Motion-soul Particle-aether Motion with particle-elementar particle Particle(aether)-same, motion(soul)-various. We know how interacted motion with particle to motion with particle. Interaction motion with particle to particle. Particle none motion(mass, charge,...), bacause, motion of motion with particle shared motion with particle and particle, how electronic cloud. If watching then motion do not shared, motion cooses particle. Connection of quantum entanglement-shared motion. Photon interacted to electron of atomic orbit, motion of photon trnsmits to electron of atomic orbit and particle of photon transmits to eather.
Motion-soul Particle-aether Motion with particle-elementar particle Particle(aether)-same, motion(soul)-various. We know how interacted motion with particle to motion with particle. Interaction motion with particle to particle. Particle none motion(mass, charge,...), bacause, motion of motion with particle shared motion with particle and particle, how electronic cloud. If watching then motion do not shared, motion cooses particle. Connection of quantum entanglement-shared motion. Photon interacted to electron of atomic orbit, motion of photon trnsmits to electron of atomic orbit and particle of photon transmits to eather.
The scenario of particle has been extensively written in the past, but its incompleteness is serious enough to break the connection of microscopic and macroscopic world. The 19 th century’s cathode rays experiments by Perrin and Thomson are unable to prove whether the cathode rays are negatively charged or not. Here we propose, the elementary particles in the atom are organized in a series of hierarchical two-body systems to orbit, particle wave feature demonstrated in double-slit interference experiment is likely to be an aggregation of the movement of many fine particles. Along with previous work, it is hopeful to see that hierarchical two-body gravitation may unify different level structures and their motion together. 1
Newton thought that light was made up of particles, but then it was discovered, as we have seen here, that it behaves like a wave. Later, however (in the beginning of the twentieth century) it was found that light did indeed sometimes behave like a particle. Historically, the electron, for example, was thought to behave like a particle, and then it was found that in many respects it behaved like a wave. So it really behaves like neither. Now we have given up. We say: “it is like neither.” ere is one lucky break, however-electrons behave like light. e quantum behaviour of atomic objects (electrons, protons, neutron, photons, and so on) is the same for all, they are all ‘particle waves’ or whatever you want to call them.
For neutral particle systems in a homogeneous magnetic field, there exists a constant of motion, the pseudomomentum, which allows a complete pseudoseparation of the center-of-mass motion. For ions such a separation is not possible, and the Landau orbit of the center-of-mass and internal (electronic) motion are intimately coupled. We investigate different physical situations for which this interaction becomes strong at laboratory magnetic-field strengths. In particular, we find that the Landau orbit itself can change substantially upon this interaction.
INDIVIDUALAtomism in its latest form is called quantum mechanics.It has extended its range to comprise, besides ordinary matter, all kinds of radiation, including light-in brief, all forms of energy, ordinary matter being one of them.In the present form of the theoiy the "atoms" are electrons, jorotons, photons, mesons, etc.The generic name is elementary particle, or merely particle.The term "atom" has very wisely been retained for chemical atoms, though it has become a misnomer.This essay deals with the elementary particle, more particularly with a certain feature that this concept has acquired-or rather lost in quantum mechanics.I menn this : That the elementary particle is not an individual; it cannot be identified, it lacks "sameness."The fact is known to every physicist, but is rarely given any prominence in surveys readable by nonspccialists.In technical language it is covered by saying that the particles "obey" new-fangled statistics, either Einstein-Bose or Fermi-Dirac statistics.The implication, far from obvious, is that the unsuspected epithet "this" is not quite prop- erly applicable to, say, an electron, except with caution, in a restricted sense, and sometimes not at all.My objective here is to explain this point and to give it the thought it deserves.In order to create a foil for the discussion, let me summarize in sections 2-5 what we are usually told about particles and waves in the new physics.2. CURRENT VIEWS: THE AMALGAMATION OF PARTICLES AND WAVES Our image of the material world had been made up of two kinds of "fittings"-waves and particles.The former were instanced mainly, if not exclusively, by Maxwell's waves of electromagnetic energy, comprising such as are used in radio, light, X-rays, and gamma-rays.Material bodies were said to consist of particles.One
This paper presents a ledger-first synthesis of Singularity Mechanics Theory (SMT) with the Aether Physics Model (APM), mapping SMT quantum-entanglement nodes onto APM Aether units. Entanglement is modeled as chronovibrational phase alignment across magnetic-charge flux linkages, with the EPR singlet pair treated as a shared torsional boundary condition rather than a non-local signal process. The paper develops QMU expressions for the superposition state vector, nodal entanglement energy, resonance frequency, flux-linkage holonomy, torsional winding, and chronovibrational delay. Ledger One is used to connect Aether-unit rotation, torsional curl, and electromagnetic propagation closure through the identityAu⋅curl=Fq2λC2=c2. A central result is that the Aether-unit flux-cycle scale associated with a complete magnetic-charge holonomy cycle reduces toEcycle=meλC2Fq2=mec2,while the measured EPR correlation is carried by phase and holonomy rather than by release of this full-cycle energy. The paper distinguishes the electron--electron EPR singlet from the electron--positron pair-process scale, clarifying that the singlet correlation is a same-species shared torsional phase condition, whereas pair creation or annihilation carries the separate energy scaleEpair=2mec2. Testable predictions are proposed, including chronoscopy delays in Bell tests, resonance signatures in magnetic interferometry, gravity--entanglement coupling through resonance density, conservation of Aether torsion slots in pair processes, and a SQUID-detected Bell-resonance experiment involving a loxodromic modulator. The work provides a formal bridge between SMT network resonance, APM Aether-unit geometry, and QMU ledger closure.
Until now, we do not know whether elementary particles have structure, but we cannot assert that elementary particles do not have structure, because all experiences tell us that the properties of non-living and living things are closely related to their structure. As their foundation, can the microscopic particles be excluded? Do photons and charged fermions have structure? What structure? We study the key to the Schrödinger computation that accurately reproduce the energy levels of the Bohr model and the general solution of Schrödinger equation mathematically; we found to satisfy Schrödinger equation the charged fermions must possess a double helix structure of mass density. Such structures plus partial self-rotation make them quantized and a fixed value spin or . We prove that the Maxwell wave equation is simultaneously the Klein-Gordon equation for electromagnetic waves. Then we prove that photons have a double helix structure of EH-energy that makes photons quantized and a fixed value spin or . There is a charge in the electron (and charged fermions); a pair of charges in the photons, they distribute double helically along their side boundaries; these charges produce and carry a circular polarized E-wave and EH-wave respectively. They form two traveling-wave-particle hybrid structures. It is such hybrid structures give them traveling-wave-particle duality. Such dualities can exhibit their wave property and particle property simultaneously in the same experiments. At last, we prove that the electron cloud photo not only exhibits the probability distribution of electrons but also proves the existence of electrons’ trajectories around the nucleus; the electrons’ motions make the probability distribution. The electron probability distribution around the nucleus is causal. At last we prove that the electron in the main shells (the Eigen states) of a multi-electron atom does not radiate pure EM energy, not fall to the nucleus.