped-ion protocol fixes one- and two-excitation time scans, relative-phase scans and an even-curvature null control. It uses 18 contexts, 62 complete raw-count coordinates and 900,000 initiated validation attempts. The same independently constructed contact supplies the time-transfer predictions $p_{10\to01}=\sin^2\Theta,\qquad p_{11\to11}=\cos^2(F\Theta).$ Preparation, detector response, physical insertion class and uncertainty are frozen in a separately timestamped laboratory capsule before acquisition. No validation-fitted exchange frequency, capacity, phase origin or contrast is allowed. Failed attempts and null outcomes remain in the count denominators. A sensitivity gate prevents an unresponsive detector from passing. The finite-sample analysis has separate rejection, equivalence, inconclusive and ineligible decisions. Its total conditional false-rejection budget is 5.7330314376 × 10−7, numerically the conventional two-sided five-sigma tail. This is a design threshold, not a reported discovery. Successful equivalence requires every probability coordinate to meet a five-percentage-point tolerance. Design-stage preregistration. This deposit fixes the test today. Independent apparatus qualification, a public or verifiably escrowed Stage B capsule and new validation observations remain required. The canonical branch is shared with matched microscopic QM; a finite-slot comparison tests only the independently selected physical models. The package includes the protocol, frozen design, count analyzer, synthetic verification, deliberately incomplete laboratory templates and exact checksums. Companion: QTT Physical Contact Selection and Predictive Transfer Theorem. Source dependencies: Completed-Event Transport and Quantum Coherence; QTT Main Book. Independent experimental context: Hou et al., Nature Physics (2024). Browse the corpus. The main PDF is the preview; the ZIP contains the full reconstruction package.A preregistered one- and two-excitation trapped-ion benchmark \[\boxed{p_\eta(\mathbf y\mid u)=\operatorname{Tr}[\mathcal I_{y_m,\eta}^{u_m}\circ\cdots\circ\mathcal I_{y_1,\eta}^{u_1}(\rho_\eta)].}\] One interaction, selected before the data, must predict several observations. This prospective trapped-ion protocol fixes one- and two-excitation time scans, relative-phase scans and an even-curvature null control. It uses 18 contexts, 62 complete raw-count coordinates and 900,000 initiated validation attempts. The same independently constructed contact supplies the time-transfer predictions \[p_{10\to01}=\sin^2\Theta,\qquad p_{11\to11}=\cos^2(F\Theta).\] Preparation, detector response, physical insertion class and uncertainty are frozen in a separately timestamped laboratory capsule before acquisition. No validation-fitted exchange frequency, capacity, phase origin or contrast is allowed. Failed attempts and null outcomes remain in the count denominators. A sensitivity gate prevents an unresponsive detector from passing. The finite-sample analysis has separate rejection, equivalence, inconclusive and ineligible decisions. Its total conditional false-rejection budget is 5.7330314376 × 10−7, numerically the conventional two-sided five-sigma tail. This is a design threshold, not a reported discovery. Successful equivalence requires every probability coordinate to meet a five-percentage-point tolerance. Design-stage preregistration. This deposit fixes the test today. Independent apparatus qualification, a public or verifiably escrowed Stage B capsule and new validation observations remain required. The canonical branch is shared with matched microscopic QM; a finite-slot comparison tests only the independently selected physical models. The package includes the protocol, frozen design, count analyzer, synthetic verification, deliberately incomplete laboratory templates and exact checksums. Companion: QTT Physical Contact Selection and Predictive Transfer Theorem. Source dependencies: Completed-Event Transport and Quantum Coherence; QTT Main Book. Independent experimental context: Hou et al., Nature Physics (2024). Browse the corpus. The main PDF is the preview; the ZIP contains the full reconstruction package.

Sep 26, 20261 citation

QTT Carrier-Deletion Finite-Window and Timing-Access Blind Test Extension

Attar Ali

Erase the apparent carrier. Recover the qubit from its halo. Then ask a different clock. This preregistration separates an ordinary quantum-memory qualification from a distinct timing test. Test A evolves a logical qubit through a frozen local channel, physically resets its original carrier, and asks whether a finite surrounding window can recover it. Test B asks whether that independently reconstructed channel fidelity controls a separate timing-covariance frontier. Test A: where is the recoverable channel? $\mathcal R_i(\omega)=|0\rangle\!\langle0|_i\otimes\operatorname{Tr}_i\omega,$ $Q_{\rm del}=2F_{\rm avg}(\mathcal N_{\rm del},\operatorname{id})-1, \qquad \boxed{F_e^{\rm del}=\frac{1+3Q_{\rm del}}4.}$ Target-only and every smaller halo subwindow remain optimized counterfactuals. A physical reset, sham reset, hidden-record injection, boundary ladder, and complete terminal record are required before the recovery layer qualifies. Test B: does the memory verifier intertwine with an independent timing projector? $\boxed{W^\dagger M_eW=P_{\rm align}}, \qquad \eta_T=\operatorname{Tr}(\rho P_{\rm align}),$ $\mathcal U_T^\star =\inf 2\sqrt{\det\Sigma_{T\Omega}}.$ On the certified canonical branch, the sealed QTT target is $\boxed{ \eta_T=F_e^{\rm del}, \qquad \mathcal U_T^\star=1-F_e^{\rm del}. }$ No complement coefficient is fitted. Five fidelity corridors, a radius/depth ladder, one-third untouched holdouts, topology twins, full covariance, global five-sigma decisions, at least 95% planned power, and transfer to a second record technology are frozen before data. The external computation is a feasibility anchor, not the timing target An, Cao, and Cui report carrier-deletion recovery in a local kicked-Ising memory. Their result qualifies the plausibility of Test A. Their reported $Q=0.516$ is explicitly forbidden from constructing Test B. The public source archive lacks the exact arrays and scripts, so exact replication remains pending. Five terminal outcomes INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT REGISTERED_QTT_CONSEQUENCE_FALSIFIED QTT_CANDIDATE QUALIFIED_OTHER_OR_CROSS_CHANNEL_ANOMALY AMBIGUOUS_OR_UNDERPOWERED Any failed eligibility gate terminates without a theory verdict. A positive result requires the full multirung shape, not one selected point. An off-target anomaly is preserved rather than discarded or used as a post-hoc rescue. Immutable protocol seal eb0640b25c1d0bde56cacc7f25d9ce4304594833e4aa937ed50293a1faafc849 This is a separate sealed extension. It changes no target, threshold, classifier, protocol hash, or file in the parent test under concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21902885. Public anchors Completed-record fan-out and timing-access framework Observation as Access Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book External finite-window recovery paper The PDF is the default preview. The reconstruction archive contains the sealed JSON, classifier, eighteen-gate and raw-terminal templates, Stage-0 handoff, verifier, external audit, adversarial review, metadata, and checksums.Erase the apparent carrier. Recover the qubit from its halo. Then ask a different clock. This preregistration separates an ordinary quantum-memory qualification from a distinct timing test. Test A evolves a logical qubit through a frozen local channel, physically resets its original carrier, and asks whether a finite surrounding window can recover it. Test B asks whether that independently reconstructed channel fidelity controls a separate timing-covariance frontier. Test A: where is the recoverable channel? \[ \mathcal R_i(\omega)=|0\rangle\!\langle0|_i\otimes\operatorname{Tr}_i\omega, \] \[ Q_{\rm del}=2F_{\rm avg}(\mathcal N_{\rm del},\operatorname{id})-1, \qquad \boxed{F_e^{\rm del}=\frac{1+3Q_{\rm del}}4.} \] Target-only and every smaller halo subwindow remain optimized counterfactuals. A physical reset, sham reset, hidden-record injection, boundary ladder, and complete terminal record are required before the recovery layer qualifies. Test B: does the memory verifier intertwine with an independent timing projector? \[ \boxed{W^\dagger M_eW=P_{\rm align}}, \qquad \eta_T=\operatorname{Tr}(\rho P_{\rm align}), \] \[ \mathcal U_T^\star =\inf 2\sqrt{\det\Sigma_{T\Omega}}. \] On the certified canonical branch, the sealed QTT target is \[ \boxed{ \eta_T=F_e^{\rm del}, \qquad \mathcal U_T^\star=1-F_e^{\rm del}. } \] No complement coefficient is fitted. Five fidelity corridors, a radius/depth ladder, one-third untouched holdouts, topology twins, full covariance, global five-sigma decisions, at least 95% planned power, and transfer to a second record technology are frozen before data. The external computation is a feasibility anchor, not the timing target An, Cao, and Cui report carrier-deletion recovery in a local kicked-Ising memory. Their result qualifies the plausibility of Test A. Their reported $Q=0.516$ is explicitly forbidden from constructing Test B. The public source archive lacks the exact arrays and scripts, so exact replication remains pending. Five terminal outcomes INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT REGISTERED_QTT_CONSEQUENCE_FALSIFIED QTT_CANDIDATE QUALIFIED_OTHER_OR_CROSS_CHANNEL_ANOMALY AMBIGUOUS_OR_UNDERPOWERED Any failed eligibility gate terminates without a theory verdict. A positive result requires the full multirung shape, not one selected point. An off-target anomaly is preserved rather than discarded or used as a post-hoc rescue. Immutable protocol seal eb0640b25c1d0bde56cacc7f25d9ce4304594833e4aa937ed50293a1faafc849 This is a separate sealed extension. It changes no target, threshold, classifier, protocol hash, or file in the parent test under concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21902885. Public anchors Completed-record fan-out and timing-access framework Observation as Access Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book External finite-window recovery paper The PDF is the default preview. The reconstruction archive contains the sealed JSON, classifier, eighteen-gate and raw-terminal templates, Stage-0 handoff, verifier, external audit, adversarial review, metadata, and checksums.

Aug 14, 20260 citations

Artian Absolute-Clock Two-Test Preregistration: Matter-Wave Sagnac and Faraday Polarization-Coherence Tests

Attar Ali

A sealed two-instrument search for an unprogrammed clock-reference projection This preregistration compares two fixed point hypotheses using independent matter-wave Sagnac and Faraday polarization-coherence instruments. Each instrument uses four physical histories and a camera-corrected Gram quotient: $R_d^{\rm obs} =\frac{1}{C_dN_d^{\rm ord}} \sqrt{\frac{|D_{\tau T}^{(d)}D_{T\tau}^{(d)}|} {|D_{\tau\tau}^{(d)}D_{TT}^{(d)}|}}.$ After physical activation, the frozen fork is $\boxed{ R_d^{\rm standard}=1, \qquad R_d^{\rm QTT}=\cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right) =0.9238795325112867\ldots }.$ Version 3.1 adds a post-seal standard-physics completeness gate for rotating atomic and ring-cavity platforms. The ordinary model must include or bound every applicable centre-of-mass, internal-spin, field, rotational Röntgen, polarization, backscatter, trap, Zeeman, and Stark term. In compact form, $H_{\rm rot}^{\rm std} =H_0-\Omega\cdot(L+F+\ell_F) +H_{\rm RR}+H_Z+H_{\rm Stark}+H_{\rm trap} +H_{\rm bs}+H_{\rm pol}+\cdots,$ with the rotation-induced hyperfine row $\boxed{ H_{\rm RH}=-\Omega\cdot F, \qquad \delta\omega_{\rm RH}=-\Omega_{\parallel}\Delta m_F. }$ The standard-null ledger, parameter provenance, held-out controls, and adequacy thresholds are frozen before target labels. If an applicable row is unresolved, the packet returns INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT. No target digit, ratio orientation, compatibility band, power floor, or numerical decision threshold is changed. Operation eligibility and reporting are amended as described below. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21376520 Main book: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 Website: quantumtraction.org Version 3.2: operation qualification and retained observations The numerical targets, ratio orientation, decision regions and historical seals are unchanged. A 22.5-degree or 45-degree component is no longer excluded by its angle alone: its physical transfer must be independently established. Common-operation cancellation and signal-preserving calibration are proved; both hypotheses must remain identifiable. Every acquired record is retained. After authorized unblinding, QTT-like, ordinary-like and unexpected outcomes are reported, including observations that do not qualify for a theory verdict. This is a prospective amendment, not a retrospective resealing of data. Clock, ruler and signal-recovery qualification. Both registered predictions are constructed at the raw detector with explicit proper-time, coordinate-time, worldline, ruler and synchronization conventions. Each relativistic effect is counted once. Independently calibrated corrections carry their uncertainties through the common comparison; the tested rows cannot train a normalization that forces either answer. Blind recovery is required separately for both alternatives at every predeclared operating setting. The inherited targets and decision rules remain fixed. The included design study makes sensitivity explicit: for the Two-Test Gram classifier, a total ratio uncertainty of 0.0013 gives approximately 88.9% QTT-branch and 94.1% ordinary-branch power under the stated ideal model. These are conditional detection probabilities, not probabilities that a theory is true, and each instrument retains its own classifier. The complete apparatus packet must be sealed before acquisition and target access; historical campaign rules remain preserved. Reconstruction entry point. Start with current/CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in the ZIP. The shared execution contract refers once to the development filename CURRENT_EXECUTION_RC.md; that reference means CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in this release. The packaged README names the correct file. This navigation correction does not change the deposited files, scientific requirements or historical seals.A sealed two-instrument search for an unprogrammed clock-reference projection This preregistration compares two fixed point hypotheses using independent matter-wave Sagnac and Faraday polarization-coherence instruments. Each instrument uses four physical histories and a camera-corrected Gram quotient: \[ R_d^{\rm obs} =\frac{1}{C_dN_d^{\rm ord}} \sqrt{\frac{|D_{\tau T}^{(d)}D_{T\tau}^{(d)}|} {|D_{\tau\tau}^{(d)}D_{TT}^{(d)}|}}. \] After physical activation, the frozen fork is \[ \boxed{ R_d^{\rm standard}=1, \qquad R_d^{\rm QTT}=\cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right) =0.9238795325112867\ldots }. \] Version 3.1 adds a post-seal standard-physics completeness gate for rotating atomic and ring-cavity platforms. The ordinary model must include or bound every applicable centre-of-mass, internal-spin, field, rotational Röntgen, polarization, backscatter, trap, Zeeman, and Stark term. In compact form, \[ H_{\rm rot}^{\rm std} =H_0-\Omega\cdot(L+F+\ell_F) +H_{\rm RR}+H_Z+H_{\rm Stark}+H_{\rm trap} +H_{\rm bs}+H_{\rm pol}+\cdots, \] with the rotation-induced hyperfine row \[ \boxed{ H_{\rm RH}=-\Omega\cdot F, \qquad \delta\omega_{\rm RH}=-\Omega_{\parallel}\Delta m_F. } \] The standard-null ledger, parameter provenance, held-out controls, and adequacy thresholds are frozen before target labels. If an applicable row is unresolved, the packet returns INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT. No target digit, ratio orientation, compatibility band, power floor, or numerical decision threshold is changed. Operation eligibility and reporting are amended as described below. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21376520 Main book: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 Website: quantumtraction.org Version 3.2: operation qualification and retained observations The numerical targets, ratio orientation, decision regions and historical seals are unchanged. A 22.5-degree or 45-degree component is no longer excluded by its angle alone: its physical transfer must be independently established. Common-operation cancellation and signal-preserving calibration are proved; both hypotheses must remain identifiable. Every acquired record is retained. After authorized unblinding, QTT-like, ordinary-like and unexpected outcomes are reported, including observations that do not qualify for a theory verdict. This is a prospective amendment, not a retrospective resealing of data. Clock, ruler and signal-recovery qualification. Both registered predictions are constructed at the raw detector with explicit proper-time, coordinate-time, worldline, ruler and synchronization conventions. Each relativistic effect is counted once. Independently calibrated corrections carry their uncertainties through the common comparison; the tested rows cannot train a normalization that forces either answer. Blind recovery is required separately for both alternatives at every predeclared operating setting. The inherited targets and decision rules remain fixed. The included design study makes sensitivity explicit: for the Two-Test Gram classifier, a total ratio uncertainty of 0.0013 gives approximately 88.9% QTT-branch and 94.1% ordinary-branch power under the stated ideal model. These are conditional detection probabilities, not probabilities that a theory is true, and each instrument retains its own classifier. The complete apparatus packet must be sealed before acquisition and target access; historical campaign rules remain preserved. Reconstruction entry point. Start with current/CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in the ZIP. The shared execution contract refers once to the development filename CURRENT_EXECUTION_RC.md; that reference means CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in this release. The packaged README names the correct file. This navigation correction does not change the deposited files, scientific requirements or historical seals.

Jul 15, 20268 citations

Artian A1 Quantum-Clock Reference-Switch Theorem: A Prospective Delocalized-Clock Test of the QTT Two-Clock Projection

Attar Ali

A quantum clock can follow two proper-time histories. Can one completed coherence also distinguish two physical reference classes? Quantum-clock interferometry already supplies the standard carrier relation $\Delta\phi_{\rm clock}=\omega_0\Delta\tau.$ This preregistration keeps that relation intact and asks a separate question. The same atomic transition and path geometry are executed through four physical input/output terminal histories, $\tau\tau,\qquad \tau T,\qquad T\tau,\qquad TT.$ For each history and reversed proper-time geometry, the laboratory fits the first complex clock-coherence phasor and forms $D_{ab}=\sqrt{|Z_{ab}^{+}Z_{ab}^{-}|}.$ The registered reference-switch statistic is $\boxed{ R_{\rm qc,clk}= \frac{1}{\mathcal N_{\times}^{\rm ord}} \sqrt{\frac{D_{\tau T}D_{T\tau}} {D_{\tau\tau}D_{TT}}}.}$ After a target-blind ordinary cross-history map, the fixed prospective fork is $\boxed{ H_{\rm ordinary}:R_{\rm qc,clk}=1, \qquad H_{\rm QTT-A1}:R_{\rm qc,clk}=\cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right).}$ The alternatives differ by 7.6120467%. A bare five-standard-deviation separation requires $\sigma(R_{\rm qc,clk})\leq0.0152241,$ and the recommended design target is 0.005. The proper-time phase is a common carrier check, not the A1 discriminator. The release includes three adversarial audits. It requires a physical hardware graph for the $T$ and $\tau$ terminal classes, derives the readout exponent from a first complex phasor, and qualifies preparation and calibration by their physical transfer, not by angle alone. A target-inserting primary operation or target-trained correction remains ineligible. Any failed eligibility gate returns INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT rather than a false rejection of A1. Scientific status: theorem and estimator closed; carrier technology plausible; physical four-terminal hardware map and laboratory dataset pending. No existing quantum-clock record is claimed as A1 evidence. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21674815 Main book: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 Website: quantumtraction.org · Two Universes · Lexicon · Observatory The public files are the paper PDF first and the complete reconstruction ZIP second. Version 1.1: operation qualification and retained observations The numerical targets, ratio orientation, decision regions and historical seals are unchanged. A 22.5-degree or 45-degree component is no longer excluded by its angle alone: its physical transfer must be independently established. Common-operation cancellation and signal-preserving calibration are proved; both hypotheses must remain identifiable. Every acquired record is retained. After authorized unblinding, QTT-like, ordinary-like and unexpected outcomes are reported, including observations that do not qualify for a theory verdict. This is a prospective amendment, not a retrospective resealing of data. Clock, ruler and signal-recovery qualification. Both registered predictions are constructed at the raw detector with explicit proper-time, coordinate-time, worldline, ruler and synchronization conventions. Each relativistic effect is counted once. Independently calibrated corrections carry their uncertainties through the common comparison; the tested rows cannot train a normalization that forces either answer. Blind recovery is required separately for both alternatives at every predeclared operating setting. The inherited targets and decision rules remain fixed. The included design study makes sensitivity explicit: for the Two-Test Gram classifier, a total ratio uncertainty of 0.0013 gives approximately 88.9% QTT-branch and 94.1% ordinary-branch power under the stated ideal model. These are conditional detection probabilities, not probabilities that a theory is true, and each instrument retains its own classifier. The complete apparatus packet must be sealed before acquisition and target access; historical campaign rules remain preserved. Reconstruction entry point. Start with current/CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in the ZIP. The shared execution contract refers once to the development filename CURRENT_EXECUTION_RC.md; that reference means CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in this release. The packaged README names the correct file. This navigation correction does not change the deposited files, scientific requirements or historical seals.A quantum clock can follow two proper-time histories. Can one completed coherence also distinguish two physical reference classes? Quantum-clock interferometry already supplies the standard carrier relation $\Delta\phi_{\rm clock}=\omega_0\Delta\tau.$ This preregistration keeps that relation intact and asks a separate question. The same atomic transition and path geometry are executed through four physical input/output terminal histories, $\tau\tau,\qquad \tau T,\qquad T\tau,\qquad TT.$ For each history and reversed proper-time geometry, the laboratory fits the first complex clock-coherence phasor and forms $D_{ab}=\sqrt{|Z_{ab}^{+}Z_{ab}^{-}|}.$ The registered reference-switch statistic is \[ \boxed{ R_{\rm qc,clk}= \frac{1}{\mathcal N_{\times}^{\rm ord}} \sqrt{\frac{D_{\tau T}D_{T\tau}} {D_{\tau\tau}D_{TT}}}.} \] After a target-blind ordinary cross-history map, the fixed prospective fork is \[ \boxed{ H_{\rm ordinary}:R_{\rm qc,clk}=1, \qquad H_{\rm QTT-A1}:R_{\rm qc,clk}=\cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right).} \] The alternatives differ by 7.6120467%. A bare five-standard-deviation separation requires \[\sigma(R_{\rm qc,clk})\leq0.0152241,\] and the recommended design target is 0.005. The proper-time phase is a common carrier check, not the A1 discriminator. The release includes three adversarial audits. It requires a physical hardware graph for the $T$ and $\tau$ terminal classes, derives the readout exponent from a first complex phasor, and qualifies preparation and calibration by their physical transfer, not by angle alone. A target-inserting primary operation or target-trained correction remains ineligible. Any failed eligibility gate returns INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT rather than a false rejection of A1. Scientific status: theorem and estimator closed; carrier technology plausible; physical four-terminal hardware map and laboratory dataset pending. No existing quantum-clock record is claimed as A1 evidence. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21674815 Main book: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 Website: quantumtraction.org · Two Universes · Lexicon · Observatory The public files are the paper PDF first and the complete reconstruction ZIP second. Version 1.1: operation qualification and retained observations The numerical targets, ratio orientation, decision regions and historical seals are unchanged. A 22.5-degree or 45-degree component is no longer excluded by its angle alone: its physical transfer must be independently established. Common-operation cancellation and signal-preserving calibration are proved; both hypotheses must remain identifiable. Every acquired record is retained. After authorized unblinding, QTT-like, ordinary-like and unexpected outcomes are reported, including observations that do not qualify for a theory verdict. This is a prospective amendment, not a retrospective resealing of data. Clock, ruler and signal-recovery qualification. Both registered predictions are constructed at the raw detector with explicit proper-time, coordinate-time, worldline, ruler and synchronization conventions. Each relativistic effect is counted once. Independently calibrated corrections carry their uncertainties through the common comparison; the tested rows cannot train a normalization that forces either answer. Blind recovery is required separately for both alternatives at every predeclared operating setting. The inherited targets and decision rules remain fixed. The included design study makes sensitivity explicit: for the Two-Test Gram classifier, a total ratio uncertainty of 0.0013 gives approximately 88.9% QTT-branch and 94.1% ordinary-branch power under the stated ideal model. These are conditional detection probabilities, not probabilities that a theory is true, and each instrument retains its own classifier. The complete apparatus packet must be sealed before acquisition and target access; historical campaign rules remain preserved. Reconstruction entry point. Start with current/CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in the ZIP. The shared execution contract refers once to the development filename CURRENT_EXECUTION_RC.md; that reference means CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in this release. The packaged README names the correct file. This navigation correction does not change the deposited files, scientific requirements or historical seals.

Jul 29, 20262 citations

Can a finite Talbot chamber produce a nonconstant visibility shape after the ordinary interferometer kernel is frozen?

\boxed{ \begin{aligned} H_0:&\ \mathbf y_\perp=0,\\ H_{\mathrm{A7U}}:&\ \mathbf y_\perp=P_{\mathrm{prof}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}},\\ g_r^{\mathrm{phys}}=&\ \log\left|\frac{\int_{\Delta v_r}W_r(v)B_1^{\mathrm{QM/env}}(v)F_1^{\mathrm{A7U}}(v)\,dv}{\int_{\Delta v_r}W_r(v)B_1^{\mathrm{QM/env}}(v)\,dv}\right|,\\ &\ \frac{\partial\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}}}{\partial\mathbf y}=0. \end{aligned}}

Version: 1.2 State: Stage-0 sealed; physical target activation pending; observation pending Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22010227 Author: Ali Attar, ORCID 0009-0008-9931-2691 Version note: v1.2 is an append-only source-projector-camera scope upgrade. The historical v1.0.1 branch, source equations, seven-bin vector, thresholds, PDF hash, and protocol-seal hash remain preserved. The v1.1 calibration-orthogonality gate also remains unchanged. The new outer wrapper separates the sealed A7U source-harmonic verdict from any stronger interpretation as a measurement of the central Access-Law projector weight. This preregistration asks for a seven-bin, first-harmonic matter-wave shape, not a constant loss of fringe contrast. The source branch is fixed before observation, but the final laboratory prediction is legal only after the ordinary complex Talbot kernel, event weights, operating point, calibration uncertainty object, physics-generated tangent basis, covariance, extraction operator, and the apparatus proof of kappa = 1 are independently frozen. The finite source law is

\Delta_n(v)=\left\|n^2\frac{hL}{d^2mv}\right\|_{\mathbb Z},\qquad N_{\Gamma,n}=\left\lceil\Delta_n^{-1}\right\rceil,\qquad F_n^{\mathrm{A7U}}=\sqrt{1-2\kappa_n\frac{2}{N_{\Gamma,n}}\left(1-\frac{1}{N_{\Gamma,n}}\right)}.

The release seals a high-precision source-only feasibility vector, but proves why that vector cannot be substituted for the physical instrument prediction. Complex Talbot coefficients must be combined inside each velocity-bin integral before taking their modulus. This is the central wrong-falsification firewall: source-only forecast ≠ physical instrument prediction ≠ observation. A central Access-Law interpretation requires the additional prospectively frozen certificate

W^\dagger M W=P_a, \qquad C_n^{\mathrm{obs}}=(1-\eta)C_{n,u}+\eta C_{n,a}, \qquad \frac{\partial(W,M,C_{n,u},C_{n,a})}{\partial\mathbf y}=0.

Without it, the test still adjudicates the activated A7U Talbot-Lau branch, but the lawful projector label is INELIGIBLE_NO_ACCESS_LAW_ETA_VERDICT. This prevents both wrong falsification and false promotion without weakening the sealed test. The calibration-orthogonality gate is

U_{\mathrm{phys}}=[\mathbf 1,\partial_{\theta_1}\log|\bar B_1^0|,\ldots],\qquad R_{\mathrm{sens}}^{\mathrm{cal}}= \sqrt{(P_{\mathrm{phys}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}})^T (P_{\mathrm{phys}}\Sigma P_{\mathrm{phys}}^T)^+ (P_{\mathrm{phys}}\mathbf g^{\mathrm{phys}})}\ge5.

If the apparatus or data packet does not pass every activation gate, the deterministic result is TARGET-NOT-ACTIVATED or INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT. The source-only forecast is 96.51% linear in velocity, so a generic constant-only nuisance model is not sufficient; the activated mass, phase, velocity-width, grating, and separation derivatives must be projected explicitly. These pre-data gates cannot be altered after a null. A qualified null therefore remains a real scoped falsifier. The public Pedalino sodium-nanoparticle archive establishes that the high-mass Talbot-Lau platform is real and experimentally mature, but it does not contain the complete velocity-resolved visibility, covariance, ordinary-kernel, and path-provenance packet required for a retrospective execution. Its published ordinary theory curves share a fitted global contrast factor of 0.78, so a constant additional suppression is not separately identifiable. This is therefore a prospective sealed test, not an observation claim. Stable scientific anchors: A7U Molecular Visibility Transport A7U source framework Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book Pedalino et al., Nature experiment Public experimental archive QTT Observatory · DOI map

B_n^{\rm QTT}(v) = B_n^{\rm QM/env}(v)F_n^{\rm A7U}(v), \qquad F_n^{\rm A7U}(v)=\left|1-\frac{2}{N_{\Gamma,n}^{\rm TL}(v)}\right|.

Version 10.1 executes this factor inside the public Pedalino complex first-harmonic mass/velocity kernel. The ordinary public kernel gives chi-square 44.539 for 31 nominal degrees of freedom; the saturated A7U branch gives 70.439 under the same diagonal-error treatment and the same one-contrast profiling rule. The nominal branch is therefore a reproducible stressed diagnostic. Version 10.1 also closes the projector-harmonic type boundary. The A7U factor above is a source-conditioned harmonic transport coefficient. The Access-Law quantity eta = Tr(rho M) is the state weight of a bounded central projector. Their exact bridge is the sector-resolved Fourier camera

C_n^{\rm obs}=(1-\eta)C_{n,u}+\eta C_{n,a}.

A single visibility does not identify eta generically. The simple rule Vobs/Vu = 1 - eta is exact only after a physical intertwiner, equal DC throughput, zero aligned-sector analyzed harmonic, independent ordinary camera, and full covariance are certified before the target row is opened. The public Pedalino archive does not contain those objects, so it remains a camera diagnostic and carries no Access-Law eta verdict. That result is not a sigma exclusion. The fixed curves are nonnested, and the public archive does not contain the full observation covariance or the target-blind physical calibration tangent packet required by the separately sealed Fourth-Face activation theorem. The lawful status is: Nominal public branch: stressed diagnostic.Theory verdict: ineligible.Blind A7U observation: pending. The release also closes the multi-operating-point rank-lift theorem. With a target-blind ordinary tangent matrix

U_{\rm phys}

, full covariance

\Sigma

, and frozen A7U shape

g

, define

P_{\rm cal} = I-U_{\rm phys} \left(U_{\rm phys}^{T}\Sigma^{-1}U_{\rm phys}\right)^{+} U_{\rm phys}^{T}\Sigma^{-1}.

The A7U shape is identifiable exactly when

P_{\rm cal}g\ne0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad g\notin{\rm col}(U_{\rm phys}).

This converts the present ambiguity into a finite experimental requirement: predeclare multiple operating points, freeze the physical calibration tangent space and full covariance before target-data access, and require calibrated sensitivity of at least five. Missing activation objects block favorable and adverse verdicts equally; a packet that passes before unblinding cannot be withdrawn after a qualified null. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20796924 Fourth-Face test: 10.5281/zenodo.22010227 Main book: 10.5281/zenodo.17527179 Website: quantumtraction.org

A preregistered one- and two-excitation trapped-ion benchmark

\boxed{p_\eta(\mathbf y\mid u)=\operatorname{Tr}[\mathcal I_{y_m,\eta}^{u_m}\circ\cdots\circ\mathcal I_{y_1,\eta}^{u_1}(\rho_\eta)].}

One interaction, selected before the data, must predict several observations. This prospective trapped-ion protocol fixes one- and two-excitation time scans, relative-phase scans and an even-curvature null control. It uses 18 contexts, 62 complete raw-count coordinates and 900,000 initiated validation attempts. The same independently constructed contact supplies the time-transfer predictions

p_{10\to01}=\sin^2\Theta,\qquad p_{11\to11}=\cos^2(F\Theta).

Preparation, detector response, physical insertion class and uncertainty are frozen in a separately timestamped laboratory capsule before acquisition. No validation-fitted exchange frequency, capacity, phase origin or contrast is allowed. Failed attempts and null outcomes remain in the count denominators. A sensitivity gate prevents an unresponsive detector from passing. The finite-sample analysis has separate rejection, equivalence, inconclusive and ineligible decisions. Its total conditional false-rejection budget is 5.7330314376 × 10−7, numerically the conventional two-sided five-sigma tail. This is a design threshold, not a reported discovery. Successful equivalence requires every probability coordinate to meet a five-percentage-point tolerance. Design-stage preregistration. This deposit fixes the test today. Independent apparatus qualification, a public or verifiably escrowed Stage B capsule and new validation observations remain required. The canonical branch is shared with matched microscopic QM; a finite-slot comparison tests only the independently selected physical models. The package includes the protocol, frozen design, count analyzer, synthetic verification, deliberately incomplete laboratory templates and exact checksums. Companion: QTT Physical Contact Selection and Predictive Transfer Theorem. Source dependencies: Completed-Event Transport and Quantum Coherence; QTT Main Book. Independent experimental context: Hou et al., Nature Physics (2024). Browse the corpus. The main PDF is the preview; the ZIP contains the full reconstruction package.

\mathcal R_i(\omega)=|0\rangle\!\langle0|_i\otimes\operatorname{Tr}_i\omega,

Q_{\rm del}=2F_{\rm avg}(\mathcal N_{\rm del},\operatorname{id})-1, \qquad \boxed{F_e^{\rm del}=\frac{1+3Q_{\rm del}}4.}

Target-only and every smaller halo subwindow remain optimized counterfactuals. A physical reset, sham reset, hidden-record injection, boundary ladder, and complete terminal record are required before the recovery layer qualifies. Test B: does the memory verifier intertwine with an independent timing projector?

\boxed{W^\dagger M_eW=P_{\rm align}}, \qquad \eta_T=\operatorname{Tr}(\rho P_{\rm align}),

\mathcal U_T^\star =\inf 2\sqrt{\det\Sigma_{T\Omega}}.

On the certified canonical branch, the sealed QTT target is

\boxed{ \eta_T=F_e^{\rm del}, \qquad \mathcal U_T^\star=1-F_e^{\rm del}. }

No complement coefficient is fitted. Five fidelity corridors, a radius/depth ladder, one-third untouched holdouts, topology twins, full covariance, global five-sigma decisions, at least 95% planned power, and transfer to a second record technology are frozen before data. The external computation is a feasibility anchor, not the timing target An, Cao, and Cui report carrier-deletion recovery in a local kicked-Ising memory. Their result qualifies the plausibility of Test A. Their reported

Q=0.516

is explicitly forbidden from constructing Test B. The public source archive lacks the exact arrays and scripts, so exact replication remains pending. Five terminal outcomes INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT REGISTERED_QTT_CONSEQUENCE_FALSIFIED QTT_CANDIDATE QUALIFIED_OTHER_OR_CROSS_CHANNEL_ANOMALY AMBIGUOUS_OR_UNDERPOWERED Any failed eligibility gate terminates without a theory verdict. A positive result requires the full multirung shape, not one selected point. An off-target anomaly is preserved rather than discarded or used as a post-hoc rescue. Immutable protocol seal eb0640b25c1d0bde56cacc7f25d9ce4304594833e4aa937ed50293a1faafc849 This is a separate sealed extension. It changes no target, threshold, classifier, protocol hash, or file in the parent test under concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21902885. Public anchors Completed-record fan-out and timing-access framework Observation as Access Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book External finite-window recovery paper The PDF is the default preview. The reconstruction archive contains the sealed JSON, classifier, eighteen-gate and raw-terminal templates, Stage-0 handoff, verifier, external audit, adversarial review, metadata, and checksums.

R_d^{\rm obs} =\frac{1}{C_dN_d^{\rm ord}} \sqrt{\frac{|D_{\tau T}^{(d)}D_{T\tau}^{(d)}|} {|D_{\tau\tau}^{(d)}D_{TT}^{(d)}|}}.

After physical activation, the frozen fork is

\boxed{ R_d^{\rm standard}=1, \qquad R_d^{\rm QTT}=\cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right) =0.9238795325112867\ldots }.

Version 3.1 adds a post-seal standard-physics completeness gate for rotating atomic and ring-cavity platforms. The ordinary model must include or bound every applicable centre-of-mass, internal-spin, field, rotational Röntgen, polarization, backscatter, trap, Zeeman, and Stark term. In compact form,

H_{\rm rot}^{\rm std} =H_0-\Omega\cdot(L+F+\ell_F) +H_{\rm RR}+H_Z+H_{\rm Stark}+H_{\rm trap} +H_{\rm bs}+H_{\rm pol}+\cdots,

with the rotation-induced hyperfine row

\boxed{ H_{\rm RH}=-\Omega\cdot F, \qquad \delta\omega_{\rm RH}=-\Omega_{\parallel}\Delta m_F. }

The standard-null ledger, parameter provenance, held-out controls, and adequacy thresholds are frozen before target labels. If an applicable row is unresolved, the packet returns INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT. No target digit, ratio orientation, compatibility band, power floor, or numerical decision threshold is changed. Operation eligibility and reporting are amended as described below. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21376520 Main book: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 Website: quantumtraction.org Version 3.2: operation qualification and retained observations The numerical targets, ratio orientation, decision regions and historical seals are unchanged. A 22.5-degree or 45-degree component is no longer excluded by its angle alone: its physical transfer must be independently established. Common-operation cancellation and signal-preserving calibration are proved; both hypotheses must remain identifiable. Every acquired record is retained. After authorized unblinding, QTT-like, ordinary-like and unexpected outcomes are reported, including observations that do not qualify for a theory verdict. This is a prospective amendment, not a retrospective resealing of data. Clock, ruler and signal-recovery qualification. Both registered predictions are constructed at the raw detector with explicit proper-time, coordinate-time, worldline, ruler and synchronization conventions. Each relativistic effect is counted once. Independently calibrated corrections carry their uncertainties through the common comparison; the tested rows cannot train a normalization that forces either answer. Blind recovery is required separately for both alternatives at every predeclared operating setting. The inherited targets and decision rules remain fixed. The included design study makes sensitivity explicit: for the Two-Test Gram classifier, a total ratio uncertainty of 0.0013 gives approximately 88.9% QTT-branch and 94.1% ordinary-branch power under the stated ideal model. These are conditional detection probabilities, not probabilities that a theory is true, and each instrument retains its own classifier. The complete apparatus packet must be sealed before acquisition and target access; historical campaign rules remain preserved. Reconstruction entry point. Start with current/CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in the ZIP. The shared execution contract refers once to the development filename CURRENT_EXECUTION_RC.md; that reference means CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in this release. The packaged README names the correct file. This navigation correction does not change the deposited files, scientific requirements or historical seals.

\Delta\phi_{\rm clock}=\omega_0\Delta\tau.

This preregistration keeps that relation intact and asks a separate question. The same atomic transition and path geometry are executed through four physical input/output terminal histories,

\tau\tau,\qquad \tau T,\qquad T\tau,\qquad TT.

For each history and reversed proper-time geometry, the laboratory fits the first complex clock-coherence phasor and forms

D_{ab}=\sqrt{|Z_{ab}^{+}Z_{ab}^{-}|}.

The registered reference-switch statistic is

\boxed{ R_{\rm qc,clk}= \frac{1}{\mathcal N_{\times}^{\rm ord}} \sqrt{\frac{D_{\tau T}D_{T\tau}} {D_{\tau\tau}D_{TT}}}.}

After a target-blind ordinary cross-history map, the fixed prospective fork is

\boxed{ H_{\rm ordinary}:R_{\rm qc,clk}=1, \qquad H_{\rm QTT-A1}:R_{\rm qc,clk}=\cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{8}\right).}

The alternatives differ by 7.6120467%. A bare five-standard-deviation separation requires

\sigma(R_{\rm qc,clk})\leq0.0152241,

and the recommended design target is 0.005. The proper-time phase is a common carrier check, not the A1 discriminator. The release includes three adversarial audits. It requires a physical hardware graph for the

T

and

\tau

terminal classes, derives the readout exponent from a first complex phasor, and qualifies preparation and calibration by their physical transfer, not by angle alone. A target-inserting primary operation or target-trained correction remains ineligible. Any failed eligibility gate returns INELIGIBLE_NO_THEORY_VERDICT rather than a false rejection of A1. Scientific status: theorem and estimator closed; carrier technology plausible; physical four-terminal hardware map and laboratory dataset pending. No existing quantum-clock record is claimed as A1 evidence. Concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21674815 Main book: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 Website: quantumtraction.org · Two Universes · Lexicon · Observatory The public files are the paper PDF first and the complete reconstruction ZIP second. Version 1.1: operation qualification and retained observations The numerical targets, ratio orientation, decision regions and historical seals are unchanged. A 22.5-degree or 45-degree component is no longer excluded by its angle alone: its physical transfer must be independently established. Common-operation cancellation and signal-preserving calibration are proved; both hypotheses must remain identifiable. Every acquired record is retained. After authorized unblinding, QTT-like, ordinary-like and unexpected outcomes are reported, including observations that do not qualify for a theory verdict. This is a prospective amendment, not a retrospective resealing of data. Clock, ruler and signal-recovery qualification. Both registered predictions are constructed at the raw detector with explicit proper-time, coordinate-time, worldline, ruler and synchronization conventions. Each relativistic effect is counted once. Independently calibrated corrections carry their uncertainties through the common comparison; the tested rows cannot train a normalization that forces either answer. Blind recovery is required separately for both alternatives at every predeclared operating setting. The inherited targets and decision rules remain fixed. The included design study makes sensitivity explicit: for the Two-Test Gram classifier, a total ratio uncertainty of 0.0013 gives approximately 88.9% QTT-branch and 94.1% ordinary-branch power under the stated ideal model. These are conditional detection probabilities, not probabilities that a theory is true, and each instrument retains its own classifier. The complete apparatus packet must be sealed before acquisition and target access; historical campaign rules remain preserved. Reconstruction entry point. Start with current/CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in the ZIP. The shared execution contract refers once to the development filename CURRENT_EXECUTION_RC.md; that reference means CURRENT_RELATIVISTIC_EXECUTION.md in this release. The packaged README names the correct file. This navigation correction does not change the deposited files, scientific requirements or historical seals.