Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mechanism of Quantum Entanglement and Simultaneity Within the Framework of Relativistic Phase Velocity and Universal Quantum Energy

Hüseyin YALÇINKAYA

Published Aug 21, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT The emergence of quantum entanglement correlations across spatially separated measurement regions renders the interpretation of the relationship between quantum mechanics and relativistic causality a core problem in quantum foundations [Einstein et al., 1935; Bell, 1964]. In this study, two entangled particles are modeled not as two independent physical objects in Minkowski spacetime, but as a joint quantum state in configuration space. The relative space and time coordinates of the joint state are defined via: and the ideal space-time correlation limit assumed in the model is expressed as: This limit is not a general definition of quantum entanglement, but an idealized geometric assumption representing strong correlation in the relative coordinates of the joint state within the proposed model. In this approach, physical spacetime is treated as a geometric structure representing the projection of the joint quantum state onto observable spacetime coordinates. To ensure the projection is Lorentz-covariant, the light-like interval: is employed as the constitutive geometric condition of the model. This condition is accepted not as a mandatory Minkowski interval between physical measurement events, but as the mathematical postulate of the proposed projection geometry. The dynamic scale parameter of the model is grounded in total relativistic quantum energy instead of rest mass, establishing a dimensionless Planck-scaling factor defined as: To encompass both massive and massless systems, quantum energy density is defined via the energy density component of the stress-energy tensor relative to an observer. The required consistency condition for covariant energy-momentum conservation is derived in its general form. Furthermore, modeling the proposed geometric effect as a dimensionless metric perturbation yields a phenomenological first-order geometric phase correction defined as: where is the energy-dependent reduced wavelength. Under fixed and finite , the vanishing of the proposed correction in the low-energy regime relative to the Planck scale () demonstrates that the geometric effect added by the model to standard low-energy quantum mechanics becomes negligible. This study proposes a testable theoretical model aimed at explaining the spatiotemporal correlations of quantum entanglement within a Lorentz-covariant, energy-scaled, and phenomenological geometric framework.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22046594

Related papers

Quantum Entanglement and Proper-Distance Attenuation within the Framework of Relativistic Configuration Space and Universal Quantum Energy

Hüseyin YALÇINKAYA

ABSTRACT The representation of two spatially separated particles by a single entangled quantum state raises the question of whether their laboratory coordinate separation and their relational distance in the configuration space of the joint state are the same quantity. In this study, the relative sector of a two-particle system is described by the coordinates and . While the laboratory coordinate separation is held fixed, a phenomenological model is proposed in which the effective proper distance assigned to the joint state depends on the correlation energy and the relativistic phase velocity. The constitutive geometric postulate of the model is a reciprocal choice of the temporal and spatial metric coefficients in the reduced -dimensional relative configuration-space sector: . This condition preserves the metric determinant and the two-dimensional volume element of the relative sector. The induced metric on a constant-relative-time slice yields (1) Consequently, although remains unchanged, in the limit . Under the null constraint, the coordinate characteristic speed becomes , whereas the speed measured with local physical time and length intervals remains exactly . The response amplitude is related to a correlation-energy scale , the phase velocity , and a correlation-localization factor . It is also shown explicitly that a finite-energy, Planck-suppressed ansatz does not produce in the laboratory regime. Vanishing proper distance is therefore not presented as a necessary consequence of standard quantum mechanics or finite entanglement, but as a boundary behavior of the geometry in the strong-response limit. The model quantifies relational proximity for an entangled joint state without claiming that the physical coordinate distance disappears

•Sep 6, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement and Proper-Distance Attenuation within the Framework of Relativistic Configuration Space and Universal Quantum Energy

Hüseyin YALÇINKAYA

ABSTRACT The representation of two spatially separated particles by a single entangled quantum state raises the question of whether their laboratory coordinate separation and their relational distance in the configuration space of the joint state are the same quantity. In this study, the relative sector of a two-particle system is described by the coordinates and . While the laboratory coordinate separation is held fixed, a phenomenological model is proposed in which the effective proper distance assigned to the joint state depends on the correlation energy and the relativistic phase velocity. The constitutive geometric postulate of the model is a reciprocal choice of the temporal and spatial metric coefficients in the reduced -dimensional relative configuration-space sector: . This condition preserves the metric determinant and the two-dimensional volume element of the relative sector. The induced metric on a constant-relative-time slice yields (1) Consequently, although remains unchanged, in the limit . Under the null constraint, the coordinate characteristic speed becomes , whereas the speed measured with local physical time and length intervals remains exactly . The response amplitude is related to a correlation-energy scale , the phase velocity , and a correlation-localization factor . It is also shown explicitly that a finite-energy, Planck-suppressed ansatz does not produce in the laboratory regime. Vanishing proper distance is therefore not presented as a necessary consequence of standard quantum mechanics or finite entanglement, but as a boundary behavior of the geometry in the strong-response limit. The model quantifies relational proximity for an entangled joint state without claiming that the physical coordinate distance disappears

•Sep 6, 2026•0 citations

The Geometry of Quantum Correlation. A Source-Structural Alternative

Jose Javier Garza Cuartero

When two particles are created together in a single quantum event, they can become entangled: their properties remain correlated no matter how far apart they travel. Measure one, and the outcome of measuring the other is no longer independent. This correlation is the central puzzle of quantum mechanics. Classical physics sets a hard limit on how strong such correlations can be. The CHSH inequality (Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt, 1969) formalises that limit: for any theory in which each particle carries its own independent set of predetermined answers, the correlation measure S cannot exceed 2. Bell-type experiments consistently violate this bound, with the maximum ideal value predicted by quantum mechanics being S = 2√2. Something does not fit. Several explanations have been proposed. Some invoke extra dimensions. Others appeal to wormhole geometries connecting the particles. The mainstream position is that the outcomes "collapse and become correlated," which states the observation without explaining the mechanism. All of these either add dramatic ontological furniture or repackage the mystery as an answer. This paper proposes a simpler reading. The value 2√2 is not a mystery to be explained by exotic physics. It is the geometric signature of a jointly structured bipartite state whose correlation was fixed at the source, at the moment of entanglement, not at measurement time. The two particles are not two independent objects that later communicate. They are two readout surfaces of a single joint preparation. The cosine correlation law, the Tsirelson bound, and the full Bell violation follow directly from the geometry of the two-qubit state space and the relative orientation of the measurement settings. No signal, no extra dimension, no new physics is required. Three companion papers in this series explored the opposite hypothesis: The Speed of Light and Its Limits [1] examined whether entanglement could circumvent relativistic constraints; Quantum Entanglement as a Communication Channel [2] proposed a synchronized-clock experiment to detect timing signatures; and Parametrizing Correlation Timing [3] developed a Lorentz-structured ansatz for concurrence-dependent delays. If those experimental proposals return null, the present reading is reinforced: not by proof, but by elimination of the alternatives that require more. A final section develops geometric and regime-based frameworks consistent with the source-structural reading, including the measurement torus as the natural geometry of Bell experiments, a jointness index based on Concurrence, and connections to emergent spacetime programmes. These are offered as directions for future development.

•Apr 17, 2026•0 citations

Energy Space and Quantum Geometry: A Framework for Emergent Physical Reality

Sanjeev Gupta

Abstract This work presents a unified geometric framework for quantum reality through four interconnected papers. It proposes that the coherent, non-separable correlations described by Hilbert space originate from an unobservable Energy Space, a fundamental substrate beyond spacetime that preserves perfect coherence and all conservation laws, thereby providing a geometric interpretation of quantum entanglement. Within this framework, the relation E = hf is interpreted as an encoding relation rather than a statement of physical energy actualization. During measurement, structural branching may occur, but Energy Space ensures that only one geometrically valid branch undergoes physical localization. Spacetime emerges from Energy Space as a passive geometric medium with intrinsic dynamic capabilities, giving rise to quantum objects and their interactions. Quantum objects are interpreted as dynamic geometric patterns of spacetime possessing an encoded geometric identity. Their physical properties, including mass, charge, spin, momentum, energy, wavelength, and phase, are fundamentally encoded in Energy Space and become physically actualized according to the interaction context and the degree of coherence or decoherence. The stability, transformation, and propagation of quantum objects are determined by their geometric compatibility with spacetime and with other quantum geometries. Electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions are interpreted as direct interactions between compatible quantum-object geometries, whereas gravity is regarded as an indirect geometric interaction mediated through spacetime geometry. Geometric interactions may produce superposition, transformation into new quantum-object geometries, or the formation of larger composite geometric structures, providing a unified geometric interpretation of interactions, confinement, and composite systems. Within this geometric framework, a recursive geometric scaling parameter satisfying the invariant relation is proposed. Based on this hierarchy, phenomenological recursive scaling relations are developed for the lepton and quark families, suggesting a possible underlying geometric structure governing fermion masses, generational hierarchy, and relative stability. Finally, the Peak-Coupling Theory proposes that quantum localization and decoherence occur through discrete peak-coupling events between interacting quantum geometries at oscillatory extrema within a quantum wave packet. The wave envelope and phase continuously modulate the distribution of possible coupling events, while observable interaction probabilities may emerge from the squared magnitude of local coupling amplitudes, providing a possible geometric route toward the emergence of Born-rule probabilities Together, these four papers present a unified conceptual framework in which Energy Space, spacetime, quantum objects, physical interactions, particle hierarchies, quantum measurement, and localization are interpreted as interconnected manifestations of an underlying geometric reality. These ideas are developed across four papers: Paper 1: Energy Space and Geometric Nature of Quantum Objects and SpacetimePaper 2: Quantum GeometryPaper 3: Lepton and Quark Generational Phenomenological Patterns; and Paper 4: Peak-Coupling Theory of Quantum Interaction

•May 25, 2026•0 citations

Theory of Space: An Energy-Dependent Dimensional Framework for Quantum, Relativistic, and Gravitational Phenomena

Jose Oreste Mazzini

Abstract Quantum mechanics and relativity are extraordinarily successful mathematical theories, yet their conventional physical interpretations rely on substantially different conceptual frameworks. The Theory of Space (TS) proposes a fourth dimension defined by the Planck-related interval, with interpreted as a longitudinal dimension associated with energy (cτ), rather than as the conventional Minkowski spacetime interval. This fourth dimension does not coexist continuously with the observable three spatial dimensions as a conventional four-dimensional manifold. Instead, TS proposes an oscillatory existence between observable 3D presence and a non-observable fourth-dimensional phase. Through this oscillation, the quantum system undergoes repeated dimensional projection into observable 3D, with individual eigenstates manifested probabilistically while the underlying quantum state continues to evolve. Within this framework, phenomena including measurement, the Born rule, the arrow of time, entropy, entanglement, tunneling, and Bell-type correlations acquire a common physical interpretation. Heisenberg uncertainty and non-commutativity are interpreted as consequences of physical parameters associated with different phases of the dimensional oscillation and therefore not simultaneously manifested within the same 3D instance. TS further distinguishes between the quantum system’s spatial component and its compact physical entity. Their coexistence within the complete system provides a proposed physical basis for quantum interference and phase-dependent phenomena, including the double-slit experiment and the path-integral description of quantum evolution. As an extension of the model, TS proposes that the periodic displacement and replacement of quantum space generate a pulsed inward spatial flow. This mechanism provides a possible basis for a quantized gravitational interaction and suggests that gravitational energy may be represented by a positive contribution. Related developments, including spiral spatial flows, follow naturally from the same dimensional-oscillation mechanism. The Theory of Space therefore seeks to provide a common conceptual framework for quantum, relativistic, and gravitational phenomena without replacing the established mathematical equations that successfully reproduce experimental observations. The present work develops this framework and invites critical examination of its assumptions, physical implications, and potential experimental consequences. Keywords: relativity; Lorentz transformation; quantum superposition; quantum superposition; collapse; entanglement; quantum gravity

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH•Aug 25, 2026•0 citations

A Dynamical Spacetime Mechanism for Quantum Entanglement with a Falsifiable Experimental Signature

Marco Pettini

Quantum entanglement is a central resource of quantum information science, yet its correlations are ordinarily treated as properties of the quantum state rather than as the outcome of an underlying physical process. Here we explore the hypothesis that these correlations are mediated dynamically by a field propagating locally at finite velocity through an extension of ordinary spacetime. The model embeds physical $(3,1)$-dimensional spacetime in a warped five-dimensional geometry containing an additional timelike coordinate. Within the adopted geometric ansatz, the form of the extended spacetime metric is determined by the five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations. A massless field propagating through the resulting five-dimensional bulk can mediate correlations whose projection onto observable four-dimensional spacetime connects arbitrarily distant locations at equal laboratory time, while preserving operational no-signaling. Coupling this field to a Bohm--Bub-inspired collapse scheme provides a possible dynamical realization of entanglement correlations and, under a stated statistical consistency condition, reproduces Born statistics. The framework leads to a concrete experimental test. Two nominally independent Bell pairs are predicted to develop a weak, distance-dependent contextual correlation between particles belonging to different pairs, as a consequence of bulk-field mediation. This cross-pair correlation is absent in standard quantum mechanics for independently prepared systems and is predicted to decrease as the inverse square of their separation. It could therefore be tested by varying the distance between two simultaneous Bell experiments using existing photonic technology. Observation of such a signal would support a dynamical spacetime account of quantum entanglement and could have implications for quantum networks employing multiple independent entangled resources.

quant-pharXiv:2606.12457•Jun 9, 2026•0 citations
ABSTRACT The emergence of quantum entanglement correlations across spatially separated measurement regions renders the interpretation of the relationship between quantum mechanics and relativistic causality a core problem in quantum foundations [Einstein et al., 1935; Bell, 1964]. In this study, two entangled particles are modeled not as two independent physical objects in Minkowski spacetime, but as a joint quantum state in configuration space. The relative space and time coordinates of the joint state are defined via: and the ideal space-time correlation limit assumed in the model is expressed as: This limit is not a general definition of quantum entanglement, but an idealized geometric assumption representing strong correlation in the relative coordinates of the joint state within the proposed model. In this approach, physical spacetime is treated as a geometric structure representing the projection of the joint quantum state onto observable spacetime coordinates. To ensure the projection is Lorentz-covariant, the light-like interval: is employed as the constitutive geometric condition of the model. This condition is accepted not as a mandatory Minkowski interval between physical measurement events, but as the mathematical postulate of the proposed projection geometry. The dynamic scale parameter of the model is grounded in total relativistic quantum energy instead of rest mass, establishing a dimensionless Planck-scaling factor defined as: To encompass both massive and massless systems, quantum energy density is defined via the energy density component of the stress-energy tensor relative to an observer. The required consistency condition for covariant energy-momentum conservation is derived in its general form. Furthermore, modeling the proposed geometric effect as a dimensionless metric perturbation yields a phenomenological first-order geometric phase correction defined as: where is the energy-dependent reduced wavelength. Under fixed and finite , the vanishing of the proposed correction in the low-energy regime relative to the Planck scale () demonstrates that the geometric effect added by the model to standard low-energy quantum mechanics becomes negligible. This study proposes a testable theoretical model aimed at explaining the spatiotemporal correlations of quantum entanglement within a Lorentz-covariant, energy-scaled, and phenomenological geometric framework.
ABSTRACT The representation of two spatially separated particles by a single entangled quantum state raises the question of whether their laboratory coordinate separation and their relational distance in the configuration space of the joint state are the same quantity. In this study, the relative sector of a two-particle system is described by the coordinates and . While the laboratory coordinate separation is held fixed, a phenomenological model is proposed in which the effective proper distance assigned to the joint state depends on the correlation energy and the relativistic phase velocity. The constitutive geometric postulate of the model is a reciprocal choice of the temporal and spatial metric coefficients in the reduced -dimensional relative configuration-space sector: . This condition preserves the metric determinant and the two-dimensional volume element of the relative sector. The induced metric on a constant-relative-time slice yields (1) Consequently, although remains unchanged, in the limit . Under the null constraint, the coordinate characteristic speed becomes , whereas the speed measured with local physical time and length intervals remains exactly . The response amplitude is related to a correlation-energy scale , the phase velocity , and a correlation-localization factor . It is also shown explicitly that a finite-energy, Planck-suppressed ansatz does not produce in the laboratory regime. Vanishing proper distance is therefore not presented as a necessary consequence of standard quantum mechanics or finite entanglement, but as a boundary behavior of the geometry in the strong-response limit. The model quantifies relational proximity for an entangled joint state without claiming that the physical coordinate distance disappears
ABSTRACT The representation of two spatially separated particles by a single entangled quantum state raises the question of whether their laboratory coordinate separation and their relational distance in the configuration space of the joint state are the same quantity. In this study, the relative sector of a two-particle system is described by the coordinates and . While the laboratory coordinate separation is held fixed, a phenomenological model is proposed in which the effective proper distance assigned to the joint state depends on the correlation energy and the relativistic phase velocity. The constitutive geometric postulate of the model is a reciprocal choice of the temporal and spatial metric coefficients in the reduced -dimensional relative configuration-space sector: . This condition preserves the metric determinant and the two-dimensional volume element of the relative sector. The induced metric on a constant-relative-time slice yields (1) Consequently, although remains unchanged, in the limit . Under the null constraint, the coordinate characteristic speed becomes , whereas the speed measured with local physical time and length intervals remains exactly . The response amplitude is related to a correlation-energy scale , the phase velocity , and a correlation-localization factor . It is also shown explicitly that a finite-energy, Planck-suppressed ansatz does not produce in the laboratory regime. Vanishing proper distance is therefore not presented as a necessary consequence of standard quantum mechanics or finite entanglement, but as a boundary behavior of the geometry in the strong-response limit. The model quantifies relational proximity for an entangled joint state without claiming that the physical coordinate distance disappears
When two particles are created together in a single quantum event, they can become entangled: their properties remain correlated no matter how far apart they travel. Measure one, and the outcome of measuring the other is no longer independent. This correlation is the central puzzle of quantum mechanics. Classical physics sets a hard limit on how strong such correlations can be. The CHSH inequality (Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt, 1969) formalises that limit: for any theory in which each particle carries its own independent set of predetermined answers, the correlation measure S cannot exceed 2. Bell-type experiments consistently violate this bound, with the maximum ideal value predicted by quantum mechanics being S = 2√2. Something does not fit. Several explanations have been proposed. Some invoke extra dimensions. Others appeal to wormhole geometries connecting the particles. The mainstream position is that the outcomes "collapse and become correlated," which states the observation without explaining the mechanism. All of these either add dramatic ontological furniture or repackage the mystery as an answer. This paper proposes a simpler reading. The value 2√2 is not a mystery to be explained by exotic physics. It is the geometric signature of a jointly structured bipartite state whose correlation was fixed at the source, at the moment of entanglement, not at measurement time. The two particles are not two independent objects that later communicate. They are two readout surfaces of a single joint preparation. The cosine correlation law, the Tsirelson bound, and the full Bell violation follow directly from the geometry of the two-qubit state space and the relative orientation of the measurement settings. No signal, no extra dimension, no new physics is required. Three companion papers in this series explored the opposite hypothesis: The Speed of Light and Its Limits [1] examined whether entanglement could circumvent relativistic constraints; Quantum Entanglement as a Communication Channel [2] proposed a synchronized-clock experiment to detect timing signatures; and Parametrizing Correlation Timing [3] developed a Lorentz-structured ansatz for concurrence-dependent delays. If those experimental proposals return null, the present reading is reinforced: not by proof, but by elimination of the alternatives that require more. A final section develops geometric and regime-based frameworks consistent with the source-structural reading, including the measurement torus as the natural geometry of Bell experiments, a jointness index based on Concurrence, and connections to emergent spacetime programmes. These are offered as directions for future development.
Abstract This work presents a unified geometric framework for quantum reality through four interconnected papers. It proposes that the coherent, non-separable correlations described by Hilbert space originate from an unobservable Energy Space, a fundamental substrate beyond spacetime that preserves perfect coherence and all conservation laws, thereby providing a geometric interpretation of quantum entanglement. Within this framework, the relation E = hf is interpreted as an encoding relation rather than a statement of physical energy actualization. During measurement, structural branching may occur, but Energy Space ensures that only one geometrically valid branch undergoes physical localization. Spacetime emerges from Energy Space as a passive geometric medium with intrinsic dynamic capabilities, giving rise to quantum objects and their interactions. Quantum objects are interpreted as dynamic geometric patterns of spacetime possessing an encoded geometric identity. Their physical properties, including mass, charge, spin, momentum, energy, wavelength, and phase, are fundamentally encoded in Energy Space and become physically actualized according to the interaction context and the degree of coherence or decoherence. The stability, transformation, and propagation of quantum objects are determined by their geometric compatibility with spacetime and with other quantum geometries. Electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions are interpreted as direct interactions between compatible quantum-object geometries, whereas gravity is regarded as an indirect geometric interaction mediated through spacetime geometry. Geometric interactions may produce superposition, transformation into new quantum-object geometries, or the formation of larger composite geometric structures, providing a unified geometric interpretation of interactions, confinement, and composite systems. Within this geometric framework, a recursive geometric scaling parameter satisfying the invariant relation is proposed. Based on this hierarchy, phenomenological recursive scaling relations are developed for the lepton and quark families, suggesting a possible underlying geometric structure governing fermion masses, generational hierarchy, and relative stability. Finally, the Peak-Coupling Theory proposes that quantum localization and decoherence occur through discrete peak-coupling events between interacting quantum geometries at oscillatory extrema within a quantum wave packet. The wave envelope and phase continuously modulate the distribution of possible coupling events, while observable interaction probabilities may emerge from the squared magnitude of local coupling amplitudes, providing a possible geometric route toward the emergence of Born-rule probabilities Together, these four papers present a unified conceptual framework in which Energy Space, spacetime, quantum objects, physical interactions, particle hierarchies, quantum measurement, and localization are interpreted as interconnected manifestations of an underlying geometric reality. These ideas are developed across four papers: Paper 1: Energy Space and Geometric Nature of Quantum Objects and SpacetimePaper 2: Quantum GeometryPaper 3: Lepton and Quark Generational Phenomenological Patterns; and Paper 4: Peak-Coupling Theory of Quantum Interaction
Abstract Quantum mechanics and relativity are extraordinarily successful mathematical theories, yet their conventional physical interpretations rely on substantially different conceptual frameworks. The Theory of Space (TS) proposes a fourth dimension defined by the Planck-related interval, with interpreted as a longitudinal dimension associated with energy (cτ), rather than as the conventional Minkowski spacetime interval. This fourth dimension does not coexist continuously with the observable three spatial dimensions as a conventional four-dimensional manifold. Instead, TS proposes an oscillatory existence between observable 3D presence and a non-observable fourth-dimensional phase. Through this oscillation, the quantum system undergoes repeated dimensional projection into observable 3D, with individual eigenstates manifested probabilistically while the underlying quantum state continues to evolve. Within this framework, phenomena including measurement, the Born rule, the arrow of time, entropy, entanglement, tunneling, and Bell-type correlations acquire a common physical interpretation. Heisenberg uncertainty and non-commutativity are interpreted as consequences of physical parameters associated with different phases of the dimensional oscillation and therefore not simultaneously manifested within the same 3D instance. TS further distinguishes between the quantum system’s spatial component and its compact physical entity. Their coexistence within the complete system provides a proposed physical basis for quantum interference and phase-dependent phenomena, including the double-slit experiment and the path-integral description of quantum evolution. As an extension of the model, TS proposes that the periodic displacement and replacement of quantum space generate a pulsed inward spatial flow. This mechanism provides a possible basis for a quantized gravitational interaction and suggests that gravitational energy may be represented by a positive contribution. Related developments, including spiral spatial flows, follow naturally from the same dimensional-oscillation mechanism. The Theory of Space therefore seeks to provide a common conceptual framework for quantum, relativistic, and gravitational phenomena without replacing the established mathematical equations that successfully reproduce experimental observations. The present work develops this framework and invites critical examination of its assumptions, physical implications, and potential experimental consequences. Keywords: relativity; Lorentz transformation; quantum superposition; quantum superposition; collapse; entanglement; quantum gravity
Quantum entanglement is a central resource of quantum information science, yet its correlations are ordinarily treated as properties of the quantum state rather than as the outcome of an underlying physical process. Here we explore the hypothesis that these correlations are mediated dynamically by a field propagating locally at finite velocity through an extension of ordinary spacetime. The model embeds physical (3,1)(3,1)(3,1)-dimensional spacetime in a warped five-dimensional geometry containing an additional timelike coordinate. Within the adopted geometric ansatz, the form of the extended spacetime metric is determined by the five-dimensional vacuum Einstein equations. A massless field propagating through the resulting five-dimensional bulk can mediate correlations whose projection onto observable four-dimensional spacetime connects arbitrarily distant locations at equal laboratory time, while preserving operational no-signaling. Coupling this field to a Bohm--Bub-inspired collapse scheme provides a possible dynamical realization of entanglement correlations and, under a stated statistical consistency condition, reproduces Born statistics. The framework leads to a concrete experimental test. Two nominally independent Bell pairs are predicted to develop a weak, distance-dependent contextual correlation between particles belonging to different pairs, as a consequence of bulk-field mediation. This cross-pair correlation is absent in standard quantum mechanics for independently prepared systems and is predicted to decrease as the inverse square of their separation. It could therefore be tested by varying the distance between two simultaneous Bell experiments using existing photonic technology. Observation of such a signal would support a dynamical spacetime account of quantum entanglement and could have implications for quantum networks employing multiple independent entangled resources.