Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Formal Verification of Quantum Circuit Compilation using Symbolic Execution

Jincheng Zhang

Published Aug 28, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum circuit compilation is a crucial step in translating high-level quantum algorithms into executable quantum circuits on specific hardware. The complexity and potential for errors within this process necessitate rigorous verification methods. This paper proposes a novel approach leveraging symbolic execution to formally verify quantum circuit compilation. We represent quantum circuits and compilation steps as a symbolic program, enabling the exploration of all possible compilation paths. By incorporating quantum gate fidelities and noise models into the symbolic execution engine, we can identify potential errors in the compilation logic, providing a robust and systematic way to ensure the correctness of the compilation process. The core claim is that symbolic execution can be extended to formally verify the correctness of quantum circuit compilation processes. This work addresses a critical need in quantum computing, offering a new technique for building trust and reliability into quantum software.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22139141

Related papers

Formal Verification of Quantum Circuit Compilation

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum circuit compilation is a crucial step in the realization of quantum computation, transforming high-level quantum algorithms into gate-level operations executable on specific quantum hardware. However, this process is inherently complex and susceptible to errors, including gate decomposition errors, qubit mapping errors, and resource allocation errors. These errors can significantly degrade the fidelity of the final computation. This paper proposes and investigates the application of formal verification techniques to guarantee the correctness of quantum circuit compilation. We demonstrate how model checking and formal methods can be applied to rigorously verify that the compilation algorithm adheres to predefined constraints, such as preserving quantum properties like unitary evolution and qubit orthogonality. The core claim is that formal verification offers a robust solution to the challenges of detecting and preventing errors in quantum compilation. The proposed approach significantly advances the reliability and trustworthiness of quantum computing by providing a rigorous method for ensuring compilation accuracy. We outline a framework for applying these techniques, focusing on key constraints and illustrating their application through a simplified compilation scenario.

•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations

Formal Verification of Quantum Circuit Optimization Algorithms

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum circuit optimization is crucial for realizing the full potential of quantum computing. However, the inherent complexity of quantum circuits and the potential for errors introduce significant challenges in ensuring the correctness and efficiency of optimization algorithms. This paper proposes a novel approach to formally verify quantum circuit optimization algorithms. We translate these algorithms into formal specification languages and leverage model checking and theorem proving techniques to rigorously demonstrate that the algorithms meet their intended objectives – primarily minimizing circuit complexity – without introducing unintended side effects. The core contribution lies in applying formal verification methodologies to this largely unexplored area, offering a path towards building trust and confidence in quantum optimization strategies. The presented framework provides a systematic method for ensuring the reliability of quantum circuits, a critical step towards practical quantum computation. The verification process relies on defining the desired behavior as a set of logical properties and then employing automated tools to check whether the optimized circuit satisfies these properties. This approach addresses the fundamental need for rigorous assurance in quantum systems, moving beyond empirical validation and towards mathematically proven correctness.

•Sep 5, 2026•0 citations

Dynamic Programming for Quantum Circuit Compilation with Uncertainty

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum circuit compilation is a critical step in the process of translating high-level quantum algorithms into executable instructions on quantum hardware. Traditional compilation techniques often rely on deterministic models of gate operations and measurement outcomes, which can lead to suboptimal results and inaccurate performance estimates. This paper introduces a novel dynamic programming approach to quantum circuit compilation that explicitly addresses the inherent uncertainty associated with qubit measurements and gate operations. The algorithm utilizes probabilistic models to represent the likelihood of measurement outcomes and gate errors, optimizing the circuit design for the *expected* performance, considering the statistical nature of quantum computation. The core contribution lies in shifting the focus from worst-case scenarios to expected outcomes, leading to more realistic and potentially more efficient quantum circuit designs. The methodology provides a framework for incorporating uncertainty directly into the compilation process, a crucial step towards achieving robust and reliable quantum computation.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

A Review of Formal Methods in Quantum Circuit Verification

Arun Govindankutty

Quantum computing uses the laws of quantum mechanics to perform computation. Information is stored in qubits and processed using quantum gates arranged as quantum circuits. As quantum hardware grows in size and complexity, verifying these systems becomes increasingly difficult. Traditional verification methods do not scale well and quickly become computationally infeasible. This creates a strong need for more powerful and scalable verification techniques. Formal methods provide a potential solution to this problem. Techniques such as theorem proving, model checking, and symbolic reasoning offer mathematically rigorous ways to verify correctness, equivalence, and implementation. They also help detect design errors early in the development process. This review examines how formal methods are applied to quantum circuit verification. It focuses on barrier certificates, abstract interpretation, model checking, theorem proving approaches. The review discusses both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of these techniques. Their strengths and limitations are analysed through representative case studies. Finally, the review highlights open challenges and identifies promising directions for future research. An extensive set of references is included to support further study and exploration.

Qeios•Jan 24, 2026•0 citations

A Review of Formal Methods in Quantum Circuit Verification

Arun Govindankutty

Quantum computing uses the laws of quantum mechanics to perform computation. Information is stored in qubits and processed using quantum gates arranged as quantum circuits. As quantum hardware grows in size and complexity, verifying these systems becomes increasingly difficult. Traditional verification methods do not scale well and quickly become computationally infeasible. This creates a strong need for more powerful and scalable verification techniques. Formal methods provide a potential solution to this problem. Techniques such as theorem proving, model checking, and symbolic reasoning offer mathematically rigorous ways to verify correctness, equivalence, and implementation. They also help detect design errors early in the development process. This study examines how formal methods are applied to quantum circuit verification. It focuses on barrier certificates, abstract interpretation, model checking, and theorem proving approaches. The study discusses both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of these techniques. Their strengths and limitations are analysed through representative case studies. Finally, the study highlights open challenges and identifies promising directions for future research. An extensive set of references is included to support further study and exploration.

Qeios•Jan 31, 2026•0 citations

A Review of Formal Methods in Quantum Circuit Verification

Arun Govindankutty

Quantum computing exploits the principles, and laws of quantum mechanics to perform computation. Information is stored in qubits and processed using quantum gates arranged as quantum circuits. As quantum hardware grows in size and complexity, verifying these systems becomes increasingly difficult. Traditional verification methods do not scale well and quickly become computationally infeasible. This creates a strong need for more powerful and scalable verification techniques. Formal methods provide a potential solution to this problem. Techniques such as theorem proving, model checking, and symbolic reasoning offer mathematically rigorous ways to verify correctness, equivalence, and implementation. They also help detect design errors early in the development process. This study examines how formal methods are applied to quantum circuit verification. It focuses on barrier certificates, abstract interpretation, model checking, and theorem proving approaches. The study discusses both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of these techniques. Their strengths and limitations are analysed through representative case studies. Finally, the study highlights open challenges and identifies promising directions for future research. An extensive set of references is included to support further study and exploration.

Qeios•Feb 9, 2026•0 citations
Quantum circuit compilation is a crucial step in translating high-level quantum algorithms into executable quantum circuits on specific hardware. The complexity and potential for errors within this process necessitate rigorous verification methods. This paper proposes a novel approach leveraging symbolic execution to formally verify quantum circuit compilation. We represent quantum circuits and compilation steps as a symbolic program, enabling the exploration of all possible compilation paths. By incorporating quantum gate fidelities and noise models into the symbolic execution engine, we can identify potential errors in the compilation logic, providing a robust and systematic way to ensure the correctness of the compilation process. The core claim is that symbolic execution can be extended to formally verify the correctness of quantum circuit compilation processes. This work addresses a critical need in quantum computing, offering a new technique for building trust and reliability into quantum software.
Quantum circuit compilation is a crucial step in the realization of quantum computation, transforming high-level quantum algorithms into gate-level operations executable on specific quantum hardware. However, this process is inherently complex and susceptible to errors, including gate decomposition errors, qubit mapping errors, and resource allocation errors. These errors can significantly degrade the fidelity of the final computation. This paper proposes and investigates the application of formal verification techniques to guarantee the correctness of quantum circuit compilation. We demonstrate how model checking and formal methods can be applied to rigorously verify that the compilation algorithm adheres to predefined constraints, such as preserving quantum properties like unitary evolution and qubit orthogonality. The core claim is that formal verification offers a robust solution to the challenges of detecting and preventing errors in quantum compilation. The proposed approach significantly advances the reliability and trustworthiness of quantum computing by providing a rigorous method for ensuring compilation accuracy. We outline a framework for applying these techniques, focusing on key constraints and illustrating their application through a simplified compilation scenario.
Quantum circuit optimization is crucial for realizing the full potential of quantum computing. However, the inherent complexity of quantum circuits and the potential for errors introduce significant challenges in ensuring the correctness and efficiency of optimization algorithms. This paper proposes a novel approach to formally verify quantum circuit optimization algorithms. We translate these algorithms into formal specification languages and leverage model checking and theorem proving techniques to rigorously demonstrate that the algorithms meet their intended objectives – primarily minimizing circuit complexity – without introducing unintended side effects. The core contribution lies in applying formal verification methodologies to this largely unexplored area, offering a path towards building trust and confidence in quantum optimization strategies. The presented framework provides a systematic method for ensuring the reliability of quantum circuits, a critical step towards practical quantum computation. The verification process relies on defining the desired behavior as a set of logical properties and then employing automated tools to check whether the optimized circuit satisfies these properties. This approach addresses the fundamental need for rigorous assurance in quantum systems, moving beyond empirical validation and towards mathematically proven correctness.
Quantum circuit compilation is a critical step in the process of translating high-level quantum algorithms into executable instructions on quantum hardware. Traditional compilation techniques often rely on deterministic models of gate operations and measurement outcomes, which can lead to suboptimal results and inaccurate performance estimates. This paper introduces a novel dynamic programming approach to quantum circuit compilation that explicitly addresses the inherent uncertainty associated with qubit measurements and gate operations. The algorithm utilizes probabilistic models to represent the likelihood of measurement outcomes and gate errors, optimizing the circuit design for the *expected* performance, considering the statistical nature of quantum computation. The core contribution lies in shifting the focus from worst-case scenarios to expected outcomes, leading to more realistic and potentially more efficient quantum circuit designs. The methodology provides a framework for incorporating uncertainty directly into the compilation process, a crucial step towards achieving robust and reliable quantum computation.
Quantum computing uses the laws of quantum mechanics to perform computation. Information is stored in qubits and processed using quantum gates arranged as quantum circuits. As quantum hardware grows in size and complexity, verifying these systems becomes increasingly difficult. Traditional verification methods do not scale well and quickly become computationally infeasible. This creates a strong need for more powerful and scalable verification techniques. Formal methods provide a potential solution to this problem. Techniques such as theorem proving, model checking, and symbolic reasoning offer mathematically rigorous ways to verify correctness, equivalence, and implementation. They also help detect design errors early in the development process. This review examines how formal methods are applied to quantum circuit verification. It focuses on barrier certificates, abstract interpretation, model checking, theorem proving approaches. The review discusses both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of these techniques. Their strengths and limitations are analysed through representative case studies. Finally, the review highlights open challenges and identifies promising directions for future research. An extensive set of references is included to support further study and exploration.
Quantum computing uses the laws of quantum mechanics to perform computation. Information is stored in qubits and processed using quantum gates arranged as quantum circuits. As quantum hardware grows in size and complexity, verifying these systems becomes increasingly difficult. Traditional verification methods do not scale well and quickly become computationally infeasible. This creates a strong need for more powerful and scalable verification techniques. Formal methods provide a potential solution to this problem. Techniques such as theorem proving, model checking, and symbolic reasoning offer mathematically rigorous ways to verify correctness, equivalence, and implementation. They also help detect design errors early in the development process. This study examines how formal methods are applied to quantum circuit verification. It focuses on barrier certificates, abstract interpretation, model checking, and theorem proving approaches. The study discusses both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of these techniques. Their strengths and limitations are analysed through representative case studies. Finally, the study highlights open challenges and identifies promising directions for future research. An extensive set of references is included to support further study and exploration.
Quantum computing exploits the principles, and laws of quantum mechanics to perform computation. Information is stored in qubits and processed using quantum gates arranged as quantum circuits. As quantum hardware grows in size and complexity, verifying these systems becomes increasingly difficult. Traditional verification methods do not scale well and quickly become computationally infeasible. This creates a strong need for more powerful and scalable verification techniques. Formal methods provide a potential solution to this problem. Techniques such as theorem proving, model checking, and symbolic reasoning offer mathematically rigorous ways to verify correctness, equivalence, and implementation. They also help detect design errors early in the development process. This study examines how formal methods are applied to quantum circuit verification. It focuses on barrier certificates, abstract interpretation, model checking, and theorem proving approaches. The study discusses both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of these techniques. Their strengths and limitations are analysed through representative case studies. Finally, the study highlights open challenges and identifies promising directions for future research. An extensive set of references is included to support further study and exploration.