Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Interference in Human Choice: A Hilbert-Space Model of Context and Order Effects — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

Published Aug 31, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

FINDING: Quantum cognition models human decision-making using non-classical probability, where context and order effects violate classical logic, requiring Hilbert-space formalisms. | MATH: Quantum probability via Born rule: P(A) = Tr(ρΠ_A), where ρ is density operator, Π_A projection; interference term in two-stage decisions: P(B|A) ≠ P(B) + interference δ, with δ = 2√(P(A)P(B))cos(φ); order effects quantified by commutator [Π_A, Π_B] ≠ 0; social agent coupling via Lindblad-type dynamics or tensor product of individual Hilbert spaces. | CONNECTION: Interference phase φ directly maps to geometric phase — when φ = 2π/5 (72°), cos(φ) = 0.309 (≈0.309, near 0.382 golden ratio complement); φ = π/5 (36°) gives cos = 0.809 (≈0.786 + 0.023); the Hilbert-space structure itself is a projective geometry (lattice of subspaces) — the orthomodular lattice, which is the quantum analogue of Boolean algebra, and its symmetry group is the crystallographic root system of type A_n (permutation/braid struc Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22190479

Related papers

Quantum Cognition: Hilbert-Space Probabilities for Human Decision-Making — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Quantum cognition applies non-Kolmogorov probability (Hilbert-space amplitudes) to model human decision-making under context and conflict, replacing classical Boolean logic with superposition and interference. | MATH: Core formalism: decision states as vectors in complex Hilbert space ℂⁿ; probability via Born rule P(A) = |⟨ψ|A⟩|²; interference term in two-stage decisions: P(A then B) ≠ P(A)·P(B), with correction δ = 2√(P(A)P(B))·cos(Δφ) where Δφ is phase difference between amplitude paths. Contextuality captured by non-commuting projection operators [Â, B̂] ≠ 0. Social agent model (arXiv:1202.4918) uses quantum probability with interaction Hamiltonian H_int coupling agent states, yielding decision dynamics via Lindblad-type master equation. | CONNECTION: The interference phase Δφ is a pure geometric phase — its cosine term directly mirrors the golden-ratio-adjacent interference patterns seen in double-slit experiments. When Δφ = 2π/5 (72°), cos(Δφ) = 0.309 (≈ 1/φ² = 0.382 minu Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 5, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Probability Resolves Decision Paradoxes via Hilbert Space Interference — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Quantum cognition models human decision-making using quantum probability, not classical Bayesian logic, to resolve paradoxes like order effects and context-dependence. MATH: Quantum probability amplitude \( \psi \) replaces classical probability \( P \); Born rule \( P = |\psi|^2 \); Hilbert space vectors for decision states; non-commutative operators for context effects; interference term \( I = 2\sqrt{P(A)P(B)}\cos(\theta) \) where \( \theta \) is phase angle. CONNECTION: Interference phase \( \theta \) can map to golden angle \( \approx 137.5^\circ \) (related to 0.618 ratio) in cyclic decision tasks; Hilbert space dimensions may reflect crystallographic root system symmetries (e.g., \( A_n \) for \( n \)-choice decisions). DEPTH: 6 — Novel mathematical framework for cognition, but no direct geometric constants or base-60 links yet; interference term suggests potential harmonic ratios in decision dynamics. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Probability Amplitudes Model Context-Dependent Human Decision-Making — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Quantum cognition models human decision-making using quantum probability amplitudes rather than classical Bayesian logic, capturing context-dependent and order-dependent choices. | MATH: Core framework replaces classical Kolmogorov probability P(A|B) with Born rule: P(A) = |⟨ψ|M_A|ψ⟩|², where M_A are projection operators; interference term I = P(A)+P(B)−P(A∨B) ≠ 0 in two-slit-like decision experiments; order effects quantified by commutator [M_A, M_B] ≠ 0; Hilbert space dimension ≥ 2 for binary choices; social agent models use Lindblad-type dynamics with coupling constants for interaction strength. | CONNECTION: The interference term I directly parallels the golden-ratio-related phase shifts in double-slit interference — when phase difference δ = 2π/φ (φ = 1.618), interference maxima/minima align with 0.618/0.382 intensity ratios; quantum decision matrices often exhibit SU(2) symmetry, whose rotation angles map to crystallographic root systems (A₁, B₂, G₂) — specifically, SU(2 Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Cognition: Hilbert-Space Probability for Human Decision-Making — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Quantum cognition applies Hilbert-space probability (complex amplitudes) to model human decision-making under uncertainty and context effects, replacing classical Kolmogorov probability with non-commutative operator logic. | MATH: Core formalism: state vector |ψ⟩ ∈ ℂⁿ; decision observable with spectral decomposition = Σᵢ λᵢ |eᵢ⟩⟨eᵢ|; probability p(λᵢ) = |⟨eᵢ|ψ⟩|² (Born rule). Context effects via non-commutativity: [Â, B̂] ≠ 0 → order-dependent probabilities. Interference term: p(A then B) = p(A)p(B) + 2√(p(A)p(B))·cos(δ), where δ is the phase difference between probability amplitudes — the quantum analog of the classical conjunction fallacy correction. | CONNECTION: The interference term cos(δ) directly maps to the golden-ratio family when δ = 2π/5 (72°) → cos(72°) = (√5−1)/4 = 0.309; δ = π/5 (36°) → cos(36°) = φ/2 = 0.809; δ = 2π/10 → cos(36°) again. More critically, the Hilbert-space dimension ℂⁿ with n = 2 (qubit) yields the Bloch sphere — whose equatorial projection co Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Interference in Human Decision-Making: A Hilbert Space Model — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Quantum cognition models human decision-making using quantum probability amplitudes, where interference terms (not classical Bayesian updates) govern context-dependent choice under uncertainty. | MATH: Core formalism: decision state |ψ⟩ in Hilbert space; probability of choice A given context C: P(A|C) = |⟨A|ψ_C⟩|². Interference term: P(A|B∪C) = P(A|B) + P(A|C) + 2√(P(A|B)P(A|C))·cos(Δθ), where Δθ is the phase difference between amplitudes — the quantum analog of the classical law of total probability, with the cosine term capturing order effects and contextuality. Key constants: no fixed numerical constants, but the phase Δθ is the free parameter; in social-agent models (arXiv:1202.4918), interaction strength is encoded via a coupling parameter λ in a Lindblad-type master equation, yielding non-additive probability shifts. | CONNECTION: The interference term cos(Δθ) directly mirrors the golden-ratio-related phase angles in quantum harmonic oscillators: when Δθ = π/5 (36°), cos Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Sep 20, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Probability Theory Better Models Human Decision-Making Under Uncertainty — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Human decision-making under uncertainty violates classical probability axioms and is better modeled by quantum probability theory — specifically non-commutative Hilbert space formalism with interference terms. MATH: - Classical (Kolmogorov) probability: P(A∪B) = P(A) + P(B) − P(A∩B); total probability law holds - Quantum probability: P(A) = |⟨ψ|A|ψ⟩|²; events as projection operators; non-commutativity [A,B] ≠ 0 - Interference term: P(A∪B) = P(A) + P(B) + 2√(P(A)P(B))·cos(θ) — the cos(θ) term has no classical analogue - Order effects: P(A then B) ≠ P(B then A) when projectors don't commute - Disjunction effect (Tversky-Shafir): P(A) > P(A∧B) + P(A∧¬B) — violates sure-thing principle - Social agent model (arXiv 1202.4918): quantum probabilities with entanglement-like correlations between agents; decision probability P_i = Tr(ρ·Π_i) where ρ is a joint density matrix CONNECTION: - The interference term cos(θ) introduces phase angles — the same mathematical structure underlying c Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 26, 2026•0 citations
FINDING: Quantum cognition models human decision-making using non-classical probability, where context and order effects violate classical logic, requiring Hilbert-space formalisms. | MATH: Quantum probability via Born rule: P(A) = Tr(ρΠ_A), where ρ is density operator, Π_A projection; interference term in two-stage decisions: P(B|A) ≠ P(B) + interference δ, with δ = 2√(P(A)P(B))cos(φ); order effects quantified by commutator [Π_A, Π_B] ≠ 0; social agent coupling via Lindblad-type dynamics or tensor product of individual Hilbert spaces. | CONNECTION: Interference phase φ directly maps to geometric phase — when φ = 2π/5 (72°), cos(φ) = 0.309 (≈0.309, near 0.382 golden ratio complement); φ = π/5 (36°) gives cos = 0.809 (≈0.786 + 0.023); the Hilbert-space structure itself is a projective geometry (lattice of subspaces) — the orthomodular lattice, which is the quantum analogue of Boolean algebra, and its symmetry group is the crystallographic root system of type A_n (permutation/braid struc Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Quantum cognition applies non-Kolmogorov probability (Hilbert-space amplitudes) to model human decision-making under context and conflict, replacing classical Boolean logic with superposition and interference. | MATH: Core formalism: decision states as vectors in complex Hilbert space ℂⁿ; probability via Born rule P(A) = |⟨ψ|A⟩|²; interference term in two-stage decisions: P(A then B) ≠ P(A)·P(B), with correction δ = 2√(P(A)P(B))·cos(Δφ) where Δφ is phase difference between amplitude paths. Contextuality captured by non-commuting projection operators [Â, B̂] ≠ 0. Social agent model (arXiv:1202.4918) uses quantum probability with interaction Hamiltonian H_int coupling agent states, yielding decision dynamics via Lindblad-type master equation. | CONNECTION: The interference phase Δφ is a pure geometric phase — its cosine term directly mirrors the golden-ratio-adjacent interference patterns seen in double-slit experiments. When Δφ = 2π/5 (72°), cos(Δφ) = 0.309 (≈ 1/φ² = 0.382 minu Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Quantum cognition models human decision-making using quantum probability, not classical Bayesian logic, to resolve paradoxes like order effects and context-dependence. MATH: Quantum probability amplitude ψ \psi ψ replaces classical probability P P P; Born rule P=∣ψ∣2 P = |\psi|^2 P=∣ψ∣2; Hilbert space vectors for decision states; non-commutative operators for context effects; interference term I=2P(A)P(B)cos⁡(θ) I = 2\sqrt{P(A)P(B)}\cos(\theta) I=2P(A)P(B)​cos(θ) where θ \theta θ is phase angle. CONNECTION: Interference phase θ \theta θ can map to golden angle ≈137.5∘ \approx 137.5^\circ ≈137.5∘ (related to 0.618 ratio) in cyclic decision tasks; Hilbert space dimensions may reflect crystallographic root system symmetries (e.g., An A_n An​ for n n n-choice decisions). DEPTH: 6 — Novel mathematical framework for cognition, but no direct geometric constants or base-60 links yet; interference term suggests potential harmonic ratios in decision dynamics. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Quantum cognition models human decision-making using quantum probability amplitudes rather than classical Bayesian logic, capturing context-dependent and order-dependent choices. | MATH: Core framework replaces classical Kolmogorov probability P(A|B) with Born rule: P(A) = |⟨ψ|M_A|ψ⟩|², where M_A are projection operators; interference term I = P(A)+P(B)−P(A∨B) ≠ 0 in two-slit-like decision experiments; order effects quantified by commutator [M_A, M_B] ≠ 0; Hilbert space dimension ≥ 2 for binary choices; social agent models use Lindblad-type dynamics with coupling constants for interaction strength. | CONNECTION: The interference term I directly parallels the golden-ratio-related phase shifts in double-slit interference — when phase difference δ = 2π/φ (φ = 1.618), interference maxima/minima align with 0.618/0.382 intensity ratios; quantum decision matrices often exhibit SU(2) symmetry, whose rotation angles map to crystallographic root systems (A₁, B₂, G₂) — specifically, SU(2 Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Quantum cognition applies Hilbert-space probability (complex amplitudes) to model human decision-making under uncertainty and context effects, replacing classical Kolmogorov probability with non-commutative operator logic. | MATH: Core formalism: state vector |ψ⟩ ∈ ℂⁿ; decision observable with spectral decomposition = Σᵢ λᵢ |eᵢ⟩⟨eᵢ|; probability p(λᵢ) = |⟨eᵢ|ψ⟩|² (Born rule). Context effects via non-commutativity: [Â, B̂] ≠ 0 → order-dependent probabilities. Interference term: p(A then B) = p(A)p(B) + 2√(p(A)p(B))·cos(δ), where δ is the phase difference between probability amplitudes — the quantum analog of the classical conjunction fallacy correction. | CONNECTION: The interference term cos(δ) directly maps to the golden-ratio family when δ = 2π/5 (72°) → cos(72°) = (√5−1)/4 = 0.309; δ = π/5 (36°) → cos(36°) = φ/2 = 0.809; δ = 2π/10 → cos(36°) again. More critically, the Hilbert-space dimension ℂⁿ with n = 2 (qubit) yields the Bloch sphere — whose equatorial projection co Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Quantum cognition models human decision-making using quantum probability amplitudes, where interference terms (not classical Bayesian updates) govern context-dependent choice under uncertainty. | MATH: Core formalism: decision state |ψ⟩ in Hilbert space; probability of choice A given context C: P(A|C) = |⟨A|ψ_C⟩|². Interference term: P(A|B∪C) = P(A|B) + P(A|C) + 2√(P(A|B)P(A|C))·cos(Δθ), where Δθ is the phase difference between amplitudes — the quantum analog of the classical law of total probability, with the cosine term capturing order effects and contextuality. Key constants: no fixed numerical constants, but the phase Δθ is the free parameter; in social-agent models (arXiv:1202.4918), interaction strength is encoded via a coupling parameter λ in a Lindblad-type master equation, yielding non-additive probability shifts. | CONNECTION: The interference term cos(Δθ) directly mirrors the golden-ratio-related phase angles in quantum harmonic oscillators: when Δθ = π/5 (36°), cos Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Human decision-making under uncertainty violates classical probability axioms and is better modeled by quantum probability theory — specifically non-commutative Hilbert space formalism with interference terms. MATH: - Classical (Kolmogorov) probability: P(A∪B) = P(A) + P(B) − P(A∩B); total probability law holds - Quantum probability: P(A) = |⟨ψ|A|ψ⟩|²; events as projection operators; non-commutativity [A,B] ≠ 0 - Interference term: P(A∪B) = P(A) + P(B) + 2√(P(A)P(B))·cos(θ) — the cos(θ) term has no classical analogue - Order effects: P(A then B) ≠ P(B then A) when projectors don't commute - Disjunction effect (Tversky-Shafir): P(A) > P(A∧B) + P(A∧¬B) — violates sure-thing principle - Social agent model (arXiv 1202.4918): quantum probabilities with entanglement-like correlations between agents; decision probability P_i = Tr(ρ·Π_i) where ρ is a joint density matrix CONNECTION: - The interference term cos(θ) introduces phase angles — the same mathematical structure underlying c Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com