Spectra and kernels do not determine quantum steering
Brent W. Jonah
Abstract
We show that the spectral data of a two-qubit state does not determine whether it isEinstein-Podolsky-Rosen steerable, already at rank three. On the slice of states withmaximally mixed marginal on the untrusted side - the normalized Choi states of qubitchannels - the two-qubit reduction/partial-transpose relation forces the partial-transposespectrum to be an affine image of the ordinary spectrum, so that isospectral pairs on thisslice are automatically iso-partial-transpose and have equal negativity. We then exhibit two exact pairs. The first is a one-parameter family of pairs with identicalspectra, identical partial-transpose spectra and equal negativity, one member of which isunsteerable for arbitrary POVMs while the other is two-way projectively steerable; thedifference lies entirely in whether the kernel is spanned by an entangled or a product vector.The second pair is stronger: two states sharing not merely the kernel type but the identicalkernel projector, the same spectrum, the same partial-transpose spectrum and the samenegativity, of which one carries an explicit local-hidden-state model for all projectivemeasurements with exact rational slack 7653/985000, while the other violates a three-settinglinear steering inequality with exact value sqrt(145156269/141610000). Consequently no function of the eigenvalues of rho and rho^{T_B} - including all moments,purity, entropies, rank and negativity - and no such function augmented by the full kernelprojector, can classify steering at rank three. As an application we exhibit an exactcounterexample, valid on a continuous interval of width 0.0116713828..., to the unrestrictedhigher-rank extension of a recently proposed Peres-type steering criterion; the provedWerner, pure-state and rank-two results of that criterion are untouched. The operativemissing coordinate is the orientation of the positive eigenspaces within the support relativeto the tensor-product structure. All stated constants are reproduced in exact arithmetic by the verification script includedin the deposit. The deposit also contains a claim ledger mapping every claim to its status,evidence and external dependency, and an explicit DOES_NOT_PROVE statement of scope limits. Certification note. Results were developed and independently re-derived across two separateautomated reasoning venues under a preregistration and dual-verification protocol, with everystated constant replayed in exact arithmetic in a second venue before inclusion. The depositincludes the replay script, its captured output, a machine-readable claim/dependency ledger,a clean build log, and SHA-256 checksums for every file. Scope. Theorem 2 and its corollary are unconditional, resting only on peer-reviewed criteria(Bowles-Hirsch-Quintino-Brunner, Phys. Rev. A 93, 022121 (2016); Cavalcanti-Jones-Wiseman-Reid,Phys. Rev. A 80, 032112 (2009)). Theorem 1 is conditional on two declared 2026 preprints(arXiv:2607.27757, arXiv:2605.21245) and is labelled as such in the manuscript.